5.3.1. Algebra
Let B B be a differential algebra endowed with two 2 2 -representations
( F 1 , τ 1 ) (F_{1},\tau_{1}) and ( E 2 , τ 2 ) (E_{2},\tau_{2}) together with a closed morphism
λ : F 1 E 2 → E 2 F 1 \lambda:F_{1}E_{2}\to E_{2}F_{1} such that
the diagrams (4.2.1 ) commute.
We define the algebra
A = Δ λ ′ ( B ) A=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}(B) as the quotient of the tensor
algebra T B ( F 1 E 2 ) T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2})
by the two-sided ideal generated by the image of the composition
F 1 2 E 2 2 → τ 1 E 2 2 − F 1 2 τ 2 F 1 2 E 2 2 → F 1 λ E 2 ( F 1 E 2 ) 2 . F_{1}^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}-F_{1}^{2}\tau_{2}}F_{1}^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{F_{1}\lambda E_{2}}(F_{1}E_{2})^{2}.
We have A 0 = B A^{0}=B and A 1 = F 1 E 2 A^{1}=F_{1}E_{2} .
Let B ′ B^{\prime} be a differential algebra endowed with two 2 2 -representations
( F 1 ′ , τ 1 ′ ) (F^{\prime}_{1},\tau^{\prime}_{1}) and ( E 2 ′ , τ 2 ′ ) (E^{\prime}_{2},\tau^{\prime}_{2}) together with a closed morphism
λ ′ : F 1 ′ E 2 ′ → E 2 ′ F 1 ′ \lambda^{\prime}:F^{\prime}_{1}E^{\prime}_{2}\to E^{\prime}_{2}F^{\prime}_{1} such that the analogs of
the diagrams (4.2.1 ) commute. Let A ′ = Δ λ ′ ′ ( B ′ ) A^{\prime}=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda^{\prime}}(B^{\prime}) .
Let P P be a ( B ′ , B ) (B^{\prime},B) -bimodule and
φ 1 : P F 1 → ∼ F 1 ′ P \varphi_{1}:PF_{1}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}F^{\prime}_{1}P and φ 2 : P E 2 → ∼ E 2 ′ P \varphi_{2}:PE_{2}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}E^{\prime}_{2}P be two closed isomorphisms
of bimodules such that ( P , φ 1 ) (P,\varphi_{1}) and ( P , φ 2 ) (P,\varphi_{2}) are morphisms of
2 2 -representations and such that
λ ′ P ∘ F 1 ′ φ 2 ∘ φ 1 E 2 = E 2 ′ φ 1 ∘ φ 2 F 1 ∘ P λ : P F 1 E 2 → E 2 ′ F 1 ′ P . \lambda^{\prime}P\circ F^{\prime}_{1}\varphi_{2}\circ\varphi_{1}E_{2}=E^{\prime}_{2}\varphi_{1}\circ\varphi_{2}F_{1}\circ P\lambda:PF_{1}E_{2}\to E^{\prime}_{2}F^{\prime}_{1}P.
The isomorphism F 1 ′ φ 2 ∘ φ 1 E 2 : P F 1 E 2 → ∼ F 1 ′ E 2 ′ P F^{\prime}_{1}\varphi_{2}\circ\varphi_{1}E_{2}:PF_{1}E_{2}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}F^{\prime}_{1}E_{2}^{\prime}P induces an
isomorphism of ( B ′ , B ) (B^{\prime},B) -bimodules f : P ⊗ B T B ( F 1 E 2 ) → ∼ T B ′ ( F 1 ′ E 2 ′ ) ⊗ B ′ P f:P\otimes_{B}T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}T_{B^{\prime}}(F^{\prime}_{1}E^{\prime}_{2})\otimes_{B^{\prime}}P . This isomorphism f f endows the right T B ( F 1 E 2 ) T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2}) -module
P ⊗ B T B ( F 1 E 2 ) P\otimes_{B}T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2}) with a commuting left action of T B ′ ( F 1 ′ E 2 ′ ) T_{B^{\prime}}(F^{\prime}_{1}E^{\prime}_{2}) .
The isomorphism f f induces an isomorphism
P ⊗ B T B ( F 1 E 2 ) ⊗ T B ( F 1 E 2 ) A → ∼ A ′ ⊗ T B ′ ( F 1 ′ E 2 ′ ) T B ′ ( F 1 ′ E 2 ′ ) ⊗ B ′ P . P\otimes_{B}T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2})\otimes_{T_{B}(F_{1}E_{2})}A\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}A^{\prime}\otimes_{T_{B^{\prime}}(F^{\prime}_{1}E^{\prime}_{2})}T_{B^{\prime}}(F^{\prime}_{1}E^{\prime}_{2})\otimes_{B^{\prime}}P.
So, we obtain a structure of ( A ′ , A ) (A^{\prime},A) -bimodule on P ⊗ B A P\otimes_{B}A .
5.3.2. Left dual
Let B B be a differential algebra endowed with two 2 2 -representations
( E 1 , τ 1 ) (E_{1},\tau_{1}) and ( E 2 , τ 2 ) (E_{2},\tau_{2}) , the first of which is right finite.
We consider the data
of σ ∈ Z Hom ( E 2 E 1 , E 1 E 2 ) \sigma\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(E_{2}E_{1},E_{1}E_{2}) such that the diagrams (4.3.1 )
commute.
We define
(5.3.1)
λ : E 1 ∨ E 2 → ∙ η 1 E 1 ∨ E 2 E 1 E 1 ∨ → E 1 ∨ σ E 1 ∨ E 1 ∨ E 1 E 2 E 1 ∨ → ε 1 ∙ E 2 E 1 ∨ . \lambda:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\xrightarrow{\bullet\eta_{1}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma E_{1}^{\vee}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{1}\bullet}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}.
Let A = Δ σ ( B ) = Δ λ ′ ( B ) A=\Delta_{\sigma}(B)=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}(B) . This is the graded quotient
of the tensor algebra T B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}) by
the ideal generated by the image of the composition
( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 → τ 1 E 2 2 − ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 τ 2 ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 → E 1 ∨ λ E 2 ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 . (E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}-(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}.
The algebra A A is generated by A 0 = B A^{0}=B and A 1 = E 1 ∨ E 2 A^{1}=E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2} .
Let L L be a differential B B -module. The data
of a structure of A A -module on L L extending the action of B B
is the same as the data of a morphism of
B B -modules
ς : E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B L → L \varsigma:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}L\to L
such that d ( ς ) = 0 d(\varsigma)=0 and the following diagram commutes
(5.3.2)
( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ λ E 2 \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}} ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ E 2 ς \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma} E 1 ∨ E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ς \scriptstyle{\varsigma} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} τ 1 E 2 2 \scriptstyle{\tau_{1}E_{2}^{2}} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 τ 2 \scriptstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}\tau_{2}} L \textstyle{L} ( E 1 ∨ ) 2 E 2 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee})^{2}E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ λ E 2 \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda E_{2}} ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) 2 L \textstyle{(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 ∨ E 2 ς \scriptstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\varsigma} E 1 ∨ E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ς \scriptstyle{\varsigma}
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories)
between differential A A -modules and pairs consisting of a
differential B B -module L L and a map ς \varsigma as above.
Consider the adjunction isomorphism
ϕ : Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) → ∼ Hom B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 L , L ) \phi:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L)
Let π ∈ Z Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) \pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)
and let ς = ϕ ( π ) ∈ Z Hom B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 L , L ) \varsigma=\phi(\pi)\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L) .
The commutativity of the diagram (5.3.2 ) is equivalent to
the commutativity of the diagram
(5.3.3)
E 2 2 L \textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 2 π \scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi} τ 2 \scriptstyle{\tau_{2}} E 2 E 1 L \textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} σ \scriptstyle{\sigma} E 1 E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 π \scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi} E 1 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} τ 1 \scriptstyle{\tau_{1}} E 2 2 L \textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 2 π \scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi} E 2 E 1 L \textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} σ \scriptstyle{\sigma} E 1 E 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} E 1 π \scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi} E 1 2 L \textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L}
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories)
between differential A A -modules and pairs [ L , π ] [L,\pi] where
L L is a differential B B -module,
π ∈ Z Hom B ( E 2 L , E 1 L ) \pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)
and the diagram (5.3.3 ) commutes.
We have obtained the following lemma.
0P6V
Lemma 5.3.2 . The construction ( m , π ) ↦ [ m , π ] (m,\pi)\mapsto[m,\pi] defines an isomorphism of
differential categories Φ : Δ σ ( B − diff ) → ( Δ σ B ) − diff \Phi:\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\to(\Delta_{\sigma}B)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
We will show that the structure of 2 2 -representation on
Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) comes from a structure of 2 2 -representation
on Δ σ B \Delta_{\sigma}B , when σ \sigma is invertible.
5.3.3. Action
We define the closed morphism of ( B , A ) (B,A) -bimodules
u : E 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 ⊗ B A u:E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\to E_{1}\otimes_{B}A as the adjoint to
the multiplication map E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → A E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\to A .
We define E E as the cone of u u .
We define a morphism of ( B , A ) (B,A) -bimodules
v : E 2 ⊗ B E → E 1 ⊗ B E v:E_{2}\otimes_{B}E\to E_{1}\otimes_{B}E by
v 11 : E 2 2 ⊗ B A → τ 2 ⊗ 1 E 2 2 ⊗ B A → E 2 η 1 ∙ E 2 E 1 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → σ ∙ E 1 E 2 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 E 2 mult . E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A v_{11}:E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\tau_{2}\otimes 1}E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{2}\eta_{1}\bullet}E_{2}E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\sigma\bullet}E_{1}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}E_{2}\mathrm{mult.}}E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A
v 12 : E 2 E 1 ⊗ B A → σ ⊗ 1 E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A v_{12}:E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\sigma\otimes 1}E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A
v 22 : E 2 E 1 ⊗ B A → σ ⊗ 1 E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 η 1 ∙ E 1 2 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → τ 1 ∙ E 1 2 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 2 mult . E 1 2 ⊗ B A v_{22}:E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\sigma\otimes 1}E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}\eta_{1}\bullet}E_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\tau_{1}\bullet}E_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{2}\mathrm{mult.}}E_{1}^{2}\otimes_{B}A
Note that the morphism v v corresponds, by adjunction, to the morphism
w : E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B E → E w:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}E\to E defined as follows
w 11 : E 1 ∨ E 2 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 ∨ τ 2 ⊗ 1 E 1 ∨ E 2 2 ⊗ B A → λ E 2 ⊗ 1 E 2 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → E 2 mult . E 2 ⊗ B A w_{11}:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\tau_{2}\otimes 1}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\lambda E_{2}\otimes 1}E_{2}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{2}\mathrm{mult.}}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A
w 12 : E 1 ∨ E 2 E 1 ⊗ B A → E 1 ∨ σ ∙ E 1 ∨ E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A → ε 1 ∙ E 2 ⊗ B A , w 21 = 0 w_{12}:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma\bullet}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{1}\bullet}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A,\ w_{21}=0
w 22 : E 1 ∨ E 2 E 1 ⊗ B A → E 1 ∨ σ ⊗ 1 E 1 ∨ E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A → ρ 1 ∙ E 1 E 1 ∨ E 2 ⊗ B A → E 1 mult . E 1 ⊗ B A . w_{22}:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma\otimes 1}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\rho_{1}\bullet}E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{1}\mathrm{mult.}}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A.
0P6X
Lemma 5.3.4 . The pair [ E , v ] [E,v] gives E E a structure of differential ( A , A ) (A,A) -bimodule via Lemma
5.3.2 . Furthermore, there is an isomorphism of functors
Φ ℰ → ∼ ( E ⊗ A − ) Φ : Δ σ ( B − diff ) → A − diff \Phi{\mathcal{E}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}(E\otimes_{A}-)\Phi:\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
0P6Y
Proof. The vanishing of d ( v ) 11 d(v)_{11} and d ( v ) 22 d(v)_{22} follows from
d ( τ 1 ) = id d(\tau_{1})=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and d ( τ 2 ) = id d(\tau_{2})=\operatorname{id}\nolimits . The vanishing of d ( v ) 12 d(v)_{12} is
clear. Finally, the vanishing of d ( v ) 21 d(v)_{21} follows from the
commutativity of the diagram (5.3.3 ).
Since d ( v ) = 0 d(v)=0 , we have obtained a structure of differential
( T B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) , A ) (T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}),A) -bimodule on E E .
The object of Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) corresponding to A A via Lemma 5.3.2 is
( A , u ) (A,u) .
We have ℰ ( A , u ) = ( E , v ) {\mathcal{E}}(A,u)=(E,v) , where ℰ {\mathcal{E}} is the endofunctor defining the
2 2 -representation on Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) .
Since ( E , v ) (E,v) is an object
of Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) , it follows that the action of
T B ( E 1 ∨ E 2 ) T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}) on E E factors
through an action of A A . So, E E has a structure of differential
( A , A ) (A,A) -bimodule and we have an isomorphism of functors
Φ ℰ → ∼ ( E ⊗ A − ) Φ : Δ σ ( B − diff ) → A − diff \Phi{\mathcal{E}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}(E\otimes_{A}-)\Phi:\Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\to A\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
∎
We assume now that σ \sigma is invertible.
We define τ \tau an endomorphism of ( B , A ) (B,A) -bimodules of
E 2 2 ⊗ B A ⊕ E 2 E 1 ⊗ B A ⊕ E 1 E 2 ⊗ B A ⊕ E 1 2 ⊗ B A E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}^{2}\otimes_{B}A by
(5.3.4)
τ = ( τ 2 ⊗ 1 0 0 0 0 0 σ − 1 ⊗ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 τ 1 ⊗ 1 ) . \tau=\left(\begin{matrix}\tau_{2}\otimes 1&0&0&0\\
0&0&\sigma^{-1}\otimes 1&0\\
0&0&0&0\\
0&0&0&\tau_{1}\otimes 1\end{matrix}\right).
0P70
Proposition 5.3.6 . The pair ( E , τ ) (E,\tau) defines
a 2 2 -representation on A A and Φ \Phi induces a isomorphism of
2 2 -representations Δ σ ( B − diff ) → ∼ ( Δ σ B ) − diff \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}(\Delta_{\sigma}B)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
If E 2 E_{2} is right finite, then E E is right finite.
0P71
Proof. The fact that τ \tau defines an endomorphism of ( A , A ) (A,A) -bimodules of E 2 E^{2} satisfying
the appropriate relations follows from the fact that it agrees with
the endomorphism of ℰ 2 {\mathcal{E}}^{2} defining the 2 2 -representation on
Δ σ ( B − diff ) \Delta_{\sigma}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) . We deduce that
( E , τ ) (E,\tau) is a 2 2 -representation on A A and Φ \Phi is a morphism
of 2 2 -representations.
Note that E E is finitely generated and projective as a (non-differential)
A opp A^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} -module if E 1 E_{1} and E 2 E_{2} are finitely generated and projective
B opp B^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} -modules.
∎
5.3.4. Tensor product case
Let A 1 A_{1} and A 2 A_{2} be two differential algebras equipped with
structures of 2 2 -representations ( E i , τ i ) (E_{i},\tau_{i}) , i = 1 , 2 i=1,2 .
Let B = A 1 ⊗ A 2 B=A_{1}\otimes A_{2} . It is endowed with commuting
2 2 -representations ( E 1 ⊗ A 2 , τ 1 ⊗ 1 ) (E_{1}\otimes A_{2},\tau_{1}\otimes 1) and
( A 1 ⊗ E 2 , 1 ⊗ τ 2 ) (A_{1}\otimes E_{2},1\otimes\tau_{2}) : the isomorphism σ \sigma is
induced by the swap map E 2 ⊗ E 1 → ∼ E 1 ⊗ E 2 , a 2 ⊗ a 1 ↦ a 1 ⊗ a 2 E_{2}\otimes E_{1}\xrightarrow{\sim}E_{1}\otimes E_{2},\ a_{2}\otimes a_{1}\mapsto a_{1}\otimes a_{2} .
The tensor product identifies ( A 1 − diff ) ⊗ ( A 2 − diff ) (A_{1}\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\otimes(A_{2}\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits) with a full
subcategory of B − diff B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits .
Assume E 1 E_{1} is right finite. The map λ \lambda is an isomorphism.
We put A 1 ⊗ ○ A 2 = Δ λ ′ ( B ) A_{1}{\hskip 1.9919pt\otimes\hskip-10.81218pt\bigcirc}A_{2}=\Delta^{\prime}_{\lambda}(B) . It is
the quotient
of the tensor algebra T A 1 ⊗ A 2 ( E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 ) T_{A_{1}\otimes A_{2}}(E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2}) by
the ideal generated by p τ 2 ( q ) − τ 1 ( p ) q p\tau_{2}(q)-\tau_{1}(p)q for p ∈ ( E 1 ∨ ) ⊗ 2 p\in(E_{1}^{\vee})^{\otimes 2}
and q ∈ ( E 2 ) ⊗ 2 q\in(E_{2})^{\otimes 2} .
The underlying differential module is
A = ⨁ i ≥ 0 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 i . A=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{i}.
The multiplication is defined by
( ( E 1 i ) ∨ ⊗ H i E 2 i ) ⊗ ( ( E 1 j ) ∨ ⊗ H j E 2 j ) → ( E 1 i + j ) ∨ ⊗ H i + j E 2 i + j , ( a 1 ⊗ a 2 ) ⊗ ( b 1 ⊗ b 2 ) ↦ ( a 1 b 1 ) ⊗ ( a 2 b 2 ) . \bigl((E_{1}^{i})^{\vee}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\otimes\bigl((E_{1}^{j})^{\vee}\otimes_{H_{j}}E_{2}^{j}\bigr)\to(E_{1}^{i+j})^{\vee}\otimes_{H_{i+j}}E_{2}^{i+j},\ (a_{1}\otimes a_{2})\otimes(b_{1}\otimes b_{2})\mapsto(a_{1}b_{1})\otimes(a_{2}b_{2}).
We have
E = ( ⨁ i ≥ 0 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( ⨁ i ≥ 0 E 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 i ) η 1 ⊗ 1 . E={\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 106.07784pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-106.07784pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.50006pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\bigl(\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}E_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)}$}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-17.8201pt\raise 23.31715pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.57501pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\eta_{1}\otimes 1}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 68.28625pt\raise 11.38104pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces}}}}}.
The right action of A A on E E is given by right multiplication, while the left action of
E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2} on A 1 ⊗ E 2 ⊕ E 1 ⊗ A 2 ⊂ E A_{1}\otimes E_{2}\oplus E_{1}\otimes A_{2}\subset E is given by
( E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 ) ⊗ A 1 ⊗ A 2 ( A 1 ⊗ E 2 ) → ∼ can E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 2 → 1 ⊗ τ 2 E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 2 (E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2})\otimes_{A_{1}\otimes A_{2}}(A_{1}\otimes E_{2})\xrightarrow[\sim]{{\mathrm{can}}}E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2}^{2}\xrightarrow{1\otimes\tau_{2}}E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2}^{2}
( E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 ) ⊗ A 1 ⊗ A 2 ( E 1 ⊗ A 2 ) → ∼ can E 1 ∨ E 1 ⊗ E 2 → ( ε 1 , ρ 1 ) A 1 ⊗ E 2 ⊕ E 1 E 1 ∨ ⊗ E 2 . (E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2})\otimes_{A_{1}\otimes A_{2}}(E_{1}\otimes A_{2})\xrightarrow[\sim]{{\mathrm{can}}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{1}\otimes E_{2}\xrightarrow{(\varepsilon_{1},\rho_{1})}A_{1}\otimes E_{2}\oplus E_{1}E_{1}^{\vee}\otimes E_{2}.
We have
E 2 = ( ⨁ ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( ⨁ E 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( ⨁ E 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( ⨁ E 1 2 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 i ) η 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ E 2 2 + i η 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ τ 2 E 2 i E 1 η 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ E 2 1 + i ( E 1 ρ 1 ∘ η 1 E 1 ) ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ E 2 1 + i 1 . E^{2}={\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 203.8581pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-203.8581pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.50006pt\hbox{$\textstyle{\bigl(\bigoplus(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(\bigoplus E_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(\bigoplus E_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(\bigoplus E_{1}^{2}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)}$}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-129.51878pt\raise 23.4721pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.30058pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\eta_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes E_{2}^{2+i}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern-68.28625pt\raise 11.38104pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-96.32256pt\raise 42.43112pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.30008pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\eta_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes\tau_{2}E_{2}^{i}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 11.38104pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 64.87904pt\raise 20.62685pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.30058pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{E_{1}\eta_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes E_{2}^{1+i}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 182.09668pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 22.2066pt\raise 42.43163pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.30058pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{(E_{1}\rho_{1}\circ\eta_{1}E_{1})(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes E_{2}^{1+i}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 182.09668pt\raise 11.38104pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 3.54272pt\raise 19.79134pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.25555pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{1}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 56.90521pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces}}}}}.
The endomorphism τ \tau of E 2 E^{2} is given on
( ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( E 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( E 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 E 2 i ) ⊕ ( E 1 2 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ H i E 2 i ) \bigl((E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(E_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(E_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)\oplus\bigl(E_{1}^{2}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes_{H_{i}}E_{2}^{i}\bigr)
by
τ = ( 1 ⊗ τ 2 E 2 i 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 τ 1 ( E 1 ∨ ) i ⊗ 1 ) . \tau=\left(\begin{matrix}1\otimes\tau_{2}E_{2}^{i}&0&0&0\\
0&0&1&0\\
0&0&0&0\\
0&0&0&\tau_{1}(E_{1}^{\vee})^{i}\otimes 1\end{matrix}\right).
This construction provides the differential 2 2 -category of right finite 2 2 -representations
on differential algebras with a monoidal structure.