ScalingStacks

6.1.1. Bimodules

Fix r,n≥0r,n\geq 0. We define some bimodules L±​(r,n)L^{\pm}(r,n) and R±​(r,n)R^{\pm}(r,n) with underlying differential graded module Hr+nH_{r+n}, following §3.1.3 and Proposition 3.1.6.

We endow L+​(r,n)L^{+}(r,n) (resp. L−​(r,n)L^{-}(r,n)) with a structure of differential graded (Hr⊗Hn,Hr+n)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n},H_{r+n})-bimodule where

  • •

    Hr+nH_{r+n} acts by right multiplication

  • •

    h∈Hrh\in H_{r} acts by left multiplication by hh (resp. by fn​(h)f_{n}(h))

  • •

    h∈Hnh\in H_{n} acts by left multiplication by fr∘ιn​(h)f_{r}\circ\iota_{n}(h) (resp. by hh).

We endow R+​(r,n)R^{+}(r,n) (resp. R−​(r,n)R^{-}(r,n)) with a structure of differential graded (Hr+n,Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r+n},H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-bimodule where

  • •

    Hr+nH_{r+n} acts by left multiplication

  • •

    h∈Hrh\in H_{r} acts by right multiplication by hh (resp. by fn​(h)f_{n}(h))

  • •

    h∈Hnh\in H_{n} acts by right multiplication by fr∘ιn​(h)f_{r}\circ\iota_{n}(h) (resp. by hh).

0P77

Example 6.1.1. Elements of L±​(r,n)L^{\pm}(r,n) and R±​(r,n)R^{\pm}(r,n) can be represented by good strand diagrams in a rectangle, as in the examples below.

[Uncaptioned image]

The actions are obtained by concatenation of diagrams (note that a diagram that is not good represents 00), as in the example below, where we first apply the reflection of the rectangle swapping the top and the bottom, then rotate 9090 degrees anticlockwise the diagram of h′h^{\prime}:

[Uncaptioned image]

These bimodules coincide with (the nil version of) the bimodules introduced in §3.1.3, after restricting the action of Hr⊗HnH_{r}\otimes H_{n} to HrH_{r}:

L±​(r,n)=L±​(I,S)​ and ​R±​(r,n)=L±​(S,I)​ where ​S={s1,…,sr+n−1}​ and ​I={s1,…,sr−1}.L^{\pm}(r,n)=L^{\pm}(I,S)\text{ and }R^{\pm}(r,n)=L^{\pm}(S,I)\text{ where }S=\{s_{1},\ldots,s_{r+n-1}\}\text{ and }I=\{s_{1},\ldots,s_{r-1}\}.

Given m≥0m\geq 0, we denote by wm∈𝔖mw_{m}\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{m} the longest element, i.e., wm​(i)=m−i+1w_{m}(i)=m-i+1. We have two morphisms of differential graded 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-modules (cf Proposition 3.1.6)

tr+n,r±=tS,I±:Hr+n→Hr​⟨12​n​(2​r+n−1)⟩t_{r+n,r}^{\pm}=t_{S,I}^{\pm}:H_{r+n}\to H_{r}\langle\frac{1}{2}n(2r+n-1)\rangle

given by

tr+n,r+​(Tw)={Twr​wr+n​w if ​w∈wr+n​𝔖r0 otherwise​ and ​tr+n,r−​(Tw)={Tw​wr+n​wr if ​w∈𝔖r​wr+n0 otherwiset_{r+n,r}^{+}(T_{w})=\begin{cases}T_{w_{r}w_{r+n}w}&\text{ if }w\in w_{r+n}{\mathfrak{S}}_{r}\\ 0&\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}\text{ and }t_{r+n,r}^{-}(T_{w})=\begin{cases}T_{ww_{r+n}w_{r}}&\text{ if }w\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r}w_{r+n}\\ 0&\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}
0P78

Example 6.1.2. Let us describe some examples of t7,4±​(Tw)t_{7,4}^{\pm}(T_{w}):

[Uncaptioned image]

It is immediate that there is an isomorphism of differential graded (Hr+n,Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r+n},H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules

HomHr+nopp⁡(L±​(r,n),Hr+n)→∼R±​(r,n),f↦f⁡(1)\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{H_{r+n}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}(L^{\pm}(r,n),H_{r+n})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R^{\pm}(r,n),f\mapsto f(1)

and it follows from Proposition 3.1.6 that there is an isomorphism of differential graded (Hr⊗Hn,Hr+n)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n},H_{r+n})-modules

L∓​(r,n)→∼HomHropp⁡(R±​(r,n),Hr)​⟨12​n​(2​r+n−1)⟩,h↦(h′↦tn+r,r±​(h​h′)).L^{\mp}(r,n)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{H_{r}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}(R^{\pm}(r,n),H_{r})\langle\frac{1}{2}n(2r+n-1)\rangle,\ h\mapsto(h^{\prime}\mapsto t_{n+r,r}^{\pm}(hh^{\prime})).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2