ScalingStacks

0PD2

Proof. Let β∧α∈Hom(−⊔(−n,−1),T)∧Hom(S,−⊔(1,n))\beta\wedge\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(-\sqcup(-n,-1),T)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S,-\sqcup(1,n)). We have β∧α=β′∧α′\beta\wedge\alpha=\beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha^{\prime} where β′=β|(−n,−1)⊠id\beta^{\prime}=\beta_{|(-n,-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits and α′=(β|⁣−⊠id(1,n))⋅α\alpha^{\prime}=(\beta_{|-}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{(1,n)})\cdot\alpha. If νn​(β′∧α′)=0\nu_{n}(\beta^{\prime}\wedge\alpha^{\prime})=0, then β′=α′=0\beta^{\prime}=\alpha^{\prime}=0 (cf the beginning of §7.4.10). Now νn\nu_{n} has an inverse given by σ↦(id⊠σ|(−n,−1))∧σ|S\sigma\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\sigma_{|(-n,-1)})\wedge\sigma_{|S}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2