ScalingStacks

7.2.3. Quotients

Let (Z~,Z~o,ι~)(\tilde{Z},\tilde{Z}_{o},\tilde{\iota}) be a curve.

0P9B

Definition 7.2.6. A finite relation on Z~\tilde{Z} is an equivalence relation ∼\sim such that the set of points that are not alone in their equivalence class is finite and contained in Z~o\tilde{Z}_{o}.

Consider a finite relation ∼\sim on Z~\tilde{Z}. We define a curve structure on the 11-dimensional space Z=Z~/∼Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\!\sim.

Let q:Z~→Zq:\tilde{Z}\to Z be the quotient map. We have Ze​x​c=q⁡(Z~e​x​c)∪{z∈Z||q−1​(z)|>1}Z_{exc}=q(\tilde{Z}_{exc})\cup\{z\in Z|\ |q^{-1}(z)|>1\} (cf §7.1.3). Let Zo=q⁡(Z~o)Z_{o}=q(\tilde{Z}_{o}). The map q|Z~o−q−1(Ze​x​c):Z~o−q−1(Ze​x​c)→Zo−Ze​x​cq_{|\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc})}:\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc})\to Z_{o}-Z_{exc} is a homeomorphism and we provide Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} with the orientation coming from Z~o−q−1​(Ze​x​c)\tilde{Z}_{o}-q^{-1}(Z_{exc}). Let z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}. We define ι\iota on C⁡(z)C(z) to make the canonical bijection ∐z~∈q−1​(z)C⁡(z~)→∼C⁡(z)\coprod_{\tilde{z}\in q^{-1}(z)}C(\tilde{z})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C(z) ι\iota-equivariant. This makes qq into a strict morphism of curves.

0P9C

Lemma 7.2.7. Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves.

Define an equivalence relation on ZZ by z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} if f⁡(z1)=f⁡(z2)f(z_{1})=f(z_{2}). This is a finite relation on ZZ and ff factors as a composition of morphisms of curves Z→f1Z/∼→f2Z′Z\xrightarrow{f_{1}}Z/\!\!\sim\xrightarrow{f_{2}}Z^{\prime} where f1f_{1} is the quotient map and f2f_{2} is injective.

0P9D

Proof. We have Zf⊂f−1​(Zo′)⊂ZoZ_{f}\subset f^{-1}(Z^{\prime}_{o})\subset Z_{o}. It follows that ∼\sim is a finite relation on ZZ and the lemma follows from Lemma 7.1.13. ∎

We define the category of non-singular curves with a finite relation as the category with objects pairs (Z,∼)(Z,\sim) where ZZ is a non-singular curve and ∼\sim is a finite relation on ZZ, and where Hom((Z,∼),(Z′,∼′))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits((Z,\sim),(Z^{\prime},\sim^{\prime})) is the set of morphisms of curves f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} such that if z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2}, then f(z1)∼′f(z2)f(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f(z_{2}).

The next proposition shows that curves can be viewed as non-singular curves with a finite relation.

0P9E

Proposition 7.2.8. The quotient construction defines an equivalence from the category of non-singular curves with a finite relation to the category of curves.

0P9F

Proof. Let (Z~,∼)(\tilde{Z},\sim) and (Z~′,∼′)(\tilde{Z}^{\prime},\sim^{\prime}) be two non-singular curves with finite relations and let q:Z~→Z=Z~/∼q:\tilde{Z}\to Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\!\sim and q′:Z~′→Z′=Z~′/∼′q^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}^{\prime}\to Z^{\prime}=\tilde{Z}^{\prime}/\!\!\sim^{\prime} be the quotient maps.

A morphism of curves f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f(z1)∼′f(z2)f(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f(z_{2}) induces a morphism of curves Z→Z′Z\to Z^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor induces indeed a functor as claimed. Consider f′:Z~→Z~′f^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f′(z1)∼′f′(z2)f^{\prime}(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f^{\prime}(z_{2}). If q′∘f=q′∘f′q^{\prime}\circ f=q^{\prime}\circ f^{\prime}, then ff and f′f^{\prime} coincide outside a finite set of points, hence f=f′f=f^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor is faithful.

Consider now a morphism of curves g:Z→Z′g:Z\to Z^{\prime}. Let E′E^{\prime} be the finite subset of Z~′\tilde{Z}^{\prime} of points that are not alone in their equivalence class and E=q−1​(g−1​(q′​(E′)))E=q^{-1}(g^{-1}(q^{\prime}(E^{\prime}))). Consider the composition of continuous maps

f:Z~−E→𝑞Z−q⁡(E)→𝑔Z′−q′​(E′)→(q′|Z~′−E′)−1Z~′−E′.f:\tilde{Z}-E\xrightarrow{q}Z-q(E)\xrightarrow{g}Z^{\prime}-q^{\prime}(E^{\prime})\xrightarrow{(q^{\prime}_{|\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}})^{-1}}\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}.

Given z∈Ez\in E, the ι\iota-equivariance of C⁡(g):CZ​(q⁡(z))→CZ′​(g⁡(q⁡(z)))C(g):C_{Z}(q(z))\to C_{Z^{\prime}}(g(q(z))) ensures that ff extends to a continuous map at zz. So, ff extends (uniquely) to a continuous map Z~→Z~′\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime}, and that map is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces.

We have Z~u⊂Z~−E\tilde{Z}_{u}\subset\tilde{Z}-E and f⁡(Z~u)⊂Z~u′f(\tilde{Z}_{u})\subset\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{u}. Since g|g−1(Z~′o)−Eg_{|g^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o})-E} is orientation-preserving, it follows that f|f−1(Z~′o−E′)f_{|f^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o}-E^{\prime})} is orientation-preserving. So, f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} is a morphism of curves and it is compatible with the relations. This shows that the quotient functor is fully faithful.

Let now ZZ be a curve. Let z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc} and Uz⊂ZoU_{z}\subset Z_{o} be a small open neighbourhood of zz. Fix an isomorphism of curves fz:Uz→∼St⁡(nz),z↦0f_{z}:U_{z}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{St}(n_{z}),\ z\mapsto 0. The equivalence relation on π0​(Uz−{z})\pi_{0}(U_{z}-\{z\}) whose equivalence classes are the orbits of ι\iota defines via fzf_{z} the equivalence relation on {ei​π​r/2​nz}0≤r<2​nz\{e^{i\pi r/2n_{z}}\}_{0\leq r<2n_{z}} given by ζ∼ζ′\zeta\sim\zeta^{\prime} if and only if ζ′=ζ±1\zeta^{\prime}=\zeta^{\pm 1}.

The proof of Lemma 7.1.14 provides us a non-singular curve Z^\hat{Z} with a finite relation. Indeed, with the notations of the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we have U^z=∐0≤r<nz𝐑​ei​π​r/nz\hat{U}_{z}=\coprod_{0\leq r<n_{z}}{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}}. Note that Z^o\hat{Z}_{o} is the subspace of Z^\hat{Z} obtained by adding to Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} the point 00 of 𝐑​ei​π​r/nz{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}} for each r∈{0,…,nz−1}r\in\{0,\ldots,n_{z}-1\} and each z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}.

This gives Z^\hat{Z} a structure of non-singular curve. As in the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we obtain a finite relation on Z^\hat{Z} and an isomorphism of curves Z→∼Z^/∼Z\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\hat{Z}/\!\sim. This shows that the quotient functor is essentially surjective. ∎

0P9G

Definition 7.2.9. Given ZZ a curve, the non-singular cover of ZZ is a non-singular curve Z^\hat{Z}, together with a finite relation ∼\sim and an isomorphism Z^/∼→∼Z\hat{Z}/\!\!\sim\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}Z.

Note that Ze​x​c=ZqZ_{exc}=Z_{q} where q:Z^→Zq:\hat{Z}\to Z is the canonical map. Proposition 7.2.8 shows that non-singular covers exist and are unique up to a unique isomorphism. The following proposition makes this more precise.

0P9H

Proposition 7.2.10. The functor sending a curve ZZ to its non-singular cover is right adjoint to the embedding of the category of non-singular curves in the category of curves.

0P9I

Proof. Let Z′Z^{\prime} be a non-singular curve. We have a map h:Hom⁡(Z′,Z^)→Hom⁡(Z′,Z),g↦q∘gh:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(Z^{\prime},\hat{Z})\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(Z^{\prime},Z),\ g\mapsto q\circ g. Since ZqZ_{q} is finite, it follows that hh is injective.

Consider now a morphism of curves f:Z′→Zf:Z^{\prime}\to Z. We factor ff as Z′→f1Z′/∼→f2ZZ^{\prime}\xrightarrow{f_{1}}Z^{\prime}/\!\sim\ \xrightarrow{f_{2}}Z as in Lemma 7.2.7. By Proposition 7.2.8, there is a morphism f^:Z′→Z^\hat{f}:Z^{\prime}\to\hat{Z} such that q∘f^=fq\circ\hat{f}=f, hence h⁡(f^)=fh(\hat{f})=f. So hh is surjective. ∎

0P9J

Example 7.2.11. Let us provide some examples of curves and non-singular covers. The dotted lines link the points in the same equivalence class. The grey part corresponds to ZuZ_{u}.

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2