ScalingStacks

8.1.3. 22-representations and morphisms of curves

Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves. Assume ξ\xi is terminal for (Z,M)(Z,M) and f∘ξf\circ\xi is terminal for (Z′,f⁡(M))(Z^{\prime},f(M)).

Assume that |f−1​(f​(z))|=1|f^{-1}(f(z))|=1 for all z∈Mz\in M. Let MfM_{f} be the (𝒮M∙​(Z),𝒮f⁡(M)∙​(Z′))({\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}))-bimodule corresponding to ff, i.e. given by Mf​(S,S′)=Hom𝒮∙​(Z′)⁡(S′,f⁡(S))M_{f}(S,S^{\prime})=\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(S^{\prime},f(S)). There is a morphism of functors Eξ∧𝒮M∙​(Z)Mf→Mf∧𝒮f⁡(M)∙​(Z′)Ef∘ξE_{\xi}\wedge_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}M_{f}\to M_{f}\wedge_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime})}E_{f\circ\xi} defined as making the following diagram commutative

Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(−,T⊔{ξ⁡(1)})∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z′)⁡(S′,f⁡(−))\textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(-,T\sqcup\{\xi(1)\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(S^{\prime},f(-))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}β∧α′↦f⁡(β)⋅α′\scriptstyle{\beta\wedge\alpha^{\prime}\mapsto f(\beta)\cdot\alpha^{\prime}}Hom𝒮∙​(Z′)⁡(S′,f⁡(T)⊔{f∘ξ⁡(1)})\textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(S^{\prime},f(T)\sqcup\{f\circ\xi(1)\})}Hom𝒮∙​(Z′)(−,f(T))∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z′)(S′,−⊔{f∘ξ(1)})\textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(-,f(T))\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime})}(S^{\prime},-\sqcup\{f\circ\xi(1)\})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}β′∧α′↦(β′⊠idf∘ξ⁡(1))⋅α′\scriptstyle{\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha^{\prime}\mapsto(\beta^{\prime}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{f\circ\xi(1)})\cdot\alpha^{\prime}}

The following lemma is a consequence of (8.1.1).

0PCB

Lemma 8.1.7. If ξ−1​(M)\xi^{-1}(M) has no maximum, then the construction above gives an isomorphism

Eξ∧𝒮M∙​(Z)Mf→∼Mf∧𝒮f⁡(M)∙​(Z′)Ef∘ξ,E_{\xi}\wedge_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}M_{f}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}M_{f}\wedge_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime})}E_{f\circ\xi},

and ff provides a morphism of bimodule 22-representations Lf∘ξ∙→Lξ∙L^{\bullet}_{f\circ\xi}\to L^{\bullet}_{\xi}.

We consider now an arbitrary MM but we assume that ff is strict. Let Mf#M_{f^{\#}} be the (𝒮f⁡(M)​(Z′),𝒮M​(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z))-bimodule corresponding to f#f^{\#}, i.e. given by

Mf#(S′,S)=⨁p:S′→Z,f∘p=idS′Hom𝒮M​(Z)(S,p(S′)).M_{f^{\#}}(S^{\prime},S)=\bigoplus_{p:S^{\prime}\to Z,\ f\circ p=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S^{\prime}}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}(S,p(S^{\prime})).

There is a morphism of functors Ef∘ξ⊗𝒮f⁡(M)​(Z′)Mf#→Mf#⊗𝒮M​(Z)EξE_{f\circ\xi}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime})}M_{f^{\#}}\to M_{f^{\#}}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}E_{\xi} defined as making the following diagram commutative

⨁p:−→Zf∘p=idHom𝒮⁡(Z′)(−,T′⊔{f∘ξ(1)})⊗Hom𝒮⁡(Z)(S,p(−))\textstyle{{\displaystyle\bigoplus_{\begin{subarray}{c}p:-\to Z\\ f\circ p=\operatorname{id}\nolimits\end{subarray}}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z^{\prime})}(-,T^{\prime}\sqcup\{f\circ\xi(1)\})\otimes\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z)}(S,p(-))\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}β′∧α↦f#​(β′)⋅α\scriptstyle{\beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha\mapsto f^{\#}(\beta^{\prime})\cdot\alpha}⨁p:T′→Zf∘p=idT′Hom𝒮⁡(Z)(S,p(T′)⊔{ξ(1)})\textstyle{{\displaystyle\bigoplus_{\begin{subarray}{c}p:T^{\prime}\to Z\\ f\circ p=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T^{\prime}}\end{subarray}}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z)}(S,p(T^{\prime})\sqcup\{\xi(1)\})}⨁p:T′→Zf∘p=idT′Hom𝒮⁡(Z)(−,p(T′))⊗Hom𝒮⁡(Z)(S,−⊔{ξ(1)})\textstyle{{\displaystyle\bigoplus_{\begin{subarray}{c}p:T^{\prime}\to Z\\ f\circ p=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T^{\prime}}\end{subarray}}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z)}(-,p(T^{\prime}))\otimes\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z)}(S,-\sqcup\{\xi(1)\})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}∼\scriptstyle{\sim}β∧α↦(β⊠id{ξ⁡(1)})⋅α\scriptstyle{\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \beta\wedge\alpha\mapsto(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\{\xi(1)\}})\cdot\alpha}

The following lemma is a consequence of (8.1.1).

0PCC

Lemma 8.1.8. If ξ−1​(M)\xi^{-1}(M) has no maximum, then the construction above gives an isomorphism

Ef∘ξ⊗𝒮f⁡(M)​(Z′)Mf#→∼Mf#⊗𝒮M​(Z)Eξ,E_{f\circ\xi}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime})}M_{f^{\#}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}M_{f^{\#}}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}E_{\xi},

and f#f^{\#} provides a morphism of bimodule 22-representations Lξ→Lf∘ξL_{\xi}\to L_{f\circ\xi}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2