ScalingStacks

4.2.1. Lax bi-22-representations

A lax bi-22-representation on 𝒱{\mathcal{V}} is a lax monoidal differential functor E:π’°βŠ—π’°β†’End⁑(𝒱)E:{\mathcal{U}}\otimes{\mathcal{U}}\to\operatorname{End}\nolimits({\mathcal{V}}). It corresponds to the data of

  • β€’

    differential endofunctors Ei,j=E⁑(eiβŠ—ej)E_{i,j}=E(e^{i}\otimes e^{j}) of 𝒱{\mathcal{V}}

  • β€’

    morphisms of differential algebras HiβŠ—Hjβ†’End⁑(Ei,j)H_{i}\otimes H_{j}\to\operatorname{End}\nolimits(E_{i,j})

  • β€’

    morphisms of differential functors ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²,jβ€²):Ei,j​Eiβ€²,jβ€²β†’Ei+iβ€²,j+jβ€²\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})}:E_{i,j}E_{i^{\prime},j^{\prime}}\to E_{i+i^{\prime},j+j^{\prime}}

such that

  1. (1)

    ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²,jβ€²)\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})} is equivariant for the action of (HiβŠ—Hj)βŠ—(Hiβ€²βŠ—Hjβ€²)(H_{i}\otimes H_{j})\otimes(H_{i^{\prime}}\otimes H_{j^{\prime}}), where the action on Ei+iβ€²,j+jβ€²E_{i+i^{\prime},j+j^{\prime}} is the restriction of the action of Hi+iβ€²βŠ—Hj+jβ€²H_{i+i^{\prime}}\otimes H_{j+j^{\prime}} via the morphism (aβŠ—b)βŠ—(aβ€²βŠ—bβ€²)↦a​fi​(aβ€²)βŠ—b​fj​(bβ€²)(a\otimes b)\otimes(a^{\prime}\otimes b^{\prime})\mapsto af_{i}(a^{\prime})\otimes bf_{j}(b^{\prime})

  2. (2)

    ΞΌ(i+iβ€²,j+jβ€²),(iβ€²β€²,jβ€²β€²)∘(ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²,jβ€²)​Eiβ€²β€²,jβ€²β€²)=ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²+iβ€²β€²,jβ€²+jβ€²β€²)∘(Ei,j​μ(iβ€²,jβ€²),(iβ€²β€²,jβ€²β€²))\mu_{(i+i^{\prime},j+j^{\prime}),(i^{\prime\prime},j^{\prime\prime})}\circ(\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})}E_{i^{\prime\prime},j^{\prime\prime}})=\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime}+i^{\prime\prime},j^{\prime}+j^{\prime\prime})}\circ(E_{i,j}\mu_{(i^{\prime},j^{\prime}),(i^{\prime\prime},j^{\prime\prime})}).

Consider two actions of 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} given by (F1,Ο„1)(F_{1},\tau_{1}) and (E2,Ο„2)(E_{2},\tau_{2}) on 𝒱{\mathcal{V}} and a closed morphism of functors Ξ»:F1​E2β†’E2​F1\lambda:F_{1}E_{2}\to E_{2}F_{1} such that the following diagrams commute:

(4.2.1) F12​E2\textstyle{F_{1}^{2}E_{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F1​λ\scriptstyle{F_{1}\lambda}Ο„1​E2\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}E_{2}}F1​E2​F1\textstyle{F_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}λ​F1\scriptstyle{\lambda F_{1}}E2​F12\textstyle{E_{2}F_{1}^{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​τ1\scriptstyle{E_{2}\tau_{1}}F12​E2\textstyle{F_{1}^{2}E_{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}F1​λ\scriptstyle{F_{1}\lambda}F1​E2​F1\textstyle{F_{1}E_{2}F_{1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}λ​F1\scriptstyle{\lambda F_{1}}E2​F12\textstyle{E_{2}F_{1}^{2}}     F1​E22\textstyle{F_{1}E_{2}^{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}λ​E2\scriptstyle{\lambda E_{2}}F1​τ2\scriptstyle{F_{1}\tau_{2}}E2​F1​E2\textstyle{E_{2}F_{1}E_{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​λ\scriptstyle{E_{2}\lambda}E22​F1\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}F_{1}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Ο„2​F1\scriptstyle{\tau_{2}F_{1}}F1​E22\textstyle{F_{1}E_{2}^{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}λ​E2\scriptstyle{\lambda E_{2}}E2​F1​E2\textstyle{E_{2}F_{1}E_{2}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​λ\scriptstyle{E_{2}\lambda}E22​F1\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}F_{1}}
0P5K

Remark 4.2.1. The data of Ξ»\lambda and the required relations are described graphically as:

[Uncaptioned image]

Define morphisms

Ξ»i,1=(Ξ»F1iβˆ’1)βˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜(F1iβˆ’2Ξ»F1)∘(F1iβˆ’1Ξ»):F1iE2β†’E2F1i\lambda_{i,1}=(\lambda F_{1}^{i-1})\circ\cdots\circ(F_{1}^{i-2}\lambda F_{1})\circ(F_{1}^{i-1}\lambda):F_{1}^{i}E_{2}\to E_{2}F_{1}^{i}

and

Ξ»i,j=(E2jβˆ’1Ξ»i,1)βˆ˜β‹―βˆ˜(E2Ξ»i,1E2jβˆ’2)∘(Ξ»i,1E2jβˆ’1):F1iE2jβ†’E2jF1i.\lambda_{i,j}=(E_{2}^{j-1}\lambda_{i,1})\circ\cdots\circ(E_{2}\lambda_{i,1}E_{2}^{j-2})\circ(\lambda_{i,1}E_{2}^{j-1}):F_{1}^{i}E_{2}^{j}\to E_{2}^{j}F_{1}^{i}.

We define a lax bi-22-representation on 𝒱{\mathcal{V}} by Ei,j=E2i​F1jE_{i,j}=E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{j}. The actions of HiH_{i} on E2iE_{2}^{i} and HjH_{j} on F1jF_{1}^{j} provide an action of HiβŠ—HjH_{i}\otimes H_{j} on Ei,jE_{i,j} and ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²,jβ€²)=E2i​λj,i′​F1jβ€²\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})}=E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{j,i^{\prime}}F_{1}^{j^{\prime}}:

ΞΌ(i,j),(iβ€²,jβ€²):E2i​F1j​E2i′​F1jβ€²β†’E2i​λj,i′​F1jβ€²E2i​E2i′​F1j​F1jβ€²=E2i+i′​F1j+jβ€².\mu_{(i,j),(i^{\prime},j^{\prime})}:E_{2}^{i}F_{1}^{j}E_{2}^{i^{\prime}}F_{1}^{j^{\prime}}\xrightarrow{E_{2}^{i}\lambda_{j,i^{\prime}}F_{1}^{j^{\prime}}}E_{2}^{i}E_{2}^{i^{\prime}}F_{1}^{j}F_{1}^{j^{\prime}}=E_{2}^{i+i^{\prime}}F_{1}^{j+j^{\prime}}.
0P5L

Remark 4.2.2. One can also consider the notion of colax 22-representation. A colax 22-representation on 𝒱{\mathcal{V}} is the same data as a lax 22-representation on 𝒱opp{\mathcal{V}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2