Definition 5.1.1. A -representation on is the data of a differential -bimodule and of an endomorphism of the -bimodule such that
We say that the -representation is right finite if is finitely generated and projective as a (non-differential) -module.
Let be a differential algebra.
Definition 5.1.1. A -representation on is the data of a differential -bimodule and of an endomorphism of the -bimodule such that
We say that the -representation is right finite if is finitely generated and projective as a (non-differential) -module.
Consider a -representation on . Note that is a differential endofunctor of , and defines an endomorphism of . This gives a structure of -representation on . It restricts to a -representation on if is strictly perfect as a differential -module.
Note that there is a morphism of differential algebras
Let be another differential algebra with a -representation . We define a morphism of -representations from to to be an -bimodule together with a closed isomorphism of -bimodules such that
| (5.1.1) |
Note that such a pair gives rise to a morphism of -representations .
We obtain a differential -category of -representations on differential algebras.
The opposite -representation is the data where , and . Note that coincides with its double dual.
Assume now the -representation is right finite. We have two morphisms of -bimodules and (unit and counit of adjunction). We have a morphism of -bimodules defined as the composition
There is a canonical isomorphism of differential algebras and we still denote by the endomorphism of corresponding to .
We define the left dual -representation on with the bimodule and the endomorphism .
Let be a differential algebra. A lax bi--representation on is the data of
differential -bimodules for
morphisms of differential algebras
morphisms satisfying properties (1) and (2) of §4.2.1.
Consider a lax bi--representation . Note that the functors provide a structure of lax bi--representation on .
We define the differential algebra as the quotient of the tensor algebra by the two-sided ideal generated by , where is the kernel of the composition
We have and is generated by and as an algebra.
Let be an object of . The action of on vanishes on for all , hence defines an action of on . This gives a fully faithful differential functor . If the canonical injective morphism of differential -bimodules
| (5.2.1) |
is a split injection for all , then the functor above is an isomorphism
Let be a differential algebra endowed with two -representations and together with a closed morphism such that the diagrams (4.2.1) commute.
We define the algebra as the quotient of the tensor algebra by the two-sided ideal generated by the image of the composition
We have and .
Let be a differential algebra endowed with two -representations and together with a closed morphism such that the analogs of the diagrams (4.2.1) commute. Let . Let be a -bimodule and and be two closed isomorphisms of bimodules such that and are morphisms of -representations and such that
The isomorphism induces an isomorphism of -bimodules . This isomorphism endows the right -module with a commuting left action of . The isomorphism induces an isomorphism
So, we obtain a structure of -bimodule on .
Remark 5.3.1. The data of and and the relations they are required to satisfy are described graphically as:
![]() |
Let be a differential algebra endowed with two -representations and , the first of which is right finite.
We consider the data of such that the diagrams (4.3.1) commute.
We define
| (5.3.1) |
Let . This is the graded quotient of the tensor algebra by the ideal generated by the image of the composition
The algebra is generated by and .
Let be a differential -module. The data of a structure of -module on extending the action of is the same as the data of a morphism of -modules such that and the following diagram commutes
| (5.3.2) |
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories) between differential -modules and pairs consisting of a differential -module and a map as above.
Consider the adjunction isomorphism
Let and let . The commutativity of the diagram (5.3.2) is equivalent to the commutativity of the diagram
| (5.3.3) |
This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories) between differential -modules and pairs where is a differential -module, and the diagram (5.3.3) commutes. We have obtained the following lemma.
Lemma 5.3.2. The construction defines an isomorphism of differential categories .
We will show that the structure of -representation on comes from a structure of -representation on , when is invertible.
Remark 5.3.3. The map , the relations it is required to satisfy, and the relation are described graphically as:
![]() |
We define the closed morphism of -bimodules as the adjoint to the multiplication map . We define as the cone of .
We define a morphism of -bimodules by
Note that the morphism corresponds, by adjunction, to the morphism defined as follows
Lemma 5.3.4. The pair gives a structure of differential -bimodule via Lemma 5.3.2. Furthermore, there is an isomorphism of functors .
Proof. The vanishing of and follows from and . The vanishing of is clear. Finally, the vanishing of follows from the commutativity of the diagram (5.3.3). Since , we have obtained a structure of differential -bimodule on .
The object of corresponding to via Lemma 5.3.2 is . We have , where is the endofunctor defining the -representation on . Since is an object of , it follows that the action of on factors through an action of . So, has a structure of differential -bimodule and we have an isomorphism of functors . ∎
Remark 5.3.5. The maps and are described graphically as:
![]() |
We assume now that is invertible. We define an endomorphism of -bimodules of by
| (5.3.4) |
Proposition 5.3.6. The pair defines a -representation on and induces a isomorphism of -representations . If is right finite, then is right finite.
Proof. The fact that defines an endomorphism of -bimodules of satisfying the appropriate relations follows from the fact that it agrees with the endomorphism of defining the -representation on . We deduce that is a -representation on and is a morphism of -representations.
Note that is finitely generated and projective as a (non-differential) -module if and are finitely generated and projective -modules. ∎
Remark 5.3.7. Consider three -representations on a differential algebra together with closed morphisms for satisfying (4.3.5). Assume and are right finite. We will construct a triple tensor product -representation.
Define
and denote by the map adjoint to .
Let . There is a derivation of whose restriction to is and whose restriction to is
Define to be the differential algebra with underlying algebra and with differential .
Let be the set of quadruples with , and . Given such a quadruple, we define
where we put and . We define to be the two-sided ideal generated by the images of for . We put .
Let and be two differential algebras equipped with structures of -representations , .
Let . It is endowed with commuting -representations and : the isomorphism is induced by the swap map . The tensor product identifies with a full subcategory of .
Assume is right finite. The map is an isomorphism. We put . It is the quotient of the tensor algebra by the ideal generated by for and . The underlying differential module is
The multiplication is defined by
We have
The right action of on is given by right multiplication, while the left action of on is given by
We have
The endomorphism of is given on
by
This construction provides the differential -category of right finite -representations on differential algebras with a monoidal structure.
Let be a differential algebra endowed with two -representations and together with a closed morphism such that the diagrams (4.2.1) commute.
We define the differential algebra
Its multiplication is given by the maps defined in §4.2.1.
Given a differential -module and given , we have differential -module maps . These make into an object of and provides an isomorphism of differential categories .
Remark 5.4.1. As in Remark 4.4.3, we obtain a lax bi--representation on by setting . We have an injective morphism of differential algebras .
Assume the morphisms (5.2.1) are isomorphisms for all (this holds for example if is an isomorphism). Then we have a canonical isomorphism . The algebra is generated by and .
The map extends (uniquely) to a morphism of algebras that is the identity on . If is an isomorphism, then this map is an isomorphism .
We assume now that is left finite and we put . Consider defined as in (4.4.1).
Let be the closed morphism of -bimodules given as a composition
We put . Given , we define a morphism of -bimodules
Lemma 5.4.2. The ’s define a left action of on , giving a structure of differential -bimodule.
Note that the isomorphism of differential categories commutes with .
Assume now is an isomorphism. We define a -bimodule endomorphism of as in (5.3.4).
Theorem 4.4.15 has the following consequence.
Theorem 5.4.3. The data defines a -representation on .
Note that we have an isomorphism of -representations .
Consider the -bimodule , where the right action is given by multiplication and the left action by multiplication preceded by the morphism of algebras . It follows from Proposition 4.4.16 that this bimodule induces a morphism of -representations from to .
All the definitions and constructions of §5.1–5.4 extend from the setting of differential algebras to that of differential categories. We will describe this explicitly.
We view the monoidal category as a -category with one object .
Definition 5.5.1. A bimodule -representation is the data of a -functor .
It is right finite if is right finite.
We say that is a bimodule -representation on .
Bimodule -representations form a differential -category.
Let be a differential category. There are equivalences of differential -categories between
the -category of bimodule -representations on
the -category with objects differential functors together with
isomorphisms functorial in and , compatible with the canonical morphism and satisfying
an isomorphism such that and
the -category of pairs where is a -bimodule and satisfies (4.1.1).
The category of -arrows in the third -category above has objects pairs where is a -bimodule and is a closed isomorphism of -bimodules satisfying (5.1.1). We leave it to the reader to describe -arrows in the second -category above. In these -categories, the -arrows are morphisms of (non-differential) bimodules or functors compatible with the additional structure.
The equivalences are given by
We will use the terminology “bimodule -representation” for either one of those three equivalent structures.
Note that a -representation gives rise to a bimodule -representation on given by (cf §2.2.3). Note also that a bimodule -representation on a differential category gives rise to a -representation given by .
A bimodule lax bi--representation is a lax differential -functor . We say it is a bimodule lax bi--representation on .
A bimodule lax bi--representation on is the same as the data of
-bimodules for
morphisms of differential algebras
morphisms satisfying properties (1) and (2) of §4.2.1.
We define the differential category as the additive category quotient of by the ideal of maps generated by the kernels of the compositions
Assume now is a differential category endowed with two structures and of bimodule -representations together with a closed morphism such that the diagrams (4.2.1) commute.
We define the differential category as the additive category quotient of by the ideal of maps generated by the image of the composition
We have a differential category . Its objects are those of and . The multiplication is induced by the maps . We define the differential category as the additive category quotient of by the ideal of maps generated by the images of for .
Assume now is a differential category endowed with two structures and of bimodule -representations, the first of which is right finite. Consider closed such that the diagrams (4.3.1) commute. We define as in (5.3.1).
We put . As in §5.3.3, we define a -bimodule and extend it to a -bimodule. Assume finally that is invertible. We construct in addition an endomorphism of . We obtain a bimodule -representation on and an isomorphism of -representations . The -representation is right finite if is right finite.
As in §5.3.4, we have a monoidal structure on the differential -category of right finite bimodule -representations.
We drop now the assumption that is invertible. We define as in §5.4.2 a -bimodule . Assume is invertible. We obtain an endomorphism of and a bimodule -representation on .
Let be a differential pointed category. A bimodule -represesentation on is the data of a strict monoidal differential pointed functor from the -category with one object given by to . Note that a bimodule -representation on gives rise to a bimodule -representation on .
A bimodule lax bi--representation is a lax differential pointed -functor . We say it is a bimodule lax bi--representation on .
A bimodule lax bi--representation on is the same as the data of
-bimodules for
morphisms of differential pointed algebras
morphisms satisfying properties (1) and (2) of §4.2.1.
We define the differential pointed category as the quotient of by the equivalence relation generated by if is in the equalizer of a composition
Consider a differential pointed category endowed with two bimodule -representations and and a closed morphism such that the diagrams (4.2.1) commute.
We define the differential pointed category as the quotient of by the equivalence relation generated by
We define the differential pointed category . We consider first the differential pointed category with same objects as and pointed set of maps given by . The category is the quotient of that category by the equivalence relation generated by for and .
Note that there is a canonical isomorphism of differential categories for
Let us recall some aspects of Douglas-Manolescu’s theory [DouMa].
Note that Douglas and Manolescu work in the differential graded setting, and we translate their constructions to the differential setting.
Their nil-Coxeter -algebra [DouMa, §2.2] can be viewed as the same data as our monoidal category (cf [DouMa, Remark 2.4]). A bottom-algebra module [DouMa, §2.4] for the nil-Coxeter -algebra is the same data as a lax bimodule -representation on a differential algebra , where a lax bimodule -representation on is defined to be a lax -functor with the differential category with one object whose endomorphism ring is . They also consider top-algebra modules, where above is replaced by . Using the isomorphism (§4.1.1), a top-algebra module can be viewed as a bottom-algebra module, hence as a lax bimodule -representation.
Douglas and Manolescu define a tensor product of a top algebra-module and a bottom algebra-module [DouMa, Definition 2.11]. This corresponds to our construction of a differential algebra as a tensor product . Note that they do not endow this tensor product with any algebra-module structure.
Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2