ScalingStacks

8.2. Gluing

8.2.1. Construction

Consider two injective morphisms of curves ฮพ1+:๐‘>0โ†’Z\xi_{1}^{+}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to Z and ฮพ2โˆ’:๐‘<0โ†’Z\xi_{2}^{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z where ๐‘<0{\mathbf{R}}_{<0} and ๐‘>0{\mathbf{R}}_{>0} are unoriented. We assume that ฮพ1+\xi_{1}^{+} is outgoing for ZZ, that ฮพ2โˆ’\xi_{2}^{-} is incoming for ZZ and that ฮพ1+โ€‹(๐‘>0)โˆฉฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(๐‘<0)=โˆ…\xi_{1}^{+}({\mathbf{R}}_{>0})\cap\xi_{2}^{-}({\mathbf{R}}_{<0})=\emptyset. We write rr instead of ฮพ1+โ€‹(r)\xi_{1}^{+}(r) and โˆ’r-r instead of ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’r)\xi_{2}^{-}(-r), for rโˆˆ๐™>0r\in{\mathbf{Z}}_{>0}.

Let MM be a subset of Zโˆ–(ฮพ1+โ€‹(๐‘โ‰ฅ1)โŠ”ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(๐‘โ‰คโˆ’1))Z\setminus(\xi_{1}^{+}({\mathbf{R}}_{\geq 1})\sqcup\xi_{2}^{-}({\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1})).

Fix an oriented diffeomorphism ๐‘>0โ†’โˆผ๐‘<โˆ’1{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{<-1} and let i+:๐‘>0โ†’๐‘i_{+}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to{\mathbf{R}} be its composition with the inclusion map. Similarly, fix an oriented diffeomorphism ๐‘<0โ†’โˆผ๐‘>1{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{>1} and let iโˆ’:๐‘<0โ†’๐‘i_{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to{\mathbf{R}} be its composition with the inclusion map.

Consider m,nโ‰ฅ0m,n\geq 0. Let Em,nE_{m,n} be the (๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z),๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodule given by

Em,nโ€‹(T,S)=Hom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,m)).E_{m,n}(T,S)=\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,m)).

Note that E0,1=Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™E_{0,1}=R^{\bullet}_{\xi_{2}^{-}} and E1,0=Lฮพ1+โˆ™E_{1,0}=L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}}, but Em,nE_{m,n} is not isomorphic to (Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™)nโ€‹(Lฮพ1+โˆ™)m(R^{\bullet}_{\xi_{2}^{-}})^{n}(L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})^{m} in general.

There is an action of Hmโˆ™โˆงHnโˆ™H_{m}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n}^{\bullet} on Em,nE_{m,n} given by

(TaโˆงTb)โ‹…ฯƒ=(idTโŠ ([iโ†ฆa(i)]1โ‰คiโ‰คm)โ‹…ฯƒโ‹…(idSโŠ (โˆ’iโ†ฆbโˆ’1(n+1โˆ’i)โˆ’nโˆ’1)1โ‰คiโ‰คn)(T_{a}\wedge T_{b})\cdot\sigma=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T}\boxtimes([i\mapsto a(i)]_{1\leq i\leq m})\cdot\sigma\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes(-i\mapsto b^{-1}(n+1-i)-n-1)_{1\leq i\leq n})

for ฯƒโˆˆHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,m))\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,m)), aโˆˆ๐”–ma\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{m} and bโˆˆ๐”–nb\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n}.

There is a map โˆ—:Em,nโ€‹Emโ€ฒ,nโ€ฒโ†’Em+mโ€ฒ,n+nโ€ฒ\ast:E_{m,n}E_{m^{\prime},n^{\prime}}\to E_{m+m^{\prime},n+n^{\prime}} given by

ฮฑโˆงฮฒโ†ฆฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ=(ฮฑโŠ ([iโ†’i+m])1โ‰คiโ‰คmโ€ฒ)โ‹…(ฮฒโŠ ([โˆ’nโ€ฒโˆ’iโ†’โˆ’i])1โ‰คiโ‰คn).\alpha\wedge\beta\mapsto\alpha\ast\beta=(\alpha\boxtimes([i\to i+m])_{1\leq i\leq m^{\prime}})\cdot(\beta\boxtimes([-n^{\prime}-i\to-i])_{1\leq i\leq n}).

This map is compatible with the action of (Hmโˆ™โˆงHnโˆ™)โˆง(Hmโ€ฒโˆ™โˆงHnโ€ฒโˆ™)(H_{m}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n}^{\bullet})\wedge(H_{m^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}) via the canonical embeddings Hmโˆ™โ€‹Hmโ€ฒโˆ™โ†’Hm+mโ€ฒโˆ™H_{m}^{\bullet}H_{m^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\to H_{m+m^{\prime}}^{\bullet} and Hnโˆ™โ€‹Hnโ€ฒโˆ™โ†’Hn+nโ€ฒโˆ™H_{n}^{\bullet}H_{n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\to H_{n+n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}. We have (ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ)โˆ—ฮณ=ฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโˆ—ฮณ)(\alpha\ast\beta)\ast\gamma=\alpha\ast(\beta\ast\gamma).

So, we have defined a bimodule lax bi-22-representation on ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z){\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z).

Let Zฮพ=ZโŠ”๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0๐‘Z_{\xi}=Z\sqcup_{{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}}{\mathbf{R}}, where the gluing is done along the maps ฮพ1+โŠ”ฮพ2โˆ’:๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0โ†’Z\xi_{1}^{+}\sqcup\xi_{2}^{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z and i+โŠ”iโˆ’:๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0โ†’๐‘i_{+}\sqcup i_{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to{\mathbf{R}}. Note that ZฮพZ_{\xi} is a 11-dimensional space and it comes with an injective open morphism of 11-dimensional spaces ฮพ:๐‘โ†’Zฮพ\xi:{\mathbf{R}}\to Z_{\xi}. We endow ๐‘{\mathbf{R}} with a curve structure by setting ๐‘u=๐‘โ‰คโˆ’1โŠ”๐‘โ‰ฅ1{\mathbf{R}}_{u}={\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{\geq 1} and by endowing (โˆ’1,1)(-1,1) with its usual orientation. We extend the curve structure on ZZ by endowing ฮพโก(๐‘)\xi({\mathbf{R}}) with the curve structure of ๐‘{\mathbf{R}}. Note that (Zฮพ)u=Zuยฏ(Z_{\xi})_{u}=\overline{Z_{u}}.

Given ฮต,ฮตโ€ฒโˆˆ{+,โˆ’}\varepsilon,\varepsilon^{\prime}\in\{+,-\} and aโˆˆ๐‘ฮตa\in{\mathbf{R}}_{\varepsilon}, bโˆˆ๐‘ฮตโ€ฒb\in{\mathbf{R}}_{\varepsilon^{\prime}}, we put [aโ†’b]=ฮพ([iฮต(a),iฮตโ€ฒ(b)])[a\to b]=\xi([i_{\varepsilon}(a),i_{\varepsilon^{\prime}}(b)]).

We consider the differential pointed category T๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)T_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}) with objects those of ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z){\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and with

Hom๐’ฎ~Mโˆ™โ€‹(Z)(S,T)=โ‹iโ‰ฅ0Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™(T,โˆ’i)โˆงLฮพ1+โˆ™(โˆ’i,โˆ’iโˆ’1)โˆงโ‹ฏโˆงRฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™(โˆ’2,โˆ’1)โˆงLฮพ1+โˆ™(โˆ’1,S).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\tilde{{\mathcal{S}}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(S,T)=\bigvee_{i\geq 0}R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-_{i})\wedge L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-_{i},-_{i-1})\wedge\cdots\wedge R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-_{2},-_{1})\wedge L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-_{1},S).

We define a differential pointed functor ฮž~:T๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)โ†’๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\tilde{\Xi}:T_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet})\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi}). It is the identity on objects and defined on maps by

ฮฒiโˆงฮฑiโˆงโ‹ฏโˆงฮฒ1โˆงฮฑ1โ†ฆ(ฮฒiโ‹…(idโŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1])โ‹…ฮฑi)โ‹…โ‹ฏโ‹…(ฮฒ1โ‹…(idโŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1])โ‹…ฮฑ1):\beta_{i}\wedge\alpha_{i}\wedge\cdots\wedge\beta_{1}\wedge\alpha_{1}\mapsto(\beta_{i}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[1\to-1])\cdot\alpha_{i})\cdot\cdots\cdot(\beta_{1}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[1\to-1])\cdot\alpha_{1}):
Sโ†’ฮฑ1U1โŠ”{ฮพ1+โ€‹(1)}โ†’idU1โŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1]U1โŠ”{ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’1)}โ†’ฮฒ1V1โ†’ฮฑ2โ‹ฏโ†’T.S\xrightarrow{\alpha_{1}}U_{1}\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\}\xrightarrow{\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U_{1}}\boxtimes[1\to-1]}U_{1}\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)\}\xrightarrow{\beta_{1}}V_{1}\xrightarrow{\alpha_{2}}\cdots\to T.
0PCW

Theorem 8.2.1. The functor ฮž~\tilde{\Xi} factors through ฮ”Eโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and induces an isomorphism of differential pointed categories ฮž:ฮ”Eโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ†’โˆผ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\Xi:\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

The sections ยง8.2.2-8.2.4 below are devoted to the proof of Theorem 8.2.1.

0PCX

Example 8.2.2. We give below an illustration of the gluing data.

[Uncaptioned image]
0PCY

Example 8.2.3. The pictures below give two examples of description of ฮž~\tilde{\Xi}. The first picture corresponds to the gluing of two intervals to form an interval. The second picture corresponds to the self-gluing of an interval to form a circle.

[Uncaptioned image]
[Uncaptioned image]

8.2.2. Bimodules

If Hom๐’ฎโ€‹(Zฮพ)โˆ™โก({โˆ’1},{1})โ‰ 0\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})^{\bullet}}(\{-1\},\{1\})\neq 0, then there is ฮบโ€ฒโˆˆHom๐’ฎโ€‹(Zฮพ)โˆ™โก({โˆ’1},{1})\kappa^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})^{\bullet}}(\{-1\},\{1\}) such that Hom๐’ฎโ€‹(Zฮพ)โˆ™โก({โˆ’1},{1})={ฮบnโ‹…ฮบโ€ฒ}nโ‰ฅ0\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})^{\bullet}}(\{-1\},\{1\})=\{\kappa^{n}\cdot\kappa^{\prime}\}_{n\geq 0}, where ฮบ=ฮบโ€ฒโ‹…[1โ†’โˆ’1]\kappa=\kappa^{\prime}\cdot[1\to-1].

When Hom๐’ฎโ€‹(Zฮพ)โˆ™โก({โˆ’1},{1})=0\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})^{\bullet}}(\{-1\},\{1\})=0, we put ฮบ=id1\kappa=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{1}.

We define a partial order on the component Zโ€ฒZ^{\prime} of ZZ containing 11. We define s<sโ€ฒs<s^{\prime} if there exists an admissible path ฮถ:sโ€ฒโ†’1\zeta:s^{\prime}\to 1 in Zโ€ฒZ^{\prime} whose support does not contain ss.

We consider the map ฮผ\mu of ยง7.4.6 for the curve ZฮพZ_{\xi} and its point z0=0z_{0}=0.

Given nโ‰ฅ0n\geq 0, we put Gn=En,nG_{n}=E_{n,n}.

0PCZ

Lemma 8.2.4. Let ฮฑโˆˆGnโˆ’{0}\alpha\in G_{n}-\{0\}.

Given iโˆˆ(1,nโˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1), the following assertions are equivalent

  1. (1)

    ฮฑโก(iโˆ’nโˆ’1)>ฮฑโก(iโˆ’n)\alpha(i-n-1)>\alpha(i-n)

  2. (2)

    L(ฮฑ|{iโˆ’nโˆ’1,iโˆ’n})โ‰ โˆ…L(\alpha_{|\{i-n-1,i-n\}})\neq\emptyset

  3. (3)

    [iโˆ’nโˆ’1โ†’iโˆ’n]โˆˆD(ฮฑ)[i-n-1\to i-n]\in D(\alpha)

  4. (4)

    ฮฑโˆˆGnโ€‹Ti\alpha\in G_{n}T_{i}

  5. (5)

    ฮฑโ€‹Ti=0\alpha T_{i}=0.

There exists iโˆˆ(1,nโˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1) such that ฮฑโˆˆGnโ€‹Ti\alpha\in G_{n}T_{i} if and only if L(ฮฑ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))โ‰ โˆ…L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})\neq\emptyset.

0PD0

Proof. The equivalence between (1) and (2) follows from Lemma 7.4.20.

Assume (2). We deduce that [iโˆ’nโˆ’1โ†’iโˆ’n]โˆˆL(ฮฑ)[i-n-1\to i-n]\in L(\alpha), hence [iโˆ’nโˆ’1โ†’iโˆ’n]โˆˆD(ฮฑ)[i-n-1\to i-n]\in D(\alpha). So (3) holds.

Assume (3). Writing ฮฑ=ฮฑโ‹…1\alpha=\alpha\cdot 1, we deduce from Lemma 7.4.35 that (4) holds.

The implication (4)โ‡’\Rightarrow(5) is immediate.

Asssume (5). We have ฮฑ|{iโˆ’nโˆ’1,iโˆ’n}โ‹…([iโˆ’nโˆ’1โ†’iโˆ’n]โŠ [iโˆ’nโ†’iโˆ’nโˆ’1])=0\alpha_{|\{i-n-1,i-n\}}\cdot([i-n-1\to i-n]\boxtimes[i-n\to i-n-1])=0 by Remark 7.4.11. Lemma 7.4.9 shows that i(ฮฑ|{iโˆ’nโˆ’1,iโˆ’n})โ‰ 0i(\alpha_{|\{i-n-1,i-n\}})\neq 0, hence (2) holds.

Assume now L(ฮฑ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))โ‰ โˆ…L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})\neq\emptyset. It follows from Lemma 7.4.20 that there is iโˆˆ(1,nโˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1) with ฮฑโก(iโˆ’nโˆ’1)>ฮฑโก(iโˆ’n)\alpha(i-n-1)>\alpha(i-n), hence ฮฑโˆˆGnโ€‹Ti\alpha\in G_{n}T_{i}. This shows the last statement of the lemma. โˆŽ

There is a map ฮฝn:Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹(โˆ’,โˆ’,en)โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™โ€‹(โˆ’,โˆ’,en)โ†’Gn\nu_{n}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-,-,e^{n})L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-,-,e^{n})\to G_{n} given by

Hom(โˆ’โŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),T)โˆงHom(S,โˆ’โŠ”(1,n))โ†’Hom(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,n))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(-\sqcup(-n,-1),T)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S,-\sqcup(1,n))\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,n))
ฮฒโˆงฮฑโ†ฆ(ฮฒโŠ id(1,n))โ‹…(ฮฑโŠ id(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))\beta\wedge\alpha\mapsto(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{(1,n)})\cdot(\alpha\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{(-n,-1)})

We have

ฮฝnโ€‹((ฮฒโ‹…Tb)โˆง(Taโ‹…ฮฑ))=Taโ‹…ฮฝnโ€‹(ฮฒโˆงฮฑ)โ‹…ฮนnโ€‹(Tb)\nu_{n}\bigl((\beta\cdot T_{b})\wedge(T_{a}\cdot\alpha)\bigr)=T_{a}\cdot\nu_{n}(\beta\wedge\alpha)\cdot\iota_{n}(T_{b})

for a,bโˆˆ๐”–na,b\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n}.

The multiplication map on EE defines a map ฮผn:(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)n=(E0,1โ€‹E1,0)nโ†’En,n=Gn\mu_{n}:(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})^{n}=(E_{0,1}E_{1,0})^{n}\to E_{n,n}=G_{n}, hence gives a morphism Tโˆ—โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)โ†’G=โ‹nโ‰ฅ0GnT^{*}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})\to G=\bigvee_{n\geq 0}G_{n} compatible with multiplication.

We define (๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z),๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-subbimodules AnA_{n}, BnB_{n}, CnC_{n}, DnD_{n}, EnE_{n} and FnF_{n} of GnG_{n}. Let ฯƒโˆˆGnโ€‹(T,S)\sigma\in G_{n}(T,S).

We have

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆAn\sigma\in A_{n} if ฯƒโก(โˆ’i)โˆˆTโŠ”(1,nโˆ’i)\sigma(-i)\in T\sqcup(1,n-i) for 1โ‰คiโ‰คn1\leq i\leq n

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆBn\sigma\in B_{n} if there exists 1โ‰คjโ‰คiโ‰คn1\leq j\leq i\leq n with ฯƒโก(โˆ’i)=nโˆ’j+1\sigma(-i)=n-j+1

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆCn\sigma\in C_{n} if it is in the image of ฮผn\mu_{n}

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆDn\sigma\in D_{n} if ฯƒโก(โˆ’i)โˆˆT\sigma(-i)\in T for 1โ‰คiโ‰คn1\leq i\leq n

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆEn\sigma\in E_{n} if ฯƒโˆˆAn\sigma\in A_{n} and L(ฯƒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))=โˆ…L(\sigma_{|(-n,-1)})=\emptyset.

  • โ€ข

    ฯƒโˆˆFn\sigma\in F_{n} if ฯƒโˆˆAn\sigma\in A_{n} and L(ฯƒ|ฯƒโˆ’1(1,n))=โˆ…L(\sigma_{|\sigma^{-1}(1,n)})=\emptyset.

We put A=โ‹nโ‰ฅ0AnA=\bigvee_{n\geq 0}A_{n}, B=โ‹nโ‰ฅ0BnB=\bigvee_{n\geq 0}B_{n}, etc.

Note that Gn=AnโˆจBnG_{n}=A_{n}\vee B_{n}.

We have Cn,Dn,En,FnโŠ‚AnC_{n},D_{n},E_{n},F_{n}\subset A_{n}.

0PD1

Lemma 8.2.5. We have an isomorphism ฮฝn:Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹(โˆ’,โˆ’,en)โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™โ€‹(โˆ’,โˆ’,en)โ†’โˆผDn\nu_{n}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-,-,e^{n})L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-,-,e^{n})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}D_{n}.

In particular, we have an isomorphism ฮฝ1:Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™โ†’โˆผD1=A1=C1\nu_{1}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}D_{1}=A_{1}=C_{1} and Cn=C1โˆ—n=A1โˆ—nC_{n}=C_{1}^{\ast n}=A_{1}^{\ast n}.

0PD2

Proof. Let ฮฒโˆงฮฑโˆˆHom(โˆ’โŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),T)โˆงHom(S,โˆ’โŠ”(1,n))\beta\wedge\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(-\sqcup(-n,-1),T)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S,-\sqcup(1,n)). We have ฮฒโˆงฮฑ=ฮฒโ€ฒโˆงฮฑโ€ฒ\beta\wedge\alpha=\beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha^{\prime} where ฮฒโ€ฒ=ฮฒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)โŠ id\beta^{\prime}=\beta_{|(-n,-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits and ฮฑโ€ฒ=(ฮฒ|โฃโˆ’โŠ id(1,n))โ‹…ฮฑ\alpha^{\prime}=(\beta_{|-}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{(1,n)})\cdot\alpha. If ฮฝnโ€‹(ฮฒโ€ฒโˆงฮฑโ€ฒ)=0\nu_{n}(\beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha^{\prime})=0, then ฮฒโ€ฒ=ฮฑโ€ฒ=0\beta^{\prime}=\alpha^{\prime}=0 (cf the beginning of ยง7.4.10). Now ฮฝn\nu_{n} has an inverse given by ฯƒโ†ฆ(idโŠ ฯƒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))โˆงฯƒ|S\sigma\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\sigma_{|(-n,-1)})\wedge\sigma_{|S}. โˆŽ

0PD3

Remark 8.2.6. Consider ฮพยฏ1+:๐‘>0โ†’Zopp,xโ†ฆฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’x)\bar{\xi}_{1}^{+}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to Z^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}},\ x\mapsto\xi_{2}^{-}(-x) and ฮพยฏ2โˆ’:๐‘<0โ†’Zopp,xโ†ฆฮพ1+โ€‹(โˆ’x)\bar{\xi}_{2}^{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}},\ x\mapsto\xi_{1}^{+}(-x). There is an isomorphism (Zopp)ฮพยฏโ†’โˆผ(Zฮพ)opp(Z^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})_{\bar{\xi}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}(Z_{\xi})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} that is the identity on ZZ and xโ†ฆโˆ’xx\mapsto-x on ๐‘{\mathbf{R}}. This provides an isomorphism (๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ))oppโ†’โˆผ๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพยฏopp)({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi}))^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}_{\bar{\xi}}). It induces isomorphisms

Hom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,n))โ†’โˆผHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Zopp)โก(TโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),SโŠ”(1,n)).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,n))\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})}(T\sqcup(-n,-1),S\sqcup(1,n)).

This restricts to isomorphisms between AnA_{n} (resp. BnB_{n}, DnD_{n}, EnE_{n}, FnF_{n}) for ZZ and AnA_{n} (resp. BnB_{n}, DnD_{n}, FnF_{n}, EnE_{n}) for ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

0PD4
  • โ€ข

    Lemma 8.2.7. BnB_{n} and DnD_{n} are stable under the action of Hnโˆ™โˆง(Hnโˆ™)oppH_{n}^{\bullet}\wedge(H_{n}^{\bullet})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

  • โ€ข

    EnE_{n} is stable under the action of Hnโˆ™H_{n}^{\bullet} and FnF_{n} is stable under the action of (Hnโˆ™)opp(H_{n}^{\bullet})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

  • โ€ข

    AA and CC are stable under multiplication

  • โ€ข

    Given ฮฑโˆˆB\alpha\in B and ฮฒโˆˆG\beta\in G, we have ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒโˆˆB\alpha\ast\beta\in B and ฮฒโˆ—ฮฑโˆˆB\beta\ast\alpha\in B.

0PD5

Proof. Let ฯƒโˆˆBn\sigma\in B_{n} and rโˆˆ{1,โ€ฆ,nโˆ’1}r\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\}. Assume ฯƒโ€‹Trโ‰ 0\sigma T_{r}\neq 0.

If there is 1โ‰คjโ‰คiโ‰คn1\leq j\leq i\leq n with ฯƒโก(โˆ’i)=nโˆ’j+1\sigma(-i)=n-j+1 and iโ‰ n+1โˆ’ri\neq n+1-r, then ฯƒโ€‹TrโˆˆBn\sigma T_{r}\in B_{n}.

Assume now ฯƒโก(โˆ’i)โˆˆTโŠ”(1,nโˆ’i)\sigma(-i)\in T\sqcup(1,n-i) for all iโ‰ n+1โˆ’ri\neq n+1-r. We deduce that L(ฯƒ|{โˆ’(n+1โˆ’r),โˆ’(nโˆ’r)})โ‰ โˆ…L(\sigma_{|\{-(n+1-r),-(n-r)\}})\neq\emptyset, hence ฯƒโ€‹Tr=0\sigma T_{r}=0 (cf Lemma 8.2.4), a contradiction.

Using Remark 8.2.6, we deduce that Trโ€‹ฯƒโˆˆBnT_{r}\sigma\in B_{n}.

The other assertions of the lemma are immediate. โˆŽ

8.2.3. Gluing map

We define a morphism of (๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z),๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodules q:Gโ†’Id๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)q:G\to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}:

Hom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,n))โ†’Hom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)โก(S,T).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,n))\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,T).

Let ฮฑโˆˆAn\alpha\in A_{n}. We put T1=ฮฑโก(S)โˆฉTT_{1}=\alpha(S)\cap T and I1=ฮฑโก(S)โˆฉ(1,n)I_{1}=\alpha(S)\cap(1,n). We define inductively TmโŠ‚TT_{m}\subset T and ImโŠ‚(1,nโˆ’m+1)I_{m}\subset(1,n-m+1) for 1<mโ‰คn+11<m\leq n+1 by Tm=Tmโˆ’1โŠ”(ฮฑโก(โˆ’n+Imโˆ’1โˆ’1)โˆฉT)T_{m}=T_{m-1}\sqcup(\alpha(-n+I_{m-1}-1)\cap T) and Im=ฮฑโก(โˆ’n+Imโˆ’1โˆ’1)โˆฉ(1,n)I_{m}=\alpha(-n+I_{m-1}-1)\cap(1,n).

Note that โˆ’n+Imโˆ’1โˆ’1โŠ‚(โˆ’n,โˆ’m+1)-n+I_{m-1}-1\subset(-n,-m+1), hence ImโŠ‚(1,nโˆ’m+1)I_{m}\subset(1,n-m+1) since ฮฑโˆˆAn\alpha\in A_{n}.

Note that Tn+1=TT_{n+1}=T and In+1=โˆ…I_{n+1}=\emptyset.

Define

ฮฒm=idTmโŠ (โŠ rโˆˆIm(ฮฑโˆ’n+rโˆ’1โ‹…[rโ†’โˆ’n+rโˆ’1])):TmโŠ”Imโ†’Tm+1โŠ”Im+1\beta^{m}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T_{m}}\boxtimes\bigl(\bigboxtimes_{r\in I_{m}}(\alpha_{-n+r-1}\cdot[r\to-n+r-1])\bigr):T_{m}\sqcup I_{m}\to T_{m+1}\sqcup I_{m+1}

for 1โ‰คmโ‰คn1\leq m\leq n. We define q(ฮฑ)=ฮฒnโ‹…ฮฒnโˆ’1โ‹ฏฮฒ1โ‹…ฮฑ|Sq(\alpha)=\beta^{n}\cdot\beta^{n-1}\cdots\beta^{1}\cdot\alpha_{|S}

qโก(ฮฑ):Sโ†’ฮฑ|ST1โŠ”I1โ†’ฮฒ1T2โŠ”I2โ†’โ‹ฏโ†’TnโŠ”Inโ†’ฮฒnT.q(\alpha):S\xrightarrow{\alpha_{|S}}T_{1}\sqcup I_{1}\xrightarrow{\beta^{1}}T_{2}\sqcup I_{2}\to\cdots\to T_{n}\sqcup I_{n}\xrightarrow{\beta^{n}}T.

We put qโก(ฮฑ)=0q(\alpha)=0 if ฮฑโˆˆBn\alpha\in B_{n}.

Assume now qโก(ฮฑ)โ‰ 0q(\alpha)\neq 0, hence ฮฑโˆˆAn\alpha\in A_{n}. Let Sโ€ฒ=Sโˆฉฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(T)S^{\prime}=S\cap\alpha^{-1}(T) and Tโ€ฒ=Tโˆฉฮฑโก(S)T^{\prime}=T\cap\alpha(S). Let Sโ€ฒโ€ฒ=Sโˆ’Sโ€ฒS^{\prime\prime}=S-S^{\prime} and Tโ€ฒโ€ฒ=Tโˆ’Tโ€ฒT^{\prime\prime}=T-T^{\prime}.

Given sโˆˆSโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime}, we have qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s=ฮฑsq(\alpha)_{s}=\alpha_{s}.

Note in particular that Sโ€ฒ={sโˆˆS|ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s)=0}S^{\prime}=\{s\in S\ |\ \mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=0\}.

Let sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=qโ€‹(ฮฑ)โ€‹(s)t=q(\alpha)(s) and i=ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t). Put ds=ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s)โˆ’1โ‰ฅ0d_{s}=\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})-1\geq 0. We have

q(ฮฑ)s=ฮฑiโ‹…[1โ†’i]โ‹…ฮบdsโ‹…[ฮฑ(s)โ†’1]โ‹…ฮฑs.q(\alpha)_{s}=\alpha_{i}\cdot[1\to i]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}}\cdot[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}.

Given a decomposition q(ฮฑ)s=ฮพโ‹…[1โ†’โˆ’1]โ‹…ฮบdsโ‹…ฮพโ€ฒq(\alpha)_{s}=\xi\cdot[1\to-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}}\cdot\xi^{\prime} with ฮพโ€ฒโˆˆHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก({s},{1})\xi^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(\{s\},\{1\}) and ฮพโˆˆHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก({โˆ’1},{t})\xi\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(\{-1\},\{t\}), we have ฮฑi=ฮพโ‹…[iโ†’โˆ’1]\alpha_{i}=\xi\cdot[i\to-1] and ฮฑs=[1โ†’ฮฑ(s)]โ‹…ฮพโ€ฒ\alpha_{s}=[1\to\alpha(s)]\cdot\xi^{\prime}.

The next lemma is immediate.

0PD6

Lemma 8.2.8. The map qq defines a morphism of (๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z),๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodules Gโ†’Id๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)G\to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})} and qโก(ฮฑโˆ—ฮฑโ€ฒ)=qโก(ฮฑ)โ‹…qโก(ฮฑโ€ฒ)q(\alpha\ast\alpha^{\prime})=q(\alpha)\cdot q(\alpha^{\prime}).

Given hโˆˆHnโˆ™h\in H^{\bullet}_{n} and ฮฑโˆˆGn\alpha\in G_{n}, we have qโก(hโ€‹ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฑโ€‹h)q(h\alpha)=q(\alpha h).

0PD7

Lemma 8.2.9. The restrictions of qq to EE and to FF are injective.

0PD8

Proof. Let ฮฑ:SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)โ†’TโŠ”(1,n)\alpha:S\sqcup(-n,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,n) be a non-zero element of FnF_{n}. Let sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}. Given 1โ‰คmโ‰คn1\leq m\leq n, we put im(s)=ฮฒmโˆ’1โˆ˜โ‹ฏโˆ˜ฮฒ1โˆ˜ฮฑ(s)i_{m}(s)=\beta^{m-1}\circ\cdots\circ\beta^{1}\circ\alpha(s). We put ds=minโก{m|im+1โ€‹(s)โˆˆTm+1}d_{s}=\min\{m|i_{m+1}(s)\in T_{m+1}\}.

Let s,sโ€ฒs,s^{\prime} be two distinct elements of SS and let ฮธ=ฮฒn|ฮฒnโˆ’1โˆ˜โ‹ฏโˆ˜ฮฒ1โˆ˜ฮฑ({s,sโ€ฒ})โ‹ฏฮฒ1|ฮฑ({s,sโ€ฒ})โ‹…ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ}\theta=\beta^{n}_{|\beta^{n-1}\circ\cdots\circ\beta^{1}\circ\alpha(\{s,s^{\prime}\})}\cdots\beta^{1}_{|\alpha(\{s,s^{\prime}\})}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}.

โˆ™\bullet\ If s,sโ€ฒโˆˆSโ€ฒs,s^{\prime}\in S^{\prime}, then ฮธ=ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ}โ‰ 0\theta=\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}\neq 0.

โˆ™\bullet\ Assume sโˆˆSโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime} and sโ€ฒโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs^{\prime}\in S^{\prime\prime}. We have ฮธ=ฮธ1โ‹…ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ}\theta=\theta^{1}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}} where

ฮธ1=(idฮฑโก(s)โŠ (ฮฑโˆ’n+idsโ€ฒโ€‹(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1โ‹…[1โ†’โˆ’n+idsโ€ฒ(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1]โ‹…ฮบdsโ€ฒโˆ’1โ‹…[i1(sโ€ฒ)โ†’1])).\theta^{1}=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\alpha(s)}\boxtimes(\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1}\cdot[1\to-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s^{\prime}}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])).

We have

i(ฮธ1โˆ˜ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ})=i(ฮฑs,ฮฑsโ€ฒ)+i(ฮฑs,ฮฑโˆ’n+idsโ€ฒโ€‹(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1)+dsโ€ฒโˆ’1=i(ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ})+i(ฮธ1).i(\theta^{1}\circ\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})=i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{s^{\prime}})+i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1})+d_{s^{\prime}}-1=i(\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})+i(\theta^{1}).

Ir follows that ฮธโ‰ 0\theta\neq 0.

โˆ™\bullet\ Assume finally s,sโ€ฒโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs,s^{\prime}\in S^{\prime\prime} and dsโ€ฒโ‰ฅdsd_{s^{\prime}}\geq d_{s}. We have ฮธ=ฮธ1โ‹…ฮธ2โ‹…ฮธ3โ‹…ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ}\theta=\theta^{1}\cdot\theta^{2}\cdot\theta^{3}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}} where

ฮธ1=(ฮฑโˆ’n+idsโ€ฒโ€‹(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1โ‹…[1โ†’โˆ’n+idsโ€ฒ(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1]โ‹…ฮบdsโ€ฒโˆ’dsโ‹…[ids+1(sโ€ฒ)โ†’1])โŠ idinโ€‹(s)\theta^{1}=(\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1}\cdot[1\to-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s^{\prime}}-d_{s}}\cdot[i_{d_{s}+1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{i_{n}(s)}
ฮธ2=[โˆ’n+ids(sโ€ฒ)+1โ†’ids+1(sโ€ฒ)]โŠ (ฮฑnโˆ’idsโ€‹(s)+1โ‹…[โˆ’nโ†’nโˆ’ids(s)+1])\theta^{2}=[-n+i_{d_{s}}(s^{\prime})+1\to i_{d_{s}+1}(s^{\prime})]\boxtimes(\alpha_{n-i_{d_{s}}(s)+1}\cdot[-n\to n-i_{d_{s}}(s)+1])
ฮธ3=(([1โ†’โˆ’n+ids(sโ€ฒ)+1]โ‹…ฮบdsโˆ’1โ‹…[i1(sโ€ฒ)โ†’1])โŠ ([1โ†’โˆ’n]โ‹…ฮบdsโˆ’1โ‹…[i1(s)โ†’1])).\theta^{3}=(([1\to-n+i_{d_{s}}(s^{\prime})+1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])\boxtimes([1\to-n]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s)\to 1])).

We have

i(ฮธ1โˆ˜ฮธ2โˆ˜ฮธ3โˆ˜ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ})=i(ฮฑidsโ€‹(s),ฮฑidsโ€ฒโ€‹(sโ€ฒ))+dsโ€ฒโˆ’ds+i(ฮฑs,ฮฑsโ€ฒ)=i(ฮธ1)+i(ฮธ2)+i(ฮธ3)+i(ฮฑ|{s,sโ€ฒ}).i(\theta^{1}\circ\theta^{2}\circ\theta^{3}\circ\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})=i(\alpha_{i_{d_{s}}(s)},\alpha_{i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})})+d_{s^{\prime}}-d_{s}+i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{s^{\prime}})=i(\theta^{1})+i(\theta^{2})+i(\theta^{3})+i(\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}).

It follows that ฮธโ‰ 0\theta\neq 0.

It follows from Remark 7.4.11 that qโก(ฮฑ)โ‰ 0q(\alpha)\neq 0.

Define Sโ€ฒS^{\prime} and Sโ€ฒโ€ฒS^{\prime\prime} as above. Let r=|Sโ€ฒโ€ฒ|r=|S^{\prime\prime}|. We have ฮฑโก(Sโ€ฒโ€ฒ)=(nโˆ’r+1,n)\alpha(S^{\prime\prime})=(n-r+1,n) and ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(i)<ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(iโ€ฒ)\alpha^{-1}(i)<\alpha^{-1}(i^{\prime}) for i<iโ€ฒi<i^{\prime} in (nโˆ’r+1,n)(n-r+1,n).

Given i<iโ€ฒi<i^{\prime} in (โˆ’n,โˆ’1)(-n,-1) with ฮฑโก(i),ฮฑโก(iโ€ฒ)โˆˆ(1,n)\alpha(i),\alpha(i^{\prime})\in(1,n), we have ฮฑโก(i)<ฮฑโก(iโ€ฒ)\alpha(i)<\alpha(i^{\prime}).

Consider now ฮฑ~:SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)โ†’TโŠ”(1,n)\tilde{\alpha}:S\sqcup(-n,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,n) another non-zero element of FnF_{n} and assume qโก(ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฑ~)โ‰ 0q(\alpha)=q(\tilde{\alpha})\neq 0. We have Sโˆฉฮฑ~โˆ’1โ€‹(T)=Sโ€ฒS\cap\tilde{\alpha}^{-1}(T)=S^{\prime} and Tโˆฉฮฑ~โ€‹(S)=Tโ€ฒT\cap\tilde{\alpha}(S)=T^{\prime}. The discussion above shows that ฮฑโ€‹(s)=ฮฑ~โ€‹(s)\alpha(s)=\tilde{\alpha}(s) for sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}. Note also that ฮฑs=ฮฑ~s\alpha_{s}=\tilde{\alpha}_{s} for sโˆˆSโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime}. As a consequence, ฮฑ=ฮฑ~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha} if ฮผโก(qโก(ฮฑ))=0\mu(q(\alpha))=0.

Let sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=qโ€‹(ฮฑ)โ€‹(s)t=q(\alpha)(s), t~=qโ€‹(ฮฑ~)โ€‹(s)\tilde{t}=q(\tilde{\alpha})(s), i=ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t) and i~=ฮฑ~โˆ’1โ€‹(t)\tilde{i}=\tilde{\alpha}^{-1}(t). Since qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s=qโ€‹(ฮฑ~)sq(\alpha)_{s}=q(\tilde{\alpha})_{s}, it follows that t~=t\tilde{t}=t, ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s)=ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ~)s)\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=\mu(q(\tilde{\alpha})_{s}), [ฮฑ(s)โ†’1]โ‹…ฮฑs=[ฮฑ~(s)โ†’1]โ‹…ฮฑ~s[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}=[\tilde{\alpha}(s)\to 1]\cdot\tilde{\alpha}_{s}, and ฮฑiโ‹…[โˆ’1โ†’i]=ฮฑ~i~โ‹…[โˆ’1โ†’i~]\alpha_{i}\cdot[-1\to i]=\tilde{\alpha}_{\tilde{i}}\cdot[-1\to\tilde{i}]. We deduce that ฮฑ~s=ฮฑs\tilde{\alpha}_{s}=\alpha_{s} for sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}.

We proceed now by induction on ฮผโก(qโก(ฮฑ))\mu(q(\alpha)) to show that qโก(ฮฑ)q(\alpha) determines ฮฑ\alpha, for ฮฑโˆˆF\alpha\in F.

Assume there is sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime} such that ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s)=1\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=1. Let j=ฮฑโก(s)โˆˆ(1,n)j=\alpha(s)\in(1,n) and i=โˆ’n+jโˆ’1i=-n+j-1. We have t=ฮฑโก(i)=qโก(ฮฑ)โ€‹(s)โˆˆTt=\alpha(i)=q(\alpha)(s)\in T. Define ฮฑโ€ฒ:Sโˆ–{s}โŠ”(โˆ’n+1,โˆ’1)โ†’Tโˆ–{t}โŠ”(1,nโˆ’1)\alpha^{\prime}:S\setminus\{s\}\sqcup(-n+1,-1)\to T\setminus\{t\}\sqcup(1,n-1) an element of Fnโˆ’1F_{n-1} as follows. Given sโ€ฒโˆˆSโˆ–{s}s^{\prime}\in S\setminus\{s\}, we put ฮฑsโ€ฒโ€ฒ=ฮฑsโ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}}=\alpha_{s^{\prime}} if ฮฑโก(sโ€ฒ)<j\alpha(s^{\prime})<j, ฮฑsโ€ฒโ€ฒ=[ฮฑ(sโ€ฒ)โ†’ฮฑ(sโ€ฒ)โˆ’1]โ‹…ฮฑsโ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}}=[\alpha(s^{\prime})\to\alpha(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\alpha_{s^{\prime}} if ฮฑโก(sโ€ฒ)>j\alpha(s^{\prime})>j. Given iโ€ฒโˆˆ(โˆ’i+1,โˆ’1)i^{\prime}\in(-i+1,-1), we put ฮฑiโ€ฒโ€ฒ=ฮฑiโ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}_{i^{\prime}}=\alpha_{i^{\prime}}. Given iโ€ฒโˆˆ(โˆ’n+1,โˆ’i)i^{\prime}\in(-n+1,-i), we put ฮฑiโ€ฒโ€ฒ=ฮฑiโ€ฒโˆ’1\alpha^{\prime}_{i^{\prime}}=\alpha_{i^{\prime}-1}. This defines an element of Fnโˆ’1F_{n-1}. Furthermore, q(ฮฑโ€ฒ)=q(ฮฑ)|Sโˆ–{s}q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\alpha)_{|S\setminus\{s\}}.

We define similarly i~\tilde{i}, j~\tilde{j}, t~\tilde{t} and ฮฑ~โ€ฒ\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} starting with ฮฑ~\tilde{\alpha} and ss. We have j~=j\tilde{j}=j and t~=t\tilde{t}=t, hence also i~=i\tilde{i}=i. We have qโก(ฮฑโ€ฒ)=qโก(ฮฑ~โ€ฒ)q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}), hence ฮฑโ€ฒ=ฮฑ~โ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}=\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} by induction. Since ฮฑs=ฮฑ~s\alpha_{s}=\tilde{\alpha}_{s} and ฮฑi=ฮฑ~i\alpha_{i}=\tilde{\alpha}_{i}, it follows that ฮฑ=ฮฑ~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha}.

Assume ฮผโก(qโ€‹(ฮฑ)s)โ‰ฅ2\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})\geq 2 for all sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}. We have ฮฑโˆ’1((1,nโˆ’r))={i1<โ‹ฏ<inโˆ’r}โŠ‚(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)\alpha^{-1}((1,n-r))=\{i_{1}<\cdots<i_{n-r}\}\subset(-n,-1). Note that ฮฑโˆ’id=[โˆ’idโ†’d]\alpha_{-i_{d}}=[-i_{d}\to d] for 1โ‰คdโ‰คnโˆ’r1\leq d\leq n-r. Let ฯ†:(โˆ’r,โˆ’1)โ†’(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)โˆ–ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹((,,,))\varphi:(-r,-1)\to(-n,-1)\setminus\alpha^{-1}((1,n-r)) be the unique increasing bijection. We define ฮฑโ€ฒ:SโŠ”(โˆ’r,โˆ’1)โ†’TโŠ”(1,r)\alpha^{\prime}:S\sqcup(-r,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,r) and an element of FrF_{r} as follows. We put ฮฑsโ€ฒ=ฮฑs\alpha^{\prime}_{s}=\alpha_{s} for sโˆˆSโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime}, ฮฑsโ€ฒ=[ฮฑ(s)โ†’ฮฑ(s)โˆ’n+r]โ‹…ฮฑs\alpha^{\prime}_{s}=[\alpha(s)\to\alpha(s)-n+r]\cdot\alpha_{s} for sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime} and ฮฑi=ฮฑฯ†โก(i)โ‹…[iโ†’ฯ†(i)]\alpha_{i}=\alpha_{\varphi(i)}\cdot[i\to\varphi(i)] for iโˆˆ(โˆ’r,โˆ’1)i\in(-r,-1).

Let sโˆˆSโ€ฒโ€ฒs\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=qโ€‹(ฮฑ)โ€‹(s)t=q(\alpha)(s) and i=ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t). We have

q(ฮฑโ€ฒ)s=ฮฑiโ‹…[1โ†’i]โ‹…[ฮฑ(s)โ†’1]โ‹…ฮฑs.q(\alpha^{\prime})_{s}=\alpha_{i}\cdot[1\to i]\cdot[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}.

Define ฮฑ~โ€ฒ\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} similarly, starting with ฮฑ~\tilde{\alpha} instead of ฮฑ\alpha. We have qโก(ฮฑโ€ฒ)=qโก(ฮฑ~โ€ฒ)q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}). By induction, we deduce that ฮฑโ€ฒ=ฮฑ~โ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}=\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}, hence ฮฑ=ฮฑ~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha}.

This completes the proof that the restriction of qq to FF is injective.

We deduce that the restriction of qq to EE is injective using Remark 8.2.6 โˆŽ

0PD9

Lemma 8.2.10. The restrictions of qq to EโˆฉCE\cap C and to FโˆฉCF\cap C are surjective.

0PDA

Proof. Let ฮธโˆˆHom๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)โก(I,J)\theta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi})}(I,J). Let n=ฮผโก(ฮธ)n=\mu(\theta). We show by induction on nn that there exists ฮฑโˆˆFnโˆฉCn\alpha\in F_{n}\cap C_{n} such that qโก(ฮฑ)=ฮธq(\alpha)=\theta.

Assume n=1n=1. Let sโˆˆIs\in I such that ฮผโก(ฮธs)=1\mu(\theta_{s})=1. There is a decomposition ฮธs=ฮธsrโˆ’โ‹…ฮธsr\theta_{s}=\theta_{s}^{r-}\cdot\theta_{s}^{r} as in ยง7.4.6. We define ฮฑโˆˆHom๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(IโŠ”{โˆ’1},JโŠ”{1})\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(I\sqcup\{-1\},J\sqcup\{1\}) by ฮฑsโ€ฒ=ฮธsโ€ฒ\alpha_{s^{\prime}}=\theta_{s^{\prime}} for sโ€ฒโ‰ ss^{\prime}\neq s, ฮฑs=[0โ†’1]โ‹…ฮธsr\alpha_{s}=[0\to 1]\cdot\theta_{s}^{r} and ฮฑโˆ’1=ฮธsrโˆ’โ‹…[โˆ’1โ†’0]\alpha_{-1}=\theta_{s}^{r-}\cdot[-1\to 0]. We have ฮฑโˆˆA1=F1โˆฉC1\alpha\in A_{1}=F_{1}\cap C_{1} and qโก(ฮฑ)=ฮธq(\alpha)=\theta.

Assume now n>1n>1. Consider a decomposition ฮธ=rโ€ฒโ€‹(ฮธ)โ‹…rโก(ฮธ)\theta=r^{\prime}(\theta)\cdot r(\theta) as in Lemma 7.4.27. There exists ฮฑโˆˆA1\alpha\in A_{1} and ฮฒโˆˆFnโˆ’1โˆฉCnโˆ’1\beta\in F_{n-1}\cap C_{n-1} such that qโก(ฮฑ)=rโก(ฮธ)q(\alpha)=r(\theta) and qโ€‹(ฮฒ)=rโ€ฒโ€‹(ฮธ)q(\beta)=r^{\prime}(\theta). Let ฮณ=ฮฒโˆ—ฮฑโˆˆCn\gamma=\beta\ast\alpha\in C_{n}. We have qโก(ฮณ)=ฮธq(\gamma)=\theta.

Let s=ฮณโˆ’1โ€‹(n)=ฮฑโˆ’1โ€‹(1)s=\gamma^{-1}(n)=\alpha^{-1}(1). We have ฮผโก(rโ€‹(ฮธ)s)=1\mu(r(\theta)_{s})=1. Let iโˆˆ(1,nโˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1) and sโ€ฒ=ฮณโˆ’1โ€‹(i)s^{\prime}=\gamma^{-1}(i). If sโ€ฒโˆˆ(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)s^{\prime}\in(-n,-1), then I(ฮณ|{sโ€ฒ,s})=โˆ…I(\gamma_{|\{s^{\prime},s\}})=\emptyset. Assume sโ€ฒโˆ‰(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)s^{\prime}{\not\in}(-n,-1). We have ฮธsโ€ฒr=[iโ†’0]โ‹…ฮณsโ€ฒ\theta_{s^{\prime}}^{r}=[i\to 0]\cdot\gamma_{s^{\prime}}. Since suppโก(ฮธsr)โŠ‚suppโก(ฮธsโ€ฒr)\mathrm{supp}(\theta_{s}^{r})\subset\mathrm{supp}(\theta_{s^{\prime}}^{r}), it follows that I(ฮณ|{sโ€ฒ,s})=โˆ…I(\gamma_{|\{s^{\prime},s\}})=\emptyset. Since ฮฒโˆˆFnโˆ’1\beta\in F_{n-1}, we deduce that ฮณโˆˆFn\gamma\in F_{n}.

The case of EโˆฉCE\cap C follows from that of FโˆฉCF\cap C applied to ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}, cf Remark 8.2.6. โˆŽ

8.2.4. Equivalence relation

We define an equivalence relation โˆผ\sim on GG as the transitive, symmetric and reflexive closure of the relation Tiโ€‹ฯƒโˆผฯƒโ€‹TiT_{i}\sigma\sim\sigma T_{i} for ฯƒโˆˆGn\sigma\in G_{n} and 1โ‰คi<n1\leq i<n and ฯƒโˆผ0\sigma\sim 0 if ฯƒโˆˆBn\sigma\in B_{n}.

0PDB

Lemma 8.2.11. Let ฮฑโˆˆGn\alpha\in G_{n}. There exists ฯƒโˆˆEn\sigma\in E_{n} and ฯƒโ€ฒโˆˆFn\sigma^{\prime}\in F_{n} such that ฮฑโˆผฯƒโˆผฯƒโ€ฒ\alpha\sim\sigma\sim\sigma^{\prime}.

0PDC

Proof. If ฮฑโˆˆBn\alpha\in B_{n}, then ฮฑโˆผ0\alpha\sim 0 and we are done. Assume now ฮฑโˆˆAn\alpha\in A_{n}. We proceed by induction on M(ฮฑ)=12|L(ฮฑ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))|M(\alpha)=\frac{1}{2}|L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})| and then on N(ฮฑ)=nโˆ’max{i|[โˆ’n+iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’n+i]โˆˆL(ฮฑ)}N(\alpha)=n-\max\{i\ |\ [-n+i-1\to-n+i]\in L(\alpha)\} if Mโก(ฮฑ)โ‰ 0M(\alpha)\neq 0 to show that there exists ฯƒโˆˆEn\sigma\in E_{n} with ฮฑโˆผฯƒ\alpha\sim\sigma.

If Mโก(ฮฑ)=0M(\alpha)=0, then ฮฑโˆˆEn\alpha\in E_{n} and we are done. Assume now Mโก(ฮฑ)>0M(\alpha)>0. By Lemma 8.2.4, there are iโˆˆ(1,nโˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1) and ฮฒโˆˆGn\beta\in G_{n} such that ฮฑ=ฮฒโ€‹Ti\alpha=\beta T_{i}, and we choose ii maximal with this property, so that Nโก(ฮฑ)=nโˆ’iN(\alpha)=n-i. We have ฮฑโˆผTiโ€‹ฮฒ\alpha\sim T_{i}\beta. If Tiโ€‹ฮฒโˆˆBnT_{i}\beta\in B_{n} then we are done. We assume now Tiโ€‹ฮฒโˆ‰BnT_{i}\beta{\not\in}B_{n}. We have L(ฮฒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))=L(ฮฑ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))โˆ–{[โˆ’n+iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’n+i],[โˆ’n+iโ†’โˆ’n+iโˆ’1]}L(\beta_{|(-n,-1)})=L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})\setminus\{[-n+i-1\to-n+i],[-n+i\to-n+i-1]\}.

If ฮฒโˆ’1โ€‹({i,i+1})โŠ„(โˆ’n,โˆ’1)\beta^{-1}(\{i,i+1\}){\not\subset}(-n,-1), then L(Tiฮฒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))=L(ฮฒ|(โˆ’n,โˆ’1))L(T_{i}\beta_{|(-n,-1)})=L(\beta_{|(-n,-1)}), hence Mโก(Tiโ€‹ฮฒ)<Mโก(ฮฑ)M(T_{i}\beta)<M(\alpha). By induction, there is ฯƒโˆˆEn\sigma\in E_{n} with Tiโ€‹ฮฒโˆผฯƒT_{i}\beta\sim\sigma, hence ฮฑโˆผฯƒ\alpha\sim\sigma.

Assume now there are j,kโˆˆ(1,n)j,k\in(1,n) with ฮฒโก(โˆ’n+jโˆ’1)=i\beta(-n+j-1)=i and ฮฒโก(โˆ’n+kโˆ’1)=i+1\beta(-n+k-1)=i+1. Since Tiโ€‹ฮฒโ‰ 0T_{i}\beta\neq 0, we have j<kj<k. Since ฮฒโˆˆAn\beta\in A_{n}, we have j>ij>i and k>i+1k>i+1. We have Mโก(Tiโ€‹ฮฒ)โ‰คMโก(ฮฒ)+1=Mโก(ฮฑ)M(T_{i}\beta)\leq M(\beta)+1=M(\alpha). On the other hand, [jโ†’k]โˆˆL(Tiฮฒ)[j\to k]\in L(T_{i}\beta) (cf Lemma 7.4.20), hence Nโก(Tiโ€‹ฮฒ)<Nโก(ฮฑ)N(T_{i}\beta)<N(\alpha). We conclude by induction.

The case of FnF_{n} follows by applying Remark 8.2.6. โˆŽ

0PDD

Lemma 8.2.12. Let ฮฑ,ฮฒโˆˆGn\alpha,\beta\in G_{n}. We have qโก(ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฒ)q(\alpha)=q(\beta) if and only if ฮฑโˆผฮฒ\alpha\sim\beta.

0PDE

Proof. Lemma 8.2.8 shows that if ฮฑโˆผฮฒ\alpha\sim\beta, then qโก(ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฒ)q(\alpha)=q(\beta). Assume now qโก(ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฒ)q(\alpha)=q(\beta). There are ฮฑโ€ฒ,ฮฒโ€ฒโˆˆEn\alpha^{\prime},\beta^{\prime}\in E_{n} with ฮฑโ€ฒโˆผฮฑ\alpha^{\prime}\sim\alpha and ฮฒโ€ฒโˆผฮฒ\beta^{\prime}\sim\beta (Lemma 8.2.11) and we have qโก(ฮฑโ€ฒ)=qโก(ฮฑ)=qโก(ฮฒ)=qโก(ฮฒโ€ฒ)q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\alpha)=q(\beta)=q(\beta^{\prime}). It follows now from Lemma 8.2.9 that ฮฑโ€ฒ=ฮฒโ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}=\beta^{\prime}, hence ฮฑโˆผฮฒ\alpha\sim\beta. โˆŽ

0PDF

Proof of Theorem 8.2.1. Lemma 8.2.12 shows that qq factors through an isomorphism G/โˆผโ†’โˆผId๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)G/\!\sim\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}. Since the restriction of qq to CC is surjective (Lemma 8.2.10), it follows that qq induces an isomorphism C/โˆผโ†’โˆผId๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)C/\!\sim\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}.

Recall that ฮผi:(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)iโ†’Gi\mu_{i}:(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})^{i}\to G_{i} has image CiC_{i}, hence ฮผi\mu_{i} induces an isomorphism (Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™Lฮพ1+โˆ™)i/Kiโ†’โˆผCi/โˆผ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})^{i}/K_{i}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{i}/\!\sim. As a consequence, the canonical surjective map Tโˆ—โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)โ†’Idฮ”Eโ€‹(๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))T^{*}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})\to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{E}({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z))} factors through a surjective map C/โˆผโ†’Idฮ”Eโ€‹(๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))C/\!\sim\ \to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{E}({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z))}. Since the restriction of qq to CC factors through Idฮ”Eโ€‹(๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{E}({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z))}, we deduce that we have an isomorphism Idฮ”Eโ€‹(๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))โ†’โˆผId๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{E}({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z))}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}. โˆŽ

8.2.5. Complement

We provide here a more direct description of the equivalence relation โˆผ\sim on CC.

0PDG

Corollary 8.2.13. We have EโŠ‚CE\subset C and FโŠ‚CF\subset C.

We define an equivalence relation โˆผโ€ฒ\sim^{\prime} on CC as the relation generated by ฮฑโ€ฒโˆ—(T1ฮฑ)โˆ—ฮฑโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆผโ€ฒฮฑโ€ฒโˆ—(ฮฑT1)โˆ—ฮฑโ€ฒโ€ฒ\alpha^{\prime}\ast(T_{1}\alpha)\ast\alpha^{\prime\prime}\sim^{\prime}\alpha^{\prime}\ast(\alpha T_{1})\ast\alpha^{\prime\prime} for ฮฑโ€ฒ,ฮฑโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆˆC\alpha^{\prime},\alpha^{\prime\prime}\in C and ฮฑโˆˆD2\alpha\in D_{2}.

0PDH

Lemma 8.2.14. Let ฯƒโˆˆGn\sigma\in G_{n} and iโˆˆ{1,โ€ฆ,nโˆ’1}i\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\}

If ฯƒโ€‹TiโˆˆCnโˆ–{0}\sigma T_{i}\in C_{n}\setminus\{0\}, then Tiโ€‹ฯƒโˆˆCnT_{i}\sigma\in C_{n} and ฯƒTiโˆผโ€ฒTiฯƒ\sigma T_{i}\sim^{\prime}T_{i}\sigma.

If Tiโ€‹ฯƒโˆˆCnโˆ–{0}T_{i}\sigma\in C_{n}\setminus\{0\}, then ฯƒโ€‹TiโˆˆCn\sigma T_{i}\in C_{n} and ฯƒTiโˆผโ€ฒTiฯƒ\sigma T_{i}\sim^{\prime}T_{i}\sigma.

0PDI

Proof. Put ฯƒโ€ฒ=ฯƒโ€‹Ti\sigma^{\prime}=\sigma T_{i} and assume ฯƒโ€ฒโˆˆCnโˆ–{0}\sigma^{\prime}\in C_{n}\setminus\{0\}. There are ฮณโˆˆCnโˆ’iโˆ’1\gamma\in C_{n-i-1}, ฮฒโˆˆC2\beta\in C_{2} and ฮฑโˆˆCiโˆ’1\alpha\in C_{i-1} such that ฯƒโ€ฒ=ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒโˆ—ฮณ\sigma^{\prime}=\alpha\ast\beta\ast\gamma.

Lemma 8.2.4 shows that [โˆ’n+iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’n+i]โˆˆD(ฯƒโ€ฒ)[-n+i-1\to-n+i]\in D(\sigma^{\prime}). We have ฯƒ|{โˆ’n+iโˆ’1,โˆ’n+i}โ€ฒ=(ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ)|(โˆ’iโˆ’1,โˆ’i)โˆ˜([โˆ’n+iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’iโˆ’1]โŠ [โˆ’n+iโ†’โˆ’i])\sigma^{\prime}_{|\{-n+i-1,-n+i\}}=(\alpha\ast\beta)_{|(-i-1,-i)}\circ([-n+i-1\to-i-1]\boxtimes[-n+i\to-i]). It follows from Lemma 8.2.4 that [โˆ’iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’i]โˆˆD(ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ)[-i-1\to-i]\in D(\alpha\ast\beta). Since [โˆ’iโˆ’1โ†’โˆ’i]โˆˆL((ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ)|(โˆ’iโˆ’1,โˆ’i))[-i-1\to-i]\in L((\alpha\ast\beta)_{|(-i-1,-i)}), it follows that ฮฒโก(โˆ’1)โ‰ 1\beta(-1)\neq 1, hence ฮฒโˆˆD2\beta\in D_{2}.

โˆ™\bullet\ Assume [โˆ’1โ†’โˆ’2]โˆˆD(ฮฒ)[-1\to-2]\in D(\beta). We have ฮฒ=ฮฒโ€ฒโ€‹T1\beta=\beta^{\prime}T_{1} for some ฮฒโ€ฒโˆˆG2\beta^{\prime}\in G_{2} by Lemma 8.2.4. Since ฮฒโˆˆD2\beta\in D_{2}, we have ฮฒโ€ฒโˆˆD2โŠ‚A2\beta^{\prime}\in D_{2}\subset A_{2}. We deduce that ฮฒโ€ฒโˆˆE2\beta^{\prime}\in E_{2}, hence T1โ€‹ฮฒโ€ฒโˆˆE2โŠ‚C2T_{1}\beta^{\prime}\in E_{2}\subset C_{2} (Corollary 8.2.13). So, ฯƒTi=ฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโ€ฒT1)โˆ—ฮณโˆผโ€ฒฮฑโˆ—(T1ฮฒโ€ฒ)โˆ—ฮณ=Tiฯƒ\sigma T_{i}=\alpha\ast(\beta^{\prime}T_{1})\ast\gamma\sim^{\prime}\alpha\ast(T_{1}\beta^{\prime})\ast\gamma=T_{i}\sigma.

โˆ™\bullet\ Assume now [โˆ’1โ†’โˆ’2]โˆ‰D(ฮฒ)[-1\to-2]{\not\in}D(\beta), i.e., ฮฒโˆˆE2\beta\in E_{2}. We have T1โ€‹ฮฒ,ฮฒโ€‹T1โˆˆD2โŠ‚A2T_{1}\beta,\beta T_{1}\in D_{2}\subset A_{2} and T1โ€‹ฮฒโŠ‚E2โŠ‚C2T_{1}\beta\subset E_{2}\subset C_{2} (Corollary 8.2.13).

โ‹„\ \ \diamond\ Assume T1โ€‹ฮฒ=0T_{1}\beta=0. There is ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆˆG2\beta^{\prime\prime}\in G_{2} such that ฮฒ=T1โ€‹ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒ\beta=T_{1}\beta^{\prime\prime} (Lemma 8.2.4). Since ฮฒโˆˆE2โˆฉD2\beta\in E_{2}\cap D_{2}, we have ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆˆE2โˆฉD2โŠ‚C2\beta^{\prime\prime}\in E_{2}\cap D_{2}\subset C_{2}, hence also ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆˆF2\beta^{\prime\prime}\in F_{2}. As a consequence, ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒโ€‹T1โˆˆF2โŠ‚C2\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1}\in F_{2}\subset C_{2}. We deduce that ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒโˆผโ€ฒฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒT1)\alpha\ast\beta\sim^{\prime}\alpha\ast(\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1}). We have L(ฮฑ|ฮฒ((โˆ’2,โˆ’1)))โ‰ โˆ…L(\alpha_{|\beta((-2,-1))})\neq\emptyset and L((ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒT1)|(โˆ’2,โˆ’1))โ‰ โˆ…L((\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1})_{|(-2,-1)})\neq\emptyset, hence (ฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒT1))|(โˆ’2,โˆ’1)=0(\alpha\ast(\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1}))_{|(-2,-1)}=0 and ฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒโ€‹T1)=0\alpha\ast(\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1})=0. We have ฯƒTi=ฮฑโˆ—(T1ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒ)โˆ—ฮณโˆผโ€ฒฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโ€ฒโ€ฒT1)โˆ—ฮณ=0\sigma T_{i}=\alpha\ast(T_{1}\beta^{\prime\prime})\ast\gamma\sim^{\prime}\alpha\ast(\beta^{\prime\prime}T_{1})\ast\gamma=0. Since Tiโ€‹ฯƒโ€‹Ti=0T_{i}\sigma T_{i}=0 and ฯƒโ€‹Tiโ‰ 0\sigma T_{i}\neq 0, it follows that L((ฯƒTi)|(ฯƒTi)โˆ’1({i,i+1}))โ‰ โˆ…L((\sigma T_{i})_{|(\sigma T_{i})^{-1}(\{i,i+1\})})\neq\emptyset, by applying Lemma 8.2.4 to ZoppZ^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}. Since ฯƒโ€‹TiโˆˆAn\sigma T_{i}\in A_{n}, we deduce that L(ฯƒ|ฯƒโˆ’1({i,i+1}))โ‰ โˆ…L(\sigma_{|\sigma^{-1}(\{i,i+1\})})\neq\emptyset, hence Tiฯƒ=0โˆผโ€ฒฯƒTiT_{i}\sigma=0\sim^{\prime}\sigma T_{i} (using Lemma 8.2.4 for ZoppZ^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}} again).

โ‹„\ \ \diamond\ Assume now T1โ€‹ฮฒโ‰ 0T_{1}\beta\neq 0. It follows that ฮฒโˆˆF2\beta\in F_{2}, hence ฮฒโ€‹T1โˆˆF2โŠ‚C2\beta T_{1}\in F_{2}\subset C_{2}.

There are ฮฑ1,โ€ฆ,ฮฑiโˆ’1โˆˆC1\alpha^{1},\ldots,\alpha^{i-1}\in C_{1} with ฮฑ=ฮฑiโˆ’1โˆ—โ‹ฏโˆ—ฮฑ1\alpha=\alpha^{i-1}\ast\cdots\ast\alpha^{1}. Let si=ฮฒโก(โˆ’i)s_{i}=\beta(-i) for iโˆˆ{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}. Consider jโ‰ฅ1j\geq 1 minimal such that L((ฮฑjโˆ—โ‹ฏโˆ—ฮฑ1)|{s1,s2})โ‰ โˆ…L((\alpha^{j}\ast\cdots\ast\alpha^{1})_{|\{s_{1},s_{2}\}})\neq\emptyset.

Define uโ€ฒ=ฮฑjโŠ ([lโ†’l+1])1โ‰คlโ‰คj+1u^{\prime}=\alpha^{j}\boxtimes([l\to l+1])_{1\leq l\leq j+1} and uโ€ฒโ€ฒ=(ฮฑjโˆ’1โˆ—โ‹ฏฮฑ1โˆ—ฮฒ)โŠ [โˆ’jโˆ’2โ†’โˆ’1]u^{\prime\prime}=(\alpha^{j-1}\ast\cdots\alpha^{1}\ast\beta)\boxtimes[-j-2\to-1].

Let ฮถ=uโˆ’2โ€ฒโ€ฒโˆ˜[โˆ’1โ†’โˆ’2]โˆ˜(uโˆ’1โ€ฒโ€ฒ)โˆ’1\zeta=u^{\prime\prime}_{-2}\circ[-1\to-2]\circ(u^{\prime\prime}_{-1})^{-1}. Define II and JJ to be the domain and codomain of uโ€ฒโ€ฒu^{\prime\prime}, intersected with MM. Note that ฮถโก(0),ฮถโก(1)โˆˆM\zeta(0),\zeta(1)\in M. Let vโ€ฒ=(uโ€ฒ)ฮถ=(ฮฑj)ฮถโŠ ([lโ†’l+1])1โ‰คlโ‰คj+1v^{\prime}=(u^{\prime})^{\zeta}=(\alpha^{j})^{\zeta}\boxtimes([l\to l+1])_{1\leq l\leq j+1} and define vโ€ฒโ€ฒ:IโŠ”(โˆ’jโˆ’2,โˆ’1)โ†’JโŠ”(1,2)โŠ”{โˆ’1}โŠ”(1,j+1)v^{\prime\prime}:I\sqcup(-j-2,-1)\to J\sqcup(1,2)\sqcup\{-1\}\sqcup(1,j+1) by

vsโ€ฒโ€ฒ={uโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆ’2โˆ˜[โˆ’1โ†’โˆ’2]ย ifย โ€‹s=โˆ’1uโ€ฒโ€ฒโˆ’1โˆ˜[โˆ’2โ†’โˆ’1]ย ifย โ€‹s=โˆ’2usโ€ฒโ€ฒย otherwise.v^{\prime\prime}_{s}=\begin{cases}u^{\prime\prime}_{-2}\circ[-1\to-2]&\text{ if }s=-1\\ u^{\prime\prime}_{-1}\circ[-2\to-1]&\text{ if }s=-2\\ u^{\prime\prime}_{s}&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

Lemma 7.4.35 shows that vโ€ฒv^{\prime} and vโ€ฒโ€ฒv^{\prime\prime} are braids and ฮฑjโˆ—โ‹ฏโˆ—ฮฑ1โˆ—ฮฒ=uโ€ฒโ‹…uโ€ฒโ€ฒ=vโ€ฒโ‹…vโ€ฒโ€ฒ\alpha^{j}\ast\cdots\ast\alpha^{1}\ast\beta=u^{\prime}\cdot u^{\prime\prime}=v^{\prime}\cdot v^{\prime\prime}. We have vโ€ฒโ€ฒ=(ฮฑjโˆ’1โˆ—โ‹ฏฮฑ1โˆ—(ฮฒT1))โŠ [โˆ’jโˆ’2โ†ฆโˆ’1]v^{\prime\prime}=(\alpha^{j-1}\ast\cdots\alpha^{1}\ast(\beta T_{1}))\boxtimes[-j-2\mapsto-1] and we deduce that ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ=ฮฑโ€ฒโˆ—(ฮฒโ€‹T1)\alpha\ast\beta=\alpha^{\prime}\ast(\beta T_{1}), where ฮฑโ€ฒ=ฮฑiโˆ’1โˆ—โ‹ฏโˆ—ฮฑj+1โˆ—(ฮฑj)ฮถโˆ—ฮฑjโˆ’1โ‹ฏโˆ—ฮฑ1โˆˆCiโˆ’1\alpha^{\prime}=\alpha^{i-1}\ast\cdots\ast\alpha^{j+1}\ast(\alpha^{j})^{\zeta}\ast\alpha^{j-1}\cdots\ast\alpha^{1}\in C_{i-1}. We have ฯƒTi=ฮฑโ€ฒโˆ—(ฮฒT1)โˆ—ฮณโˆผโ€ฒฮฑโ€ฒโˆ—(T1ฮฒ)โˆ—ฮณ=Tiฯƒ\sigma T_{i}=\alpha^{\prime}\ast(\beta T_{1})\ast\gamma\sim^{\prime}\alpha^{\prime}\ast(T_{1}\beta)\ast\gamma=T_{i}\sigma. This completes the proof of the first statement of the lemma.

The second statement of the lemma follows from the first one applied to ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} thanks to Remark 8.2.6. โˆŽ

0PDJ

Proposition 8.2.15. Let ฮฑ,ฮฒโˆˆCn\alpha,\beta\in C_{n}. We have ฮฑโˆผโ€ฒฮฒ\alpha\sim^{\prime}\beta if and only if ฮฑโˆผฮฒ\alpha\sim\beta.

0PDK

Proof. It is clear that ฮฑโˆผโ€ฒฮฒ\alpha\sim^{\prime}\beta implies ฮฑโˆผฮฒ\alpha\sim\beta. The converse follows from Lemma 8.2.14. โˆŽ

0PDL

Corollary 8.2.16. We have C/โˆผโ€ฒ=G/โˆผC/\!\sim^{\prime}\ =G/\!\sim.

0PDM

Proof. The surjectivity of C/โˆผโ€ฒโ†’G/โˆผC/\!\sim^{\prime}\ \to G/\!\sim\ is given by Lemma 8.2.10. The injectivity follows from Lemmas 8.2.12 and 8.2.15. โˆŽ

8.2.6. Large enough MM

We assume in ยง8.2.6 that (ฮพ1+)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)(\xi_{1}^{+})^{-1}(M) has no maximum and (ฮพ2โˆ’)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)(\xi_{2}^{-})^{-1}(M) has no minimum. Fix an increasing sequence (m0+,m1+,โ€ฆ)(m^{+}_{0},m^{+}_{1},\ldots) of points of (ฮพ1+)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)(\xi_{1}^{+})^{-1}(M) and a decreasing sequence (m0โˆ’,m1โˆ’,โ€ฆ)(m^{-}_{0},m^{-}_{1},\ldots) of points of (ฮพ2โˆ’)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)(\xi_{2}^{-})^{-1}(M) such that limimi+>t\lim_{i}m^{+}_{i}>t for all tโˆˆ(ฮพ1+)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)t\in(\xi_{1}^{+})^{-1}(M) and limimiโˆ’<t\lim_{i}m^{-}_{i}<t for all tโˆˆ(ฮพ2โˆ’)โˆ’1โ€‹(M)t\in(\xi_{2}^{-})^{-1}(M).

0PDN

Lemma 8.2.17. We have a canonical isomorphism Lโ€‹Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ†’โˆผG1LR_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}G_{1}.

0PDP

Proof. Using (8.1.1) and (8.1.5), we have isomorphisms

Lฮพ1+โˆ™โ€‹(T,โˆ’)โˆงRฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹(โˆ’,S)โ†’โˆผcolimr,sโ†’โˆžโกHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(โˆ’,TโŠ”{ฮพ1+โ€‹(mr+)})โˆงHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”{ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(msโˆ’)},โˆ’)โ†’โˆผcolimr,sโ†’โˆžโกHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(SโŠ”{ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(msโˆ’)},TโŠ”{ฮพ1+โ€‹(mr+)})โ†’โˆผHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”{ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’1)},TโŠ”{ฮพ1+โ€‹(1)}).L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(T,-)\wedge R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-,S)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\\ \operatorname{colim}\nolimits_{r,s\to\infty}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(-,T\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(m^{+}_{r})\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(m^{-}_{s})\},-)\\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{colim}\nolimits_{r,s\to\infty}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(m^{-}_{s})\},T\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(m^{+}_{r})\})\\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)\},T\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\}).

and the lemma follows. โˆŽ

Let us define ฮป:Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lโ†’Lโ€‹Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™\lambda:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L\to LR_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet} as the composition of the injective map ฮผ1:Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lโ†’G1\mu_{1}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L\to G_{1} (cf Lemma 8.2.5) with the inverse of the isomorphism of the lemma above.

Under the assumptions above, we have a simpler version of Theorem 8.2.1.

0PDQ

Theorem 8.2.18. The functor ฮž~\tilde{\Xi} factors through ฮ”ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and induces an isomorphism of differential pointed categories ฮ”ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ†’โˆผ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

0PDR

Proof. Every element of Rฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(S,T)R_{\xi_{2}}^{-}(S,T) is of the form (idTโŠ ฮถ)โ‹…(ฮฑโŠ idโˆ’1)(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T}\boxtimes\zeta)\cdot(\alpha\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{-1}) for some ฮถ\zeta admissible class of paths starting at โˆ’1-1 and ฮฑ\alpha a braid starting at SS.

Every element of Lฮพ1+โ€‹(S,T)L_{\xi_{1}}^{+}(S,T) is of the form ([mi+โ†’1]โŠ idT)โ‹…ฮฑ([m_{i}^{+}\to 1]\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T})\cdot\alpha for some braid ฮฑ\alpha starting at SS.

It follows that every element of (Rฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹Lฮพ1+)n(R_{\xi_{2}}^{-}L_{\xi_{1}}^{+})^{n} is of the form

(idโŠ ฮถ1)โˆง([mi+โ†’1]โŠ id)โˆงโ‹ฏโˆง(idโŠ ฮถnโˆ’1)โˆง([mi+nโˆ’2+โ†’1]โŠ id)โˆง(idโŠ ฮถn)โˆงฮฑ(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\zeta_{1})\wedge([m_{i}^{+}\to 1]\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\wedge\cdots\wedge(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\zeta_{n-1})\wedge([m_{i+n-2}^{+}\to 1]\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\wedge(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\zeta_{n})\wedge\alpha

for some iโ‰ฅ0i\geq 0 and ฮถr\zeta_{r} an admissible class of paths starting at โˆ’1-1 for 1โ‰คrโ‰คn1\leq r\leq n. The image by ฮผn\mu_{n} of such an element is

(([mi+rโˆ’1+โ†’r])1โ‰คrโ‰คnโˆ’1โŠ id)โˆ˜ฮฑ)โŠ ฮถ1โŠ (ฮถ2โˆ˜[โˆ’2โ†’โˆ’1])โŠ โ‹ฏโŠ (ฮถnโˆ˜[โˆ’nโ†’โˆ’1]).\bigl(([m_{i+r-1}^{+}\to r])_{1\leq r\leq n-1}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\circ\alpha)\boxtimes\zeta_{1}\boxtimes(\zeta_{2}\circ[-2\to-1])\boxtimes\cdots\boxtimes(\zeta_{n}\circ[-n\to-1]).

It follows that ฮผn\mu_{n} is injective, hence it induces an isomorphism (Rฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹Lฮพ1+)nโ†’โˆผCn(R_{\xi_{2}}^{-}L_{\xi_{1}}^{+})^{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C_{n}.

Let LL be the image of ฮปโˆ˜(T1โŠ—1โˆ’1โŠ—T1)\lambda\circ(T_{1}\otimes 1-1\otimes T_{1}). We have ฮฝ2=ฮผ2โˆ˜ฮป\nu_{2}=\mu_{2}\circ\lambda. It follows that ฮผ2โ€‹(L)=(T1โŠ—1โˆ’1โŠ—T1)โ€‹(D2)\mu_{2}(L)=(T_{1}\otimes 1-1\otimes T_{1})(D_{2}), since D2D_{2} is the image of ฮฝ2\nu_{2} (Lemma 8.2.5). The theorem follows now from Corollary 8.2.16 and Theorem 8.2.1. โˆŽ

0PDS

Remark 8.2.19. Consider ZZ the singular curve quotient of oriented ๐‘{\mathbf{R}} by the identification of two points. Take MM to be the single exceptional point of ZZ. The construction above applied to ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z){\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z) gives a category where going twice around the circle, avoiding the loop, is non-zero (cf picture below), while it is not represented by a smooth path in ZฮพZ_{\xi}. Theorem 8.2.18 does not hold because MM is too small.

[Uncaptioned image]

8.2.7. Functoriality

Consider f:Zโ†’Zโ€ฒf:Z\to Z^{\prime} a morphism of curves and assume fโˆ˜ฮพ1+f\circ\xi_{1}^{+} is outgoing for Zโ€ฒZ^{\prime} and fโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’f\circ\xi_{2}^{-} is incoming for Zโ€ฒZ^{\prime}.

The morphism ff extends uniquely to a morphism of curves f:Zฮพโ†’Zfโˆ˜ฮพโ€ฒf:Z_{\xi}\to Z^{\prime}_{f\circ\xi}.

The functor f:๐’ฎf,Mโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ†’๐’ฎfโก(M)โˆ™โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ)f:{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f,M}(Z)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}) can be equipped with a structure of morphism of 22-representations Lฮพ1+โˆ™โ†’Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+โˆ™L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}\to L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet} and of morphism of 22-representations Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ†’Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}\to R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet} (Lemma 8.1.7 and ยง8.1.5), and it induces a differential pointed functor (cf ยง4.3.4)

ฮ”โ€‹f:ฮ”Rฮพ2โˆ’,Lฮพ1+,ฮปโ€‹๐’ฎf,Mโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ†’ฮ”Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’,Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+,ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹๐’ฎfโก(M)โˆ™โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ),\Delta f:\Delta_{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f,M}(Z)\to\Delta_{R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda^{\prime}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}),

where ฮปโ€ฒ\lambda^{\prime} is the analog of the map ฮป\lambda for Zโ€ฒZ^{\prime}.

We obtain a commutative diagram of differential pointed functors

(8.2.1) ฮ”Rฮพ2โˆ’,Lฮพ1+,ฮปโ€‹๐’ฎf,Mโˆ™โ€‹(Z)\textstyle{\Delta_{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f,M}(Z)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฮž\scriptstyle{\Xi}ฮ”โ€‹f\scriptstyle{\Delta f}๐’ฎf,Mโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\textstyle{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f,M}(Z_{\xi})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}ฮ”Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’,Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+,ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹๐’ฎfโก(M)โˆ™โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ)\textstyle{\Delta_{R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda^{\prime}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฮž\scriptstyle{\Xi}๐’ฎfโก(M)โˆ™โ€‹(Zfโˆ˜ฮพโ€ฒ)\textstyle{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}_{f\circ\xi})}

Assume f|Zf_{|Z} is strict. It follows that ff is strict. The functor f#:addโก(๐’ฎfโก(M)โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ))โ†’addโก(๐’ฎMโ€‹(Z))f^{\#}:\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}))\to\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)) can be equipped with a structure of morphism of 22-representations Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+โ†’Lฮพ1+L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}}\to L_{\xi_{1}^{+}} and of morphism of 22-representations Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’โ†’Rฮพ2โˆ’R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}}\to R_{\xi_{2}^{-}} (Lemma 8.1.4 and ยง8.1.5), and it induces a differential functor (cf ยง4.3.4)

ฮ”โ€‹f#:ฮ”Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’,Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+,ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹addโก(๐’ฎfโก(M)โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ))โ†’ฮ”Rฮพ2โˆ’,Lฮพ1+,ฮปโ€‹addโก(๐’ฎMโ€‹(Z)).\Delta f^{\#}:\Delta_{R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda^{\prime}}\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}))\to\Delta_{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda}\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)).

We obtain a commutative diagram of differential functors commuting with coproducts

(8.2.2) ฮ”Rฮพ2โˆ’,Lฮพ1+,ฮปโ€‹addโก(๐’ฎMโ€‹(Z))\textstyle{\Delta_{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda}\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฮž\scriptstyle{\Xi}addโก(๐’ฎMโ€‹(Zฮพ))\textstyle{\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}))}ฮ”Rfโˆ˜ฮพ2โˆ’,Lfโˆ˜ฮพ1+,ฮปโ€ฒโ€‹addโก(๐’ฎfโก(M)โ€‹(Zโ€ฒ))\textstyle{\Delta_{R_{f\circ\xi_{2}^{-}},L_{f\circ\xi_{1}^{+}},\lambda^{\prime}}\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ฮž\scriptstyle{\Xi}ฮ”โ€‹f#\scriptstyle{\Delta f^{\#}}OPENaddโก(๐’ฎfโก(M)โ€‹(Zfโˆ˜ฮพโ€ฒ)))\textstyle{\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}_{f\circ\xi})))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f#\scriptstyle{f^{\#}}

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2