ScalingStacks

1.3. Fukaya categories

The main examples of higher representations of 𝔤​𝔩​(1|1)+\mathfrak{gl}(1|1)^{+} that we introduce here are on partially wrapped Fukaya categories of symmetric powers of surfaces. These are A∞A_{\infty}-categories and the results of §1.3 will be made more precise in §1.4, where we work with differential categories.

Let Σ\Sigma be a compact oriented surface with a finite collection MM of marked points in its boundary, and assume that each component of FF contains at least one point of MM.

In the pictures below, we expand each point of MM to an interval in the boundary of Σ\Sigma. We draw the complement of these intervals in dotted light orange. Here are two views of a genus-one surface with one boundary component and MM consisting of one point.

[Uncaptioned image]

For any k≥0k\geq 0, Auroux [Au2, Section 3.1] considers a partially wrapped Fukaya category ℱ​(Symk​(Σ),M)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{k}(\Sigma),M) of Symk​(Σ)\mathrm{Sym}^{k}(\Sigma) with set of stops M×Symk−1​(Σ)M\times\mathrm{Sym}^{k-1}(\Sigma). We write ℱ​(Sym∗​(Σ),M)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma),M) for the direct sum of these categories over all k≥0k\geq 0 (they vanish for kk large enough).

Given a component II of ∂Σ∖M\partial\Sigma\setminus M, we define a higher action of 𝔤​𝔩​(1|1)+\mathfrak{gl}(1|1)^{+} on ℱ​(Sym∗​(Σ),M)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma),M).

Consider (Σ1,M1,I1)(\Sigma_{1},M_{1},I_{1}) and (Σ2,M2,I2)(\Sigma_{2},M_{2},I_{2}) two surfaces with chosen intervals as above. We form a new surface (Σ,M)(\Sigma,M) with a chosen interval II by gluing I1I_{1} and I2I_{2} to the two legs of an open pair of pants.

0P4I

Theorem 1.3.1. There is an equivalence of triangulated categories

ℱ(Sym∗(Σ),M)≃ℱ(Sym∗(Σ1),M1)⊗○ℱ(Sym∗(Σ2),M2)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma),M)\simeq\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma_{1}),M_{1}){\hskip 1.9919pt\otimes\hskip-10.81218pt\bigcirc}\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma_{2}),M_{2})

compatible with the structure of higher representations of 𝔤​𝔩​(1|1)+\mathfrak{gl}(1|1)^{+}.

Theorem 1.3.1 extends a result of Douglas–Manolescu [DouMa]; their theorem corresponds to the special case of Theorem 1.3.1 in which Σ1\Sigma_{1} and Σ2\Sigma_{2} have only one boundary circle and one marked point each. They prove an equivalence of categories without the statement on compatibility of higher actions.

More generally, given (Σ,M)(\Sigma,M) with two disjoint chosen intervals I1,I2I_{1},I_{2} in ∂Σ∖M\partial\Sigma\setminus M, we form a new surface (Σ¯,M¯)(\overline{\Sigma},\overline{M}) by gluing the two legs of an open pair of pants to I1I_{1} and I2I_{2}. Theorem 1.3.1 generalizes to say that ℱ⁡(Sym∗​Σ¯,M¯)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}\overline{\Sigma},\overline{M}) is equivalent to Δ​ℱ​(Sym∗​Σ,M)\Delta\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}\Sigma,M) with its diagonal action.

This makes it possible to recover ℱ​(Sym∗​(Σ),M)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma),M) for any (Σ,M)(\Sigma,M) from the case of a disk with two points in the boundary. As an illustration, consider the genus-one surface (Σ,M)(\Sigma,M) shown above; the partially wrapped Fukaya category ℱ​(Sym∗​(Σ),M)\mathcal{F}(\mathrm{Sym}^{*}(\Sigma),M) is described by the “torus algebra”, a standard example in bordered Heegaard Floer homology. We can cut (Σ,M)(\Sigma,M) along three arcs as shown; we are left with two rectangles. Gluing the cuts back together, the torus algebra can then be recovered from one application of the tensor product followed by two applications of the more general Δ\Delta construction.

[Uncaptioned image]
[Uncaptioned image]

In the case of the first symmetric power Sym1⁡(Σ)=Σ\operatorname{Sym}\nolimits^{1}(\Sigma)=\Sigma, a general construction of Fukaya categories by a gluing procedure is given by Haiden, Katzarkov and Kontsevich in [HaiKaKon].

A general theory of partially wrapped Fukaya categories and how they glue is provided by Ganatra, Pardon and Shende in [GaPaShe], but this doesn’t apply directly to our case.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2