ScalingStacks

5.3.2. Left dual

Let BB be a differential algebra endowed with two 22-representations (E1,τ1)(E_{1},\tau_{1}) and (E2,τ2)(E_{2},\tau_{2}), the first of which is right finite.

We consider the data of σ∈Z​Hom⁡(E2​E1,E1​E2)\sigma\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(E_{2}E_{1},E_{1}E_{2}) such that the diagrams (4.3.1) commute.

We define

(5.3.1) λ:E1∨​E2→∙η1E1∨​E2​E1​E1∨→E1∨​σ​E1∨E1∨​E1​E2​E1∨→ε1∙E2​E1∨.\lambda:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\xrightarrow{\bullet\eta_{1}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma E_{1}^{\vee}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{1}\bullet}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}.

Let A=Δσ​(B)=Δλ′​(B)A=\Delta_{\sigma}(B)=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}(B). This is the graded quotient of the tensor algebra TB​(E1∨​E2)T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}) by the ideal generated by the image of the composition

(E1∨)2​E22→τ1​E22−(E1∨)2​τ2(E1∨)2​E22→E1∨​λ​E2(E1∨​E2)2.(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}-(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}.

The algebra AA is generated by A0=BA^{0}=B and A1=E1∨​E2A^{1}=E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}.

Let LL be a differential BB-module. The data of a structure of AA-module on LL extending the action of BB is the same as the data of a morphism of BB-modules ς:E1∨​E2⊗BL→L\varsigma:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}L\to L such that d⁡(ς)=0d(\varsigma)=0 and the following diagram commutes

(5.3.2) (E1∨)2​E22​L\textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1∨​λ​E2\scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}}(E1∨​E2)2​L\textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1∨​E2​ς\scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma}E1∨​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ς\scriptstyle{\varsigma}(E1∨)2​E22​L\textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}τ1​E22\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}}(E1∨)2​τ2\scriptstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}}L\textstyle{L}(E1∨)2​E22​L\textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1∨​λ​E2\scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}}(E1∨​E2)2​L\textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1∨​E2​ς\scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma}E1∨​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ς\scriptstyle{\varsigma}

This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories) between differential AA-modules and pairs consisting of a differential BB-module LL and a map ς\varsigma as above.

Consider the adjunction isomorphism

ϕ:HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)→∼HomB⁡(E1∨​E2​L,L)\phi:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L)

Let π∈Z​HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)\pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L) and let ς=ϕ⁡(π)∈Z​HomB⁡(E1∨​E2​L,L)\varsigma=\phi(\pi)\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L). The commutativity of the diagram (5.3.2) is equivalent to the commutativity of the diagram

(5.3.3) E22​L\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​π\scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi}τ2\scriptstyle{\tau_{2}}E2​E1​L\textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}E1​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1​π\scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi}E12​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}τ1\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}}E22​L\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​π\scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi}E2​E1​L\textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}E1​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1​π\scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi}E12​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L}

This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories) between differential AA-modules and pairs [L,π][L,\pi] where LL is a differential BB-module, π∈Z​HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)\pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L) and the diagram (5.3.3) commutes. We have obtained the following lemma.

0P6V

Lemma 5.3.2. The construction (m,π)↦[m,π](m,\pi)\mapsto[m,\pi] defines an isomorphism of differential categories Φ:Δσ​(B​−diff)→(Δσ​B)​−diff\Phi:\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\to(\Delta_{\sigma}B)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits.

We will show that the structure of 22-representation on Δσ​(B​−diff)\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) comes from a structure of 22-representation on Δσ​B\Delta_{\sigma}B, when σ\sigma is invertible.

0P6W

Remark 5.3.3. The map ς\varsigma, the relations it is required to satisfy, and the relation ς=ϕ⁡(π)\varsigma=\phi(\pi) are described graphically as:

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2