ScalingStacks

4.4. Dual diagonal action

4.4.1. Category

Consider two actions of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} given by (F1,Ο„1)(F_{1},\tau_{1}) and (E2,Ο„2)(E_{2},\tau_{2}) on 𝒲{\mathcal{W}} and a closed morphism of functors Ξ»:F1​E2β†’E2​F1\lambda:F_{1}E_{2}\to E_{2}F_{1} such that diagrams (4.2.1) commute. As in Β§4.2.1, we have maps ΞΌi,j=ΞΌ(i,i),(j,j):E2i​F1i​E2j​F1jβ†’E2i+j​F1i+j\mu_{i,j}=\mu_{(i,i),(j,j)}:E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j}\to E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j}.

We define a differential category Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. Its objects are pairs (m,Ο‚)(m,\varsigma) where mβˆˆπ’²Β―im\in\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} and Ο‚=(Ο‚i)iβ‰₯1\varsigma=(\varsigma_{i})_{i\geq 1}, Ο‚i∈Z​Hom𝒲¯i⁑(E2i​F1i​(m),m)\varsigma_{i}\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}}(E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m),m), satisfies that

  • β€’

    for all i,jβ‰₯1i,j\geq 1, we have Ο‚i∘E2i​F1i​ςj=Ο‚i+j∘μi,j\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\varsigma_{j}=\varsigma_{i+j}\circ\mu_{i,j}

  • β€’

    Ο‚i∘Tr​F1i=Ο‚i∘E2i​Tr\varsigma_{i}\circ T_{r}F_{1}^{i}=\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}T_{r} for all 1≀r<i1\leq r<i.

We define HomΔλ​𝒲⁑((m,Ο‚),(mβ€²,Ο‚β€²))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}}((m,\varsigma),(m^{\prime},\varsigma^{\prime})) to be the differential submodule of Hom𝒲¯i⁑(m,mβ€²)\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}}(m,m^{\prime}) of elements ff such that for all iβ‰₯1i\geq 1, the following diagram commutes

E2i​F1i​(m)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ο‚i\scriptstyle{\varsigma_{i}}E2i​F1i​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}f}m\textstyle{m\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}E2i​F1i​(mβ€²)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m^{\prime})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ο‚iβ€²\scriptstyle{\varsigma^{\prime}_{i}}mβ€²\textstyle{m^{\prime}}

The composition of maps is defined to be that of 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}.

0P65

Remark 4.4.1. The structure of objects in Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}} can be described graphically as follows:

[Uncaptioned image]
0P66

Remark 4.4.2. The maps ΞΌi,j\mu_{i,j} make A=⨁iβ‰₯0E2i​F1iA=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i} into a monoid in the monoidal category of endofunctors of 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}, when 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} has enough direct sums. If 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} has enough colimits, we have an induced monoid AΒ―=⨁iβ‰₯0(E2i​F1i)βŠ—HiβŠ—HioppHi\bar{A}=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}(E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i})\otimes_{H_{i}\otimes H_{i}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}H_{i}. Now, the category Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}} is the category of AΒ―\bar{A}-modules in 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}.

0P67

Remark 4.4.3. Let us define a lax bi-22-representation Ei,j=E2j​F1iE_{i,j}=E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{i} on 𝒲{\mathcal{W}} as deduced from the one defined in Β§4.2.1 by applying the swap automorphism of 𝒰×𝒰{\mathcal{U}}\times{\mathcal{U}} (cf Remark 4.2.3).

There is a faithful differential functor Δλ​𝒲→ΔE​𝒲,(m,Ο‚)↦(m,Ο‚1)\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}\to\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{W}},\ (m,\varsigma)\mapsto(m,\varsigma_{1}).

4.4.2. Adjoint

We assume F1F_{1} has a right adjoint E1E_{1} and denote by Ξ΅1\varepsilon_{1} and Ξ·1\eta_{1} the counit and unit of the adjunction. We denote by Ο„1\tau_{1} the endomorphism of E12E_{1}^{2} corresponding by adjunction to the endomorphism Ο„1\tau_{1} of F12F_{1}^{2}. The pair (E1,Ο„1)(E_{1},\tau_{1}) provides an action of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} on 𝒲{\mathcal{W}}.

0P68

Remark 4.4.4. The maps Ξ·1\eta_{1}, Ξ΅1\varepsilon_{1}, the relations they satisfy, and Ξ»\lambda, Οƒ\sigma and ρ\rho are described graphically as:

[Uncaptioned image]

We denote by Οƒ\sigma the composition

(4.4.1) Οƒ:E2​E1β†’Ξ·1​E2​E1E1​F1​E2​E1β†’E1​λ​E2E1​E2​F1​E1β†’E1​E2​Ρ1E1​E2\sigma:E_{2}E_{1}\xrightarrow{\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{1}}E_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\xrightarrow{E_{1}\lambda E_{2}}E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}E_{1}\xrightarrow{E_{1}E_{2}\varepsilon_{1}}E_{1}E_{2}

and by ρ\rho the composition

(4.4.2) ρ:F1​E1β†’F1​E1​η1F1​E12​F1β†’F1​τ1​F1F1​E12​F1β†’Ξ΅1​E1​F1E1​F1.\rho:F_{1}E_{1}\xrightarrow{F_{1}E_{1}\eta_{1}}F_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}\xrightarrow{F_{1}\tau_{1}F_{1}}F_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}}E_{1}F_{1}.

The diagram (4.3.1) is commutative.

0P69

Lemma 4.4.5. We have

E1β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜Οβ€‹E2∘F1​σ=σ​F1∘E2β€‹Οβˆ˜Ξ»β€‹E1​ and ​ρ​F1∘F1β€‹Οβˆ˜Ο„1​E1=E1​τ1βˆ˜Οβ€‹F1∘F1​ρ.E_{1}\lambda\circ\rho E_{2}\circ F_{1}\sigma=\sigma F_{1}\circ E_{2}\rho\circ\lambda E_{1}\text{ and }\rho F_{1}\circ F_{1}\rho\circ\tau_{1}E_{1}=E_{1}\tau_{1}\circ\rho F_{1}\circ F_{1}\rho.
0P6A

Proof. We have

E1β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜Οβ€‹E2∘F1​σ=E_{1}\lambda\circ\rho E_{2}\circ F_{1}\sigma=
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘F1​E12​F1​λ​E1∘F1​τ1​F12​E2​E1∘F1​E1​η1​F1​E2​E1∘F1​η1​E2​E2\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ F_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ F_{1}\tau_{1}F_{1}^{2}E_{2}E_{1}\circ F_{1}E_{1}\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ F_{1}\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{2}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘F1​E12​F1​λ​E1∘F1​E12​τ1​E2​E1∘F1​E1​η1​F1​E2​E1∘F1​η1​E2​E2\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ F_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ F_{1}E_{1}^{2}\tau_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ F_{1}E_{1}\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ F_{1}\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{2}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘E1​τ1​E2​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1∘Ρ1​F1​E2​E1∘F1​η1​E2​E2\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ E_{1}\tau_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ\varepsilon_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ F_{1}\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{2}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘E1​τ1​E2​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ E_{1}\tau_{1}E_{2}E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​E2​τ1​E1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\tau_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​E2​F1​Ρ1​E1​F1∘E1​E2​F12​E1​η1∘E1​E2​τ1​E1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\tau_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​E2​F1​Ρ1​E1​F1∘E1​E2​τ1​E12​F1∘E1​E2​F12​E1​η1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\tau_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=E1​E2​F1​Ρ1∘E1​E2​F1​Ρ1​E1​F1∘E1​E2​F12​τ1​F1∘E1​E2​F12​E1​η1∘E1​λ​F1​E1∘E1​F1​λ​E1∘η1​F1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}^{2}\tau_{1}F_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda F_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}F_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=σ​F1∘E2β€‹Οβˆ˜Ξ»β€‹E1.\displaystyle=\sigma F_{1}\circ E_{2}\rho\circ\lambda E_{1}.

We have

ρ​F1∘F1β€‹Οβˆ˜Ο„1​E1\displaystyle\rho F_{1}\circ F_{1}\rho\circ\tau_{1}E_{1} =Ξ΅1​E1​F12∘F1​Ρ1​E12​F12βˆ˜Ο„1​E13​F12∘F12​E1​τ1​F12∘F12​E12​η1​F1∘F12​τ1​F1∘F12​E1​η1\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}^{2}\circ\tau_{1}E_{1}^{3}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\tau_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{2}\eta_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}\tau_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}
=Ξ΅1​E1​F12∘F1​Ρ1​E12​F12∘F12​τ1​E1​F12∘F12​E1​τ1​F12∘F12​E12​η1​F1∘F12​τ1​F1∘F12​E1​η1\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}\tau_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\tau_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{2}\eta_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}\tau_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}
=Ξ΅1​E1​F12∘F1​Ρ1​E12​F12∘F12​(Ο„1​E1∘E1​τ1βˆ˜Ο„1​E1)​F12∘F12​E12​η1​F1∘F12​E1​η1\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}(\tau_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}\tau_{1}\circ\tau_{1}E_{1})F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{2}\eta_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}
=Ξ΅1​E1​F12∘F1​Ρ1​E12​F12∘F12​(E1​τ1βˆ˜Ο„1​E1∘E1​τ1)​F12∘F12​E12​η1​F1∘F12​E1​η1\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}(E_{1}\tau_{1}\circ\tau_{1}E_{1}\circ E_{1}\tau_{1})F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{2}\eta_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}
=Ξ΅1​E1​F12∘F1​Ρ1​E12​F12∘F12​(E1​τ1βˆ˜Ο„1​E1)​F12∘F12​E13​τ1∘F12​E12​η1​F1∘F12​E1​η1\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}^{2}F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}(E_{1}\tau_{1}\circ\tau_{1}E_{1})F_{1}^{2}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{3}\tau_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}^{2}\eta_{1}F_{1}\circ F_{1}^{2}E_{1}\eta_{1}
=E1​τ1βˆ˜Οβ€‹F1∘F1​ρ.\displaystyle=E_{1}\tau_{1}\circ\rho F_{1}\circ F_{1}\rho.

∎

4.4.3. Relations

Let β„³{\mathcal{M}} be the strict monoidal pointed category generated by objects ala_{l} for 1≀l≀31\leq l\leq 3 and maps Ξ»l​m:al​amβ†’am​al\lambda_{lm}:a_{l}a_{m}\to a_{m}a_{l} for l≀ml\leq m with relations Ξ»l​l2=0\lambda_{ll}^{2}=0 and

Ξ»m​n​l∘m​λl​n∘λl​m​n=n​λl​m∘λl​n​m∘l​λm​n​ for ​l≀m≀n.\lambda_{mn}l\circ m\lambda_{ln}\circ\lambda_{lm}n=n\lambda_{lm}\circ\lambda_{ln}m\circ l\lambda_{mn}\text{ for }l\leq m\leq n.
0P6B

Lemma 4.4.6. We have a pointed faithful strict monoidal functor

H:β„³β†’π’°βˆ™,al↦e,Ξ»l​m↦τ.H:{\mathcal{M}}\to{\mathcal{U}}^{\bullet},\ a_{l}\mapsto e,\ \lambda_{lm}\mapsto\tau.

Given l1,…,lr,m1,…,mr∈{1,2,3}l_{1},\ldots,l_{r},m_{1},\ldots,m_{r}\in\{1,2,3\}, the non-zero elements of H(Homβ„³(al1β‹―alr,am1β‹―amr))βŠ‚Hrβˆ™H(\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\mathcal{M}}(a_{l_{1}}\cdots a_{l_{r}},a_{m_{1}}\cdots a_{m_{r}}))\subset H_{r}^{\bullet} are those TwT_{w} with wβˆˆπ”–rw\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r} such that for all i,j∈{1,…,r}i,j\in\{1,\ldots,r\} with i<ji<j and w⁑(i)>w⁑(j)w(i)>w(j), we have li≀ljl_{i}\leq l_{j}.

0P6C

Proof. Given the defining relations for π’°βˆ™{\mathcal{U}}^{\bullet}, the construction of the lemma does define (uniquely) a monoidal functor HH.

Fix l1,…,ln∈{1,…,3}l_{1},\ldots,l_{n}\in\{1,\ldots,3\}. Given i∈{1,…,nβˆ’1}i\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\} such that li≀li+1l_{i}\leq l_{i+1}, we put T~i=al1β‹―aliβˆ’1Ξ»li,li+1ali+2β‹―aln\tilde{T}_{i}=a_{l_{1}}\cdots a_{l_{i-1}}\lambda_{l_{i},l_{i+1}}a_{l_{i+2}}\cdots a_{l_{n}}. Note that T~i​T~i+1​T~i\tilde{T}_{i}\tilde{T}_{i+1}\tilde{T}_{i} is well-defined if and only if li≀li+1≀li+2l_{i}\leq l_{i+1}\leq l_{i+2}, hence if and only if T~i+1​T~i​T~i+1\tilde{T}_{i+1}\tilde{T}_{i}\tilde{T}_{i+1} is well-defined. As a consequence, given i1,…,ir,j1,…,js∈{1,…,nβˆ’1}i_{1},\ldots,i_{r},j_{1},\ldots,j_{s}\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\} such that T~i1β‹―T~ir\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r}} and T~j1β‹―T~js\tilde{T}_{j_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{j_{s}} are well-defined and Ti1β‹―Tir=Tj1β‹―TjsT_{i_{1}}\cdots T_{i_{r}}=T_{j_{1}}\cdots T_{j_{s}}, then we have T~i1β‹―T~ir=T~j1β‹―T~js\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r}}=\tilde{T}_{j_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{j_{s}}. This shows the faithfulness of HH.

Consider i1,…,iri_{1},\ldots,i_{r} such that T~i1β‹―T~ir\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r}} is well-defined and non-zero. Let w=si1β‹―sirβˆˆπ”–nw=s_{i_{1}}\cdots s_{i_{r}}\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n}. We show by induction on rr that given (i,j)∈L~​(w)(i,j)\in\tilde{L}(w), we have li≀ljl_{i}\leq l_{j}.

Let wβ€²=si1β‹―sirβˆ’1w^{\prime}=s_{i_{1}}\cdots s_{i_{r-1}}. Put d=ird=i_{r} and wβ€²=w​sdw^{\prime}=ws_{d}. Since Ti1β‹―Tirβ‰ 0T_{i_{1}}\cdots T_{i_{r}}\neq 0, we have r=ℓ⁑(w)r=\ell(w). We have L~​(w)={(d,d+1)}β€‹βˆsd​(L~​(wβ€²))\tilde{L}(w)=\{(d,d+1)\}\coprod s_{d}(\tilde{L}(w^{\prime})) by Lemma 3.2.3. We have a well-defined map T~i1β‹―T~irβˆ’1\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r-1}} from al1β‹―aldβˆ’1ald+1aldald+2β‹―alna_{l_{1}}\cdots a_{l_{d-1}}a_{l_{d+1}}a_{l_{d}}a_{l_{d+2}}\cdots a_{l_{n}}. It follows by induction that given (i,j)∈L~​(wβ€²)(i,j)\in\tilde{L}(w^{\prime}), we have lsd​(i)≀lsd​(j)l_{s_{d}(i)}\leq l_{s_{d}(j)}. Since L~​(w)={(d,d+1)}β€‹βˆsd​(L~​(wβ€²))\tilde{L}(w)=\{(d,d+1)\}\coprod s_{d}(\tilde{L}(w^{\prime})) (Lemma 3.2.3), we deduce that li≀ljl_{i}\leq l_{j} for all (i,j)∈L~​(w)(i,j)\in\tilde{L}(w).

Consider now wβˆˆπ”–nw\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n} such that given (i,j)∈L~​(w)(i,j)\in\tilde{L}(w), we have li≀ljl_{i}\leq l_{j}. Let w=si1β‹―sirw=s_{i_{1}}\cdots s_{i_{r}} be a reduced decomposition of ww. We show by induction on rr that T~i1β‹―T~ir\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r}} is well-defined. As before, we define dd and wβ€²w^{\prime}. By induction on rr, the element T~i1β‹―T~irβˆ’1\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r-1}} gives a well-defined map from al1β‹―aldβˆ’1ald+1aldald+2β‹―alna_{l_{1}}\cdots a_{l_{d-1}}a_{l_{d+1}}a_{l_{d}}a_{l_{d+2}}\cdots a_{l_{n}}. Since (d,d+1)∈L~​(w)(d,d+1)\in\tilde{L}(w), it follows that ld≀ld+1l_{d}\leq l_{d+1}, hence T~d\tilde{T}_{d} is a well-defined map from al1β‹―alna_{l_{1}}\cdots a_{l_{n}}. We deduce that T~i1β‹―T~ir\tilde{T}_{i_{1}}\cdots\tilde{T}_{i_{r}}. This shows that TwT_{w} is in the image of HH. ∎

Given l1,…,lr,m1,…,mr∈{1,2,3}l_{1},\ldots,l_{r},m_{1},\ldots,m_{r}\in\{1,2,3\} and wβˆˆπ”–rw\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r} satisfying the assumptions of Lemma 4.4.6, we put Ξ»w=Hβˆ’1​(Tw)\lambda_{w}=H^{-1}(T_{w}).

We denote by β„³β€²{\mathcal{M}}^{\prime} the strict monoidal kk-linear category obtained from k⁑[β„³]k[{\mathcal{M}}] by adding maps Ξ΅:a1​a3β†’1\varepsilon:a_{1}a_{3}\to 1 and Ξ·:1β†’a3​a1\eta:1\to a_{3}a_{1} and relations

a3β€‹Ξ΅βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a3=id,Ρ​a1∘a1​η=ida_{3}\varepsilon\circ\eta a_{3}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits,\ \varepsilon a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta=\operatorname{id}\nolimits
Ξ»23=a3​a2β€‹Ξ΅βˆ˜a3​λ12​a3βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a2​a3,Ξ»13=Ρ​a3​a1∘a1​λ33​a1∘a1​a3​η\lambda_{23}=a_{3}a_{2}\varepsilon\circ a_{3}\lambda_{12}a_{3}\circ\eta a_{2}a_{3},\ \lambda_{13}=\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}\circ a_{1}\lambda_{33}a_{1}\circ a_{1}a_{3}\eta
Ξ»11=Ρ​a12∘a1​Ρ​a3​a12∘a12​λ33​a12∘a12​a3​η​a1∘a12​η.\lambda_{11}=\varepsilon a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}^{2}\lambda_{33}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}^{2}a_{3}\eta a_{1}\circ a_{1}^{2}\eta.

There is a monoidal duality, i.e. a monoidal equivalence β„³β€²oppβ†’βˆΌβ„³β€²{\mathcal{M}}^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{M}}^{\prime} given by

a1↦a3,a2↦a2,a3↦a1,Ξ»12↦λ23,Ξ»23↦λ12,Ξ»13↦λ13a_{1}\mapsto a_{3},\ a_{2}\mapsto a_{2},\ a_{3}\mapsto a_{1},\ \lambda_{12}\mapsto\lambda_{23},\ \lambda_{23}\mapsto\lambda_{12},\ \lambda_{13}\mapsto\lambda_{13}
Ξ»11↦λ33,Ξ»22↦λ22,Ξ»33↦λ11,Ρ↦η,η↦Ρ.\lambda_{11}\mapsto\lambda_{33},\ \lambda_{22}\mapsto\lambda_{22},\ \lambda_{33}\mapsto\lambda_{11},\ \varepsilon\mapsto\eta,\ \eta\mapsto\varepsilon.
0P6D

Lemma 4.4.7. Let G1,…,Gn∈{a1,a2,a3}G_{1},\ldots,G_{n}\in\{a_{1},a_{2},a_{3}\}. We have

Ξ»(1β‹―n+1)∘G1β‹―GnΞ·=Ξ»(n+2β‹―2)∘ηG1β‹―Gn:G1β‹―Gnβ†’a3G1β‹―Gna1\lambda_{(1\cdots n+1)}\circ G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\eta=\lambda_{(n+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta G_{1}\cdots G_{n}:G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\to a_{3}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}a_{1}

and

Ξ΅G1β‹―Gn∘λ(2β‹―n+2)=G1β‹―GnΡ∘λ(n+1β‹―1):a1G1β‹―Gna3β†’G1β‹―Gn.\varepsilon G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots n+2)}=G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\varepsilon\circ\lambda_{(n+1\cdots 1)}:a_{1}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}a_{3}\to G_{1}\cdots G_{n}.
0P6E

Proof. We have

a3​λ13βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a3\displaystyle a_{3}\lambda_{13}\circ\eta a_{3} =a3​Ρ​a3​a1∘a3​a1​λ33​a1∘a3​a1​a3β€‹Ξ·βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a3\displaystyle=a_{3}\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}\circ a_{3}a_{1}\lambda_{33}a_{1}\circ a_{3}a_{1}a_{3}\eta\circ\eta a_{3}
=a3​Ρ​a3​a1βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a32​a1∘λ33​a1∘a3​η\displaystyle=a_{3}\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}\circ\eta a_{3}^{2}a_{1}\circ\lambda_{33}a_{1}\circ a_{3}\eta
=Ξ»33​a1∘a3​η\displaystyle=\lambda_{33}a_{1}\circ a_{3}\eta
Ξ»13​a1∘a1​η\displaystyle\lambda_{13}a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta =Ρ​a3​a12∘a1​λ33​a12∘a1​a3​η​a1∘a1​η\displaystyle=\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}\lambda_{33}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}a_{3}\eta a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta
=Ρ​a3​a12∘a1​a32​λ11∘a1​a3​η​a1∘a1​η\displaystyle=\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}a_{3}^{2}\lambda_{11}\circ a_{1}a_{3}\eta a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta
=a3​λ11βˆ˜Ξ΅β€‹a3​a12∘a1​a3​η​a1∘a1​η\displaystyle=a_{3}\lambda_{11}\circ\varepsilon a_{3}a_{1}^{2}\circ a_{1}a_{3}\eta a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta
=a3​λ11βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a1βˆ˜Ξ΅β€‹a1∘a1​η\displaystyle=a_{3}\lambda_{11}\circ\eta a_{1}\circ\varepsilon a_{1}\circ a_{1}\eta
=a3​λ11βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a1\displaystyle=a_{3}\lambda_{11}\circ\eta a_{1}
Ξ»23​a1∘a2​η\displaystyle\lambda_{23}a_{1}\circ a_{2}\eta =a3​a2​Ρ​a1∘a3​λ12​a3​a1βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a2​a3​a1∘a2​η\displaystyle=a_{3}a_{2}\varepsilon a_{1}\circ a_{3}\lambda_{12}a_{3}a_{1}\circ\eta a_{2}a_{3}a_{1}\circ a_{2}\eta
=a3​a2​Ρ​a1∘a3​a2​a1β€‹Ξ·βˆ˜a3​λ12βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a2\displaystyle=a_{3}a_{2}\varepsilon a_{1}\circ a_{3}a_{2}a_{1}\eta\circ a_{3}\lambda_{12}\circ\eta a_{2}
=a3​λ12βˆ˜Ξ·β€‹a2\displaystyle=a_{3}\lambda_{12}\circ\eta a_{2}

It follows that the first statement of the lemma holds when n=1n=1. Consider now nβ‰₯2n\geq 2. We prove the first statement of the lemma by induction on nn. We have

Ξ»(n+2β‹―2)∘ηG1β‹―Gn\displaystyle\lambda_{(n+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta G_{1}\cdots G_{n} =Ξ»(n+2β‹―3)∘(Ξ»(23)∘ηG1)G2β‹―Gn\displaystyle=\lambda_{(n+2\cdots 3)}\circ(\lambda_{(23)}\circ\eta G_{1})G_{2}\cdots G_{n}
=Ξ»(n+2β‹―3)∘(Ξ»(12)∘G1Ξ·)G2β‹―Gn\displaystyle=\lambda_{(n+2\cdots 3)}\circ(\lambda_{(12)}\circ G_{1}\eta)G_{2}\cdots G_{n}
=Ξ»(12)∘G1(Ξ»(n+1β‹―2)∘ηG2β‹―Gn)\displaystyle=\lambda_{(12)}\circ G_{1}(\lambda_{(n+1\cdots 2)}\circ\eta G_{2}\cdots G_{n})
=Ξ»(12)∘G1(Ξ»(1β‹―n)∘G2β‹―GnΞ·)\displaystyle=\lambda_{(12)}\circ G_{1}(\lambda_{(1\cdots n)}\circ G_{2}\cdots G_{n}\eta)
=Ξ»(1β‹―n+1)∘G1β‹―GnΞ·\displaystyle=\lambda_{(1\cdots n+1)}\circ G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\eta

The second statement of the lemma follows by applying the duality of β„³β€²{\mathcal{M}}^{\prime}. ∎

Lemmas 4.4.5 and 4.4.6 show that there is a kk-linear monoidal functor R:ℳ′→𝒲R:{\mathcal{M}}^{\prime}\to{\mathcal{W}}

a1↦F1,a2↦E2,a3↦E1,Ξ»12↦λ,Ξ»23↦σ,Ξ»13↦ρ,Ξ»11↦τ1,Ξ»22↦τ2,Ξ»33↦τ1a_{1}\mapsto F_{1},\ a_{2}\mapsto E_{2},\ a_{3}\mapsto E_{1},\ \lambda_{12}\mapsto\lambda,\lambda_{23}\mapsto\sigma,\ \lambda_{13}\mapsto\rho,\ \lambda_{11}\mapsto\tau_{1},\ \lambda_{22}\mapsto\tau_{2},\ \lambda_{33}\mapsto\tau_{1}
η↦η1,Ρ↦Ρ1.\eta\mapsto\eta_{1},\ \varepsilon\mapsto\varepsilon_{1}.

Given l1,…,lr,m1,…,mr∈{1,2,3}l_{1},\ldots,l_{r},m_{1},\ldots,m_{r}\in\{1,2,3\} and wβˆˆπ”–rw\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r} satisfying the assumptions of Lemma 4.4.6, we still denote by Ξ»w\lambda_{w} the element R⁑(Ξ»w)R(\lambda_{w}).

Lemma 4.4.7 has the following consequence.

0P6F

Lemma 4.4.8. Let G1,…,Gn∈{E1,E2,F1}G_{1},\ldots,G_{n}\in\{E_{1},E_{2},F_{1}\}. We have

Ξ»(1β‹―n+1)∘G1β‹―GnΞ·1=Ξ»(n+2β‹―2)∘η1G1β‹―Gn:G1β‹―Gnβ†’E1G1β‹―GnF1\lambda_{(1\cdots n+1)}\circ G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\eta_{1}=\lambda_{(n+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}:G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\to E_{1}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}F_{1}

and

Ξ΅1G1β‹―Gn∘λ(2β‹―n+2)=G1β‹―GnΞ΅1∘λ(n+1β‹―1):F1G1β‹―GnE1β†’G1β‹―Gn.\varepsilon_{1}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots n+2)}=G_{1}\cdots G_{n}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(n+1\cdots 1)}:F_{1}G_{1}\cdots G_{n}E_{1}\to G_{1}\cdots G_{n}.

4.4.4. 11-arrows

Let (m,Ο‚)βˆˆΞ”Ξ»β€‹π’²(m,\varsigma)\in\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. Let Ο€=π⁑(Ο‚)\pi=\pi(\varsigma) be the composition

Ο€:E2​(m)β†’E2​η1E2​E1​F1​(m)→σ​F1E1​E2​F1​(m)β†’E1​ς1E1​(m).\pi:E_{2}(m)\xrightarrow{E_{2}\eta_{1}}E_{2}E_{1}F_{1}(m)\xrightarrow{\sigma F_{1}}E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}(m)\xrightarrow{E_{1}\varsigma_{1}}E_{1}(m).

Note that Ο€\pi is also equal to the composition

Ο€:E2​(m)β†’Ξ·1​E2E1​F1​E2​(m)β†’E1​λE1​E2​F1​(m)β†’E1​ς1E1​(m)\pi:E_{2}(m)\xrightarrow{\eta_{1}E_{2}}E_{1}F_{1}E_{2}(m)\xrightarrow{E_{1}\lambda}E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}(m)\xrightarrow{E_{1}\varsigma_{1}}E_{1}(m)

since E1​λ​E1​F1∘η1​E2​E1​F1∘E2​η1=E1​E2​F1​η1∘E1β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜Ξ·1​E2E_{1}\lambda E_{1}F_{1}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{1}F_{1}\circ E_{2}\eta_{1}=E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\eta_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda\circ\eta_{1}E_{2} and E1​E2​F1​η1∘E1​E2​F1​Ρ1=idE1​E2​F1E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\eta_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varepsilon_{1}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}}.

The pair (m,Ο€)(m,\pi) defines an object of Δσ​𝒲\Delta_{\sigma}{\mathcal{W}}. We obtain a faithful differential functor Ξ“:Δλ​𝒲→Δσ​𝒲,(m,Ο‚)↦(m,Ο€)\Gamma:\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}\to\Delta_{\sigma}{\mathcal{W}},\ (m,\varsigma)\mapsto(m,\pi).

0P6G

Remark 4.4.9. The construction of Ο€\pi from Ο‚1\varsigma_{1} is illustrated below.

[Uncaptioned image]

We define now a differential functor E:Δλ​𝒲→Δλ​𝒲E:\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}\to\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}.

Let (m,Ο‚)βˆˆΞ”Ξ»β€‹π’²(m,\varsigma)\in\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. Let mβ€²=Β Β Β Β E2​(m)βŠ•E1​(m)   π         m^{\prime}={\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 35.11345pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-35.11345pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.5pt\hbox{$\textstyle{E_{2}(m)\oplus E_{1}(m)}$}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-6.76079pt\raise 19.04272pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.50694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\pi}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 19.91682pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces}}}}} where Ο€=π⁑(Ο‚1)\pi=\pi(\varsigma_{1}). Given iβ‰₯1i\geq 1, we define

Ο‚iβ€²=(E2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)0E1Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)):E2i​F1i​(mβ€²)β†’mβ€²\varsigma^{\prime}_{i}=\left(\begin{matrix}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}&\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\\ 0&E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\end{matrix}\right):E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m^{\prime})\to m^{\prime}
0P6H

Lemma 4.4.10. (mβ€²,Ο‚β€²)(m^{\prime},\varsigma^{\prime}) is an object of Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}.

0P6I

Proof. We have

d⁑((Ο‚iβ€²)11)\displaystyle d((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}) =E2Ο‚i∘d(Ο„2E2iβˆ’1βˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜E2iβˆ’1Ο„2)F1i∘λ(i+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ d(\tau_{2}E_{2}^{i-1}\circ\cdots\circ E_{2}^{i-1}\tau_{2})F_{1}^{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―r)(r+1β‹―i+1)∘λ(i+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(r+1\cdots i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―r)(r+1β‹―i+1)∘λ(i+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(r+1\cdots i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―r)(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(i+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=E2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―i)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i)}
(Ο‚iβ€²)12∘E2i​F1i​π=(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{12}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\pi=
=βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ο‚1∘λ(2​i,2​i+1)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1F1E2∘E2iF1iΞ·1E2∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varsigma_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i,2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}F_{1}E_{2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚i∘λ(i+1β‹―2i)∘λ(2​i,2​i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i)}\circ\lambda_{(2i,2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―i)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i)}
=d⁑((Ο‚iβ€²)11).\displaystyle=d((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}).
d⁑((Ο‚iβ€²)22)\displaystyle d((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{22}) =E1Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―i+1)∘E2id(ρF1iβˆ’1∘F1ρF1iβˆ’2βˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜F1iβˆ’1ρ)\displaystyle=E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}d(\rho F_{1}^{i-1}\circ F_{1}\rho F_{1}^{i-2}\circ\cdots\circ F_{1}^{i-1}\rho)
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―i+r)∘E2iF1rβˆ’1Ξ·1F1iβˆ’r∘E2iF1rβˆ’1Ξ΅1F1iβˆ’r∘λ(i+r+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i+r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{r-1}\eta_{1}F_{1}^{i-r}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{r-1}\varepsilon_{1}F_{1}^{i-r}\circ\lambda_{(i+r+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚i∘λ(i+r+1β‹―2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+r+1\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚i∘λ(i+r+1β‹―i+2)∘λ(i+2β‹―2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+r+1\cdots i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(i+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(i+2β‹―2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(i+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E1Ο‚i∘λ(i+2β‹―2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+1)\displaystyle=E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+1)}
Ο€βˆ˜(Ο‚iβ€²)12\displaystyle\pi\circ(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{12} =βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚1∘λ(12)∘E2Ξ·1∘E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{1}\circ\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{2}\eta_{1}\circ E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚1∘λ(23)∘η1E2∘E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{1}\circ\lambda_{(23)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚1∘E1E2F1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ23∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{23}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1Ο‚i∘λ(i+2β‹―3)∘λ23∘λ(3β‹―r+2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+2\cdots 3)}\circ\lambda_{23}\circ\lambda_{(3\cdots r+2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E1Ο‚i∘λ(i+2β‹―2)∘η1E2iF1iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)=d((Ο‚iβ€²)22).\displaystyle=E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+2\cdots 2)}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}=d((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{22}).

We have

d⁑((Ο‚iβ€²)12)=A+Bd((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{12})=A+B

where

A\displaystyle A =βˆ‘1≀s<r≀iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―s)(s+1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq s<r\leq i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s)(s+1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀s<r≀iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(s+1β‹―r)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―s)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq s<r\leq i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(s+1\cdots r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀s<r≀iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(i+rβˆ’1β‹―s+i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―s)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq s<r\leq i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(i+r-1\cdots s+i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀s<r≀iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―s)(2iβ‹―i+r)(i+rβˆ’1β‹―i+s)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq s<r\leq i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s)(2i\cdots i+r)(i+r-1\cdots i+s)}

and

B=βˆ‘1≀r′≀i1≀s′≀iβˆ’rβ€²E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―rβ€²)(2iβ‹―i+rβ€²+sβ€²)(i+rβ€²+sβ€²βˆ’1β‹―i+rβ€²)B=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r^{\prime}\leq i\\ 1\leq s^{\prime}\leq i-r^{\prime}\end{subarray}}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r^{\prime})(2i\cdots i+r^{\prime}+s^{\prime})(i+r^{\prime}+s^{\prime}-1\cdots i+r^{\prime})}

So A=BA=B and d⁑((Ο‚iβ€²)12)=0d((\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{12})=0.

We have shown that d⁑(Ο‚iβ€²)=0d(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})=0,

Fix r∈{1,…,i}r\in\{1,\ldots,i\}. We put br=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r):E2iF1iE1(m)β†’E2(m)b_{r}=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}:E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{1}(m)\to E_{2}(m).

Consider s∈{1,…,iβˆ’1}s\in\{1,\ldots,i-1\}.

If s>rs>r, we have

br​(TsβŠ—1)\displaystyle b_{r}(T_{s}\otimes 1) =E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(s,s+1)∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(s,s+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(i+sβˆ’1,i+s)∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(i+s-1,i+s)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(i+sβˆ’1,i+s)Ξ»(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(i+s-1,i+s)}\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)Ξ»(i+s,i+s+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\lambda_{(i+s,i+s+1)}
=br​(1βŠ—Ts).\displaystyle=b_{r}(1\otimes T_{s}).

If s<rβˆ’1s<r-1, we have

br​(1βŠ—Ts)\displaystyle b_{r}(1\otimes T_{s}) =E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(i+s,i+s+1)∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(i+s,i+s+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(s+1,s+2)∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(s+1,s+2)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(s+1,s+2)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(s+1,s+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(s,s+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(s,s+1)}
=br​(TsβŠ—1).\displaystyle=b_{r}(T_{s}\otimes 1).

We have

br(Trβˆ’1βŠ—1)=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(rβˆ’1,r)=0b_{r}(T_{r-1}\otimes 1)=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(r-1,r)}=0
br(1βŠ—Tr)=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(i+r,i+r+1)=0b_{r}(1\otimes T_{r})=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(i+r,i+r+1)}=0
br(1βŠ—Trβˆ’1)=E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iFiβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+rβˆ’1)=brβˆ’1(Trβˆ’1βŠ—1).b_{r}(1\otimes T_{r-1})=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r-1)}=b_{r-1}(T_{r-1}\otimes 1).

We have shown that (Ο‚i)12​(1βŠ—Ts)=(Ο‚i)12​(TsβŠ—1)(\varsigma_{i})_{12}(1\otimes T_{s})=(\varsigma_{i})_{12}(T_{s}\otimes 1).

We have

(Ο‚iβ€²)11​(TsβŠ—1)\displaystyle(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}(T_{s}\otimes 1) =E2Ο‚i∘λ(s+1,s+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(s+1,s+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=E2Ο‚i∘λ(i+s+1,i+s+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(i+s+1,i+s+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=E2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)Ξ»(i+s,i+s+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\lambda_{(i+s,i+s+1)}
=(Ο‚iβ€²)11​(1βŠ—Ts).\displaystyle=(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}(1\otimes T_{s}).

Similarly,

(Ο‚iβ€²)22​(TsβŠ—1)=(Ο‚iβ€²)11​(1βŠ—Ts).(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{22}(T_{s}\otimes 1)=(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}(1\otimes T_{s}).

So Ο‚i​(1βŠ—Ts)=Ο‚i​(TsβŠ—1)\varsigma_{i}(1\otimes T_{s})=\varsigma_{i}(T_{s}\otimes 1).

Let l∈{1,2}l\in\{1,2\}. We have

(Ο‚i+jβ€²)l​l∘μi​j=El​ςi+j∘λw(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i+j})_{ll}\circ\mu_{ij}=E_{l}\varsigma_{i+j}\circ\lambda_{w}

where w⁑(r)=rw(r)=r and w⁑(i+r)=i+r+j+1w(i+r)=i+r+j+1 for 1≀r≀i1\leq r\leq i, w⁑(2​i+r)=i+rw(2i+r)=i+r and w⁑(2​i+j+r)=2​i+j+r+1w(2i+j+r)=2i+j+r+1 for 1≀r≀j1\leq r\leq j and w⁑(2​i+2​j+1)=i+j+1w(2i+2j+1)=i+j+1.

We have

(Ο‚iβ€²)l​l∘(Ο‚jβ€²)l​l\displaystyle(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{ll}\circ(\varsigma^{\prime}_{j})_{ll} =ElΟ‚i∘ElE2iF1iΟ‚j∘λ(1β‹…2​i+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+2j+1)\displaystyle=E_{l}\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{l}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\varsigma_{j}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdot 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+2j+1)}
=ElΟ‚i+j∘λwβ€²βˆ˜Ξ»(1β‹…2​i+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+2j+1)\displaystyle=E_{l}\varsigma_{i+j}\circ\lambda_{w^{\prime}}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdot 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+2j+1)}

where w′​(r)=rw^{\prime}(r)=r for 1≀r≀i+11\leq r\leq i+1, w′​(i+1+r)=i+j+1+rw^{\prime}(i+1+r)=i+j+1+r for 1≀r≀i1\leq r\leq i, w′​(1+2​i+r)=1+i+rw^{\prime}(1+2i+r)=1+i+r and w′​(1+2​i+j+r)=1+2​i+j+rw^{\prime}(1+2i+j+r)=1+2i+j+r for 1≀r≀j1\leq r\leq j.

It follows that (Ο‚i+jβ€²)l​l∘μi​j=(Ο‚iβ€²)l​l∘(Ο‚jβ€²)l​l(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i+j})_{ll}\circ\mu_{ij}=(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{ll}\circ(\varsigma^{\prime}_{j})_{ll}.

Given l≀l′≀1l\leq l^{\prime}\leq 1, we put blβ€²,l=E2Ο‚lβ€²βˆ’1∘E2lβ€²Flβ€²βˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―l)(2lβ€²β‹―lβ€²+l):E2lβ€²F1lβ€²E1(m)β†’E2(m)b_{l^{\prime},l}=E_{2}\varsigma_{l^{\prime}-1}\circ E_{2}^{l^{\prime}}F_{l^{\prime}-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots l)(2l^{\prime}\cdots l^{\prime}+l)}:E_{2}^{l^{\prime}}F_{1}^{l^{\prime}}E_{1}(m)\to E_{2}(m). We denote by wl1,l2w_{l_{1},l_{2}} the permutation of 𝔖l1+l2{\mathfrak{S}}_{l_{1}+l_{2}} given by s↦s+l2s\mapsto s+l_{2} for 1≀s≀l11\leq s\leq l_{1} and s↦sβˆ’l1s\mapsto s-l_{1} for l1+1≀s≀l1+l2l_{1}+1\leq s\leq l_{1}+l_{2}.

Consider r∈{1,…,i}r\in\{1,\ldots,i\}. We have

bi,r∘(Ο‚jβ€²)22\displaystyle b_{i,r}\circ(\varsigma^{\prime}_{j})_{22} =E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ο‚j∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E2jF1j∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+2j+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varsigma_{j}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+2j+1)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘λwiβˆ’1,j∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E2jF1j∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+2j+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ\lambda_{w_{i-1,j}}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+2j+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2iΞ»wiβˆ’1,jF1j∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E2jF1jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2i+2jβ‹―2i)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{w_{i-1,j}}F_{1}^{j}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+2j\cdots 2i)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2iΞ»wiβˆ’1,jF1j∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E2jF1jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2i+2jβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{w_{i-1,j}}F_{1}^{j}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+2j\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2i+jF1i+jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘E2iΞ»wiβˆ’1,jF1j+1E1∘λ(2i+2jβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{w_{i-1,j}}F_{1}^{j+1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+2j\cdots i+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2i+jF1i+jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2i+2jβ‹―i+j+r)∘E2iΞ»wi,jF1jE1\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+2j\cdots i+j+r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{w_{i,j}}F_{1}^{j}E_{1}
=bi+j,r∘μi,j.\displaystyle=b_{i+j,r}\circ\mu_{i,j}.

Consider r∈{1,…,j}r\in\{1,\ldots,j\}. We have

(Ο‚iβ€²)11∘bj,r\displaystyle(\varsigma^{\prime}_{i})_{11}\circ b_{j,r} =E2Ο‚i∘E2i+1F1iΟ‚jβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iE2jF1jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+r)(2i+2jβ‹―2i+j+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i}\varsigma_{j-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+r)(2i+2j\cdots 2i+j+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2i+1Ξ»wi,jβˆ’1F1jβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iE2jF1jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+r)(2i+2jβ‹―2i+j+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}\lambda_{w_{i,j-1}}F_{1}^{j-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+r)(2i+2j\cdots 2i+j+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2i+jF1i+jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘E2i+1Ξ»wi,jβˆ’1F1jE1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―2i+r)(2i+2jβ‹―2i+j+r)\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}\lambda_{w_{i,j-1}}F_{1}^{j}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots 2i+r)(2i+2j\cdots 2i+j+r)}
=E2Ο‚i+jβˆ’1∘E2i+jF1i+jβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―i+r)(2i+2jβ‹―2i+j+r)∘E2iΞ»wi,jF1jE1\displaystyle=E_{2}\varsigma_{i+j-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i+r)(2i+2j\cdots 2i+j+r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{w_{i,j}}F_{1}^{j}E_{1}
=bi+j,j+r∘μi,j.\displaystyle=b_{i+j,j+r}\circ\mu_{i,j}.

It follows that for all i,jβ‰₯1i,j\geq 1, we have Ο‚i∘E2i​F1i​ςj=Ο‚i+j∘μi,j\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\varsigma_{j}=\varsigma_{i+j}\circ\mu_{i,j}. ∎

0P6J

Remark 4.4.11. The graphical description of Ο‚β€²\varsigma^{\prime} is the following:

[Uncaptioned image]

Given f∈HomΔλ​𝒲⁑((m,Ο‚),(m~,Ο‚~))f\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}}((m,\varsigma),(\tilde{m},\tilde{\varsigma})), we put E⁑(f)=(E2​(f)00E1​(f))E(f)=\left(\begin{matrix}E_{2}(f)&0\\ 0&E_{1}(f)\end{matrix}\right).

0P6K

Lemma 4.4.12. We have E⁑(f)∈HomΔλ​𝒲⁑(E⁑(m,Ο‚),E⁑(m~,Ο‚~))E(f)\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}}(E(m,\varsigma),E(\tilde{m},\tilde{\varsigma})). The construction makes EE into a differential endofunctor of Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}.

0P6L

Proof. The lemma follows from the commutativity of the following diagram:

E2i​F1i​E2​(m)βŠ•E2i​F1i​E1​(m)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}(m)\oplus E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{1}(m)}E2​(m)βŠ•E1​(m)\textstyle{E_{2}(m)\oplus E_{1}(m)}E2i​F1i​E2​(m~)βŠ•E2i​F1i​E1​(m~)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}(\tilde{m})\oplus E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{1}(\tilde{m})}E2​(m~)βŠ•E1​(m~)\textstyle{E_{2}(\tilde{m})\oplus E_{1}(\tilde{m})}E2Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\scriptstyle{E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}}E1Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\scriptstyle{E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}}βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\scriptstyle{\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}}E2i​F1i​E2​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}f}E2i​F1i​E1​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{1}f}E2​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}f}E1​f\scriptstyle{E_{1}f}E2Ο‚~i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\scriptstyle{E_{2}\tilde{\varsigma}_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}}E1Ο‚~i∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\scriptstyle{E_{1}\tilde{\varsigma}_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}}βˆ‘r=1iE2Ο‚~iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\scriptstyle{\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}\tilde{\varsigma}_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}}

∎

0P6M

Lemma 4.4.13. We have Eβˆ˜Ξ“=Ξ“βˆ˜EE\circ\Gamma=\Gamma\circ E.

0P6N

Proof. Let (m,Ο‚)βˆˆΞ”Ξ»β€‹π’²(m,\varsigma)\in\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. We have E⁑(m,Ο€)=(mβ€²,Ο€β€²)E(m,\pi)=(m^{\prime},\pi^{\prime}) where mβ€²=cone⁑(Ο€)m^{\prime}=\operatorname{cone}\nolimits(\pi) and Ο€β€²\pi^{\prime} is given in Β§4.3.2. We have Ξ“βˆ˜E⁑(m,Ο‚)=(mβ€²,Ο€β€²β€²)\Gamma\circ E(m,\varsigma)=(m^{\prime},\pi^{\prime\prime}) where

Ο€12β€²β€²=E1​E2​Ρ1∘E1​λ​E1∘η1​E2​E1=Οƒ,Ο€21β€²β€²=0\pi^{\prime\prime}_{12}=E_{1}E_{2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{1}\lambda E_{1}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{1}=\sigma,\ \pi^{\prime\prime}_{21}=0
Ο€11β€²β€²\displaystyle\pi^{\prime\prime}_{11} =E1​E2​ς1∘E1​E2β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E1​λ​E2∘E1​F1​τ2∘η1​E22\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\lambda\circ E_{1}\lambda E_{2}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\tau_{2}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{2}
=E1​E2​ς1∘E1​E2β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E1​λ​E2∘η1​E22βˆ˜Ο„2\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\lambda\circ E_{1}\lambda E_{2}\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}^{2}\circ\tau_{2}
=E1​E2​ς1∘E1​E2β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜Οƒβ€‹F1​E2∘E2​η1​E2βˆ˜Ο„2\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\lambda\circ\sigma F_{1}E_{2}\circ E_{2}\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ\tau_{2}
=Οƒβˆ˜E2​E1​ς1∘E2​E1β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E2​η1​E2βˆ˜Ο„2\displaystyle=\sigma\circ E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{2}E_{1}\lambda\circ E_{2}\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ\tau_{2}
=Ο€11β€²\displaystyle=\pi^{\prime}_{11}
Ο€22β€²β€²\displaystyle\pi^{\prime\prime}_{22} =E12​ς1∘E12β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E1​ρ​E2∘E1​F1β€‹Οƒβˆ˜Ξ·1​E2​E1\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}^{2}\lambda\circ E_{1}\rho E_{2}\circ E_{1}F_{1}\sigma\circ\eta_{1}E_{2}E_{1}
=E12​ς1∘E12β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E1​ρ​E2∘η1​E1​E2βˆ˜Οƒ\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}^{2}\lambda\circ E_{1}\rho E_{2}\circ\eta_{1}E_{1}E_{2}\circ\sigma
=E12​ς1∘E12β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜Ο„1​F1​E2∘E1​η1​E2βˆ˜Οƒ\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}^{2}\lambda\circ\tau_{1}F_{1}E_{2}\circ E_{1}\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ\sigma
=Ο„1∘E12​ς1∘E12β€‹Ξ»βˆ˜E1​η1​E2βˆ˜Οƒ\displaystyle=\tau_{1}\circ E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{1}\circ E_{1}^{2}\lambda\circ E_{1}\eta_{1}E_{2}\circ\sigma
=Ο€22β€²\displaystyle=\pi^{\prime}_{22}

It follows that Ο€β€²β€²=Ο€β€²\pi^{\prime\prime}=\pi^{\prime}. ∎

4.4.5. 22-arrows

We assume in Β§4.4.5 that Οƒ\sigma is invertible.

Given (m,Ο‚)βˆˆΞ”Ξ»β€‹π’²(m,\varsigma)\in\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}, write E2​(m,Ο‚)=(mβ€²β€²,Ο‚β€²β€²)E^{2}(m,\varsigma)=(m^{\prime\prime},\varsigma^{\prime\prime}). The formula (4.3.3) defines an endomorphism Ο„\tau of mβ€²β€²m^{\prime\prime}.

0P6P

Lemma 4.4.14. Given iβ‰₯1i\geq 1, we have Ο„βˆ˜Ο‚iβ€²β€²=Ο‚iβ€²β€²βˆ˜E2i​F1i​τ\tau\circ\varsigma^{\prime\prime}_{i}=\varsigma^{\prime\prime}_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\tau.

0P6Q

Proof. Let A=Ο„βˆ˜Ο‚iβ€²β€²A=\tau\circ\varsigma^{\prime\prime}_{i} and B=Ο‚iβ€²β€²βˆ˜E2i​F1i​τB=\varsigma^{\prime\prime}_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\tau.

We have

a21=a22=a31=a32=a33=a34=a41=a42=a43=0a_{21}=a_{22}=a_{31}=a_{32}=a_{33}=a_{34}=a_{41}=a_{42}=a_{43}=0
a11\displaystyle a_{11} =Ξ»(12)∘E22Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=E22Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
a12\displaystyle a_{12} =βˆ‘r=1iΞ»(12)∘E22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2i+1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2i+1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(12)∘λ(1β‹―i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(i+1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(12)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(i+1\cdots 2i+1)}
=0\displaystyle=0
a13\displaystyle a_{13} =βˆ‘r=1iΞ»(12)∘E22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(2β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E2∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{2}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E2∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Οƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{2}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\sigma^{-1}
=βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E2Ξ΅1∘λ(2​i,2​i+1)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Οƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i,2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\sigma^{-1}
=βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2i+1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Οƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\sigma^{-1}
a14\displaystyle a_{14} =βˆ‘1≀r≀i1≀s<iΞ»(12)∘E22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―s+1)(2iβˆ’1β‹―i+s)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r\leq i\\ 1\leq s<i\end{subarray}}\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots s+1)(2i-1\cdots i+s)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀r≀i1≀s<iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(1β‹―s+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβˆ’1β‹―i+s)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r\leq i\\ 1\leq s<i\end{subarray}}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i-1\cdots i+s)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀r≀s<iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(1β‹―s+1)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+s+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq r\leq s<i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+s+1)}
a23\displaystyle a_{23} =Οƒβˆ’1∘E1E2Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sigma^{-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=Οƒβˆ’1∘E1E2Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sigma^{-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
=Οƒβˆ’1∘E1E2Ο‚i∘λ(12)∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sigma^{-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(12)}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
=E1E2Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
a24\displaystyle a_{24} =βˆ‘r=1iΟƒβˆ’1∘E1E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E1E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2E1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2E1E2iβˆ’1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1βˆ˜Οƒβˆ’1E2iβˆ’1F1iE1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}E_{1}E_{2}^{i-1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\sigma^{-1}E_{2}^{i-1}F_{1}^{i}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2E1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2E1E2iβˆ’1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―2i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}E_{1}E_{2}^{i-1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
a44\displaystyle a_{44} =Ξ»(12)∘E12Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=\lambda_{(12)}\circ E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
=E12Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}

We have

b21=b12=b22=b31=b32=b33=b41=b42=b43=0b_{21}=b_{12}=b_{22}=b_{31}=b_{32}=b_{33}=b_{41}=b_{42}=b_{43}=0
b11\displaystyle b_{11} =E22Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)\displaystyle=E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}
=E22Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}
b13\displaystyle b_{13} =βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2i+1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
=βˆ‘r=1iE22Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2i+1F1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i+1}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
b14\displaystyle b_{14} =βˆ‘1≀r≀i1≀s<iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―s+1)(2iβˆ’1β‹―i+s)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)\displaystyle=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r\leq i\\ 1\leq s<i\end{subarray}}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots s+1)(2i-1\cdots i+s)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}
=βˆ‘1≀r≀i1≀s<iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘λ(2β‹―s+1)(2iβˆ’1β‹―i+s)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r\leq i\\ 1\leq s<i\end{subarray}}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots s+1)(2i-1\cdots i+s)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀r≀i1≀s<iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2​iβˆ’1,2​i)∘λ(2β‹―s+1)(2iβˆ’1β‹―i+s)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}1\leq r\leq i\\ 1\leq s<i\end{subarray}}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i-1,2i)}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots s+1)(2i-1\cdots i+s)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀s<r≀iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2β‹―s+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+s)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq s<r\leq i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots s+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+s)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘1≀r′≀s′≀iE22Ο‚iβˆ’2∘E2iF1iβˆ’2Ξ΅1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2β‹―rβ€²+1)∘λ(1β‹―sβ€²+1)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+rβ€²)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+sβ€²+1)\displaystyle=\sum_{1\leq r^{\prime}\leq s^{\prime}\leq i}E_{2}^{2}\varsigma_{i-2}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r^{\prime}+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots s^{\prime}+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r^{\prime})}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+s^{\prime}+1)}
b23=E2E1Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘E2iF1iΟƒβˆ’1b_{23}=E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\sigma^{-1}
b24\displaystyle b_{24} =βˆ‘r=1iE2E1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(2β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2E1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(2β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E1Ξ΅1∘λ(2​i,2​i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i,2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE2E1Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―2i+1)∘λ(1β‹―r)(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{2}E_{1}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)(2i\cdots i+r)}
b34\displaystyle b_{34} =βˆ‘r=1iE1E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E1E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(2β‹―r+1)∘λ(2i+1β‹―i+r+1)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1\cdots i+r+1)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘E1E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1∘λ(1β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ E_{1}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1E1Ξ΅1∘λ(2​i,2​i+1)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}E_{1}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i,2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=βˆ‘r=1iE1E2Ο‚iβˆ’1∘λ(1β‹―2i)∘E2iF1iβˆ’1Ξ΅1E1∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)∘λ(1β‹―r)∘λ(2iβ‹―i+r)\displaystyle=\sum_{r=1}^{i}E_{1}E_{2}\varsigma_{i-1}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i)}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i-1}\varepsilon_{1}E_{1}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots r)}\circ\lambda_{(2i\cdots i+r)}
=0\displaystyle=0
b44\displaystyle b_{44} =E12Ο‚i∘λ(2β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)∘λ(2​i+1,2​i+2)\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(2\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}\circ\lambda_{(2i+1,2i+2)}
=E12Ο‚i∘λ(1β‹―2i+2)∘λ(1β‹―2i+1)\displaystyle=E_{1}^{2}\varsigma_{i}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+2)}\circ\lambda_{(1\cdots 2i+1)}

We deduce that A=BA=B and the lemma follows. ∎

Lemma 4.4.14 shows that Ο„\tau defines an endomorphism of E2​(m,Ο‚)E^{2}(m,\varsigma) for all (m,Ο‚)βˆˆΞ”Ξ»β€‹π’²(m,\varsigma)\in\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. The functor Ξ“\Gamma is faithful, Γ​E2=E2​Γ\Gamma E^{2}=E^{2}\Gamma (Lemma 4.4.13) and Ο„\tau commutes with Ξ“\Gamma. It follows that Ο„\tau is functorial.

Theorem 4.3.8 has the following consequence.

0P6R

Theorem 4.4.15. The data (Δλ​𝒲,E,Ο„)(\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}},E,\tau) is an idempotent-complete strongly pretriangulated 22-representation.

The following proposition is a consequence of Lemma 4.4.13 and the construction of Ο„\tau.

0P6S

Proposition 4.4.16. The functor Ξ“:Δλ​𝒲→Δσ​𝒲\Gamma:\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}\to\Delta_{\sigma}{\mathcal{W}} induces a morphism of 22-representations.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2