Recall that is the restriction of the -bimodule
.
We show here that the previous isomorphism is functorial in
. Consider the diagram
| (8.3.1) |
|
|
|
where
(cf §5.4.2) with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0PE1
Proof. Note first that all the maps of the diagram are functorial with respect to
.
Let , and .
We will show that
| (8.3.2) |
|
|
|
Since and since
and are morphisms of -modules, we can assume .
We have , hence we can assume .
We can also assume that .
We have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where
. On the other
hand, we have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We deduce that (8.3.2) holds.
Let , and .
We will show that
| (8.3.3) |
|
|
|
As before, we can assume , and .
We put and .
|
|
|
|
|
|
where
- •
if and otherwise
- •
if and otherwise.
We have
|
|
|
We have
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where
- •
if and
and otherwise
- •
if and otherwise.
Since , we deduce that (8.3.3) holds and the lemma follows.
∎