ScalingStacks

7.3.1. Admissible paths

Let ZZ be a curve.

0P9M

Definition 7.3.1. An oriented path γ\gamma in ZZ is defined to be a path whose restriction to γ−1​(Zo−Ze​x​c)\gamma^{-1}(Z_{o}-Z_{exc}) is compatible (non strictly) with the orientation.

Let us note some basics facts about oriented paths.

0P9N

Properties 7.3.2. Let γ\gamma be a non-constant oriented path in ZZ.

  • (1)

    We have γ⁡([0,1])∩Zo=supp⁡([γ])∩Zo\gamma([0,1])\cap Z_{o}=\operatorname{supp}\nolimits([\gamma])\cap Z_{o} and γ⁡([0,1])∩Zu\gamma([0,1])\cap Z_{u} is contained in the union of the connected components of ZuZ_{u} that have a non-empty intersection with supp⁡([γ])\operatorname{supp}\nolimits([\gamma]).

  • (2)

    If γ\gamma is homotopic to a constant path, then it is contained in ZuZ_{u} (as γ⁡([0,1])\gamma([0,1]) is contractible).

  • (3)

    There are unique real numbers 0=t0<t1<⋯<tr=10=t_{0}<t_{1}<\cdots<t_{r}=1 such that

    • –

      given 0≤i<r0\leq i<r, there are {j,k}={i,i+1}\{j,k\}=\{i,i+1\} with the property that γ⁡([tj,tj+1])⊆Zu\gamma([t_{j},t_{j+1}])\subseteq Z_{u} (if j<rj<r) and γ⁡([tk,tk+1])⊆Z¯o\gamma([t_{k},t_{k+1}])\subseteq\bar{Z}_{o} (if k<rk<r) (cf Lemma 7.1.16 for E=Zu∩Z¯oE=Z_{u}\cap\bar{Z}_{o}).

    • –

      given 0<i<r0<i<r and ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that γ⁡([ti,ti+ε])⊂Zu∩Z¯o\gamma([t_{i},t_{i}+\varepsilon])\subset Z_{u}\cap\bar{Z}_{o}, we have γ⁡([ti,ti+1])⊈Z¯o\gamma([t_{i},t_{i+1}]){\not\subseteq}\bar{Z}_{o}

    • –

      given 0<i<r0<i<r and ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that γ⁡([ti−ε,ti])⊂Zu∩Z¯o\gamma([t_{i}-\varepsilon,t_{i}])\subset Z_{u}\cap\bar{Z}_{o}, we have γ⁡([ti−1,ti])⊈Z¯o\gamma([t_{i-1},t_{i}]){\not\subseteq}\bar{Z}_{o}.

    The sequence [γ|[t0,t1]],…,[γ|[tr−1,tr]][\gamma_{|[t_{0},t_{1}]}],\ldots,[\gamma_{|[t_{r-1},t_{r}]}] depends only on [γ][\gamma].

  • (4)

    Consider homotopy classes of oriented paths ζ1\zeta_{1}, ζ2\zeta_{2} and ζ3\zeta_{3} with [γ]=ζ3∘ζ2∘ζ1[\gamma]=\zeta_{3}\circ\zeta_{2}\circ\zeta_{1}. If supp⁡(ζ2)\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta_{2}) is contained in Zo¯\overline{Z_{o}} but not in ZuZ_{u}, then there are 0≤t1≤t2≤10\leq t_{1}\leq t_{2}\leq 1 such that [γ|[0,t1]]=ζ1[\gamma_{|[0,t_{1}]}]=\zeta_{1}, [γ|[t1,t2]]=ζ2[\gamma_{|[t_{1},t_{2}]}]=\zeta_{2} and [γ|[t2,1]]=ζ3[\gamma_{|[t_{2},1]}]=\zeta_{3}.

0P9P

Lemma 7.3.3. Let γ\gamma be a path in ZZ. The following conditions are equivalent:

  • (i)

    γ\gamma lifts to a path in the non-singular cover of ZZ

  • (ii)

    given z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}, given a small open neighbourhood UU of zz in ZoZ_{o} and given KK a connected component of γ−1​(z)\gamma^{-1}(z), the set of L∈π0​(U−{z})L\in\pi_{0}(U-\{z\}) with K∩γ−1​(L)¯≠∅K\cap\overline{\gamma^{-1}(L)}\neq\emptyset is contained in an orbit of ι\iota.

0P9Q

Proof. Let Z^\hat{Z} be the non-singular cover of ZZ and q:Z^→Zq:\hat{Z}\to Z be the quotient map.

Assume (i). Consider zz, UU, KK as in the lemma and let γ^\hat{\gamma} be a lift of γ\gamma. Consider Li∈π0​(U−{z})L_{i}\in\pi_{0}(U-\{z\}) with K∩γ−1​(Li)¯≠∅K\cap\overline{\gamma^{-1}(L_{i})}\neq\emptyset for i∈{1,2}i\in\{1,2\}. We have γ^​(K)⊂q−1​(Li)¯\hat{\gamma}(K)\subset\overline{q^{-1}(L_{i})}. Consequently, we have q−1​(L1)¯∩q−1​(L2)¯≠∅\overline{q^{-1}(L_{1})}\cap\overline{q^{-1}(L_{2})}\neq\emptyset. If L1L_{1} and L2L_{2} are not in the same ι\iota-orbit, then q−1​(L1)¯\overline{q^{-1}(L_{1})} and q−1​(L2)¯\overline{q^{-1}(L_{2})} are in distinct connected components of q−1​(U)¯\overline{q^{-1}(U)}, a contradiction. So, (ii) holds.

Assume (ii). Since lifts of non-identity paths are unique if they exist (Lemma 7.1.20), it is enough to show the existence of lifts locally on ZZ. This is clear for a small open neighbourhood of a point of Z−Ze​x​cZ-Z_{exc}. Consider now z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc} and a small open neighbourhood UU of zz in ZoZ_{o}. Let KK be a connected component of γ−1​(z)\gamma^{-1}(z) and let WW be the connected component of γ−1​(U)\gamma^{-1}(U) containing KK. There is L∈π0​(U−{z})L\in\pi_{0}(U-\{z\}) such that γ⁡(W)⊂L∪{z}∪ι⁡(L)\gamma(W)\subset L\cup\{z\}\cup\iota(L). Since qq splits over L∪{z}∪ι⁡(L)L\cup\{z\}\cup\iota(L), it follows that the restriction of γ\gamma to WW lifts to Z^\hat{Z}. ∎

0P9R

Definition 7.3.4. We say that a path γ\gamma in ZZ is smooth if it satisfies the equivalent conditions of Lemma 7.3.3.

We say that a path γ\gamma in ZZ is admissible if it is oriented and smooth.

We say that a homotopy class of paths is smooth (resp. admissible, resp. oriented) if it contains a smooth (resp. an admissible, resp. an oriented) path.

Let us note some basic properties of smooth and admissible paths and classes.

0P9S

Properties 7.3.5.

  • (1)

    A path is smooth if and only if its inverse is smooth.

  • (2)

    A smooth path is contained in a component of ZZ.

  • (3)

    Every admissible path γ\gamma is homotopic to a minimal admissible path via a homotopy involving only admissible paths contained in the support of γ\gamma (cf Lemma 7.1.18).

  • (4)

    A minimal path in a smooth (resp. admissible) homotopy class is smooth (resp. admissible).

  • (5)

    An oriented path is admissible if and only if its homotopy class is admissible (Lemma 7.1.16 provides a minimal oriented path γm​i​n\gamma_{min} homotopic to a given oriented path γ\gamma with the property that γ\gamma is admissible if γm​i​n\gamma_{min} is admissible, hence we obtain the desired equivalence by (4) above).

  • (6)

    Given two oriented homotopy classes of paths α\alpha and β\beta with α∘β\alpha\circ\beta admissible, then α\alpha and β\beta are admissible (cf (5) above).

0P9T

Definition 7.3.6. Given two smooth non-identity homotopy classes of paths ζ1\zeta_{1} and ζ2\zeta_{2} contained in the same component of ZZ, there is a unique ε∈{±1}\varepsilon\in\{\pm 1\} such that there is a minimal smooth path γ\gamma in ZZ with the property that ζ1\zeta_{1} and ζ2ε\zeta_{2}^{\varepsilon} are equal to the classes of restrictions of γ\gamma. We say that ζ1\zeta_{1} and ζ2\zeta_{2} have the same orientation (resp. opposite orientation) if ε=1\varepsilon=1 (resp. ε=−1\varepsilon=-1).

Note that ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} and ZZ have the same smooth paths. Note also that the notion of “opposite orientation” does not depend on the orientation of ZZ.

0P9U

Remark 7.3.7. Assume X⊂𝐑NX\subset{\mathbf{R}}^{N} is obtained by the construction of Remark 7.2.5. A homotopy class of paths in XX is smooth if and only if it contains a path γ\gamma such that the composition [0,1]→𝛾X↪𝐑N[0,1]\xrightarrow{\gamma}X\hookrightarrow{\mathbf{R}}^{N} is a smooth immersion.

0P9V

Example 7.3.8. We give below some examples of paths. The top and bottom paths are admissible, while the middle one is not. The left and middle columns describe the path in the singular curve, while the right column describes the lifted path (if it exists) in the non-singular cover.

In the middle and right columns, and throughout the paper, we depict paths γ\gamma using their time-reversed graphs, so that γ⁡(0)\gamma(0) is on the right and γ⁡(1)\gamma(1) is on the left.

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2