ScalingStacks

8.3. Diagonal action

8.3.1. Isomorphism Theorem

Let Z′=𝐑Z^{\prime}={\mathbf{R}} be the smooth curve with Zo′=(−12,12)Z^{\prime}_{o}=(-\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}) with its standard orientation. Fix an increasing homeomorphism α:𝐑>0→∼𝐑>12\alpha:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{>\frac{1}{2}} fixing the positive integers and define α′:𝐑<0→∼𝐑<−12\alpha^{\prime}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{<-\frac{1}{2}} by α′​(t)=−α⁡(−t)\alpha^{\prime}(t)=-\alpha(-t).

Assume Z⁡(ξ1+)≠Z⁡(ξ2−)Z(\xi_{1}^{+})\neq Z(\xi_{2}^{-}) and assume there is a morphism ξ~1:Z′→Z\tilde{\xi}_{1}:Z^{\prime}\to Z with image Z⁡(ξ1+)Z(\xi_{1}^{+}) and such that ξ1+=ξ~1∘α\xi_{1}^{+}=\tilde{\xi}_{1}\circ\alpha. Put ξ1−=ξ~1∘α′:𝐑<0→Z\xi_{1}^{-}=\tilde{\xi}_{1}\circ\alpha^{\prime}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z and denote by ξ−\xi^{-} the composition 𝐑<0→ξ1−Z↪Zξ1{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\xrightarrow{\xi_{1}^{-}}Z\hookrightarrow Z_{\xi_{1}}.

Proposition 8.1.15 gives an isomorphism of differential pointed bimodules κ^1:Lξ1+(−2,−1)→∼Rξ1−(−1,−2)∨\hat{\kappa}_{1}:L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-_{2},-_{1})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(-_{1},-_{2})^{\vee}.

Since there is no admissible path from ξ2−​(−1)\xi_{2}^{-}(-1) to ξ1+​(1)\xi_{1}^{+}(1) in ZZ, we have An=Dn=GnA_{n}=D_{n}=G_{n} (with the notations of §8.2.2), hence we have an isomorphism (Lemma 8.2.5)

νn:Rξ2−∙​(T,−,en)∧Lξ1+∙​(−,S,en)→∼Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S⊔{ξ2−​(−n),…,ξ2−​(−1)},T⊔{ξ1+​(1),…,ξ1+​(n)}).\nu_{n}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-,e^{n})\wedge L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-,S,e^{n})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(-n),\ldots,\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)\},T\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(1),\ldots,\xi_{1}^{+}(n)\}).

Consider

λ:Lξ1+∙​(T,−)​Rξ2−∙​(−,S)\displaystyle\lambda:L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(T,-)R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-,S) →Rξ2−∙​(T,−)​Lξ1+∙​(−,S)\displaystyle\to R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-)L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-,S)
α∧β\displaystyle\alpha\wedge\beta ↦ν1−1(α⋅β)=((α⋅β)ξ2−​(−1)⊠idT∖{χ⁡(α∘β)​(ξ2−​(−1))})∧(α⋅β)|S.\displaystyle\mapsto\nu_{1}^{-1}(\alpha\cdot\beta)=((\alpha\cdot\beta)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\chi(\alpha\circ\beta)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))\}})\wedge(\alpha\cdot\beta)_{|S}.

Since νn\nu_{n} is an isomorphism, the morphisms (5.2.1) are isomorphisms (cf proof of Theorem 8.2.1) and we obtain from Remark 5.4.1 an isomorphism of differential pointed categories

ΔE​𝒮M∙​(Z)→∼Δλ​𝒮M∙​(Z).\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z).

Composing its inverse with Ξ\Xi, we deduce from Theorem 8.2.1 an isomorphism of differential pointed categories

Ξ′:Δλ​𝒮M∙​(Z)→∼𝒮M∙​(Zξ).\Xi^{\prime}:\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi}).
0PDT

Theorem 8.3.1. The isomorphism Ξ′\Xi^{\prime} provides an isomorphism of 22-representations, where Δλ​𝒮M∙​(Z)\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z) is equipped with the diagonal action and 𝒮M∙​(Zξ){\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi}) with the action of Rξ−R_{\xi^{-}}.

The remainder of §8.3 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 8.3.1.

8.3.2. Setting

Let σ:Rξ2−​(T,−)⊗Rξ1−​(−,S)→Rξ1−​(T,−)⊗Rξ2−​(−,S)\sigma:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(-,S)\to R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(-,S) be defined as in (4.4.1).

0PDU

Lemma 8.3.2. The morphism σ\sigma is invertible. Given α∈Rξ2−∙​(T,U)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U) and β∈Rξ1−∙​(U,S)\beta\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U,S), we have

σ(α⊗β)=δα|U⋅β≠0(id⊠(αχ⁡(β)​(ξ1−​(−1))⋅βξ1−​(−1)))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠(α|U∖{χ(β)(ξ1−(−1))}⋅β|S)).\sigma(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\delta_{\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta\neq 0}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\chi(\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes(\alpha_{|U\setminus\{\chi(\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))\}}\cdot\beta_{|S})\bigr).

Given α′∈Rξ1−∙​(T,U′)\alpha^{\prime}\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U^{\prime}) and β′∈Rξ2−∙​(U′,S)\beta^{\prime}\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U^{\prime},S), we have

σ−1(α′⊗β′)=δα′|U′⋅β′≠0(id⊠(αχ⁡(β′)​(ξ2−​(−1))′⋅βξ2−​(−1)′))⊗(αξ1−​(−1)′⊠(α|U′∖χ(β′)(ξ2−(−1))′∘β|S′)).\sigma^{-1}(\alpha^{\prime}\otimes\beta^{\prime})=\delta_{\alpha^{\prime}_{|U^{\prime}}\cdot\beta^{\prime}\neq 0}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha^{\prime}_{\chi(\beta^{\prime})(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\beta^{\prime}_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\alpha^{\prime}_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes(\alpha^{\prime}_{|U^{\prime}\setminus\chi(\beta^{\prime})(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\circ\beta^{\prime}_{|S})\bigr).
0PDV

Proof. We have

σ=(Rξ1−∘mult)∘(Rξ1−⊗Rξ2−⊗εLξ1+,Rξ1−)∘(Rξ1−⊗λ⊗Rξ1−)∘(ηLξ1+,Rξ1−⊗id).\sigma=(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\circ\textrm{mult})\circ(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\otimes R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\otimes\varepsilon_{L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}})\circ(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\otimes\lambda\otimes R_{\xi_{1}^{-}})\circ(\eta_{L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}}\otimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits).

We have α=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⋅(α|U⊠id)\alpha=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot(\alpha_{|U}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits), hence α⊗β=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗(α|U⋅β)\alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta). As a consequence, it is enough to prove the first statement of the lemma assuming that α|U=idU\alpha_{|U}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U}. In that case, the composition above is given by

α⊗β\displaystyle\alpha\otimes\beta ↦∑x∈ξ~1−1​(T)(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([x→1]))⊗α⊗β\displaystyle\mapsto\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(T)}(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x]))\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1]))\otimes\alpha\otimes\beta
↦∑x∈ξ~1−1​(T)(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠id)⊗(id⊠ξ~1([x→1]))⊗β\displaystyle\mapsto\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(T)}(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x]))\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1]))\otimes\beta
↦(id⊠βξ1−​(−1))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠id)⊗β|S\displaystyle\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes\beta_{|S}
↦(id⊠βξ1−​(−1))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠β|S).\displaystyle\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\beta_{|S}).

It is immediate to check that the formula for σ−1\sigma^{-1} does produce an inverse. ∎

Consider the map ρ:Lξ1+​(T,−)⊗Rξ1−​(−,S)→Rξ1−​(T,−)⊗Lξ1−​(−,S)\rho:L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(T,-)\otimes R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(-,S)\to R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes L_{\xi_{1}}^{-}(-,S) defined in §4.4.2.

0PDW

Lemma 8.3.3. Given α∈Lξ1+∙​(T,U)\alpha\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(T,U) and β∈Rξ1−∙​(U,S)\beta\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U,S), we have

ρ(α⊗β)=δ1(α|U∖χ(α)−1(ξ1+(1))⋅(βξ1−​(−1)⊠id))⊗((αχ​(α)−1​(ξ1+​(1))⊠id)⋅β|S)\rho(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\delta_{1}\bigr(\alpha_{|U\setminus\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\cdot(\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\bigl)\otimes\bigl((\alpha_{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\cdot\beta_{|S}\bigr)

where δ1=1\delta_{1}=1 if χ⁡(α∘β)​(ξ1−​(−1))≠ξ1+​(1)\chi(\alpha\circ\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))\neq\xi_{1}^{+}(1) and (idχ⁡(β)​(ξ1−​(−1))⊠αχ​(α)−1​(ξ1+​(1)))⋅(βξ1−​(−1)⊠idχ​(α)−1​(ξ1+​(1)))≠0(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\chi(\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))}\boxtimes\alpha_{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))})\cdot(\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))})\neq 0 and δ1=0\delta_{1}=0 otherwise.

0PDX

Proof. Assume first α|U∖{χ(α)−1(ξ1+(1))}=id\alpha_{|U\setminus\{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))\}}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and β|S=id\beta_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We have

ρ⁡(α⊗β)\displaystyle\rho(\alpha\otimes\beta) =ε1​Rξ1−​Lξ1+∘Lξ1+​τ​Lξ1+​(α⊗β⊗η1​(idS))\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\eta_{1}(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}))
=ε1Rξ1−Lξ1+(∑x∈ξ~1−1​(S)α⊗τ((βξ1−​(−1)⊠id)⊗(id⊠ξ~1([−1→x])))⊗(ξ~1([x→1])⊠id))\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\biggl(\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(S)}\alpha\otimes\tau\Bigl((\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\bigr)\Bigr)\otimes\bigl(\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\biggr)
=ε1Rξ1−Lξ1+(∑x∈Iα⊗(id⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗(βξ1−​(−1)⊠id)⊗(ξ~1([x→1])⊠id))\displaystyle=\varepsilon_{1}R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\biggl(\sum_{x\in I}\alpha\otimes\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\bigr)\otimes(\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes\bigl(\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\biggr)
=δ1(βξ1−​(−1)⊠id)⊗(αχ​(α)−1​(ξ1+​(1))⊠id)\displaystyle=\delta_{1}(\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes(\alpha_{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)

where I={x∈ξ~1−1(S)|(ξ~1([−1→x])⊠(βξ1−​(−1)∘[ξ1−(−2)→ξ1−(−1)])⋅τ≠0}I=\{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(S)\ |\ (\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\boxtimes(\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\circ[\xi_{1}^{-}(-2)\to\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)])\cdot\tau\neq 0\}.

Since ρ\rho is a morphism of (𝒮M​(Z),𝒮M​(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z))-bimodules, the general result follows using the decompositions α=(α|U∖{χ(α)−1(ξ1+(1))}⊠idξ1+​(1))⋅(id⊠αχ​(α)−1​(ξ1+​(1)))\alpha=(\alpha_{|U\setminus\{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))\}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)})\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\chi(\alpha)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}) and β=(id⊠βξ1−​(−1))⋅(β|S⊠idξ1−​(−1))\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\cdot(\beta_{|S}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}). ∎

8.3.3. Diagonal bimodule

Recall that we have a (Δλ​𝒮M​(Z),Δλ​𝒮M​(Z))(\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z),\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z))-bimodule EE. Its restriction to a (𝒮M​(Z),Δλ​𝒮M​(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z),\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z))-bimodule is the cone of π:Rξ2−⊗𝒮M​(Z)IdΔλ​𝒮M​(Z)→Rξ1−⊗𝒮M​(Z)IdΔλ​𝒮M​(Z)\pi:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}\to R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\otimes_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{\Delta_{\lambda}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)}.

The (𝒮M​(Z),𝒮M​(Zξ))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}))-bimodule E′=E∘(1⊗Ξ′−1)E^{\prime}=E\circ(1\otimes\Xi^{\prime-1}) is the cone of the map uu defined as follows.

Given α∈Rξ2−∙​(T,U)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U) with α|U=id\alpha_{|U}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and given β∈Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,U)\beta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,U), we have

u(α⊗β)=∑x∈ξ~1−1​(T)(id⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗((αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅ξ~1([x→1]))⊠id)⋅β.u(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(T)}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\bigr)\otimes\Bigl(\bigl(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\bigr)\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\Bigr)\cdot\beta.

We construct now an isomorphism between E′E^{\prime} and the restriction of Rξ−R_{\xi^{-}} to a (𝒮M​(Z),𝒮M​(Zξ))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}))-bimodule.

We define two morphisms of pointed sets

f1:Rξ1−∙​(T,−)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,−)\displaystyle f_{1}:R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,-) →Rξ−∙​(T,S)\displaystyle\to R_{\xi^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,S)
(α:U⊔{ξ1−(−1)}→T)∧(β:S→U)\displaystyle(\alpha:U\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\}\to T)\wedge(\beta:S\to U) ↦α⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1))=(α|U⋅β)⊠αξ1−​(−1)\displaystyle\mapsto\alpha\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})=(\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta)\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}

and

f2:Rξ2−∙​(T,−)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,−)\displaystyle f_{2}:R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,-) →Rξ−∙​(T,S)\displaystyle\to R_{\xi^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,S)
(α:U⊔{ξ2−(−1)}→T)∧(β:S→U)\displaystyle(\alpha:U\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)\}\to T)\wedge(\beta:S\to U) ↦α⋅(β⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])\displaystyle\mapsto\alpha\cdot(\beta\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])
=(α|U⋅β)⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)]).\displaystyle\ \ \ \ =(\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta)\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]).

Note that we have an isomorphism of pointed sets

f2∨f1:(Rξ2−∙​(T,−)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,−))∨((Rξ1−∙​(T,−)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,−))→∼Rξ−∙​(T,S)CLOSE.f_{2}\vee f_{1}:\bigl(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,-)\bigr)\vee\bigl((R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-)\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,-)\bigr)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R_{\xi^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,S).
0PDY

Lemma 8.3.4. We have d⁡(f1)=0d(f_{1})=0 and d⁡(f2)=f1∘ud(f_{2})=f_{1}\circ u. There is an isomorphism of differential modules

(f2,f1):E′​(T,S)→∼Rξ−​(T,S)(f_{2},f_{1}):E^{\prime}(T,S)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R_{\xi^{-}}(T,S)

functorial in T∈𝒮M​(Z)T\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z) and S∈𝒮M​(Zξ)S\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

0PDZ

Proof. It is immediate that d⁡(f1)=0d(f_{1})=0. For the second equality, consider α∈Rξ2−∙​(T,U)\alpha\in R^{\bullet}_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,U) and β∈Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,U)\beta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,U). Since α⊗β=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗(α|U⋅β)\alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta), we can assume that α|U=id\alpha_{|U}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We have

d(f2)(α⊗β)=α⋅(d(β⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])+d(β)⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)]).d(f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\alpha\cdot\bigl(d(\beta\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])+d(\beta)\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr).

We have

d(β⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])\displaystyle d(\beta\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]) =d((id⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1)))\displaystyle=d\bigl((\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)
=(id⊠[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)])⋅d(idU⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ1+(1)])⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1))\displaystyle=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\cdot d(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U}\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{1}^{+}(1)])\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})
+(id⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])⋅(d(β)⊠idξ1−​(−1))\displaystyle\ \ \ \ +(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\cdot(d(\beta)\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})
=(idU⊠[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)])∑x∈ξ~1−1​(U)(id⊠ξ~1([x→1])⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))\displaystyle=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U}\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(U)}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\bigr)
⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1))+d(β)⊠[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)]\displaystyle\ \ \ \ \cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})+d(\beta)\boxtimes[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]

hence

d(f2)(α⊗β)=α⋅∑x∈ξ~1−1​(U)(id⊠([ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅ξ~1([x→1]))⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1))d(f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\alpha\cdot\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(U)}\Bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\bigl([\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\bigr)\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\Bigr)\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})
=∑x∈ξ~1−1​(U)(id⊠ξ~1([−1→x])⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅ξ~1([x→1])))⋅(β⊠idξ1−​(−1))\displaystyle=\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(U)}\Bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x])\boxtimes\bigl(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1])\bigr)\Bigr)\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})
=f1∘u⁡(α⊗β).\displaystyle=f_{1}\circ u(\alpha\otimes\beta).

The lemma follows. ∎

8.3.4. Matching of extended action

Recall that E′E^{\prime} is the restriction of the (𝒮M​(Zξ),𝒮M​(Zξ))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}))-bimodule E∘(Ξ′−1⊗Ξ′−1)E\circ(\Xi^{\prime-1}\otimes\Xi^{\prime-1}).

We show here that the previous isomorphism is functorial in T∈𝒮M​(Zξ)T\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}). Consider the diagram

(8.3.1) Rξ2−​(T,−)⊗Lξ1+​(−,U)⊗E⁡(U,S)\textstyle{R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,-)\otimes L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(-,U)\otimes E(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}w\scriptstyle{w}Ξ⊗(f2,f1)\scriptstyle{\Xi\otimes(f_{2},f_{1})}E⁡(T,S)\textstyle{E(T,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}(f2,f1)\scriptstyle{(f_{2},f_{1})}Hom𝒮⁡(Zξ)⁡(T,U)⊗Rξ−​(U,S)\textstyle{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z_{\xi})}(T,U)\otimes R_{\xi^{-}}(U,S)\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}action\scriptstyle{\mathrm{action}}Rξ−​(T,S)\textstyle{R_{\xi^{-}}(T,S)}

where w=(w11w120w22)w=\left(\begin{matrix}w_{11}&w_{12}\\ 0&w_{22}\end{matrix}\right) (cf §5.4.2) with

w11=(Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ​Hom))∘(τ​Lξ1+​Hom)∘(Rξ2−​λ​Hom)w_{11}=(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)
w12=Rξ2−​ε​Homw_{12}=R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits
w22=(Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ​Hom))∘(σ​Lξ1+​Hom)∘(Rξ2−​ρ​Hom).w_{22}=(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits))\circ(\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits)\circ(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits).
0PE0

Lemma 8.3.5. The diagram (8.3.1) is commutative.

0PE1

Proof. Note first that all the maps of the diagram are functorial with respect to S∈𝒮M​(Zξ)S\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

∙\bullet\ Let γ∈Rξ2−​(U,S)\gamma\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(U,S), β∈Lξ1+​(V,U)\beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α∈Rξ2−​(T,V)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V). We will show that

(8.3.2) action∘(Ξ⊗f2)​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λ​(α⊗β⊗γ).\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

Since γ=(id⊠γξ2−​(−1))⋅γ|S\gamma=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot\gamma_{|S} and since action∘(Ξ⊗f2)\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2}) and f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λf_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda are morphisms of 𝒮M​(Z)opp{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}-modules, we can assume γ|S=id\gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We have α⊗β=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗(α|V⊠idξ1+​(1)⋅β)\alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|V}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)}\cdot\beta), hence we can assume α|V=id\alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits. We can also assume that β⊗γ≠0\beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0.

We have

action∘(Ξ⊗f2)(α⊗β⊗γ)=(idV⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta
⋅(idS⊠(γξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)]))\cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes(\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)
=δ1β|S∖χ(β)−1(ξ1+(1))⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βχ​(β)−1​(ξ1+​(1)))=\delta_{1}\beta_{|S\setminus\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1))})
⊠((β∘γ)ξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])\boxtimes\bigl((\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)

where δ1=δi⁡(αξ2−​(−1),(β∘γ)ξ2−​(−1))=0\delta_{1}=\delta_{i(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)},(\beta\circ\gamma)_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})=0}. On the other hand, we have

f2∘Rξ2−​(mult∘Ξ)∘τ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​λ​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\lambda(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
=f2∘Rξ2−(mult∘Ξ)∘τLξ1+(α⊗((βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1))⊠id)⊗β|S)\displaystyle=f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\tau L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=δ1f2∘Rξ2−(mult∘Ξ)((id⊠(βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1)))⊗(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗β|S)\displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=δ1f2((id⊠(βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1)))⊗((id⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β|S))\displaystyle=\delta_{1}f_{2}\biggl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)\biggr)
=δ1((βχ⁡(γ)​(ξ2−​(−1))⋅γξ2−​(−1))⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠((id⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β|S)\displaystyle=\delta_{1}\bigl((\beta_{\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\gamma_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)\boxtimes\Bigl(\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta_{|S}\Bigr)
=action∘(Ξ⊗f2)​(α⊗β⊗γ).\displaystyle=\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{2})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

We deduce that (8.3.2) holds.

∙\bullet\ Let γ∈Rξ1−​(U,S)\gamma\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(U,S), β∈Lξ1+​(V,U)\beta\in L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}(V,U) and α∈Rξ2−​(T,V)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}(T,V). We will show that

(8.3.3) action∘(Ξ⊗f1)​(α⊗β⊗γ)=(f1∘Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ)∘σ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​ρ+f2∘Rξ2−​ε)​(α⊗β⊗γ).\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho+f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon\bigr)(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma).

As before, we can assume γ|S=id\gamma_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits, α|V=id\alpha_{|V}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and β⊗γ≠0\beta\otimes\gamma\neq 0. We put u1=χ⁡(γ)​(ξ1−​(−1))u_{1}=\chi(\gamma)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)) and u2=χ​(β)−1​(ξ1+​(1))u_{2}=\chi(\beta)^{-1}(\xi_{1}^{+}(1)).

We have

action∘(Ξ⊗f1)(α⊗β⊗γ)=(idV⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]))⋅β⋅(idS⊠γξ1−​(−1))\mathrm{action}\circ(\Xi\otimes f_{1})(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{V}\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\bigr)\cdot\beta\cdot\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\bigr)
={δ2(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠β|S if ​u1=u2δ3(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βu2)⊠(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠β|S∖{u2} otherwise=\begin{cases}\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}&\text{ if }u_{1}=u_{2}\\ \delta_{3}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}&\text{ otherwise}\end{cases}

where

  • •

    δ2=1\delta_{2}=1 if γξ1−​(−1)​(1−)=ι⁡(βu2​(0+))\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}(1-)=\iota(\beta_{u_{2}}(0+)) and δ2=0\delta_{2}=0 otherwise

  • •

    δ3=1\delta_{3}=1 if β|U⋅(idS⊠γξ1−​(−1))≠0\beta_{|U}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ3=0\delta_{3}=0 otherwise.

We have

f2∘Rξ2−ε(α⊗β⊗γ)=δ2f2(α⊗β|S)=δ2(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(1)→ξ2−(−1)])⊠β|S.f_{2}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\varepsilon(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=\delta_{2}f_{2}(\alpha\otimes\beta_{|S})=\delta_{2}(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)])\boxtimes\beta_{|S}.

We have

f1∘Rξ1−​(mult∘Ξ)∘σ​Lξ1+∘Rξ2−​ρ​(α⊗β⊗γ)=f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\circ R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\rho(\alpha\otimes\beta\otimes\gamma)=
=δ3′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)∘σLξ1+(α⊗(β|U∖{u2}⋅(γξ1−​(−1)⊠id))⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)∘σLξ1+(α⊗(β|S∖{u2}⊠(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1)))⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\circ\sigma L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}\Bigl(\alpha\otimes\bigr(\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigl)\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′f1∘Rξ1−(mult∘Ξ)(((βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠id)⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠β|S∖{u2})⊗(βu2⊠id))\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}f_{1}\circ R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}(\mathrm{mult}\circ\Xi)\Bigl(\bigl((\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}})\otimes(\beta_{u_{2}}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\Bigr)
=δ3′δ3′′(βu1∘γξ1−​(−1))⊠(αξ2−​(−1)⋅[ξ1+(1)→ξ2−(−1)]⋅βu2)⊠β|S∖{u2}\displaystyle=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}(\beta_{u_{1}}\circ\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\boxtimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\to\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)]\cdot\beta_{u_{2}})\boxtimes\beta_{|S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}

where

  • •

    δ3′=1\delta^{\prime}_{3}=1 if u1≠u2u_{1}\neq u_{2} and (idu1⊠βu2)⋅(γξ1−​(−1)⊠idu2)≠0(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{1}}\boxtimes\beta_{u_{2}})\cdot(\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{u_{2}})\neq 0 and δ3′=0\delta^{\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise

  • •

    δ3′′=1\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=1 if β|U∖{u2}⋅(idS∖{u2}⊠γξ1−​(−1))≠0\beta_{|U\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S\setminus\{u_{2}\}}\boxtimes\gamma_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\neq 0 and δ3′′=0\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}=0 otherwise.

Since δ3=δ3′​δ3′′\delta_{3}=\delta^{\prime}_{3}\delta^{\prime\prime}_{3}, we deduce that (8.3.3) holds and the lemma follows. ∎

8.3.5. Action of τ\tau

The action of τ\tau on E⁡(T,−)⊗E⁡(−,S)E(T,-)\otimes E(-,S) corresponds to an endomorphism of Rξ2−2⊕Rξ2−​Rξ1−⊕Rξ1−​Rξ2−⊕Rξ1−2R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{2}\oplus R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\oplus R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\oplus R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{2} given in (5.3.4).

0PE2

Lemma 8.3.6. We have τ∘((f2,f1)⊗(f2,f1))=((f2,f1)⊗(f2,f1))∘τ\tau\circ((f_{2},f_{1})\otimes(f_{2},f_{1}))=((f_{2},f_{1})\otimes(f_{2},f_{1}))\circ\tau.

0PE3

Proof. Consider αi∈Rξi−∙​(T,U)\alpha_{i}\in R_{\xi_{i}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U) and βi∈Rξi−∙​(U,S)\beta_{i}\in R_{\xi_{i}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U,S). In order to prove that the equality of the lemma holds when applied to ((α2,α1)⊗(β2,β1))((\alpha_{2},\alpha_{1})\otimes(\beta_{2},\beta_{1})), we can assume that (αi)|T=id(\alpha_{i})_{|T}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits and (βi)|S=id(\beta_{i})_{|S}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits, since the morphisms involved in the equality commute with the right action of 𝒮M​(Z){\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z).

We have

τ∘(fi⊗fj)​(αi⊗βj)=\tau\circ(f_{i}\otimes f_{j})(\alpha_{i}\otimes\beta_{j})=
=τ(((αi)ξi−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξi−(−1)]⊠id)⊗(id⊠(βj)ξj−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξj−(−1)]))\displaystyle=\tau\Bigl(\bigl((\alpha_{i})_{\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)]\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\beta_{j})_{\xi_{j}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{j}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)\Bigr)
=di,j((βj)ξj−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξj−(−1)]⊠id)⊗(id⊠(αi)ξi−​(−1)⋅[ξ1−(−1)→ξi−(−1)])\displaystyle=d_{i,j}\bigl((\beta_{j})_{\xi_{j}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{j}^{-}(-1)]\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{i})_{\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)\to\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)]\bigr)

where d2,1=0d_{2,1}=0, d1,2=1d_{1,2}=1 and di,i=1d_{i,i}=1 if ((αi)ξi−​(−1)⋅[ξi−(−2)→ξi−(−1)]⊠(βi)ξi−​(−1))⋅τ≠0\bigl((\alpha_{i})_{\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)}\cdot[\xi_{i}^{-}(-2)\to\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)]\boxtimes(\beta_{i})_{\xi_{i}^{-}(-1)}\bigr)\cdot\tau\neq 0 and di,i=0d_{i,i}=0 otherwise. We deduce that the lemma holds when applied to ((α2,α1)⊗(β2,β1))((\alpha_{2},\alpha_{1})\otimes(\beta_{2},\beta_{1})), hence it holds in general. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2