ScalingStacks

4.4.1. Category

Consider two actions of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} given by (F1,Ο„1)(F_{1},\tau_{1}) and (E2,Ο„2)(E_{2},\tau_{2}) on 𝒲{\mathcal{W}} and a closed morphism of functors Ξ»:F1​E2β†’E2​F1\lambda:F_{1}E_{2}\to E_{2}F_{1} such that diagrams (4.2.1) commute. As in Β§4.2.1, we have maps ΞΌi,j=ΞΌ(i,i),(j,j):E2i​F1i​E2j​F1jβ†’E2i+j​F1i+j\mu_{i,j}=\mu_{(i,i),(j,j)}:E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{j}\to E_{2}^{i+j}F_{1}^{i+j}.

We define a differential category Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}. Its objects are pairs (m,Ο‚)(m,\varsigma) where mβˆˆπ’²Β―im\in\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} and Ο‚=(Ο‚i)iβ‰₯1\varsigma=(\varsigma_{i})_{i\geq 1}, Ο‚i∈Z​Hom𝒲¯i⁑(E2i​F1i​(m),m)\varsigma_{i}\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}}(E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m),m), satisfies that

  • β€’

    for all i,jβ‰₯1i,j\geq 1, we have Ο‚i∘E2i​F1i​ςj=Ο‚i+j∘μi,j\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}\varsigma_{j}=\varsigma_{i+j}\circ\mu_{i,j}

  • β€’

    Ο‚i∘Tr​F1i=Ο‚i∘E2i​Tr\varsigma_{i}\circ T_{r}F_{1}^{i}=\varsigma_{i}\circ E_{2}^{i}T_{r} for all 1≀r<i1\leq r<i.

We define HomΔλ​𝒲⁑((m,Ο‚),(mβ€²,Ο‚β€²))\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}}((m,\varsigma),(m^{\prime},\varsigma^{\prime})) to be the differential submodule of Hom𝒲¯i⁑(m,mβ€²)\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}}(m,m^{\prime}) of elements ff such that for all iβ‰₯1i\geq 1, the following diagram commutes

E2i​F1i​(m)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ο‚i\scriptstyle{\varsigma_{i}}E2i​F1i​f\scriptstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}f}m\textstyle{m\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}f\scriptstyle{f}E2i​F1i​(mβ€²)\textstyle{E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i}(m^{\prime})\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ο‚iβ€²\scriptstyle{\varsigma^{\prime}_{i}}mβ€²\textstyle{m^{\prime}}

The composition of maps is defined to be that of 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}.

0P65

Remark 4.4.1. The structure of objects in Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}} can be described graphically as follows:

[Uncaptioned image]
0P66

Remark 4.4.2. The maps ΞΌi,j\mu_{i,j} make A=⨁iβ‰₯0E2i​F1iA=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i} into a monoid in the monoidal category of endofunctors of 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}, when 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} has enough direct sums. If 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i} has enough colimits, we have an induced monoid AΒ―=⨁iβ‰₯0(E2i​F1i)βŠ—HiβŠ—HioppHi\bar{A}=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}(E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{i})\otimes_{H_{i}\otimes H_{i}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}H_{i}. Now, the category Δλ​𝒲\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}} is the category of AΒ―\bar{A}-modules in 𝒲¯i\overline{{\mathcal{W}}}^{i}.

0P67

Remark 4.4.3. Let us define a lax bi-22-representation Ei,j=E2j​F1iE_{i,j}=E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{i} on 𝒲{\mathcal{W}} as deduced from the one defined in Β§4.2.1 by applying the swap automorphism of 𝒰×𝒰{\mathcal{U}}\times{\mathcal{U}} (cf Remark 4.2.3).

There is a faithful differential functor Δλ​𝒲→ΔE​𝒲,(m,Ο‚)↦(m,Ο‚1)\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{W}}\to\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{W}},\ (m,\varsigma)\mapsto(m,\varsigma_{1}).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2