ScalingStacks

0PDC

Proof. If α∈Bn\alpha\in B_{n}, then α∼0\alpha\sim 0 and we are done. Assume now α∈An\alpha\in A_{n}. We proceed by induction on M(α)=12|L(α|(−n,−1))|M(\alpha)=\frac{1}{2}|L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})| and then on N(α)=n−max{i|[−n+i−1→−n+i]∈L(α)}N(\alpha)=n-\max\{i\ |\ [-n+i-1\to-n+i]\in L(\alpha)\} if M⁡(α)≠0M(\alpha)\neq 0 to show that there exists σ∈En\sigma\in E_{n} with α∼σ\alpha\sim\sigma.

If M⁡(α)=0M(\alpha)=0, then α∈En\alpha\in E_{n} and we are done. Assume now M⁡(α)>0M(\alpha)>0. By Lemma 8.2.4, there are i∈(1,n−1)i\in(1,n-1) and β∈Gn\beta\in G_{n} such that α=β​Ti\alpha=\beta T_{i}, and we choose ii maximal with this property, so that N⁡(α)=n−iN(\alpha)=n-i. We have α∼Ti​β\alpha\sim T_{i}\beta. If Ti​β∈BnT_{i}\beta\in B_{n} then we are done. We assume now Ti​β∉BnT_{i}\beta{\not\in}B_{n}. We have L(β|(−n,−1))=L(α|(−n,−1))∖{[−n+i−1→−n+i],[−n+i→−n+i−1]}L(\beta_{|(-n,-1)})=L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})\setminus\{[-n+i-1\to-n+i],[-n+i\to-n+i-1]\}.

If β−1​({i,i+1})⊄(−n,−1)\beta^{-1}(\{i,i+1\}){\not\subset}(-n,-1), then L(Tiβ|(−n,−1))=L(β|(−n,−1))L(T_{i}\beta_{|(-n,-1)})=L(\beta_{|(-n,-1)}), hence M⁡(Ti​β)<M⁡(α)M(T_{i}\beta)<M(\alpha). By induction, there is σ∈En\sigma\in E_{n} with Ti​β∼σT_{i}\beta\sim\sigma, hence α∼σ\alpha\sim\sigma.

Assume now there are j,k∈(1,n)j,k\in(1,n) with β⁡(−n+j−1)=i\beta(-n+j-1)=i and β⁡(−n+k−1)=i+1\beta(-n+k-1)=i+1. Since Ti​β≠0T_{i}\beta\neq 0, we have j<kj<k. Since β∈An\beta\in A_{n}, we have j>ij>i and k>i+1k>i+1. We have M⁡(Ti​β)≤M⁡(β)+1=M⁡(α)M(T_{i}\beta)\leq M(\beta)+1=M(\alpha). On the other hand, [j→k]∈L(Tiβ)[j\to k]\in L(T_{i}\beta) (cf Lemma 7.4.20), hence N⁡(Ti​β)<N⁡(α)N(T_{i}\beta)<N(\alpha). We conclude by induction.

The case of FnF_{n} follows by applying Remark 8.2.6. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2