ScalingStacks

0PD4
  • •

    Lemma 8.2.7. BnB_{n} and DnD_{n} are stable under the action of Hn∙∧(Hn∙)oppH_{n}^{\bullet}\wedge(H_{n}^{\bullet})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

  • •

    EnE_{n} is stable under the action of Hn∙H_{n}^{\bullet} and FnF_{n} is stable under the action of (Hn∙)opp(H_{n}^{\bullet})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

  • •

    AA and CC are stable under multiplication

  • •

    Given α∈B\alpha\in B and β∈G\beta\in G, we have α∗β∈B\alpha\ast\beta\in B and β∗α∈B\beta\ast\alpha\in B.

0PD5

Proof. Let σ∈Bn\sigma\in B_{n} and r∈{1,…,n−1}r\in\{1,\ldots,n-1\}. Assume σ​Tr≠0\sigma T_{r}\neq 0.

If there is 1≤j≤i≤n1\leq j\leq i\leq n with σ⁡(−i)=n−j+1\sigma(-i)=n-j+1 and i≠n+1−ri\neq n+1-r, then σ​Tr∈Bn\sigma T_{r}\in B_{n}.

Assume now σ⁡(−i)∈T⊔(1,n−i)\sigma(-i)\in T\sqcup(1,n-i) for all i≠n+1−ri\neq n+1-r. We deduce that L(σ|{−(n+1−r),−(n−r)})≠∅L(\sigma_{|\{-(n+1-r),-(n-r)\}})\neq\emptyset, hence σ​Tr=0\sigma T_{r}=0 (cf Lemma 8.2.4), a contradiction.

Using Remark 8.2.6, we deduce that Tr​σ∈BnT_{r}\sigma\in B_{n}.

The other assertions of the lemma are immediate. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2