6.2.1. Definition
We now define a groupoid of n n -periodic bijections.
Given I I a subset of 𝐙 / n {\mathbf{Z}}/n we denote by I ~ \tilde{I} its inverse image in 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} .
Let 𝒮 n {\mathcal{S}}_{n} be the category with objects the subsets of 𝐙 / n {\mathbf{Z}}/n and where
Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) is the set of n n -periodic
bijections σ : I ~ → ∼ J ~ \sigma:\tilde{I}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\tilde{J} . The group n 𝐙 n{\mathbf{Z}} acts by
translation on Hom \operatorname{Hom}\nolimits -sets.
Note that 𝔖 ^ n = End 𝒮 n ( 𝐙 / n ) \hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n}=\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}({\mathbf{Z}}/n) .
Given i , j ∈ I ~ i,j\in\tilde{I} with i − j ∉ n 𝐙 i-j{\not\in}n{\mathbf{Z}} , the element
s i j ∈ 𝔖 ^ n s_{ij}\in\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n} restricts to an n n -periodic bijection I ~ → ∼ I ~ \tilde{I}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\tilde{I} ,
which we also denote by s i j s_{ij} .
Let I I be a subset of 𝐙 / n {\mathbf{Z}}/n .
There is a unique increasing bijection
β I : { 1 , … , | I | } → ∼ I ~ ∩ { 1 , … , n } \beta_{I}:\{1,\ldots,|I|\}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\tilde{I}\cap\{1,\ldots,n\} . We extend it to an
increasing bijection 𝐙 → ∼ I ~ {\mathbf{Z}}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\tilde{I} by β I ( r + d | I | ) = β I ( r ) + d n \beta_{I}(r+d|I|)=\beta_{I}(r)+dn for
r ∈ { 1 , … , | I | } r\in\{1,\ldots,|I|\} and d ∈ 𝐙 d\in{\mathbf{Z}} .
There is an isomorphism of groups
F I : 𝔖 ^ | I | → ∼ End 𝒮 n ( I ) , σ ↦ β I ∘ σ ∘ β I − 1 . F_{I}:\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{|I|}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I),\ \sigma\mapsto\beta_{I}\circ\sigma\circ\beta_{I}^{-1}.
6.2.2. Length
Consider σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) . We define
L ( σ ) = { ( i , i ′ ) ∈ I ~ 2 | i < i ′ , σ ( i ) > σ ( i ′ ) } L(\sigma)=\{(i,i^{\prime})\in\tilde{I}^{2}\ |\ i<i^{\prime},\ \sigma(i)>\sigma(i^{\prime})\}
and L ~ ( σ ) = { ( i , i ′ ) ∈ L ( σ ) | 1 ≤ i ≤ n } \tilde{L}(\sigma)=\{(i,i^{\prime})\in L(\sigma)\ |\ 1\leq i\leq n\} .
The canonical map L ~ ( σ ) → L ( σ ) / n 𝐙 \tilde{L}(\sigma)\to L(\sigma)/n{\mathbf{Z}} is bijective.
We define
ℓ ( σ ) = | L ~ ( σ ) | \ell(\sigma)=|\tilde{L}(\sigma)| .
0P7F
Lemma 6.2.1 . We have ℓ ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) ≤ ℓ ( σ ′ ) + ℓ ( σ ) \ell(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)\leq\ell(\sigma^{\prime})+\ell(\sigma) for all
σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) and σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , K ) \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K) .
0P7G
Proof. We have
L ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) = { ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ I ~ 2 | i 1 < i 2 , σ ( i 1 ) > σ ( i 2 ) , σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 1 ) > σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 2 ) } ⊔ { ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ I ~ 2 | i 1 < i 2 , σ ( i 1 ) < σ ( i 2 ) , σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 1 ) > σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 2 ) } = { ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ) | σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 1 ) > σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 2 ) } ⊔ ( σ − 1 × σ − 1 ) ( { ( j 1 , j 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ′ ) | σ − 1 ( j 1 ) < σ − 1 ( j 2 ) } ) . L(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\{(i_{1},i_{2})\in\tilde{I}^{2}\ |\ i_{1}<i_{2},\ \sigma(i_{1})>\sigma(i_{2}),\ \sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{1})>\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{2})\}\sqcup\\
\{(i_{1},i_{2})\in\tilde{I}^{2}\ |\ i_{1}<i_{2},\ \sigma(i_{1})<\sigma(i_{2}),\ \sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{1})>\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{2})\}\\
=\{(i_{1},i_{2})\in L(\sigma)\ |\ \sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{1})>\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{2})\}\sqcup(\sigma^{-1}\times\sigma^{-1})\bigl(\{(j_{1},j_{2})\in L(\sigma^{\prime})\ |\ \sigma^{-1}(j_{1})<\sigma^{-1}(j_{2})\}\bigr).
It follows that
ℓ ( σ ′ ) + ℓ ( σ ) − ℓ ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) = 2 | { ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ I ~ 2 | i 1 < i 2 , σ ( i 1 ) > σ ( i 2 ) , σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 1 ) < σ ′ ∘ σ ( i 2 ) } / n 𝐙 | ≥ 0 . \ell(\sigma^{\prime})+\ell(\sigma)-\ell(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=2|\{(i_{1},i_{2})\in\tilde{I}^{2}\ |\ i_{1}<i_{2},\ \sigma(i_{1})>\sigma(i_{2}),\ \sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{1})<\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma(i_{2})\}/n{\mathbf{Z}}|\geq 0.
∎
Let σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) . We have ℓ ( σ ) = 0 \ell(\sigma)=0 if and only if
σ \sigma is an increasing bijection.
Given τ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , I ) \tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,I) with ℓ ( τ ) = 0 \ell(\tau)=0 , we have
L ( τ ∘ σ ) = L ( σ ) = ( τ × τ ) ( L ( σ ∘ τ ) ) L(\tau\circ\sigma)=L(\sigma)=(\tau\times\tau)\bigl(L(\sigma\circ\tau)\bigr) ,
hence ℓ ( τ ∘ σ ) = ℓ ( σ ∘ τ ) = ℓ ( σ ) \ell(\tau\circ\sigma)=\ell(\sigma\circ\tau)=\ell(\sigma) .
Since L ( τ ∘ σ ) = ( β I × β I ) ( L ( F I − 1 ( τ ∘ σ ) ) ) L(\tau\circ\sigma)=(\beta_{I}\times\beta_{I})(L(F_{I}^{-1}(\tau\circ\sigma))) ,
we have ℓ ( σ ) = ℓ ( F I − 1 ( τ ∘ σ ) ) \ell(\sigma)=\ell(F_{I}^{-1}(\tau\circ\sigma)) .
As a consequence,
we deduce the following result from Lemma 3.2.3 .
0P7H
Lemma 6.2.2 . Let σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) . We have
ℓ ( σ ) = ∑ 0 ≤ i 1 < i 2 < n i 1 , i 2 ∈ I ~ | ⌊ σ ( i 2 ) − σ ( i 1 ) n ⌋ | . \ell(\sigma)=\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}0\leq i_{1}<i_{2}<n\\
i_{1},i_{2}\in\tilde{I}\end{subarray}}\bigl|{\lfloor\frac{\sigma(i_{2})-\sigma(i_{1})}{n}\rfloor}\bigr|.
The next lemma relates length and number of intersections of paths on a cylinder.
0P7I
Lemma 6.2.3 . Let σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) where I = { i 1 + n 𝐙 , i 2 + n 𝐙 } I=\{i_{1}+n{\mathbf{Z}},i_{2}+n{\mathbf{Z}}\} and
J = { j 1 + n 𝐙 , j 2 + n 𝐙 } J=\{j_{1}+n{\mathbf{Z}},j_{2}+n{\mathbf{Z}}\} with 1 ≤ i 1 ≠ i 2 ≤ n 1\leq i_{1}\neq i_{2}\leq n ,
1 ≤ j 1 ≠ j 2 ≤ n 1\leq j_{1}\neq j_{2}\leq n and σ ( i r ) = j r ( mod n ) \sigma(i_{r})=j_{r}\pmod{n} for r ∈ { 1 , 2 } r\in\{1,2\} .
Fix β : { i 1 , i 2 , j 1 , j 2 } → 𝐑 \beta:\{i_{1},i_{2},j_{1},j_{2}\}\to{\mathbf{R}} increasing with
| β ( u ) − β ( v ) | < 1 |\beta(u)-\beta(v)|<1 for all u , v u,v .
Consider γ r : [ 0 , 1 ] → 𝐑 \gamma_{r}:[0,1]\to{\mathbf{R}} continuous with
γ r ( 0 ) = β ( i r ) \gamma_{r}(0)=\beta(i_{r}) and γ r ( 1 ) = β ( j r ) + σ ( i r ) − j r n \gamma_{r}(1)=\beta(j_{r})+\frac{\sigma(i_{r})-j_{r}}{n}
for r ∈ { 1 , 2 } r\in\{1,2\} . We have
ℓ ( σ ) ≤ | { t ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] | e 2 i π γ 1 ( t ) = e 2 i π γ 2 ( t ) } | \ell(\sigma)\leq|\{t\in[0,1]\ |\ e^{2i\pi\gamma_{1}(t)}=e^{2i\pi\gamma_{2}(t)}\}|
with equality if, for all r ∈ { 1 , 2 } r\in\{1,2\} , the map
γ r \gamma_{r} is affine.
0P7J
Proof. Without loss of generality, we can assume i 1 < i 2 i_{1}<i_{2} . The lemma follows
by applying the intermediate value theorem to γ 2 ( t ) − γ 1 ( t ) \gamma_{2}(t)-\gamma_{1}(t) and
using Lemma 6.2.2 , considering four cases according to the signs of
j 2 − j 1 j_{2}-j_{1} and σ ( i 2 ) − σ ( i 1 ) \sigma(i_{2})-\sigma(i_{1}) .
∎
6.2.4. Non-commutative degree
Let us consider the free abelian groups
R n = ⨁ a ∈ 𝐙 / n 𝐙 α a R_{n}=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}{\mathbf{Z}}\alpha_{a} and
L n = ⨁ a ∈ 𝐙 / n 𝐙 ε a L_{n}=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}{\mathbf{Z}}\varepsilon_{a} . We define a linear map
ρ : R n → L n \rho:R_{n}\to L_{n} by ρ ( α a ) = ε a + 1 − ε a \rho(\alpha_{a})=\varepsilon_{a+1}-\varepsilon_{a} and
a representation of the group R n R_{n} on L n L_{n} given by
α a ⋅ ε b = ( δ a , b + δ a + 1 , b ) ε b . \alpha_{a}\cdot\varepsilon_{b}=(\delta_{a,b}+\delta_{a+1,b})\varepsilon_{b}.
Note that δ = ∑ a ∈ 𝐙 / n α a ∈ ker ρ \delta=\sum_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}\alpha_{a}\in\ker\rho and
δ ⋅ ε b = 2 ε b \delta\cdot\varepsilon_{b}=2\varepsilon_{b} for all b b .
We define a bilinear map
⟨ − , − ⟩ : R n × R n → L n , ⟨ α , α ′ ⟩ = α ⋅ ρ ( α ′ ) . \langle-,-\rangle:R_{n}\times R_{n}\to L_{n},\ \langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle=\alpha\cdot\rho(\alpha^{\prime}).
Let Γ n ′ = L n × R n \Gamma_{n}^{\prime}=L_{n}\times R_{n} . We define a group structure on
Γ n ′ \Gamma_{n}^{\prime} by
( l , α ) ⋅ ( l ′ , α ′ ) = ( l + l ′ + ⟨ α , α ′ ⟩ , α + α ′ ) . (l,\alpha)\cdot(l^{\prime},\alpha^{\prime})=(l+l^{\prime}+\langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle,\alpha+\alpha^{\prime}).
Given I ⊂ 𝐙 / n I\subset{\mathbf{Z}}/n , we put
ε I = ∑ a ∈ I ε a ∈ L n \varepsilon_{I}=\sum_{a\in I}\varepsilon_{a}\in L_{n} .
Given i , j ∈ 𝐙 i,j\in{\mathbf{Z}} , we put
α i , j = ∑ i ≤ r < j α r + n 𝐙 − ∑ j ≤ r < i α r + n 𝐙 . \alpha_{i,j}=\sum_{i\leq r<j}\alpha_{r+n{\mathbf{Z}}}-\sum_{j\leq r<i}\alpha_{r+n{\mathbf{Z}}}.
Note that α i , i + 1 = α i + n 𝐙 \alpha_{i,i+1}=\alpha_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}} ,
α i + n , j + n = α i , j \alpha_{i+n,j+n}=\alpha_{i,j} and
α i , j + α j , k = α i , k \alpha_{i,j}+\alpha_{j,k}=\alpha_{i,k} for all i , j , k ∈ 𝐙 i,j,k\in{\mathbf{Z}} .
Note also that δ = α i , i + n \delta=\alpha_{i,i+n} for all i ∈ 𝐙 i\in{\mathbf{Z}} . Note finally that
ρ ( α i , j ) = ε j + n 𝐙 − ε i + n 𝐙 \rho(\alpha_{i,j})=\varepsilon_{j+n{\mathbf{Z}}}-\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}} .
Consider σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) . We put
⟦ σ ⟧ = ∑ i ∈ I ~ ∩ [ 1 , n ] α i , σ ( i ) ∈ R n . \llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=\sum_{i\in\tilde{I}\cap[1,n]}\alpha_{i,\sigma(i)}\in R_{n}.
Note that
ρ ( ⟦ σ ⟧ ) = ε J − ε I \rho(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\varepsilon_{J}-\varepsilon_{I} and
⟦ σ ′ ∘ σ ⟧ = ⟦ σ ′ ⟧ + ⟦ σ ⟧ \llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\rrbracket=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket+\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket for any
σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , K ) \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K) .
We define
m ( σ ) = ⟦ σ ⟧ ⋅ ε I ∈ L n and dm ( σ ) = ( − m ( σ ) , − ⟦ σ ⟧ ) ∈ Γ n ′ . m(\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket\cdot\varepsilon_{I}\in L_{n}\text{ and }\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma)=(-m(\sigma),-\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)\in\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}.
0P7K
Lemma 6.2.4 . Let w ∈ W | I | w\in W_{|I|} , m ∈ 𝐙 m\in{\mathbf{Z}} and let σ = F I ( w c m ) \sigma=F_{I}(wc^{m})
be the element of End 𝒮 n ( I ) \operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I)
corresponding to w c m wc^{m} .
We have ℓ ( σ ) = ℓ ( w ) \ell(\sigma)=\ell(w) ,
⟦ σ ⟧ = m ⋅ δ \llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=m\cdot\delta
and m ( σ ) = 2 m ε I m(\sigma)=2m\varepsilon_{I} .
0P7L
Proof. The first statement follows from the fact that
F I F_{I} preserves lengths (cf the discussion before Lemma 6.2.2 ).
Note that ⟦ s i , j ⟧ = 0 \llbracket s_{i,j}\rrbracket=0 for
i , j ∈ I ~ i,j\in\tilde{I} with i − j ∉ n 𝐙 i-j{\not\in}n{\mathbf{Z}} , while
⟦ F I ( c ) ⟧ = δ \llbracket F_{I}(c)\rrbracket=\delta . We deduce that
⟦ σ ⟧ = m ⋅ δ \llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=m\cdot\delta .
The last statement of the lemma is immediate.
∎
0P7M
Lemma 6.2.5 . Consider σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) and σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , K ) \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K) .
We have dm ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) = dm ( σ ′ ) ⋅ dm ( σ ) \operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma^{\prime})\cdot\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma) .
0P7N
Proof. We have
m ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) = ⟦ σ ′ ⟧ ⋅ ε I + ⟦ σ ⟧ ε I = m ( σ ′ ) + m ( σ ) + ⟦ σ ′ ⟧ ⋅ ( ε I − ε J ) , m(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot\varepsilon_{I}+\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket\varepsilon_{I}=m(\sigma^{\prime})+m(\sigma)+\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot(\varepsilon_{I}-\varepsilon_{J}),
hence
m ( σ ′ ) + m ( σ ) − m ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) = ⟦ σ ′ ⟧ ⋅ ρ ( ⟦ σ ⟧ ) . m(\sigma^{\prime})+m(\sigma)-m(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot\rho(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket).
The lemma follows.
∎
We put Γ n = 1 2 𝐙 × Γ n ′ \Gamma_{n}=\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times\Gamma^{\prime}_{n} . We endow
Γ n \Gamma_{n} with a structure of 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} -monoid by using the canonical embedding
𝐙 ↪ 1 2 𝐙 ↪ Γ n {\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\Gamma_{n} .
Given
σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) , we put deg ( σ ) = ( − ℓ ( σ ) , dm ( σ ) ) ∈ Γ n \deg(\sigma)=(-\ell(\sigma),\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma))\in\Gamma_{n} .
Let D D be a subset of { 1 , … , n } × { ± 1 } \{1,\ldots,n\}\times\{\pm 1\} that embeds in its
projection on { 1 , … , n } \{1,\ldots,n\} .
We denote by Γ D \Gamma_{D} the quotient of
Γ n \Gamma_{n} by the subgroup generated by ( 0 , ε i + n 𝐙 ) + ( 1 2 ν i , 0 ) (0,\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}})+(\frac{1}{2}\nu_{i},0) ,
where ( i , ν i ) ∈ D (i,\nu_{i})\in D . We identify 1 2 𝐙 \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} with the image of 1 2 𝐙 × 0 \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times 0 in
Γ D \Gamma_{D} .
We define a partial order on Γ D \Gamma_{D} by h ≥ g h\geq g if h g − 1 hg^{-1} is in 1 2 𝐙 ≥ 0 \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}_{\geq 0} .
We denote by deg D ( σ ) \deg_{D}(\sigma) the image of deg ( σ ) \deg(\sigma)
in Γ D \Gamma_{D} .
Given E E a subset of { 1 , … , n } \{1,\ldots,n\} , we put E + = { ( i , 1 ) | i ∈ E } E^{+}=\{(i,1)\ |\ i\in E\} .
By Lemmas 6.2.1 and 6.2.5 ,
we obtain a Γ D \Gamma_{D} -filtration on 𝒮 n {\mathcal{S}}_{n} by defining
Hom 𝒮 n ≥ g ( I , J ) = { σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) | deg D ( σ ) ≥ g } . \operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{\geq g}}(I,J)=\{\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J)\ |\ \deg_{D}(\sigma)\geq g\}.
It follows from Lemma 6.2.5 that the pointed category ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n}
is isomorphic to the graded pointed category associated to the Γ D \Gamma_{D} -filtration of 𝒮 n {\mathcal{S}}_{n}
(after forgetting the Γ D \Gamma_{D} -grading to 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} ).
Note that if D = ∅ D=\emptyset , then Γ D = Γ n \Gamma_{D}=\Gamma_{n} , deg D = deg \deg_{D}=\deg and the
𝐙 ≤ 0 {\mathbf{Z}}_{\leq 0} grading on ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n} given by the length can be recovered from
the Γ n \Gamma_{n} -grading by using the quotient map
Γ n → Γ n / Γ n ′ = 1 2 𝐙 \Gamma_{n}\to\Gamma_{n}/\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}=\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} .
This quotient map provides a 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} -grading on
the Γ n \Gamma_{n} -graded pointed category associated to the Γ n \Gamma_{n} -filtration of
𝒮 n {\mathcal{S}}_{n} . This 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} -graded pointed category is isomorphic to ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n} .
Assume D = [ 1 , n ] + D=[1,n]^{+} . Composing with the quotient map
Γ n ↠ Γ D \Gamma_{n}\twoheadrightarrow\Gamma_{D} ,
the embedding 1 2 𝐙 ↪ Γ n , r ↦ ( r , 0 ) \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\Gamma_{n},\ r\mapsto(r,0) and the quotient map
Γ n ↠ R n , ( r , ( l , α ) ) ↦ α \Gamma_{n}\twoheadrightarrow R_{n},\ (r,(l,\alpha))\mapsto\alpha induce
an embedding of 1 2 𝐙 \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} as a central
subgroup of Γ D \Gamma_{D} with quotient map
Γ D ↠ R n \Gamma_{D}\twoheadrightarrow R_{n} . So, Γ [ 1 , n ] + \Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} identifies with the set
1 2 𝐙 × R n \frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times R_{n} , with multiplication given by
( r , α ) ⋅ ( r ′ , α ′ ) = ( r + r ′ + ⟨ ⟨ α , α ′ ⟩ ⟩ , α + α ′ ) (r,\alpha)\cdot(r^{\prime},\alpha^{\prime})=(r+r^{\prime}+\langle\langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle\rangle,\alpha+\alpha^{\prime}) .
When n ≥ 3 n\geq 3 , the group Γ [ 1 , n ] + \Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} has a presentation with generators
z = ( 1 2 , 0 ) z=(\frac{1}{2},0) , g a = ( 0 , α a ) g_{a}=(0,\alpha_{a}) , a ∈ 𝐙 / n a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n and relations
z g a = g a z , g a g b g a − 1 g b − 1 = { z if b = a + 1 z − 1 if b = a − 1 1 otherwise. zg_{a}=g_{a}z,\ g_{a}g_{b}g_{a}^{-1}g_{b}^{-1}=\begin{cases}z&\text{ if }b=a+1\\
z^{-1}&\text{ if }b=a-1\\
1&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}
We define a morphism of groups
ϵ : Γ [ 1 , n ] + → 𝐙 / 2 , z ↦ 1 , g a ↦ 1 . \epsilon:\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}\to{\mathbf{Z}}/2,\ z\mapsto 1,\ g_{a}\mapsto 1.
0P7Q
Lemma 6.2.7 . Given ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) ∈ Γ [ 1 , n ] + (r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})\in\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} , we have
ϵ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) = 2 r + 1 2 | { a ∈ 𝐙 / n | v a + v a + 1 odd } | \epsilon(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})=2r+\frac{1}{2}\bigl|\{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n\ |\ v_{a}+v_{a+1}\text{ odd}\}\bigr| .
Given σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) , we have ϵ ( deg [ 1 , n ] + ( σ ) ) = 0 \epsilon(\deg_{[1,n]^{+}}(\sigma))=0 .
0P7R
Proof. Denote by ϵ ~ \tilde{\epsilon} the map defined by the right
hand side of the equality of the lemma.
Let N N (resp. N ′ N^{\prime} ) be the cardinality of the set
of a ∈ 𝐙 / n a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n such that v a + v a + 1 v_{a}+v_{a+1}
(resp. v a ′ + v a + 1 ′ v^{\prime}_{a}+v^{\prime}_{a+1} ) is odd, where
v a ′ = v a + δ a b v^{\prime}_{a}=v_{a}+\delta_{ab} . The integers N N and N ′ N^{\prime} are even.
We have
ϵ ~ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) + ϵ ~ ( ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) ( s , α b ) ) \displaystyle\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}((r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})(s,\alpha_{b}))
= ϵ ~ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) + ϵ ~ ( r + s + 1 2 ( v b − 1 − v b + 1 ) , α b + ∑ a v a α a ) \displaystyle=\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}(r+s+\frac{1}{2}(v_{b-1}-v_{b+1}),\alpha_{b}+\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})
= 2 s + v b + 1 + v b − 1 + 1 2 ( N + N ′ ) . \displaystyle=2s+v_{b+1}+v_{b-1}+\frac{1}{2}(N+N^{\prime}).
We have
N ′ = { N + 2 if v b − 1 , v b and v b + 1 have the same parity N − 2 if v b − 1 , v b + 1 and v b + 1 have the same parity N otherwise . N^{\prime}=\begin{cases}N+2&\text{ if }v_{b-1},\ v_{b}\text{ and }v_{b+1}\text{ have the same parity}\\
N-2&\text{ if }v_{b-1},\ v_{b}+1\text{ and }v_{b+1}\text{ have the same parity}\\
N&\text{otherwise}.\end{cases}
It follows that
ϵ ~ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) + ϵ ~ ( ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) ( s , α b ) ) = 2 s + 1 . \tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}((r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})(s,\alpha_{b}))=2s+1.
We deduce by
induction on ∑ a ∈ 𝐙 / n | v a | \sum_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}|v_{a}|
that ϵ ~ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) = ϵ ( r , ∑ a v a α a ) \tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})=\epsilon(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a}) .
Given a , b ∈ 𝐙 / n a,b\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n and i ∈ I i\in I , we have
α a , b ⋅ ε i = δ i ∈ { a , b } a ≠ b ε i mod 2 L n . \alpha_{a,b}\cdot\varepsilon_{i}=\delta_{\begin{subarray}{c}i\in\{a,b\}\\
a\neq b\end{subarray}}\ \varepsilon_{i}\mod 2L_{n}.
It follows that m ( σ ) ≡ ∑ i ∈ I ∖ ( I ∩ J ) ε i mod 2 L n m(\sigma)\equiv\sum_{i\in I\setminus(I\cap J)}\varepsilon_{i}\mod{2L_{n}} . Write ⟦ σ ⟧ = ∑ a v a α a \llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a} .
Given a ∈ 𝐙 / n a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n , the integer v a + v a + 1 v_{a}+v_{a+1} is odd
if and only if a ∈ I Δ J a\in I\Delta J , hence
ϵ ( 0 , ⟦ σ ⟧ ) = 1 2 | I Δ J | = | I ∖ ( I ∩ J ) | \epsilon(0,\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\frac{1}{2}|I\Delta J|=|I\setminus(I\cap J)| . It follows that
ϵ ( deg [ 1 , n ] + ( σ ) ) = 0 \epsilon(\deg_{[1,n]^{+}}(\sigma))=0 .
∎
It follows from Lemma 6.2.7 that the Γ n \Gamma_{n} -grading on
ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n} comes from a grading by the kernel of the
composition Γ n → can Γ [ 1 , n ] + → ϵ 𝐙 / 2 \Gamma_{n}\xrightarrow{{\mathrm{can}}}\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}\xrightarrow{\epsilon}{\mathbf{Z}}/2 .
6.2.5. Differential
Given σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) , let
D ( σ ) D(\sigma) be the set of pairs ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in L(\sigma) such that
•
i 2 − i 1 < n i_{2}-i_{1}<n or σ ( i 1 ) − σ ( i 2 ) < n \sigma(i_{1})-\sigma(i_{2})<n and
•
given i ∈ I ~ i\in\tilde{I}
with i 1 < i < i 2 i_{1}<i<i_{2} , we have σ ( i 1 ) < σ ( i ) \sigma(i_{1})<\sigma(i) or σ ( i ) < σ ( i 2 ) \sigma(i)<\sigma(i_{2}) .
We put D ~ ( σ ) = D ( σ ) ∩ L ~ ( σ ) \tilde{D}(\sigma)=D(\sigma)\cap\tilde{L}(\sigma) . The diagonal action
of n 𝐙 n{\mathbf{Z}} on L ( σ ) L(\sigma) preserves D ( σ ) D(\sigma) and we have a canonical bijection
D ~ ( σ ) → ∼ D ( σ ) / n 𝐙 \tilde{D}(\sigma)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}D(\sigma)/n{\mathbf{Z}} .
Given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in L(\sigma) , we put σ i 1 , i 2 := σ ∘ s i 1 , i 2 \sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}:=\sigma\circ s_{i_{1},i_{2}} .
We define a partial order on
Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) as the transitive closure of σ ′ < σ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma if
σ ′ = σ i 1 , i 2 \sigma^{\prime}=\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}} for some ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma) .
When I = J = 𝐙 / n I=J={\mathbf{Z}}/n ,
this coincides with the extended Chevalley-Bruhat order on 𝔖 ^ n \hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n}
by Lemma 3.2.4 and given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in L(\sigma) , we have
σ i 1 , i 2 < σ \sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}<\sigma (Lemma 3.2.3 ).
The next lemma shows that this holds for general maps in 𝒮 n {\mathcal{S}}_{n} .
0P7S
Lemma 6.2.8 . Let σ , σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma,\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) .
Given τ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , I ) \tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,I) with ℓ ( τ ) = 0 \ell(\tau)=0 , we have
σ ′ < σ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma if and only if τ ∘ σ ′ < τ ∘ σ \tau\circ\sigma^{\prime}<\tau\circ\sigma
if and only if σ ′ ∘ τ < σ ∘ τ \sigma^{\prime}\circ\tau<\sigma\circ\tau .
0P7T
Proof. Note that τ \tau is an increasing bijection since ℓ ( τ ) = 0 \ell(\tau)=0 .
We have D ( τ ∘ σ ) = D ( σ ) D(\tau\circ\sigma)=D(\sigma) and
given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma) ,
we have ( τ ∘ σ ) i 1 , i 2 = τ ∘ σ i 1 , i 2 (\tau\circ\sigma)^{i_{1},i_{2}}=\tau\circ\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}} . This shows
the first equivalence. The second equivalence follows from the fact that
D ( σ ∘ τ ) = ( τ − 1 × τ − 1 ) ( D ( σ ) ) D(\sigma\circ\tau)=(\tau^{-1}\times\tau^{-1})(D(\sigma)) and
given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma) ,
we have ( σ ∘ τ ) τ − 1 ( i 1 ) , τ − 1 ( i 2 ) = σ i 1 , i 2 ∘ τ (\sigma\circ\tau)^{\tau^{-1}(i_{1}),\tau^{-1}(i_{2})}=\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}\circ\tau .
∎
0P7U
Lemma 6.2.9 . Given σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) , there is a bijection
D ~ ( σ ) → ∼ { σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) | σ ′ < σ , ℓ ( σ ′ ) = ℓ ( σ ) − 1 } , ( i 1 , i 2 ) ↦ σ i 1 , i 2 . \tilde{D}(\sigma)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\{\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J)\ |\ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma,\ \ell(\sigma^{\prime})=\ell(\sigma)-1\},\ (i_{1},i_{2})\mapsto\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}.
Note that
{ σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) | σ ′ < σ , ℓ ( σ ′ ) = ℓ ( σ ) − 1 } = { σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) | σ ′ < σ , deg ( σ ′ ) = deg ( σ ) + 1 } . \{\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J)\ |\ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma,\ \ell(\sigma^{\prime})=\ell(\sigma)-1\}=\{\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J)\ |\ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma,\ \deg(\sigma^{\prime})=\deg(\sigma)+1\}.
Given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in L(\sigma) , we have ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma) if and only
if deg D ( σ ) = deg D ( σ i 1 , i 2 ) − 1 \deg_{D}(\sigma)=\deg_{D}(\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}})-1 for some subset (equivalently, for
any subset) D D of { 1 , … , n } × { ± 1 } \{1,\ldots,n\}\times\{\pm 1\} that embeds in its
projection on { 1 , … , n } \{1,\ldots,n\} .
0P7V
Proof. Let τ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , I ) \tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,I) be an increasing bijection.
We have D ( τ ∘ σ ) = D ( σ ) D(\tau\circ\sigma)=D(\sigma) and
{ σ ′′ ∈ End 𝒮 n ( I ) | σ ′′ < τ ∘ σ , ℓ ( σ ′′ ) = ℓ ( τ ∘ σ ) − 1 } = { τ ∘ σ ′ | σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) , σ ′ < σ , ℓ ( σ ′ ) = ℓ ( σ ) − 1 } \{\sigma^{\prime\prime}\in\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I)\ |\ \sigma^{\prime\prime}<\tau\circ\sigma,\ \ell(\sigma^{\prime\prime})=\ell(\tau\circ\sigma)-1\}=\{\tau\circ\sigma^{\prime}\ |\ \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J),\ \sigma^{\prime}<\sigma,\ \ell(\sigma^{\prime})=\ell(\sigma)-1\}
by Lemma 6.2.8 .
Since the first statement of the
lemma holds for τ ∘ σ \tau\circ\sigma by Lemma 3.2.4 ,
it holds for σ \sigma .
The other statements follow from Lemmas 6.2.4 and
6.2.5 .
∎
0P7W
Lemma 6.2.10 . Consider σ ′′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma^{\prime\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) and
σ ′ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( J , K ) \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K) and let σ = σ ′ σ ′′ \sigma=\sigma^{\prime}\sigma^{\prime\prime} .
Assume ℓ ( σ ) = ℓ ( σ ′ ) + ℓ ( σ ′′ ) \ell(\sigma)=\ell(\sigma^{\prime})+\ell(\sigma^{\prime\prime}) .
Let ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ( σ ) ∖ ( D ( σ ) ∩ D ( σ ′′ ) ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma)\setminus(D(\sigma)\cap D(\sigma^{\prime\prime})) .
Let α ′′ = σ ′′ s i 1 , i 2 \alpha^{\prime\prime}=\sigma^{\prime\prime}s_{i_{1},i_{2}} and
α ′′ = ( σ ′ ) σ ′′ ( i 1 ) , σ ′′ ( i 2 ) \alpha^{\prime\prime}=(\sigma^{\prime})^{\sigma^{\prime\prime}(i_{1}),\sigma^{\prime\prime}(i_{2})} .
We have σ = α ′ α ′′ \sigma=\alpha^{\prime}\alpha^{\prime\prime} and
ℓ ( σ ) = ℓ ( α ′ ) + ℓ ( α ′′ ) \ell(\sigma)=\ell(\alpha^{\prime})+\ell(\alpha^{\prime\prime}) .
0P7X
Proof. Assume first I = J = K I=J=K .
The lemma follows in that case from Lemmas 3.2.4 and 3.2.2 .
Consider now the general case.
There are increasing bijections τ : J → I \tau:J\to I and τ ′ : K → J \tau^{\prime}:K\to J .
We have D ( σ ) = τ − 1 ( D ( τ ′ σ τ ) ) D(\sigma)=\tau^{-1}(D(\tau^{\prime}\sigma\tau)) and
D ( σ ′′ ) = τ − 1 ( D ( σ ′′ τ ) ) D(\sigma^{\prime\prime})=\tau^{-1}(D(\sigma^{\prime\prime}\tau)) (proof of Lemma 5.4.7).
The lemma follows now from the previous case
applied to the decomposition
τ ′ σ τ = ( τ ′ σ ′ ) ( σ ′′ τ ) \tau^{\prime}\sigma\tau=(\tau^{\prime}\sigma^{\prime})(\sigma^{\prime\prime}\tau) .
∎
Consider σ ∈ Hom ℋ n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(I,J) non-zero.
We put
d ( σ ) = ∑ ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ D ~ ( σ ) σ i 1 , i 2 ∈ Hom 𝐅 2 [ ℋ n ] ( I , J ) . d(\sigma)=\sum_{(i_{1},i_{2})\in\tilde{D}(\sigma)}\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}]}(I,J).
0P7Y
Proposition 6.2.11 . The maps d d equip
the 𝐅 2 {\mathbf{F}}_{2} -linear Γ n \Gamma_{n} -graded category 𝐅 2 [ ℋ n ] {\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}] with a differential
Γ n \Gamma_{n} -graded structure,
hence equip ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n} with a differential Γ n \Gamma_{n} -graded pointed structure.
Given I ⊂ 𝐙 / n I\subset{\mathbf{Z}}/n , the morphism F I F_{I} induces
an isomorphism of differential 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}} -graded pointed monoids
𝔖 ^ | I | nil → ∼ End ℋ n ( I ) . \hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{|I|}^{\operatorname{nil}\nolimits}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(I).
0P7Z
Proof. Note that Lemma 6.2.9 shows that d d is homogeneous of degree 1 1 .
The compatibility of d d with F I F_{I} follows from Lemma 3.2.4 .
Consider now σ ∈ Hom ℋ n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(I,J) non-zero. There exists
τ ∈ Hom ℋ n ( J , I ) \tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(J,I) with ℓ ( τ ) = 0 \ell(\tau)=0 . We have
d ( τ ∘ σ ) = τ ∘ d ( σ ) d(\tau\circ\sigma)=\tau\circ d(\sigma) , hence
d 2 ( τ ∘ σ ) = τ ∘ d 2 ( σ ) d^{2}(\tau\circ\sigma)=\tau\circ d^{2}(\sigma) . The compatibility of F I F_{I} with d d
shows that d 2 ( τ ∘ σ ) = 0 d^{2}(\tau\circ\sigma)=0 . Since τ \tau is invertible, we deduce
that d 2 ( σ ) = 0 d^{2}(\sigma)=0 .
Consider finally σ ′ ∈ Hom ℋ n ( J , K ) \sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(J,K) and fix
τ ′ ∈ Hom ℋ n ( K , J ) \tau^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(K,J) with ℓ ( τ ′ ) = 0 \ell(\tau^{\prime})=0 .
We have d ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ∘ σ ∘ τ ) = τ ′ ∘ d ( σ ′ ∘ σ ) ∘ τ d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau)=\tau^{\prime}\circ d(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)\circ\tau and
it follows from the compatibility of F J F_{J} with d d that
d ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ∘ σ ∘ τ ) \displaystyle d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau)
= F J ( d ( F J − 1 ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ∘ σ ∘ τ ) ) ) = F J ( d ( F J − 1 ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ) ∘ F J − 1 ( σ ∘ τ ) ) ) \displaystyle=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau))\bigr)=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime})\circ F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau))\bigr)
= F J ( d ( F J − 1 ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ) ) ∘ F J − 1 ( σ ∘ τ ) ) + F J ( F J − 1 ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ) ) ∘ d ( F J − 1 ( σ ∘ τ ) ) \displaystyle=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}))\circ F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau)\bigr)+F_{J}\bigl(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}))\circ d(F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau)\bigr)
= d ( τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ) ∘ σ ∘ τ + τ ′ ∘ σ ′ ∘ d ( σ ∘ τ ) . \displaystyle=d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime})\circ\sigma\circ\tau+\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ d(\sigma\circ\tau).
∎
0P80
Example 6.2.12 . Elements of L ~ ( σ ) \tilde{L}(\sigma) correspond to intersections in a representing
diagram. Given ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∈ L ~ ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2})\in\tilde{L}(\sigma) , the
element σ i 1 , i 2 \sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}} correspond to the diagram obtained by smoothing the
intersection point corresponding to ( i 1 , i 2 ) (i_{1},i_{2}) . If ( i 1 , i 2 ) ∉ D ~ ( σ ) (i_{1},i_{2}){\not\in}\tilde{D}(\sigma) , the element associated to the diagram will vanish in
ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n} .
6.2.6. Change of n n
Fix a positive integer n ′ ≤ n n^{\prime}\leq n and an increasing injection
α : { 1 , … , n ′ } ↪ { 1 , … , n } \alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\} .
We extend α \alpha to an increasing injection 𝐙 → 𝐙 {\mathbf{Z}}\to{\mathbf{Z}} by
α ( r + d n ′ ) = α ( r ) + d n \alpha(r+dn^{\prime})=\alpha(r)+dn for r ∈ { 1 , … , n ′ } r\in\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\} and d ∈ 𝐙 d\in{\mathbf{Z}} .
Consider α : { 1 , … , n ′ } ↪ { 1 , … , n } \alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\} an increasing injection as
in §6.2.1 . We define two injective morphisms of groups
R α : R n → R n ′ , α i + n ′ 𝐙 ↦ α α ( i ) , α ( i + 1 ) and L α : L n → L n ′ , ε i + n ′ 𝐙 ↦ ε i + n 𝐙 R_{\alpha}:R_{n}\to R_{n^{\prime}},\ \alpha_{i+n^{\prime}{\mathbf{Z}}}\mapsto\alpha_{\alpha(i),\alpha(i+1)}\text{ and }L_{\alpha}:L_{n}\to L_{n^{\prime}},\ \varepsilon_{i+n^{\prime}{\mathbf{Z}}}\mapsto\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}}
for 1 ≤ i ≤ n ′ 1\leq i\leq n^{\prime} .
We have commutative diagrams
R n ′ \textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ρ \scriptstyle{\rho} R α \scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}} L n ′ \textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} L α \scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}} R n ′ × L n ′ \textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\times L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ⋅ \scriptstyle{\cdot} R α × L α \scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}\times L_{\alpha}} L n ′ \textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} L α \scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}} R n ′ × R n ′ \textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\times R_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ⟨ − , − ⟩ \scriptstyle{\langle-,-\rangle} R α × R α \scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}} L n ′ \textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} L α \scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}} R n \textstyle{R_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ρ \scriptstyle{\rho} L n \textstyle{L_{n}} R n × L n \textstyle{R_{n}\times L_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ⋅ \scriptstyle{\cdot} L n \textstyle{L_{n}} R n × R n \textstyle{R_{n}\times R_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ⟨ − , − ⟩ \scriptstyle{\langle-,-\rangle} L n \textstyle{L_{n}}
As a consequence, we have two injective morphisms of groups
Γ α ′ = L α × R α : Γ n ′ ′ → Γ n ′ and Γ α = id × L α × R α : Γ n ′ → Γ n , \Gamma^{\prime}_{\alpha}=L_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}:\Gamma^{\prime}_{n^{\prime}}\to\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}\text{ and }\Gamma_{\alpha}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits\times L_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}:\Gamma_{n^{\prime}}\to\Gamma_{n},
the last of which induces an injective morphism of groups
Γ D → Γ ( α × id ) ( D ) \Gamma_{D}\to\Gamma_{(\alpha\times\operatorname{id}\nolimits)(D)} , for
D D a subset of { 1 , … , n ′ } × { ± 1 } \{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\times\{\pm 1\} that embeds in its
projection on { 1 , … , n ′ } \{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\} .
We define now a fully faithful functor F = F α : 𝒮 n ′ → 𝒮 n F=F_{\alpha}:{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{S}}_{n} .
Given I I a subset of 𝐙 / n ′ {\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime} , we define F ( I ) F(I) to be the image of
α ( I ~ ∩ [ 1 , n ′ ] ) \alpha(\tilde{I}\cap[1,n^{\prime}]) in 𝐙 / n {\mathbf{Z}}/n .
Given σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ′ ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}}(I,J) ,
we put F ( σ ) = α ∘ σ ∘ α − 1 F(\sigma)=\alpha\circ\sigma\circ\alpha^{-1} .
Note that the isomorphism of groups 𝔖 ^ n ′ = End 𝒮 n ′ ( 𝐙 / n ′ ) → ∼ End 𝒮 n ( F ( 𝐙 / n ′ ) ) \hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n^{\prime}}=\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}}({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(F({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})) induced by F F coincides with F F ( 𝐙 / n ′ ) F_{F({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})} defined
in §6.2.1 .
As a consequence, F α F_{\alpha} induces a fully faithful graded functor
ℋ n ′ → ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{H}}_{n} .
0P81
Lemma 6.2.13 . Given n ′ ≤ n n^{\prime}\leq n and α : { 1 , … , n ′ } ↪ { 1 , … , n } \alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\} an
increasing injection, the functor F α F_{\alpha} induces a differential
Γ n \Gamma_{n} -graded pointed functor ℋ n ′ → ℋ n {\mathcal{H}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{H}}_{n} .
0P82
Proof. Let σ ∈ Hom 𝒮 n ( I , J ) \sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) .
We have L ( F α ( σ ) ) = ( α × α ) ( L ( σ ) ) L(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=(\alpha\times\alpha)(L(\sigma)) , hence
ℓ ( F α ( σ ) ) = ℓ ( σ ) \ell(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=\ell(\sigma) . We have R α ( ⟦ σ ⟧ ) = ⟦ F α ( σ ) ⟧ R_{\alpha}(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\llbracket F_{\alpha}(\sigma)\rrbracket , hence
L α ( m ( σ ) ) = m ( F α ( σ ) ) L_{\alpha}(m(\sigma))=m(F_{\alpha}(\sigma)) . We deduce that
Γ σ ( deg ( σ ) ) = deg ( F α ( σ ) ) \Gamma_{\sigma}(\deg(\sigma))=\deg(F_{\alpha}(\sigma)) .
We have D ( F α ( σ ) ) = ( α × α ) ( D ( σ ) ) D(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=(\alpha\times\alpha)(D(\sigma)) and
F α ( s i 1 , i 2 ) = s α ( i 1 ) , α ( i 2 ) F_{\alpha}(s_{i_{1},i_{2}})=s_{\alpha(i_{1}),\alpha(i_{2})} for i 1 , i 2 ∈ I ~ i_{1},i_{2}\in\tilde{I}
with i 1 − i 2 ∉ n 𝐙 i_{1}-i_{2}{\not\in}n{\mathbf{Z}} , hence
F α F_{\alpha} is compatible with d d .
∎