ScalingStacks

7.4.1. Braids

Let ZZ be a curve. Let II and JJ be two finite subsets of ZZ.

0PAL

Definition 7.4.1. A parametrized braid I→JI\to J is a family ϑ=(ϑs)s∈I\vartheta=(\vartheta_{s})_{s\in I} where ϑs\vartheta_{s} is an admissible path in ZZ with ϑs​(0)=s\vartheta_{s}(0)=s and such that s↦ϑs​(1)s\mapsto\vartheta_{s}(1) defines a bijection χ⁡(ϑ):I→∼J\chi(\vartheta):I\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}J . A braid I→JI\to J is a homotopy class of parametrized braids, i.e., a family of admissible homotopy classes of paths.

0PAM

Definition 7.4.2. We define the pre-strand category 𝒫∙​(Z)=S⁡(𝒮∙​(Z,1)){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z)=S({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1)) (cf §2.4).

The objects of this pointed category are the finite subsets of ZZ and Hom𝒫∙​(Z)⁡(I,J)\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(I,J) is the set of braids I→JI\to J, together with a 00-element. Given θ:I→J\theta:I\to J and θ′:J→K\theta^{\prime}:J\to K two braids, we have θ′∘θ=(θθs​(1)′∘θs)s∈I\theta^{\prime}\circ\theta=(\theta^{\prime}_{\theta_{s}(1)}\circ\theta_{s})_{s\in I} if θθs​(1)′∘θs\theta^{\prime}_{\theta_{s}(1)}\circ\theta_{s} is admissible for all s∈Is\in I, and we have θ′∘θ=0\theta^{\prime}\circ\theta=0 otherwise. If θ′∘θ≠0\theta^{\prime}\circ\theta\neq 0, we have χ⁡(θ′∘θ)=χ⁡(θ′)∘χ⁡(θ)\chi(\theta^{\prime}\circ\theta)=\chi(\theta^{\prime})\circ\chi(\theta).

We put 𝒫⁡(Z)=𝐅2​[𝒫∙​(Z)]{\mathcal{P}}(Z)={\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z)].

Note that there is a decomposition 𝒫∙​(Z)=⋁n≥0𝒫∙​(Z,n){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z)=\bigvee_{n\geq 0}{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z,n), where 𝒫∙​(Z,n){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z,n) is the full subcategory of 𝒫∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z) with objects subsets with nn elements. We have 𝒫∙​(Z,1)=𝒮∙​(Z,1){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z,1)={\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1).

Given MM a subset of ZZ, we denote by 𝒫M∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) the full subcategory of 𝒫∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z) with objects the finite subsets of MM.

Given θ:I→J\theta:I\to J a braid and I′I^{\prime} a subset of II, we denote by θ|I′\theta_{|I^{\prime}} the braid (θs)s∈I′(\theta_{s})_{s\in I^{\prime}}.

Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves. We denote by 𝒫f∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}_{f}(Z) the full subcategory of 𝒫∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z) with objects those finite subsets II of ZZ such that |f⁡(I)|=|I||f(I)|=|I|.

The next proposition follows immediately from Lemma 7.3.14 and §2.4.

0PAN

Proposition 7.4.3. The functor f:𝒮∙​(Z,1)→𝒮∙​(Z′,1)f:{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime},1) defines a faithful pointed functor

f:𝒫f∙​(Z)→𝒫∙​(Z′),I↦f⁡(I),θ↦(f⁡(θs))f⁡(s).f:{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}_{f}(Z)\to{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime}),\ I\mapsto f(I),\ \theta\mapsto(f(\theta_{s}))_{f(s)}.

In particular if f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} is injective then we have a faithful pointed functor f:𝒫∙​(Z)→𝒫∙​(Z′)f:{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z)\to{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime}).

We define a non-multiplicative f#:add⁡(𝒫⁡(Z′))→add⁡(𝒫⁡(Z))f^{\#}:\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}(Z^{\prime}))\to\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}(Z)) that commutes with coproduct. Given I′I^{\prime} a finite subset of Z′Z^{\prime}, we put

f#(I′)=∐p:I′→Z,f​p=idI′p(I′).f^{\#}(I^{\prime})=\coprod_{p:I^{\prime}\to Z,\ fp=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{I^{\prime}}}p(I^{\prime}).

Consider now θ′∈Hom𝒫∙​(Z′)⁡(I′,J′)\theta^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(I^{\prime},J^{\prime}) non-zero. Given s′∈I′s^{\prime}\in I^{\prime}, we have a decomposition f#​(θs′′)=∑s∈f−1​(s′)f#​(θs′′)sf^{\#}(\theta^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}})=\sum_{s\in f^{-1}(s^{\prime})}f^{\#}(\theta^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}})_{s} along the decomposition f#​(s′)=⨁s∈f−1​(s′)sf^{\#}(s^{\prime})=\bigoplus_{s\in f^{-1}(s^{\prime})}s (cf §7.3.4). Given p:I′→Zp:I^{\prime}\to Z with f​p=idI′fp=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{I^{\prime}}, we put fp#​(θ′)=(f#​(θf⁡(s)′)s)s∈p⁡(I′)f^{\#}_{p}(\theta^{\prime})=\bigl(f^{\#}(\theta^{\prime}_{f(s)})_{s}\bigr)_{s\in p(I^{\prime})}, a map in 𝒫⁡(Z){\mathcal{P}}(Z) with source p⁡(I′)p(I^{\prime}).

We define

f#(θ′)=∑p:I′→Z,f​p=idI′fp#(θ′).f^{\#}(\theta^{\prime})=\sum_{p:I^{\prime}\to Z,\ fp=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{I^{\prime}}}f^{\#}_{p}(\theta^{\prime}).

Note that f#​(θ′)=∑θ∈f−1​(θ′)θf^{\#}(\theta^{\prime})=\sum_{\theta\in f^{-1}(\theta^{\prime})}\theta, where f−1​(θ′)f^{-1}(\theta^{\prime}) is the set of braids in ZZ lifting θ\theta.

Given f′:Z′→Z′′f^{\prime}:Z^{\prime}\to Z^{\prime\prime} a morphism of curves, we have (f′​f)#=f#​f′#(f^{\prime}f)^{\#}=f^{\#}f^{\prime\#}.

The next two propositions are immediate consequences of Propositions 7.3.18 and 7.3.19 (cf §2.4).

0PAP

Proposition 7.4.4. If ff is strict, then f#f^{\#} defines a functor add⁡(𝒫⁡(Z′))→add⁡(𝒫f​(Z))\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}(Z^{\prime}))\to\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}_{f}(Z)) commuting with coproducts.

0PAQ

Proposition 7.4.5. Let ZZ be a curve with a finite admissible relation ∼\sim and let q:Z→Z/∼q:Z\to Z/\!\!\sim be the quotient map. The functor q#:add(𝒫(Z/∼))→add(𝒫q(Z))q^{\#}:\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}(Z/\!\!\sim))\to\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}_{q}(Z)) is faithful and every map in 𝒫∙(Z/∼){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z/\!\!\sim) is in the image of the functor q:𝒫q∙(Z)→𝒫∙(Z/∼)q:{\mathcal{P}}_{q}^{\bullet}(Z)\to{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z/\!\!\sim).

Note that the construction Z↦add⁡(𝒫⁡(Z))Z\mapsto\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{P}}(Z)) and f↦f#f\mapsto f^{\#} defines a contravariant functor from the category of curves with strict morphisms to the category of 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-linear categories.

Let Z1,…,ZrZ_{1},\ldots,Z_{r} be the connected components of ZZ. The isomorphism (7.3.4) induces an isomorphism of pointed categories

(7.4.1) 𝒫∙​(Z1)∧⋯∧𝒫∙​(Zr)→∼𝒫∙​(Z).{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z_{1})\wedge\cdots\wedge{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z).

Note that the inverse functor sends a braid θ:I→J\theta:I\to J in ZZ to (θ1,…,θr)(\theta_{1},\ldots,\theta_{r}), where θi\theta_{i} is the restriction of θ\theta to I∩ZiI\cap Z_{i}.

0PAR

Example 7.4.6. We describe below an example of product in 𝒫∙​(Z){\mathcal{P}}^{\bullet}(Z).

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2