ScalingStacks

7.4.10. Subcurves

Let ZZ be a curve.

Let SS and TT be two finite subsets of ZZ. Let S1S_{1} be a subset of SS and S2=S∖S1S_{2}=S\setminus S_{1}. Let T1T_{1} be a subset of TT and T2=T∖T1T_{2}=T\setminus T_{1}. Let Φi∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(Si,Ti)\Phi_{i}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{i},T_{i}). We define Φ=Φ1⊠Φ2∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S,T)\Phi=\Phi_{1}\boxtimes\Phi_{2}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S,T) by Φs=(Φi)s\Phi_{s}=(\Phi_{i})_{s} when s∈Sis\in S_{i}. This gives an injective map of pointed sets

Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S1,T1)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S2,T2)↪Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S,T).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{1},T_{1})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{2},T_{2})\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S,T).

Note that this is not compatible with composition in general. We obtain an isomorphism of pointed sets

⋁T1′⊂T|T1′|=|S1|(Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S1,T1′)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S2,T∖T1′))→∼Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S,T).\bigvee_{\begin{subarray}{c}T^{\prime}_{1}\subset T\\ |T^{\prime}_{1}|=|S_{1}|\end{subarray}}\bigl(\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{1},T^{\prime}_{1})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{2},T\setminus T^{\prime}_{1})\bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S,T).

We have corresponding morphisms of 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-modules between Hom\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits-spaces in 𝒮⁡(Z){\mathcal{S}}(Z). Note these are not compatible with the differential.

Assume S2=T2S_{2}=T_{2}. The map Φ1↦Φ1⊠idS2\Phi_{1}\mapsto\Phi_{1}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S_{2}} defines a canonical embedding of pointed sets (not compatible with the differential nor the multiplication in general)

Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S1,T1)↪Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S1⊔S2,T1⊔S2).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{1},T_{1})\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S_{1}\sqcup S_{2},T_{1}\sqcup S_{2}).

Given Z1Z_{1} and Z2Z_{2} two disjoint closed subcurves of ZZ, we obtain a faithful differential pointed functor

𝒮∙​(Z1)∧𝒮∙​(Z2)→𝒮∙​(Z),(S1,S2)↦S1⊔S2.{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{1})\wedge{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{2})\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z),\ (S_{1},S_{2})\mapsto S_{1}\sqcup S_{2}.

Let Z1,…,ZrZ_{1},\ldots,Z_{r} be the connected components of ZZ. The construction above induces an isomorphism of differential pointed categories (cf (7.4.2))

(7.4.5) 𝒮∙​(Z1)∧⋯∧𝒮∙​(Zr)→∼𝒮∙​(Z),(S1,…,Sr)↦S1⊔⋯⊔Sr.{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{1})\wedge\cdots\wedge{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z),\ (S_{1},\ldots,S_{r})\mapsto S_{1}\sqcup\cdots\sqcup S_{r}.

Let us record a case where the tensor product construction ⊠\boxtimes is compatible with composition and the differential in the following immediate lemma.

0PC3

Lemma 7.4.36. Let MM be a subset of ZZ and let Z′Z^{\prime} be a subcurve of ZZ. Assume that given an admissible homotopy class of paths ζ\zeta in ZZ with endpoints in MM, there is an admissible path γ\gamma in ζ\zeta contained in Z−Z′Z-Z^{\prime}. There is a faithful functor of differential pointed categories

𝒮M∙​(Z)∧𝒮∙​(Z′)\displaystyle{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)\wedge{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime}) →𝒮M∪Z′∙​(Z)\displaystyle\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M\cup Z^{\prime}}(Z)
(S,T)\displaystyle(S,T) ↦S⊔T\displaystyle\mapsto S\sqcup T
(α,β)\displaystyle(\alpha,\beta) ↦α⊠β=(α⊠id)⋅(id⊠β)=(id⊠β)⋅(α⊠id).\displaystyle\mapsto\alpha\boxtimes\beta=(\alpha\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta)=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta)\cdot(\alpha\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2