ScalingStacks

7.2. Curves

7.2.1. Definitions

We consider now partially oriented 11-dimensional spaces. We build the theory so that the unoriented part is a manifold, and morphisms are injective on the unoriented part.

0P96

Definition 7.2.1. We define a curve to be a 11-dimensional space ZZ endowed with

  • •

    an open subset ZoZ_{o} containing Ze​x​cZ_{exc}

  • •

    an orientation of Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} and

  • •

    a fixed-point free involution ι\iota of CZ​(z)C_{Z}(z) for every z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}

satisfying the following conditions:

  • •

    ∂Z=∅\partial Z=\emptyset

  • •

    Z−ZoZ-Z_{o} has finitely many connected components, none of which are points

  • •

    given z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}, given UU a small open neighbourhood of zz in ZoZ_{o}, and given L∈π0​(U−{z})L\in\pi_{0}(U-\{z\}), then L∪ι⁡(L)∪{z}L\cup\iota(L)\cup\{z\} has an orientation extending the given orientations on LL and ι⁡(L)\iota(L).

We put Zu=Z−ZoZ_{u}=Z-Z_{o}. Note that ∂Zu=Zu∩Zo¯\partial Z_{u}=Z_{u}\cap\overline{Z_{o}}. Given z∈Z−Ze​x​cz\in Z-Z_{exc}, we have |C⁡(z)|=2|C(z)|=2 and we define ι\iota as the unique non-trivial automorphism of C⁡(z)C(z).

We denote by ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} the opposite curve to ZZ all of whose data coincides with that of ZZ, except for Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc}, whose orientation is reversed.

Fix n≥1n\geq 1. The 11-dimensional space Z=St⁡(2​n)Z=\operatorname{St}\nolimits(2n) (cf §7.1.1) can be endowed with a structure of curve by giving 𝐑​ei​π​r/n{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n} the orientation of 𝐑{\mathbf{R}} for 0≤r<n0\leq r<n and setting Zo=ZZ_{o}=Z. The involution ι\iota is defined by ι⁡(𝐑>0​ei​π​r/n)=𝐑<0​ei​π​r/n\iota({\mathbf{R}}_{>0}e^{i\pi r/n})={\mathbf{R}}_{<0}e^{i\pi r/n}.

7.2.2. Morphisms and subcurves

0P97

Definition 7.2.2. A morphism of curves f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces such that

  • •

    f⁡(Zu)⊂Zu′f(Z_{u})\subset Z^{\prime}_{u}

  • •

    f|f−1(Z′o−Z′e​x​c)f_{|f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}_{o}-Z^{\prime}_{exc})} is orientation-preserving

  • •

    given z∈f−1​(Ze​x​c′)z\in f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}_{exc}), the canonical map C⁡(f):CZ​(z)→CZ′​(f⁡(z))C(f):C_{Z}(z)\to C_{Z^{\prime}}(f(z)) is ι\iota-equivariant.

Note that a composition of morphisms of curves is a morphism of curves. Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves. We have the following statements.

0P98

Properties 7.2.3.

  • •

    ff is invertible if and only if it is a homeomorphism and f⁡(Zo)⊂Zo′f(Z_{o})\subset Z^{\prime}_{o}.

  • •

    f⁡(Ze​x​c)⊂Ze​x​c′f(Z_{exc})\subset Z^{\prime}_{exc} and C⁡(f):CZ​(z)→CZ′​(f⁡(z))C(f):C_{Z}(z)\to C_{Z^{\prime}}(f(z)) is ι\iota-equivariant for all z∈Zz\in Z.

  • •

    ff restricts to a homeomorphism from f−1​(Z′−Ze​x​c′)f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}-Z^{\prime}_{exc}) to the open subset f⁡(Z)∩(Z′−Ze​x​c′)=f⁡(Z−Ze​x​c)∩(Z′−Ze​x​c′)f(Z)\cap(Z^{\prime}-Z^{\prime}_{exc})=f(Z-Z_{exc})\cap(Z^{\prime}-Z^{\prime}_{exc}) of Z′Z^{\prime}, since Zf⊂f−1​(Ze​x​c′)Z_{f}\subset f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}_{exc}). In particular, the restriction of ff to ZuZ_{u} is a homeomorphism Zu→∼f⁡(Zu)Z_{u}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}f(Z_{u}).

  • •

    If Z′Z^{\prime} is non-singular, then ff is an open embedding.

We say that ff is strict if f⁡(Zu)f(Z_{u}) is closed in Zu′Z^{\prime}_{u} and f⁡(Zo)⊂Zo′f(Z_{o})\subset Z^{\prime}_{o}. Note that this implies that f⁡(Zu)f(Z_{u}) is also open in Zu′Z^{\prime}_{u}.

Let ZZ be a curve.

0P99

Definition 7.2.4. A subcurve of ZZ is a 11-dimensional subspace XX of ZZ such that given z∈Xz\in X, the image of CX​(z)C_{X}(z) in CZ​(z)C_{Z}(z) is ι\iota-stable.

If XX is a subcurve of ZZ, then XX is a curve with Xo=X∩ZoX_{o}=X\cap Z_{o}, Xe​x​c⊂Ze​x​cX_{exc}\subset Z_{exc} and ι\iota is defined on CX​(z)C_{X}(z) as the restriction of ι\iota on CZ​(z)C_{Z}(z), for z∈Xe​x​cz\in X_{exc}. Note that XuX_{u} is open in ZuZ_{u}.

Equivalently, a subspace XX of ZZ is a subcurve if it is a curve, Xo=X∩ZoX_{o}=X\cap Z_{o} and the inclusion map X→ZX\to Z is a morphism of curves.

We define an equivalence relation on connected components of Z−Ze​x​cZ-Z_{exc}: it is the relation generated by T∼T′T\sim T^{\prime} if there is z∈Ze​x​c∩T¯∩T′¯z\in Z_{exc}\cap\overline{T}\cap\overline{T^{\prime}}, UU a small open neighbourhood of zz and L∈π0​(U−{z})L\in\pi_{0}(U-\{z\}) such that L⊂TL\subset T and ι⁡(L)⊂T′\iota(L)\subset T^{\prime}.

Let ℰ{\mathcal{E}} be the set of equivalence classes of connected components of Z−Ze​x​cZ-Z_{exc}. Given E∈ℰE\in{\mathcal{E}}, let ZE=⋃T∈ET¯Z_{E}=\bigcup_{T\in E}\overline{T}. The subspaces ZEZ_{E} of ZZ are called the components of ZZ.

A curve has only finitely many components, each of which is a closed subcurve.

If ZZ is non-singular, then its components are its connected components.

The local structure of a curve is described as follows. Let z∈Zz\in Z. There is an open neighbourhood UU of zz that is a subcurve of ZZ and an isomorphism of curves U→∼X,z↦0U\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}X,\ z\mapsto 0, where X⊂𝐂X\subset{\mathbf{C}} is one of the following:

  • •

    𝐑{\mathbf{R}} viewed as an unoriented manifold, if z∈Zu−∂Zuz\in Z_{u}-\partial Z_{u}

  • •

    𝐑{\mathbf{R}} where 𝐑≥0{\mathbf{R}}_{\geq 0} is unoriented and 𝐑<0{\mathbf{R}}_{<0} has either of its two orientations, if z∈∂Zuz\in\partial Z_{u}

  • •

    𝐑{\mathbf{R}} viewed as an oriented manifold, if z∈Zo−Ze​x​cz\in Z_{o}-Z_{exc}

  • •

    St⁡(nz)\mathrm{St}(n_{z}) if z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}.

0P9A

Remark 7.2.5. Let ZZ be a closed subspace of 𝐑N{\mathbf{R}}^{N} for some N>0N>0. Assume there is a finite subset EE of ZZ such that Z−EZ-E is a 11-dimensional submanifold of 𝐑N{\mathbf{R}}^{N} with no boundary and such that given e∈Ee\in E, there is ne′>1n^{\prime}_{e}>1 and a finite family {je,i}1≤i≤ne′\{j_{e,i}\}_{1\leq i\leq n^{\prime}_{e}} of smooth embeddings je,i:(−1,1)→𝐑Nj_{e,i}:(-1,1)\to{\mathbf{R}}^{N} such that

  • •

    je,i​(0)=ej_{e,i}(0)=e,

  • •

    je,i​((−1,0)∪(0,1))⊂Z−{e}j_{e,i}((-1,0)\cup(0,1))\subset Z-\{e\},

  • •

    je,i​((,,,))∩je,i′​((,,,))={e}j_{e,i}((-1,1))\cap j_{e,i^{\prime}}((-1,1))=\{e\} for i≠i′i\neq i^{\prime}

  • •

    𝐑​d​je,id​t​(0)≠𝐑​d​je,i′d​t​(0){\mathbf{R}}\frac{dj_{e,i}}{dt}(0)\neq{\mathbf{R}}\frac{dj_{e,i^{\prime}}}{dt}(0) for i≠i′i\neq i^{\prime} and

  • •

    ⋃ije,i​(−1,1)\bigcup_{i}j_{e,i}(-1,1) is an open neighborhood of ee in ZZ.

Let us choose in addition an open subset ZoZ_{o} of ZZ containing EE and an orientation of the 11-dimensional manifold Zo−EZ_{o}-E. We assume that Z−ZoZ-Z_{o} has finitely many connected components, none of which are points. We assume furthermore that given e∈Ee\in E and i∈{1,…,ne′}i\in\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}_{e}\}, the orientation of je,i−1​(Zo−{e})j_{e,i}^{-1}(Z_{o}-\{e\}) extends to an orientation of je,i−1​(Zo)j_{e,i}^{-1}(Z_{o}).

Given e∈Ee\in E, we denote by ι\iota the involution of C⁡(e)C(e) that swaps je,i​((,,,))j_{e,i}((-1,0)) and je,i​((,,,))j_{e,i}((0,1)) for 1≤i≤ne′1\leq i\leq n^{\prime}_{e}. Note that Ze​x​c=EZ_{exc}=E and ne=2​ne′n_{e}=2n^{\prime}_{e} for e∈Ee\in E. This defines a structure of curve on ZZ that does not depend on the choice of the maps je,ij_{e,i}.

We leave it to the reader to check that any curve is isomorphic to a curve obtained by such a construction.

7.2.3. Quotients

Let (Z~,Z~o,ι~)(\tilde{Z},\tilde{Z}_{o},\tilde{\iota}) be a curve.

0P9B

Definition 7.2.6. A finite relation on Z~\tilde{Z} is an equivalence relation ∼\sim such that the set of points that are not alone in their equivalence class is finite and contained in Z~o\tilde{Z}_{o}.

Consider a finite relation ∼\sim on Z~\tilde{Z}. We define a curve structure on the 11-dimensional space Z=Z~/∼Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\!\sim.

Let q:Z~→Zq:\tilde{Z}\to Z be the quotient map. We have Ze​x​c=q⁡(Z~e​x​c)∪{z∈Z||q−1​(z)|>1}Z_{exc}=q(\tilde{Z}_{exc})\cup\{z\in Z|\ |q^{-1}(z)|>1\} (cf §7.1.3). Let Zo=q⁡(Z~o)Z_{o}=q(\tilde{Z}_{o}). The map q|Z~o−q−1(Ze​x​c):Z~o−q−1(Ze​x​c)→Zo−Ze​x​cq_{|\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc})}:\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc})\to Z_{o}-Z_{exc} is a homeomorphism and we provide Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} with the orientation coming from Z~o−q−1​(Ze​x​c)\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc}). Let z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}. We define ι\iota on C⁡(z)C(z) to make the canonical bijection ∐z~∈q−1​(z)C⁡(z~)→∼C⁡(z)\coprod_{\tilde{z}\in q^{-1}(z)}C(\tilde{z})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C(z) ι\iota-equivariant. This makes qq into a strict morphism of curves.

0P9C

Lemma 7.2.7. Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves.

Define an equivalence relation on ZZ by z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} if f⁡(z1)=f⁡(z2)f(z_{1})=f(z_{2}). This is a finite relation on ZZ and ff factors as a composition of morphisms of curves Z→f1Z/∼→f2Z′Z\xrightarrow{f_{1}}Z/\!\!\sim\xrightarrow{f_{2}}Z^{\prime} where f1f_{1} is the quotient map and f2f_{2} is injective.

0P9D

Proof. We have Zf⊂f−1​(Zo′)⊂ZoZ_{f}\subset f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}_{o})\subset Z_{o}. It follows that ∼\sim is a finite relation on ZZ and the lemma follows from Lemma 7.1.13. ∎

We define the category of non-singular curves with a finite relation as the category with objects pairs (Z,∼)(Z,\sim) where ZZ is a non-singular curve and ∼\sim is a finite relation on ZZ, and where Hom((Z,∼),(Z′,∼′))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits((Z,\sim),(Z^{\prime},\sim^{\prime})) is the set of morphisms of curves f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} such that if z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2}, then f(z1)∼′f(z2)f(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f(z_{2}).

The next proposition shows that curves can be viewed as non-singular curves with a finite relation.

0P9E

Proposition 7.2.8. The quotient construction defines an equivalence from the category of non-singular curves with a finite relation to the category of curves.

0P9F

Proof. Let (Z~,∼)(\tilde{Z},\sim) and (Z~′,∼′)(\tilde{Z}^{\prime},\sim^{\prime}) be two non-singular curves with finite relations and let q:Z~→Z=Z~/∼q:\tilde{Z}\to Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\!\sim and q′:Z~′→Z′=Z~′/∼′q^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}^{\prime}\to Z^{\prime}=\tilde{Z}^{\prime}/\!\!\sim^{\prime} be the quotient maps.

A morphism of curves f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f(z1)∼′f(z2)f(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f(z_{2}) induces a morphism of curves Z→Z′Z\to Z^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor induces indeed a functor as claimed. Consider f′:Z~→Z~′f^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f′(z1)∼′f′(z2)f^{\prime}(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f^{\prime}(z_{2}). If q′∘f=q′∘f′q^{\prime}\circ f=q^{\prime}\circ f^{\prime}, then ff and f′f^{\prime} coincide outside a finite set of points, hence f=f′f=f^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor is faithful.

Consider now a morphism of curves g:Z→Z′g:Z\to Z^{\prime}. Let E′E^{\prime} be the finite subset of Z~′\tilde{Z}^{\prime} of points that are not alone in their equivalence class and E=q−1​(g−1​(q′​(E′)))E=q^{-1}(g^{-1}(q^{\prime}(E^{\prime}))). Consider the composition of continuous maps

f:Z~−E→𝑞Z−q⁡(E)→𝑔Z′−q′​(E′)→(q′|Z~′−E′)−1Z~′−E′.f:\tilde{Z}-E\xrightarrow{q}Z-q(E)\xrightarrow{g}Z^{\prime}-q^{\prime}(E^{\prime})\xrightarrow{(q^{\prime}_{|\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}})^{-1}}\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}.

Given z∈Ez\in E, the ι\iota-equivariance of C⁡(g):CZ​(q⁡(z))→CZ′​(g⁡(q⁡(z)))C(g):C_{Z}(q(z))\to C_{Z^{\prime}}(g(q(z))) ensures that ff extends to a continuous map at zz. So, ff extends (uniquely) to a continuous map Z~→Z~′\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime}, and that map is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces.

We have Z~u⊂Z~−E\tilde{Z}_{u}\subset\tilde{Z}-E and f⁡(Z~u)⊂Z~u′f(\tilde{Z}_{u})\subset\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{u}. Since g|g−1(Z~′o)−Eg_{|g^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o})-E} is orientation-preserving, it follows that f|f−1(Z~′o−E′)f_{|f^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o}-E^{\prime})} is orientation-preserving. So, f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} is a morphism of curves and it is compatible with the relations. This shows that the quotient functor is fully faithful.

Let now ZZ be a curve. Let z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc} and Uz⊂ZoU_{z}\subset Z_{o} be a small open neighbourhood of zz. Fix an isomorphism of curves fz:Uz→∼St⁡(nz),z↦0f_{z}:U_{z}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{St}(n_{z}),\ z\mapsto 0. The equivalence relation on π0​(Uz−{z})\pi_{0}(U_{z}-\{z\}) whose equivalence classes are the orbits of ι\iota defines via fzf_{z} the equivalence relation on {ei​π​r/2​nz}0≤r<2​nz\{e^{i\pi r/2n_{z}}\}_{0\leq r<2n_{z}} given by ζ∼ζ′\zeta\sim\zeta^{\prime} if and only if ζ′=ζ±1\zeta^{\prime}=\zeta^{\pm 1}.

The proof of Lemma 7.1.14 provides us a non-singular curve Z^\hat{Z} with a finite relation. Indeed, with the notations of the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we have U^z=∐0≤r<nz𝐑​ei​π​r/nz\hat{U}_{z}=\coprod_{0\leq r<n_{z}}{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}}. Note that Z^o\hat{Z}_{o} is the subspace of Z^\hat{Z} obtained by adding to Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} the point 00 of 𝐑​ei​π​r/nz{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}} for each r∈{0,…,nz−1}r\in\{0,\ldots,n_{z}-1\} and each z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}.

This gives Z^\hat{Z} a structure of non-singular curve. As in the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we obtain a finite relation on Z^\hat{Z} and an isomorphism of curves Z→∼Z^/∼Z\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\hat{Z}/\!\sim. This shows that the quotient functor is essentially surjective. ∎

0P9G

Definition 7.2.9. Given ZZ a curve, the non-singular cover of ZZ is a non-singular curve Z^\hat{Z}, together with a finite relation ∼\sim and an isomorphism Z^/∼→∼Z\hat{Z}/\!\!\sim\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}Z.

Note that Ze​x​c=ZqZ_{exc}=Z_{q} where q:Z^→Zq:\hat{Z}\to Z is the canonical map. Proposition 7.2.8 shows that non-singular covers exist and are unique up to a unique isomorphism. The following proposition makes this more precise.

0P9H

Proposition 7.2.10. The functor sending a curve ZZ to its non-singular cover is right adjoint to the embedding of the category of non-singular curves in the category of curves.

0P9I

Proof. Let Z′Z^{\prime} be a non-singular curve. We have a map h:Hom⁡(Z′,Z^)→Hom⁡(Z′,Z),g↦q∘gh:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(Z^{\prime},\hat{Z})\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(Z^{\prime},Z),\ g\mapsto q\circ g. Since ZqZ_{q} is finite, it follows that hh is injective.

Consider now a morphism of curves f:Z′→Zf:Z^{\prime}\to Z. We factor ff as Z′→f1Z′/∼→f2ZZ^{\prime}\xrightarrow{f_{1}}Z^{\prime}/\!\sim\ \xrightarrow{f_{2}}Z as in Lemma 7.2.7. By Proposition 7.2.8, there is a morphism f^:Z′→Z^\hat{f}:Z^{\prime}\to\hat{Z} such that q∘f^=fq\circ\hat{f}=f, hence h⁡(f^)=fh(\hat{f})=f. So hh is surjective. ∎

0P9J

Example 7.2.11. Let us provide some examples of curves and non-singular covers. The dotted lines link the points in the same equivalence class. The grey part corresponds to ZuZ_{u}.

[Uncaptioned image]

7.2.4. Chord diagrams as singular curves

We describe here the relation between singular curves and chord (or arc) diagrams.

We define a chord diagram to be to be a triple (𝒵,𝐚)({\mathcal{Z}},{\mathbf{a}}) where

  • •

    𝒵{\mathcal{Z}} is a closed oriented 11-dimensional manifold (i.e., a finite disjoint union of copies of S1S^{1} and [0,1][0,1])

  • •

    𝐚{\mathbf{a}} is a finite set of pairs of points of 𝒵̊\mathring{{\mathcal{Z}}}, all of which are distinct.

A chord diagram gives rise to a smooth oriented curve Z~=𝒵̊\tilde{Z}=\mathring{{\mathcal{Z}}} with the following relation: given z≠z′z\neq z^{\prime}, we have z∼z′z\sim z^{\prime} if {z,z′}∈𝐚\{z,z^{\prime}\}\in{\mathbf{a}}. We obtain an oriented curve Z=Z~/∼Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\sim and a map μ:⋃{z,z′}∈𝐚{z,z′}→Ze​x​c\mu:\bigcup_{\{z,z^{\prime}\}\in{\mathbf{a}}}\{z,z^{\prime}\}\to Z_{exc} inducing a bijection 𝐚→∼Ze​x​c{\mathbf{a}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}Z_{exc}.

Up to suitable isomorphism, this defines a bijection from chord diagrams to oriented singular curves with nz∈{2,4}n_{z}\in\{2,4\} for all zz.

0P9K

Convention 7.2.12. We will use the above bijection composed with the reversal of all orientations when identifying chord diagrams with certain singular curves. This orientation reversal is related to the usual direction reversal between arrows in a quiver and morphisms in the corresponding path category, and to the time-reversal of graphs mentioned in Example 7.3.8 below.

When 𝒵{\mathcal{Z}} is a union of intervals, we recover the notion of (possibly degenerate) arc diagram due to Zarev [Za, Definition 2.1] (compare Example 7.2.11 and [Za, Figures 3 and 4]).

The chord diagrams such that the singular curve ZZ is connected and k>0k>0 correspond to the chord diagrams of [AnChePeReiSu].

Zarev’s definition generalizes that of pointed matched circles due to Lipshitz, Ozsváth and Thurston [LiOzTh1, §3.2]: they correspond to the case where 𝒵{\mathcal{Z}} is a single interval (𝒵̊\mathring{{\mathcal{Z}}} is obtained from the circle considered in [LiOzTh1] by removing its basepoint).

7.2.5. Sutured surfaces and topological field theories

We define a sutured surface to be a quadruple (F,Λ,S+,S−)(F,\Lambda,S^{+},S^{-}) where FF is a compact oriented surface, Λ\Lambda is a finite subset of ∂F\partial{F}, and S+S^{+} and S−S^{-} are unions of components of ∂F−Λ\partial{F}-\Lambda such that Λ=S+¯∩S−¯\Lambda=\overline{S^{+}}\cap\overline{S^{-}} and ∂F−Λ=S+∪S−\partial{F}-\Lambda=S^{+}\cup S^{-} (this is [Za, Definition 1.2] without the topological restrictions). Note that (F,Λ,S+,S−)(F,\Lambda,S^{+},S^{-}) is determined by the data of (F,S+)(F,S^{+}): we have Λ=S¯+−S+\Lambda=\overline{S}^{+}-S^{+} and S−=∂F−S¯+S^{-}=\partial F-\overline{S}^{+}. A sutured surface is representable by a chord diagram (as we define it) if and only if each component of FF (not ∂F\partial{F}) intersects S+S^{+} and S−S^{-} nontrivially.

Let (𝒵,𝐚)({\mathcal{Z}},{\mathbf{a}}) be a chord diagram. We define a sutured surface (F,Λ,S+,S−)(F,\Lambda,S^{+},S^{-}):

  • •

    the oriented surface FF is obtained from 𝒵×[0,1]{\mathcal{Z}}\times[0,1] by adding 11-handles at {(z,0),(z′,0)}\{(z,0),(z^{\prime},0)\} for all pairs {z,z′}\{z,z^{\prime}\} in 𝐚{\mathbf{a}}

  • •

    S+=(𝒵×{1})∪(∂𝒵×(12,1])S^{+}=\bigl({\mathcal{Z}}\times\{1\}\bigr)\cup\bigl(\partial{\mathcal{Z}}\times(\frac{1}{2},1]\bigr)

When 𝒵{\mathcal{Z}} is a union of intervals, this is Zarev’s construction [Za, §2.1].

Let ZZ be a singular curve giving rise to (𝒵,𝐚)({\mathcal{Z}},{\mathbf{a}}). The oriented surface FF can be identified with Z×[0,1]Z\times[0,1] and paths in ZZ give rise to paths in FF.

The sutured surface FF also comes with an arc decomposition: for each {z,z′}\{z,z^{\prime}\} in 𝐚{\mathbf{a}}, we have an arc ω{z,z′}\omega_{\{z,z^{\prime}\}} with set of end points {(z,1),(z′,1)}\{(z,1),(z^{\prime},1)\} in S+S^{+} corresponding to the 11-handle added at {(z,0),(z′,0)}\{(z,0),(z^{\prime},0)\}.

0P9L

Example 7.2.13. In the table below, the first row depicts some chord diagrams. The second and third rows show the corresponding sutured surfaces with the S+S^{+} part of the boundary in green and with the arcs ωz\omega_{z} in red; the second row applies the above construction directly, and the third row gives an alternate perspective. The fourth row shows the sutured surfaces as open-closed cobordisms (with empty source and with target colored in green); this interpretation is discussed in §7.2.5.

Under the strands algebra construction of §8.1, the first and second columns give rise to simple 2-representations of 𝒰\mathcal{U}, categorifying the vector representation and its dual.

Tensor powers of the algebra of the first column give algebras very similar to the one considered by Tian [Ti]; in fact, Tian’s algebras were an important early clue in the development of the present work. Tensor powers of the algebra of the second column are studied from the Heegaard Floer perspective by the first-named author in [Man].

The algebra of the third column is the n=3n=3 case of a family of algebras considered in [ManMarWi, LePo]. For general nn, these are isomorphic to the algebras ℬ(n)=⊕k=0nℬ(n,k){\mathcal{B}}(n)=\oplus_{k=0}^{n}{\mathcal{B}}(n,k) used by Ozsváth and Szabó in their theory of bordered knot Floer homology [OsSz4, OsSz5, OsSz6] (their notation is slightly different). The middle summand of the algebra of the fourth column is the undeformed version of a curved A∞A_{\infty}-algebra used by Lipshitz-Ozsváth-Thurston [LiOzTh2, LiOzTh3] to define bordered H​F−HF^{-} for 33-manifolds with torus boundary. The middle summand of the algebra of the fifth column is the well-known “torus algebra” from bordered Floer homology. The fifth and sixth columns together illustrate our perspective on cornered Floer homology; following Zarev’s ideas, we view the cornered Floer gluing theorem as recovering the algebra of two matched intervals glued end-to-end, rather than as the invariants of two matched intervals with distinguished endpoints being glued to form a pointed matched circle.

The first, fifth, and sixth columns give algebras that are among Zarev’s strands algebras 𝒜⁡(𝒵)\mathcal{A}(\mathcal{Z}), although the first diagram is degenerate (equivalently, its sutured surface has closed circles in S−S^{-}). The second, third, and fourth columns do not satisfy the restrictions that Zarev imposes. As far as we are aware, our strands categories below give the first detailed description of strands algebras associated to general chord diagrams with circles as well as intervals; less formal descriptions have appeared previously, cf. [Au2, Proposition 11]. As indicated by Lipshitz-Ozsváth-Thurston’s work [LiOzTh2, LiOzTh3], curved A∞A_{\infty}-deformations of the algebras appear necessary in the general setting when defining modules and bimodules for 3-manifolds with boundary, although in special cases like Ozsváth-Szabó’s bordered knot Floer homology (third column) this complication should be avoidable.

[Uncaptioned image]

A sutured surface can be viewed as a morphism in the 2d open-closed cobordism category with empty source; if (F,Λ,S+,S−)(F,\Lambda,S^{+},S^{-}) is a sutured surface, the corresponding open-closed cobordism has target given by S+S^{+} and non-gluing boundary given by S−S^{-}. See the bottom row of the figure in Example 7.2.13; the targets of these open-closed cobordisms are shown in green and the non-gluing boundary is shown in black.

Let us consider how the end-to-end gluings of chord diagrams covered by our results in §8 can be viewed in terms of open-closed cobordisms. When gluing two distinct intervals of a chord diagram end-to-end, the corresponding sutured surface gets glued as in the top-left picture below: the two intervals marked in blue are glued together to form the top-middle picture. However, we can also consider the top-middle picture as arising from the top-right picture; in this latter case the gluing is an instance of composition (with an open pair of pants) in the open-closed cobordism category. Similarly, when self-gluing the two endpoints of an interval of a chord diagram, the sutured surface gets glued as in the bottom-left picture below, producing the bottom-middle picture; we can also think of the bottom-middle picture as arising from the bottom-right picture, which is another instance of composition in the open-closed category.

[Uncaptioned image]

One could try to view our constructions as giving part of the structure of an open-closed 2d TQFT valued in a category whose objects are dg 2-categories and whose morphisms are certain dg 2-functors. In particular, this hypothetical open-closed TQFT would assign a dg 2-category of 2-representations of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} to an interval. To an open-closed cobordism with empty source, the open-closed TQFT would assign an object of the dg 2-category of the target, encoding the data of a lax multi-2-action of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} for the interval components of the target. Our approach doesn’t quite realize that. We associate 2-representations of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} to chord diagrams or singular curves rather than directly to surfaces.

One can also consider the extent to which such a theory would extend to a point. Things are considerably simpler for the decategorified version of the theory, where one sees many relationships with other work on 3d TQFTs; this will be addressed in more detail in a follow-up paper [ArMa].

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2