ScalingStacks

6.1.2. Twisted description

We describe now L+​(r,n)L^{+}(r,n) as a twisted free (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-module.

Consider E⊂{1,…,r+n}E\subset\{1,\ldots,r+n\} with |E|=r|E|=r. Let wE∈𝔖r+nw_{E}\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r+n} be the permutation such that wE​(E)={1,…,r}w_{E}(E)=\{1,\ldots,r\} and the restrictions of wEw_{E} to EE and to {1,…,r+n}∖E\{1,\ldots,r+n\}\setminus E are increasing. If E={i1<⋯<ir}E=\{i_{1}<\cdots<i_{r}\}, then we have a reduced decomposition

wE=(sr⋯sir−1)(sr−1⋯sir−1−1)⋯(s2⋯si2−1)(s1⋯si1−1)w_{E}=(s_{r}\cdots s_{i_{r}-1})(s_{r-1}\cdots s_{i_{r-1}-1})\cdots(s_{2}\cdots s_{i_{2}-1})(s_{1}\cdots s_{i_{1}-1})

and

L~​(wE)=∐b=1r(({1,…,ib−1}∖{i1,…,ib−1})×{ib}).\tilde{L}(w_{E})=\coprod_{b=1}^{r}\bigl((\{1,\ldots,i_{b}-1\}\setminus\{i_{1},\ldots,i_{b-1}\})\times\{i_{b}\}\bigr).

There is a bijection

β:𝔖r×𝔖n×{E⊂{1,…,r+n}||E|=r}→∼𝔖r+n,(v,v′,E)↦v​fr​(v′)​wE\beta:{\mathfrak{S}}_{r}\times{\mathfrak{S}}_{n}\times\{E\subset\{1,\ldots,r+n\}\ |\ |E|=r\}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathfrak{S}}_{r+n},(v,v^{\prime},E)\mapsto vf_{r}(v^{\prime})w_{E}

where fr​(v′)∈𝔖n+rf_{r}(v^{\prime})\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n+r} is given by fr​(v′)​(i)=if_{r}(v^{\prime})(i)=i for i≤ri\leq r and fr​(v′)​(r+i)=r+v′​(i)f_{r}(v^{\prime})(r+i)=r+v^{\prime}(i) for 1≤i≤n1\leq i\leq n. We have ℓ⁡(β⁡(v,v′,E))=ℓ⁡(v)+ℓ⁡(v′)+ℓ⁡(wE)\ell(\beta(v,v^{\prime},E))=\ell(v)+\ell(v^{\prime})+\ell(w_{E}).

Given (a,ib)∈L~​(wE)(a,i_{b})\in\tilde{L}(w_{E}), we define v⁡(E,a,b)∈𝔖rv(E,a,b)\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{r} and v′​(E,a,b)∈𝔖nv^{\prime}(E,a,b)\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n} as follows. Let b′∈{1,…,r}b^{\prime}\in\{1,\ldots,r\} be minimal such that a<ib′a<i_{b^{\prime}}. We define v⁡(E,a,b)v(E,a,b) to be the cycle (b,b−1,…,b′)(b,b-1,\ldots,b^{\prime}) and v′​(E,a,b)v^{\prime}(E,a,b) to be the cycle (a−b′+1,a−b′+2,…,ib−b)(a-b^{\prime}+1,a-b^{\prime}+2,\ldots,i_{b}-b). We have

wE​sa,ib=v⁡(E,a,b)​fr​(v′​(E,a,b))​w(E∪{a})∖{ib}w_{E}s_{a,i_{b}}=v(E,a,b)f_{r}(v^{\prime}(E,a,b))w_{(E\cup\{a\})\setminus\{i_{b}\}}

and ℓ⁡(wE)−ℓ⁡(w(E∪{a})∖{ib})=ib−a\ell(w_{E})-\ell(w_{(E\cup\{a\})\setminus\{i_{b}\}})=i_{b}-a.

Given m≥1m\geq 1, we define a free differential (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-module

Vm=⨁E⊂{1,…,r+n},|E|=r,ℓ⁡(wE)=m−1(Hr⊗Hn)​bE.V_{m}=\bigoplus_{E\subset\{1,\ldots,r+n\},\ |E|=r,\ \ell(w_{E})=m-1}(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})b_{E}.

Given m′<mm^{\prime}<m, we define fm′,m:Vm→Vm′f_{m^{\prime},m}:V_{m}\to V_{m^{\prime}} as the morphism of (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules given by

bE↦∑i∈E,j∈{1,…,r+n}∖Ei−j=m−m′(Tv⁡(E,j,i)⊗Tv′​(E,j,i))​b(E∪{j})∖{i}.b_{E}\mapsto\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i\in E,\ j\in\{1,\ldots,r+n\}\setminus E\\ i-j=m-m^{\prime}\end{subarray}}(T_{v(E,j,i)}\otimes T_{v^{\prime}(E,j,i)})b_{(E\cup\{j\})\setminus\{i\}}.

We will show below (Lemma 6.1.3) that d⁡(fm′,m)=∑m>m′′>m′fm′​m′′∘fm′′​md(f_{m^{\prime},m})=\sum_{m>m^{\prime\prime}>m^{\prime}}f_{m^{\prime}m^{\prime\prime}}\circ f_{m^{\prime\prime}m}. We denote by VV the differential (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-module obtained as the corresponding twisted object [⨁Vm,(fm′​m)][\bigoplus V_{m},(f_{m^{\prime}m})] (cf §2.1.3). We have V=⨁mVmV=\bigoplus_{m}V_{m} as a (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-module and dV=∑mdVm+∑m,m′fm′,md_{V}=\sum_{m}d_{V_{m}}+\sum_{m,m^{\prime}}f_{m^{\prime},m}.

0P79

Lemma 6.1.3. The maps (fm′​m)(f_{m^{\prime}m}) define a twisted object V=[⨁Vm,(fm′​m)]V=[\bigoplus V_{m},(f_{m^{\prime}m})]. There is an isomorphism of differential (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules

V→∼L+​(r,n),(h⊗h′)​bE↦h​fr​(ιn​(h′))​TwE​ for ​h∈Hr​ and ​h′∈Hn.V\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}L^{+}(r,n),\ (h\otimes h^{\prime})b_{E}\mapsto hf_{r}(\iota_{n}(h^{\prime}))T_{w_{E}}\text{ for }h\in H_{r}\text{ and }h^{\prime}\in H_{n}.
0P7A

Proof. The length property of the bijection β\beta above shows that the map of the lemma is an isomorphism of (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules. Since

d⁡(TwE)=∑i∈E,j∈{1,…,r+n}∖E,j<iTwE​si,j,d(T_{w_{E}})=\sum_{i\in E,\ j\in\{1,\ldots,r+n\}\setminus E,\ j<i}T_{w_{E}s_{i,j}},

it follows that the map of the lemma intertwines dVd_{V} and the differential of L+​(r,n)L^{+}(r,n). The lemma follows. ∎

There is a dual version of Lemma 6.1.3. In particular, there is a decomposition of right (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules

R+​(r,n)=⨁E⊂{1,…,r+n},|E|=rTwE−1​(Hr⊗fr​(Hn))R^{+}(r,n)=\bigoplus_{E\subset\{1,\ldots,r+n\},\ |E|=r}T_{w_{E}^{-1}}(H_{r}\otimes f_{r}(H_{n}))

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2