ScalingStacks

7.1.3. Quotients

Let X~\tilde{X} be a 11-dimensional space and ∼\sim be an equivalence relation on X~\tilde{X}.

0P8I

Definition 7.1.12. We say that ∼\sim is a finite relation if the set of points that are not alone in their equivalence class is finite.

Assume ∼\sim is a finite relation. Let q:X~→X=X~/∼q:\tilde{X}\to X=\tilde{X}/\!\!\sim be the quotient map. Note that XX is a 11-dimensional space with

Xe​x​c=q(X~e​x​c)∪{x∈X||q−1(x)|>2}∪{x∈X||q−1(x)|=2,q−1(x)⊄∂X~}X_{exc}=q(\tilde{X}_{exc})\cup\{x\in X|\ |q^{-1}(x)|>2\}\cup\{x\in X\ |\ |q^{-1}(x)|=2,\ q^{-1}(x){\not\subset}\partial\tilde{X}\}

and qq is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces.

Given x∈Xx\in X, the quotient map induces a bijection q:∐x~∈q−1​(x)C⁡(x~)→∼C⁡(x)q:\coprod_{\tilde{x}\in q^{-1}(x)}C(\tilde{x})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}C(x).

Quotients have a universal property. In particular, we have the following result.

0P8J

Lemma 7.1.13. Let f:X→X′f:X\to X^{\prime} be a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces. Define an equivalence relation on XX by x1∼x2x_{1}\sim x_{2} if f⁡(x1)=f⁡(x2)f(x_{1})=f(x_{2}). This defines a finite relation on XX and ff factors uniquely as a composition f=f¯∘qf=\bar{f}\circ q where f¯:X/∼→X′\bar{f}:X/\!\!\sim\ \to X^{\prime} is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces and q:X→X/∼q:X\to X/\!\!\sim is the quotient map.

The next lemma shows that 11-dimensional spaces XX can be viewed (non-uniquely) as 11-dimensional manifolds with a finite relation.

0P8K

Lemma 7.1.14. Given XX a 11-dimensional space, there is a 11-dimensional manifold X^\hat{X} with a finite relation ∼\sim and an isomorphism f:X^/∼→∼Xf:\hat{X}/\!\!\sim\ \mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}X such that f⁡(X^f)=Xe​x​cf(\hat{X}_{f})=X_{exc}.

0P8L

Proof. Fix, for every x∈Xe​x​cx\in X_{exc}, a small open neighbourhood UxU_{x} of xx and a homeomorphism fx:Ux→∼St⁡(Ex)f_{x}:U_{x}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{St}(E_{x}), where ExE_{x} is a finite subset of S1S^{1}. We choose now an equivalence relation on ExE_{x} whose classes have cardinality at most 22. Note that fxf_{x} induces a bijection between C⁡(x)C(x) and ExE_{x}, hence the equivalence relation can be viewed on C⁡(x)C(x).

Define U^x=∐E′∈Ex/∼St(E′)\hat{U}_{x}=\coprod_{E^{\prime}\in E_{x}/\!\sim}\operatorname{St}\nolimits(E^{\prime}). The map fxf_{x} provides an open embedding

Ux−{x}→∼St∘(Ex)→∼∐E′∈Ex/∼St∘(E′)↪U^x.U_{x}-\{x\}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{St}^{\circ}(E_{x})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\coprod_{E^{\prime}\in E_{x}/\!\sim}\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(E^{\prime})\hookrightarrow\hat{U}_{x}.

We put

X^=(X−Xe​x​c)​∐(∐x∈Xe​x​c(Ux−{x}))(∐x∈Xe​x​cU^x).\hat{X}=(X-X_{exc})\coprod_{(\coprod_{x\in X_{exc}}(U_{x}-\{x\}))}\bigl(\coprod_{x\in X_{exc}}\hat{U}_{x}\bigr).

Note that X^\hat{X} is a 11-dimensional manifold. Let q:X^→Xq:\hat{X}\to X be the canonical map: it identifies XX with the quotient of X^\hat{X} by the equivalence relation given by x^1∼x^2\hat{x}_{1}\sim\hat{x}_{2} if q⁡(x^1)=q⁡(x^2)q(\hat{x}_{1})=q(\hat{x}_{2}). Up to isomorphism, X^\hat{X} depends only on the choice of an equivalence relation on C⁡(x)C(x) for x∈Xe​x​cx\in X_{exc}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2