ScalingStacks

6.2.6. Change of nn

Fix a positive integer n′≤nn^{\prime}\leq n and an increasing injection α:{1,…,n′}↪{1,…,n}\alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\}. We extend α\alpha to an increasing injection 𝐙→𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}\to{\mathbf{Z}} by α⁡(r+d​n′)=α⁡(r)+d​n\alpha(r+dn^{\prime})=\alpha(r)+dn for r∈{1,…,n′}r\in\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\} and d∈𝐙d\in{\mathbf{Z}}.

Consider α:{1,…,n′}↪{1,…,n}\alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\} an increasing injection as in §6.2.1. We define two injective morphisms of groups

Rα:Rn→Rn′,αi+n′​𝐙↦αα⁡(i),α⁡(i+1)​ and ​Lα:Ln→Ln′,εi+n′​𝐙↦εi+n​𝐙R_{\alpha}:R_{n}\to R_{n^{\prime}},\ \alpha_{i+n^{\prime}{\mathbf{Z}}}\mapsto\alpha_{\alpha(i),\alpha(i+1)}\text{ and }L_{\alpha}:L_{n}\to L_{n^{\prime}},\ \varepsilon_{i+n^{\prime}{\mathbf{Z}}}\mapsto\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}}

for 1≤i≤n′1\leq i\leq n^{\prime}. We have commutative diagrams

Rn′\textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ρ\scriptstyle{\rho}Rα\scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}}Ln′\textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Lα\scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}}Rn′×Ln′\textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\times L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}⋅\scriptstyle{\cdot}Rα×Lα\scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}\times L_{\alpha}}Ln′\textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Lα\scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}}Rn′×Rn′\textstyle{R_{n^{\prime}}\times R_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}⟨−,−⟩\scriptstyle{\langle-,-\rangle}Rα×Rα\scriptstyle{R_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}}Ln′\textstyle{L_{n^{\prime}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}Lα\scriptstyle{L_{\alpha}}Rn\textstyle{R_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ρ\scriptstyle{\rho}Ln\textstyle{L_{n}}Rn×Ln\textstyle{R_{n}\times L_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}⋅\scriptstyle{\cdot}Ln\textstyle{L_{n}}Rn×Rn\textstyle{R_{n}\times R_{n}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}⟨−,−⟩\scriptstyle{\langle-,-\rangle}Ln\textstyle{L_{n}}

As a consequence, we have two injective morphisms of groups

Γα′=Lα×Rα:Γn′′→Γn′​ and ​Γα=id×Lα×Rα:Γn′→Γn,\Gamma^{\prime}_{\alpha}=L_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}:\Gamma^{\prime}_{n^{\prime}}\to\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}\text{ and }\Gamma_{\alpha}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits\times L_{\alpha}\times R_{\alpha}:\Gamma_{n^{\prime}}\to\Gamma_{n},

the last of which induces an injective morphism of groups ΓD→Γ(α×id)(D)\Gamma_{D}\to\Gamma_{(\alpha\times\operatorname{id}\nolimits)(D)}, for DD a subset of {1,…,n′}×{±1}\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\times\{\pm 1\} that embeds in its projection on {1,…,n′}\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}.

We define now a fully faithful functor F=Fα:𝒮n′→𝒮nF=F_{\alpha}:{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{S}}_{n}. Given II a subset of 𝐙/n′{\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime}, we define F⁡(I)F(I) to be the image of α⁡(I~∩[1,n′])\alpha(\tilde{I}\cap[1,n^{\prime}]) in 𝐙/n{\mathbf{Z}}/n. Given σ∈Hom𝒮n′⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}}(I,J), we put F⁡(σ)=α∘σ∘α−1F(\sigma)=\alpha\circ\sigma\circ\alpha^{-1}.

Note that the isomorphism of groups 𝔖^n′=End𝒮n′⁡(𝐙/n′)→∼End𝒮n⁡(F⁡(𝐙/n′))\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n^{\prime}}=\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n^{\prime}}}({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(F({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})) induced by FF coincides with FF⁡(𝐙/n′)F_{F({\mathbf{Z}}/n^{\prime})} defined in §6.2.1.

As a consequence, FαF_{\alpha} induces a fully faithful graded functor ℋn′→ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{H}}_{n}.

0P81

Lemma 6.2.13. Given n′≤nn^{\prime}\leq n and α:{1,…,n′}↪{1,…,n}\alpha:\{1,\ldots,n^{\prime}\}\hookrightarrow\{1,\ldots,n\} an increasing injection, the functor FαF_{\alpha} induces a differential Γn\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed functor ℋn′→ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n^{\prime}}\to{\mathcal{H}}_{n}.

0P82

Proof. Let σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J). We have L⁡(Fα​(σ))=(α×α)​(L⁡(σ))L(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=(\alpha\times\alpha)(L(\sigma)), hence ℓ⁡(Fα​(σ))=ℓ⁡(σ)\ell(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=\ell(\sigma). We have Rα​(⟦σ⟧)=⟦Fα​(σ)⟧R_{\alpha}(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\llbracket F_{\alpha}(\sigma)\rrbracket, hence Lα​(m⁡(σ))=m⁡(Fα​(σ))L_{\alpha}(m(\sigma))=m(F_{\alpha}(\sigma)). We deduce that Γσ​(deg⁡(σ))=deg⁡(Fα​(σ))\Gamma_{\sigma}(\deg(\sigma))=\deg(F_{\alpha}(\sigma)).

We have D⁡(Fα​(σ))=(α×α)​(D⁡(σ))D(F_{\alpha}(\sigma))=(\alpha\times\alpha)(D(\sigma)) and Fα​(si1,i2)=sα⁡(i1),α⁡(i2)F_{\alpha}(s_{i_{1},i_{2}})=s_{\alpha(i_{1}),\alpha(i_{2})} for i1,i2∈I~i_{1},i_{2}\in\tilde{I} with i1−i2∉n​𝐙i_{1}-i_{2}{\not\in}n{\mathbf{Z}}, hence FαF_{\alpha} is compatible with dd. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2