ScalingStacks

8.3.4. Matching of extended action

Recall that E′E^{\prime} is the restriction of the (𝒮M​(Zξ),𝒮M​(Zξ))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}))-bimodule E∘(Ξ′−1⊗Ξ′−1)E\circ(\Xi^{\prime-1}\otimes\Xi^{\prime-1}).

We show here that the previous isomorphism is functorial in T∈𝒮M​(Zξ)T\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}). Consider the diagram

(8.3.1) Rξ2−​(T,−)⊗Lξ1+​(−,U)⊗E⁡(U,S)\textstyle{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-,U)\otimes E(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}w\scriptstyle{w}Ξ⊗(f2,f1)\scriptstyle{\Xi\otimes(f_{2},f_{1})}E⁡(T,S)\textstyle{E(T,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(f2,f1)\scriptstyle{(f_{2},f_{1})}Hom𝒮⁡(Zξ)⁡(T,U)⊗Rξ−​(U,S)\textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})}(T,U)\otimes R_{\xi^{-}}(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}action\scriptstyle{\mathrm{action}}Rξ−​(T,S)\textstyle{R_{\xi^{-}}(T,S)}

where w=(w11w120w22)w=\left(\begin{matrix}w_{11}&w_{12}\\ 0&w_{22}\end{matrix}\right) (cf §5.4.2) with

w11=(Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ​Hom))∘(τ​Lξ1+​Hom)∘(Rξ2−​λ​Hom)w_{11}=(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)
w12=Rξ2−​ε​Homw_{12}=R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits
w22=(Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ​Hom))∘(σ​Lξ1+​Hom)∘(Rξ2−​ρ​Hom).w_{22}=(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits).
0PE0

Lemma 8.3.5. The diagram (8.3.1) is commutative.

0PE1

Proof. Note first that all the maps of the diagram are functorial with respect to S∈𝒮M​(Zξ)S\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

∙\bullet\ Let γ∈Rξ2−​(U,S)\gamma\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(U,S), β∈Lξ1+​(V,U)\beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α∈Rξ2−​(T,V)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V). We will show that

(8.3.2) action∘(Ξ⊗f2)​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λ​(α⊗β⊗γ).\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

Since γ=(id⊠γξ2−​(−1))⋅γ|S\gamma=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot\gamma_{|S} and since action∘(Ξ⊗f2)\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2}) and f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λf_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda are morphisms of 𝒮M​(Z)opp{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}-modules, we can assume γ|S=id\gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We have α⊗β=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗(α|V⊠idξ1+​(1)⋅β)\alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|V}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)}\cdot\beta), hence we can assume α|V=id\alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We can also assume that β⊗γ≠0\beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0.

We have

action∘(Ξ⊗f2)(α⊗β⊗γ)=(idV⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta
⋅(idS⊠(γξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)]))\cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes(\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)
=δ1β|S∖χ(β)−1(ξ1+(1))⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βχ​(β)−1​(ξ1+​(1)))=\delta_{1}\beta_{|S\setminus\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))})
⊠((β∘γ)ξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])\boxtimes\bigl((\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)

where δ1=δi⁡(αξ2−​(−1),(β∘γ)ξ2−​(−1))=0\delta_{1}=\delta_{i(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)},(\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})=0}. On the other hand, we have

f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λ​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
=f2∘Rξ2−(mult∘Ξ)∘τLξ1+(α⊗((βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1))⊠id)⊗β|S)\displaystyle=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=δ1f2∘Rξ2−(mult∘Ξ)((id⊠(βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1)))⊗(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗β|S)\displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=δ1f2((id⊠(βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1)))⊗((id⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β|S))\displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\biggl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)\biggr)
=δ1((βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1))⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠((id⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β|S)\displaystyle=\delta_{1}\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)\boxtimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=action∘(Ξ⊗f2)​(α⊗β⊗γ).\displaystyle=\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

We deduce that (8.3.2) holds.

∙\bullet\ Let γ∈Rξ1−​(U,S)\gamma\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(U,S), β∈Lξ1+​(V,U)\beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α∈Rξ2−​(T,V)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V). We will show that

(8.3.3) action∘(Ξ⊗f1)​(α⊗β⊗γ)=(f1∘Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ)∘σ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​ρ+f2∘Rξ2−​ε)​(α⊗β⊗γ).\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho+f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\bigr)(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

As before, we can assume γ|S=id\gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits, α|V=id\alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and β⊗γ≠0\beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0. We put u1=χ⁡(γ)​(ξ1−​(−1))u_{1}=\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)) and u2=χ​(β)−1​(ξ1+​(1))u_{2}=\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1)).

We have

action∘(Ξ⊗f1)(α⊗β⊗γ)=(idV⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β⋅(idS⊠γξ1−​(−1))\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta\cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\bigr)
={δ2(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠β|S if ​u1=u2δ3(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βu2)⊠(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠β|S∖{u2} otherwise=\begin{cases}\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}&\text{ if }u_{1}=u_{2}\\ \delta_{3}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}&\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}

where

  • •

    δ2=1\delta_{2}=1 if γξ1−​(−1)​(1−)=ι⁡(βu2​(0+))\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}(1-)=\iota(\beta_{u_{2}}(0+)) and δ2=0\delta_{2}=0 otherwise

  • •

    δ3=1\delta_{3}=1 if β|U⋅(idS⊠γξ1−​(−1))≠0\beta_{|U}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ3=0\delta_{3}=0 otherwise.

We have

f2∘Rξ2−ε(α⊗β⊗γ)=δ2f2(α⊗β|S)=δ2(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠β|S.f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\delta_{2}f_{2}(\alpha\otimes\beta_{|S})=\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}.

We have

f1∘Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ)∘σ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​ρ​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
=δ3′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)∘σLξ1+(α⊗(β|U∖{u2}⋅(γξ1−​(−1)⊠id))⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)∘σLξ1+(α⊗(β|S∖{u2}⊠(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1)))⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)(((βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠id)⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠β|S∖{u2})⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl((\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}})\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βu2)⊠β|S∖{u2}\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}

where

  • •

    δ3′=1\delta^{\prime}_{3}=1 if u1≠u2u_{1}\neq u_{2} and (idu1⊠βu2)⋅(γξ1−​(−1)⊠idu2)≠0(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{1}}\boxtimes\beta_{u_{2}})\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{2}})\neq 0 and δ3′=0\delta^{\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise

  • •

    δ3′′=1\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=1 if β|U∖{u2}⋅(idS∖{u2}⊠γξ1−​(−1))≠0\beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ3′′=0\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise.

Since δ3=δ3′​δ3′′\delta_{3}=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}, we deduce that (8.3.3) holds and the lemma follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2