7.2.2. Morphisms and subcurves
0P97
Definition 7.2.2. A morphism of curves is a morphism of -dimensional spaces such that
- •
- •
is orientation-preserving
- •
given , the canonical map
is -equivariant.
Note that a composition of morphisms of curves is a morphism of curves.
Let be a morphism of curves. We have the following statements.
0P98
Properties 7.2.3.
- •
is invertible if and only if it is a homeomorphism and .
- •
and
is -equivariant for
all .
- •
restricts to a homeomorphism from to the open
subset of , since
.
In particular, the restriction of to is a homeomorphism .
- •
If is non-singular, then is an open embedding.
We say that is strict if
is closed in and . Note that this implies
that is also open in .
0P99
Definition 7.2.4. A subcurve
of is a -dimensional subspace of such that
given , the image of in is -stable.
If is a subcurve of , then is a curve with
, and is defined on
as the restriction of on , for . Note that
is open in .
Equivalently, a subspace of is a subcurve if it is a curve,
and
the inclusion map is a morphism of curves.
We define an equivalence relation on connected components of : it is the
relation generated by if there is , a small open neighbourhood of and
such that and .
Let be the set of equivalence classes of connected components of .
Given , let . The subspaces
of are called the components of .
A curve has only finitely many components, each of which is a closed subcurve.
If is non-singular, then its components are its connected components.
The local structure of a curve is described as follows.
Let .
There is an open neighbourhood of that is a subcurve of
and an isomorphism of curves , where is
one of the following:
- •
viewed as an unoriented manifold, if
- •
where is unoriented and has either
of its two orientations, if
- •
viewed as an oriented manifold, if
- •
if .
7.2.3. Quotients
Let be a curve.
0P9B
Definition 7.2.6. A finite relation
on is an equivalence relation such that
the set of points that are not alone in their equivalence class is finite and
contained in .
Consider a finite relation on .
We define a curve structure on the -dimensional space .
Let be the quotient map. We have
(cf §7.1.3).
Let .
The map is a homeomorphism and we provide with the orientation
coming from . Let . We define
on to make the canonical bijection
-equivariant.
This makes into a strict morphism of curves.
0P9C
Lemma 7.2.7. Let be a morphism of curves.
Define an equivalence
relation on by if . This is a finite
relation on and factors as a composition of morphisms
of curves where
is the quotient map and is injective.
0P9D
Proof. We have .
It follows that is a finite relation on and the lemma follows
from Lemma 7.1.13.
∎
We define the category of non-singular curves with a finite relation as the category
with objects pairs where is a non-singular curve and is a
finite relation on , and where
is the set of morphisms of curves such that
if , then .
The next proposition shows that curves can be viewed as non-singular curves with
a finite relation.
0P9E
Proposition 7.2.8. The quotient construction defines an equivalence from the category of
non-singular curves with a finite relation to the category of curves.
0P9F
Proof. Let and be two non-singular
curves with finite relations
and let and be the quotient maps.
A morphism of curves
such that implies induces
a morphism of curves . So, the quotient
functor induces indeed a functor as claimed. Consider
such that implies .
If , then and coincide outside a finite set of points,
hence . So, the quotient functor is faithful.
Consider now a morphism of curves . Let
be the finite subset of of points that are not alone
in their equivalence class and .
Consider the composition of continuous maps
|
|
|
Given , the
-equivariance of
ensures that extends to a continuous map at .
So, extends (uniquely) to a continuous map , and that map is a morphism of -dimensional spaces.
We have and
. Since
is
orientation-preserving, it follows that
is orientation-preserving.
So, is a morphism of curves and it is
compatible with the relations.
This shows that the quotient functor is fully faithful.
Let now be a curve.
Let and be a small open neighbourhood of .
Fix an isomorphism of
curves .
The equivalence relation on whose equivalence classes are the
orbits of defines via the equivalence relation on
given by if and only
if .
The proof of Lemma 7.1.14 provides us
a non-singular curve with a finite relation.
Indeed, with the notations of the proof of Lemma 7.1.14,
we have .
Note that is the subspace of obtained by adding to
the point
of for each and
each .
This gives a structure of non-singular curve.
As in the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we obtain
a finite relation on and an isomorphism of curves
. This shows that the quotient functor is essentially
surjective.
∎
0P9G
Definition 7.2.9. Given a curve, the non-singular cover
of is a non-singular curve
, together with a finite relation and an isomorphism
.
Note that where is the canonical map.
Proposition 7.2.8 shows that non-singular covers exist and
are unique up to a unique isomorphism. The following proposition makes this more precise.
0P9H
Proposition 7.2.10. The functor sending a curve to its non-singular cover is right adjoint to
the embedding of the category of non-singular curves in the category of curves.
0P9I
Proof. Let be a non-singular curve.
We have a map . Since
is finite, it follows that is injective.
Consider now a morphism of curves . We factor as
as in
Lemma 7.2.7. By Proposition
7.2.8, there is a morphism such that
, hence . So is surjective.
∎
0P9J
Example 7.2.11. Let us provide some examples of curves and non-singular covers.
The dotted lines link the points in the same equivalence class.
The grey part corresponds to .
7.2.4. Chord diagrams as singular curves
We describe here the relation between singular curves and
chord (or arc) diagrams.
We define a chord diagram to be
to be a triple where
- •
is a closed oriented -dimensional manifold
(i.e., a finite disjoint union of copies of
and )
- •
is a finite set of pairs of points of , all
of which are distinct.
A chord diagram gives rise to a smooth oriented curve with the following relation: given , we have
if .
We obtain an oriented curve and a map
inducing a bijection
.
Up to suitable isomorphism, this defines a bijection from chord diagrams
to oriented singular curves with for all .
0P9K
Convention 7.2.12. We will use the above bijection composed with the reversal of all orientations
when identifying chord diagrams with certain singular curves. This orientation
reversal is related to the usual direction reversal between arrows in a quiver
and morphisms in the corresponding path category, and to the time-reversal of
graphs mentioned in Example 7.3.8 below.
When is a union of intervals, we
recover the notion of (possibly degenerate) arc diagram due
to Zarev [Za, Definition 2.1] (compare Example
7.2.11 and [Za, Figures 3 and 4]).
The chord diagrams such that the singular curve is connected
and correspond to the chord diagrams of [AnChePeReiSu].
Zarev’s definition generalizes that of pointed matched circles due to
Lipshitz, Ozsváth and Thurston [LiOzTh1, §3.2]: they correspond
to the case where is a single interval
( is obtained from
the circle considered in [LiOzTh1] by removing its
basepoint).
7.2.5. Sutured surfaces and topological field theories
We define a sutured surface
to be a quadruple
where is a compact oriented surface,
is a finite subset of , and
and are unions of components of
such that and
(this is [Za, Definition 1.2] without the topological restrictions). Note that
is determined by the data of : we have and .
A sutured surface is representable by a chord diagram (as we define it) if and
only if each component of (not ) intersects and
nontrivially.
Let be a chord diagram. We define a sutured surface
:
- •
the oriented surface is obtained
from by adding -handles at
for all pairs in
- •
When is a union of intervals, this is
Zarev’s construction [Za, §2.1].
Let be a singular curve giving rise to . The
oriented
surface can be identified with and paths in give rise
to paths in .
The sutured surface also comes with an arc decomposition: for each
in ,
we have an arc with set of end points
in corresponding to the -handle
added at .
0P9L
Example 7.2.13. In the table below, the first row depicts some chord diagrams. The second and
third rows show the corresponding sutured surfaces with the part of the boundary in
green and with the arcs in red; the second row applies the
above construction directly, and the third row gives an alternate perspective.
The fourth row shows the sutured surfaces as open-closed cobordisms (with
empty source and with target colored in green);
this interpretation is
discussed in §7.2.5.
Under the strands algebra construction of §8.1,
the first and second
columns give rise to simple 2-representations of , categorifying
the vector representation and its dual.
Tensor powers of the algebra of the first column give algebras very
similar to the one considered by Tian [Ti];
in fact, Tian’s algebras were an important early clue in the development of
the present work. Tensor powers of the algebra of the second column are
studied from the Heegaard Floer perspective by the first-named author in [Man].
The algebra of the third column is the case of a family of algebras
considered in [ManMarWi, LePo].
For general , these are isomorphic to the algebras
used by Ozsváth and Szabó in their theory
of bordered knot Floer homology [OsSz4, OsSz5, OsSz6]
(their notation is slightly different). The middle summand of the algebra of the
fourth column is the undeformed version of a curved -algebra used
by Lipshitz-Ozsváth-Thurston [LiOzTh2, LiOzTh3] to define bordered
for -manifolds with torus boundary.
The middle summand of the algebra of the fifth column is the
well-known “torus algebra” from bordered Floer homology. The fifth and sixth
columns together illustrate our perspective on cornered Floer homology;
following Zarev’s ideas, we view the cornered Floer gluing theorem as
recovering the algebra of two matched intervals glued end-to-end, rather than
as the invariants of two matched intervals with distinguished endpoints being
glued to form a pointed matched circle.
The first, fifth, and sixth columns give algebras that are among Zarev’s
strands algebras , although the first diagram is
degenerate (equivalently, its sutured surface has closed circles in ).
The second, third, and fourth columns do not satisfy the restrictions that
Zarev imposes. As far as we are aware, our strands categories below give the
first detailed description of strands algebras associated to general chord
diagrams with circles as well as intervals; less formal descriptions have
appeared previously, cf. [Au2, Proposition 11]. As indicated by
Lipshitz-Ozsváth-Thurston’s work [LiOzTh2, LiOzTh3], curved
-deformations of the algebras appear necessary in the general
setting when defining modules and bimodules for 3-manifolds with boundary,
although in special cases like Ozsváth-Szabó’s bordered knot Floer homology
(third column) this complication should be avoidable.
A sutured surface can be viewed as a morphism in the 2d open-closed cobordism category with empty source; if is a sutured surface, the corresponding open-closed cobordism has target given by and non-gluing boundary given by . See the bottom row of the figure in Example 7.2.13; the targets of these open-closed cobordisms are shown in green and the non-gluing boundary is shown in black.
Let us consider how the end-to-end gluings of chord diagrams covered by our results in §8
can be viewed in terms of open-closed cobordisms. When gluing two distinct intervals of a chord diagram end-to-end, the corresponding sutured surface gets glued as in the top-left picture below: the two intervals marked in blue are glued together to form the top-middle picture. However, we can also consider the top-middle picture as arising from the top-right picture; in this latter case the gluing is an instance of composition (with an open pair of pants) in the open-closed cobordism category. Similarly, when self-gluing the two endpoints of an interval of a chord diagram, the sutured surface gets glued as in the bottom-left picture below, producing the bottom-middle picture; we can also think of the bottom-middle picture as arising from the bottom-right picture, which is another instance of composition in the open-closed category.
One could try to view our constructions as giving part of the structure of an open-closed 2d TQFT valued in a category whose objects are dg 2-categories and whose morphisms are certain dg 2-functors. In particular, this hypothetical open-closed TQFT would assign a dg 2-category of 2-representations of to an interval. To an open-closed cobordism with empty source, the open-closed TQFT would assign an object of the dg 2-category of the target, encoding the data of a lax multi-2-action of for the interval components of the target.
Our approach doesn’t quite realize that. We associate 2-representations of to chord diagrams or singular curves rather than directly to surfaces.
One can also consider the extent to which such a theory would extend to a point.
Things are considerably simpler for the decategorified version
of the theory, where one sees many relationships with other work on 3d TQFTs; this will be addressed in more detail in a follow-up paper [ArMa].