5.3.2. Left dual
Let B B be a differential algebra endowed with two 2 2 -representations
( E 1 , τ 1 ) (E_{1},\tau_{1}) and ( E 2 , τ 2 ) (E_{2},\tau_{2}) , the first of which is right finite.
We consider the data
of σ ∈ Z Hom ( E 2 E 1 , E 1 E 2 ) \sigma\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(E_{2}E_{1},E_{1}E_{2}) such that the diagrams (4.3.1 )
commute.
We define
(5.3.1)
λ : E 1 ∨ E 2 → ∙ η 1 E 1 ∨ E 2 E 1 E 1 ∨ → E 1 ∨ σ E 1 ∨ E 1 ∨ E 1 E 2 E 1 ∨ → ε 1 ∙ E 2 E 1 ∨ . \lambda:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\xrightarrow{\bullet\eta_{1}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma E_{1}^{\vee}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{1}\bullet}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}.
Let A = Δ σ ( B ) = Δ λ ′ ( B ) A=\Delta_{\sigma}(B)=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}(B) . This is the graded quotient
of the tensor algebra T B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}) by
the ideal generated by the image of the composition
( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 → τ 1 E 2 2 − ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 τ 2 ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 → E 1 ∨ λ E 2 ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 . (E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}-(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}.
The algebra A A is generated by A 0 = B A^{0}=B and A 1 = E 1 ∨ E 2 A^{1}=E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2} .
Let L L be a differential B B -module. The data
of a structure of A A -module on L L extending the action of B B
is the same as the data of a morphism of
B B -modules
ς : E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B L → L \varsigma:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}L\to L
such that d ( ς ) = 0 d(\varsigma)=0 and the following diagram commutes
(5.3.2)
( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ λ E 2 \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}} ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ E 2 ς \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma} E 1 ∨ E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ς \scriptstyle{\varsigma} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} τ 1 E 2 2 \scriptstyle{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 τ 2 \scriptstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}} L \textstyle{L} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ λ E 2 \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}} ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ E 2 ς \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma} E 1 ∨ E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ς \scriptstyle{\varsigma}
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories)
between differential A A -modules and pairs consisting of a
differential B B -module L L and a map ς \varsigma as above.
Consider the adjunction isomorphism
ϕ : Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) → ∼ Hom B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 L , L ) \phi:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L)
Let π ∈ Z Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) \pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)
and let ς = ϕ ( π ) ∈ Z Hom B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 L , L ) \varsigma=\phi(\pi)\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L) .
The commutativity of the diagram (5.3.2 ) is equivalent to
the commutativity of the diagram
(5.3.3)
E 2 2 L \textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 2 π \scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi} τ 2 \scriptstyle{\tau_{2}} E 2 E 1 L \textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} σ \scriptstyle{\sigma} E 1 E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 π \scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi} E 1 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} τ 1 \scriptstyle{\tau_{1}} E 2 2 L \textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 2 π \scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi} E 2 E 1 L \textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} σ \scriptstyle{\sigma} E 1 E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 π \scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi} E 1 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L}
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories)
between differential A A -modules and pairs [ L , π ] [L,\pi] where
L L is a differential B B -module,
π ∈ Z Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) \pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)
and the diagram (5.3.3 ) commutes.
We have obtained the following lemma.
0P6V
Lemma 5.3.2 . The construction ( m , π ) ↦ [ m , π ] (m,\pi)\mapsto[m,\pi] defines an isomorphism of
differential categories Φ : Δ σ ( B − diff ) → ( Δ σ B ) − diff \Phi:\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\to(\Delta_{\sigma}B)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
We will show that the structure of 2 2 -representation on
Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) comes from a structure of 2 2 -representation
on Δ σ B \Delta_{\sigma}B , when σ \sigma is invertible.