Recall that E ′ E^{\prime} is the restriction of the ( 𝒮 M ( Z ξ ) , 𝒮 M ( Z ξ ) ) ({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi})) -bimodule
E ∘ ( Ξ ′ − 1 ⊗ Ξ ′ − 1 ) E\circ(\Xi^{\prime-1}\otimes\Xi^{\prime-1}) .
We show here that the previous isomorphism is functorial in
T ∈ 𝒮 M ( Z ξ ) T\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}) . Consider the diagram
(8.3.1)
R ξ 2 − ( T , − ) ⊗ L ξ 1 + ( − , U ) ⊗ E ( U , S ) \textstyle{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-,U)\otimes E(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} w \scriptstyle{w} Ξ ⊗ ( f 2 , f 1 ) \scriptstyle{\Xi\otimes(f_{2},f_{1})} E ( T , S ) \textstyle{E(T,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} ( f 2 , f 1 ) \scriptstyle{(f_{2},f_{1})} Hom 𝒮 ( Z ξ ) ( T , U ) ⊗ R ξ − ( U , S ) \textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})}(T,U)\otimes R_{\xi^{-}}(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces} action \scriptstyle{\mathrm{action}} R ξ − ( T , S ) \textstyle{R_{\xi^{-}}(T,S)}
where w = ( w 11 w 12 0 w 22 ) w=\left(\begin{matrix}w_{11}&w_{12}\\
0&w_{22}\end{matrix}\right)
(cf §5.4.2 ) with
w 11 = ( R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ Hom ) ) ∘ ( τ L ξ 1 + Hom ) ∘ ( R ξ 2 − λ Hom ) w_{11}=(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)
w 12 = R ξ 2 − ε Hom w_{12}=R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits
w 22 = ( R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ Hom ) ) ∘ ( σ L ξ 1 + Hom ) ∘ ( R ξ 2 − ρ Hom ) . w_{22}=(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits).
0PE1
Proof. Note first that all the maps of the diagram are functorial with respect to
S ∈ 𝒮 M ( Z ξ ) S\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}) .
∙ \bullet\ Let γ ∈ R ξ 2 − ( U , S ) \gamma\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(U,S) , β ∈ L ξ 1 + ( V , U ) \beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α ∈ R ξ 2 − ( T , V ) \alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V) .
We will show that
(8.3.2)
action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 2 ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ τ L ξ 1 + ∘ R ξ 2 − λ ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) . \mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).
Since γ = ( id ⊠ γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ γ | S \gamma=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot\gamma_{|S} and since
action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 2 ) \mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2}) and f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ τ L ξ 1 + ∘ R ξ 2 − λ f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda are morphisms of 𝒮 M ( Z ) opp {\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} -modules, we can assume γ | S = id \gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits .
We have α ⊗ β = ( id ⊠ α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊗ ( α | V ⊠ id ξ 1 + ( 1 ) ⋅ β ) \alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|V}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)}\cdot\beta) , hence we can assume α | V = id \alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits .
We can also assume that β ⊗ γ ≠ 0 \beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0 .
We have
action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 2 ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = ( id V ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ) ⋅ β \mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta
⋅ ( id S ⊠ ( γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ) \cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes(\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)
= δ 1 β | S ∖ χ ( β ) − 1 ( ξ 1 + ( 1 ) ) ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ⋅ β χ ( β ) − 1 ( ξ 1 + ( 1 ) ) ) =\delta_{1}\beta_{|S\setminus\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))})
⊠ ( ( β ∘ γ ) ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) \boxtimes\bigl((\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)
where
δ 1 = δ i ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) , ( β ∘ γ ) ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) = 0 \delta_{1}=\delta_{i(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)},(\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})=0} . On the other
hand, we have
f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ τ L ξ 1 + ∘ R ξ 2 − λ ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
= f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ τ L ξ 1 + ( α ⊗ ( ( β χ ( γ ) ( ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊠ id ) ⊗ β | S ) \displaystyle=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
= δ 1 f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ( ( id ⊠ ( β χ ( γ ) ( ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ) ⊗ ( id ⊠ α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊗ β | S ) \displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
= δ 1 f 2 ( ( id ⊠ ( β χ ( γ ) ( ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ) ⊗ ( ( id ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ) ⋅ β | S ) ) \displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\biggl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)\biggr)
= δ 1 ( ( β χ ( γ ) ( ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ γ ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ⊠ ( ( id ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ) ⋅ β | S ) \displaystyle=\delta_{1}\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)\boxtimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
= action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 2 ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) . \displaystyle=\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).
We deduce that (8.3.2 ) holds.
∙ \bullet\ Let γ ∈ R ξ 1 − ( U , S ) \gamma\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(U,S) , β ∈ L ξ 1 + ( V , U ) \beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α ∈ R ξ 2 − ( T , V ) \alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V) .
We will show that
(8.3.3)
action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 1 ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = ( f 1 ∘ R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ σ L ξ 1 + ∘ R ξ 2 − ρ + f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ε ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) . \mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho+f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\bigr)(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).
As before, we can assume γ | S = id \gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits , α | V = id \alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and β ⊗ γ ≠ 0 \beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0 .
We put u 1 = χ ( γ ) ( ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) u_{1}=\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)) and u 2 = χ ( β ) − 1 ( ξ 1 + ( 1 ) ) u_{2}=\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1)) .
action ∘ ( Ξ ⊗ f 1 ) ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = ( id V ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ) ⋅ β ⋅ ( id S ⊠ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) \mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta\cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\bigr)
= { δ 2 ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 − ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ⊠ β | S if u 1 = u 2 δ 3 ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ⋅ β u 2 ) ⊠ ( β u 1 ∘ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊠ β | S ∖ { u 2 } otherwise =\begin{cases}\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}&\text{ if }u_{1}=u_{2}\\
\delta_{3}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}&\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}
where
•
δ 2 = 1 \delta_{2}=1 if γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ( 1 − ) = ι ( β u 2 ( 0 + ) ) \gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}(1-)=\iota(\beta_{u_{2}}(0+)) and δ 2 = 0 \delta_{2}=0 otherwise
•
δ 3 = 1 \delta_{3}=1 if β | U ⋅ ( id S ⊠ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ≠ 0 \beta_{|U}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ 3 = 0 \delta_{3}=0 otherwise.
We have
f 2 ∘ R ξ 2 − ε ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = δ 2 f 2 ( α ⊗ β | S ) = δ 2 ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 − ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ) ⊠ β | S . f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\delta_{2}f_{2}(\alpha\otimes\beta_{|S})=\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}.
We have
f 1 ∘ R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ σ L ξ 1 + ∘ R ξ 2 − ρ ( α ⊗ β ⊗ γ ) = f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
= δ 3 ′ f 1 ∘ R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ σ L ξ 1 + ( α ⊗ ( β | U ∖ { u 2 } ⋅ ( γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ⊠ id ) ) ⊗ ( β u 2 ⊠ id ) ) \displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
= δ 3 ′ δ 3 ′′ f 1 ∘ R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ∘ σ L ξ 1 + ( α ⊗ ( β | S ∖ { u 2 } ⊠ ( β u 1 ∘ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ) ⊗ ( β u 2 ⊠ id ) ) \displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
= δ 3 ′ δ 3 ′′ f 1 ∘ R ξ 1 − ( mult ∘ Ξ ) ( ( ( β u 1 ∘ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊠ id ) ⊗ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⊠ β | S ∖ { u 2 } ) ⊗ ( β u 2 ⊠ id ) ) \displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl((\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}})\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
= δ 3 ′ δ 3 ′′ ( β u 1 ∘ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ⊠ ( α ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ⋅ [ ξ 1 + ( 1 ) → ξ 2 − ( − 1 ) ] ⋅ β u 2 ) ⊠ β | S ∖ { u 2 } \displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}
where
•
δ 3 ′ = 1 \delta^{\prime}_{3}=1 if u 1 ≠ u 2 u_{1}\neq u_{2} and
( id u 1 ⊠ β u 2 ) ⋅ ( γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ⊠ id u 2 ) ≠ 0 (\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{1}}\boxtimes\beta_{u_{2}})\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{2}})\neq 0
and δ 3 ′ = 0 \delta^{\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise
•
δ 3 ′′ = 1 \delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=1 if β | U ∖ { u 2 } ⋅ ( id S ∖ { u 2 } ⊠ γ ξ 1 − ( − 1 ) ) ≠ 0 \beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ 3 ′′ = 0 \delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise.
Since δ 3 = δ 3 ′ δ 3 ′′ \delta_{3}=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3} , we deduce that (8.3.3 ) holds and the lemma follows.
∎