ScalingStacks

8.1.4. Twisted object description

We explain how to obtain a version of Lemma 8.1.2 with a differential.

We say that a homotopy class of path in Z⁡(ξ)Z(\xi) is positive if it has the same orientation as ξ([1→2])\xi([1\to 2]).

Fix a finite subset SS of MM and n≥0n\geq 0.

Let S′′S^{\prime\prime} be a subset of SS with nn elements, let s′∈S∖S′′s^{\prime}\in S\setminus S^{\prime\prime} and s′′∈S′′s^{\prime\prime}\in S^{\prime\prime}. Let ζ:s′′→s′\zeta:s^{\prime\prime}\to s^{\prime} be a positive smooth homotopy class of paths in ZZ. We put S′=(S′′∖{s′′})⊔{s′}S^{\prime}=(S^{\prime\prime}\setminus\{s^{\prime\prime}\})\sqcup\{s^{\prime}\}.

We define a map

gS′′,ζ:Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′′,{ξ⁡(1),…,ξ⁡(n)})→Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′,{ξ⁡(1),…​ξ​(n)})∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S∖S′,S∖S′′).g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots,\xi(n)\})\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots\xi(n)\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\setminus S^{\prime},S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}).

We put

gS′′,ζ(α)=(α|S′∖{s′}⊠(αs′′∘ζ−1))∧(idS∖(S′′⊔{s′})⊠ζ)g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)=(\alpha_{|S^{\prime}\setminus\{s^{\prime}\}}\boxtimes(\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{-1}))\wedge(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S\setminus(S^{\prime\prime}\sqcup\{s^{\prime}\})}\boxtimes\zeta)

if

  • •

    αs′′∘ζ−1\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{-1} is smooth

  • •

    and given s∈S′′∖{s′′}s\in S^{\prime\prime}\setminus\{s^{\prime\prime}\} and ζ′:s→s′\zeta^{\prime}:s\to s^{\prime} and ζ′′:s′′→s\zeta^{\prime\prime}:s^{\prime\prime}\to s smooth positive with ζ=ζ′∘ζ′′\zeta=\zeta^{\prime}\circ\zeta^{\prime\prime} and with αs′′∘ζ′′−1\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{\prime\prime-1} smooth, then αs′′∘ζ′′−1∘αs−1\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{\prime\prime-1}\circ\alpha_{s}^{-1} is negative.

We put gS′′,ζ​(α)=0g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)=0 otherwise.

0PCD

Remark 8.1.9. Note that if αs′′∘ζ−1\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{-1} is smooth, then the support of ζ\zeta is contained in Z⁡(ξ)Z(\xi).

Given α\alpha non-zero, if ζ\zeta is positive, then both αs′′∘ζ−1\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}}\circ\zeta^{-1} and ζ\zeta are oriented, since αs′′\alpha_{s^{\prime\prime}} is oriented.

We obtain a map fS′′,ζ:α∧β↦(id∧β)∘gS′′,ζ​(α)f_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}:\alpha\wedge\beta\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\wedge\beta)\circ g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)

Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′′,{ξ⁡(1),…,ξ⁡(n)})∧Hom⁡(S∖S′′,−)→Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′,{ξ⁡(1),…​ξ​(n)})∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S∖S′,−).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots,\xi(n)\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime},-)\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots\xi(n)\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\setminus S^{\prime},-).

Let r⁡(S′′)r(S^{\prime\prime}) be the number of pairs (s′′,s)∈S′′×(S∖S′′)(s^{\prime\prime},s)\in S^{\prime\prime}\times(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}) such that there exists a positive path s′′→ss^{\prime\prime}\to s.

We define now

Vr=⨁S′⊂S,|S′|=nr⁡(S′)=rHom⁡(S′,{ξ⁡(1),…,ξ⁡(n)})⊗Hom𝒮⁡(Z)⁡(S∖S′,−)∈𝒮M​(Z)​−diff.V_{r}=\bigoplus_{\begin{subarray}{c}S^{\prime}\subset S,\ |S^{\prime}|=n\\ r(S^{\prime})=r\end{subarray}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(S^{\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots,\xi(n)\})\otimes\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}(Z)}(S\setminus S^{\prime},-)\in{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits.

Given r′<r′′r^{\prime}<r^{\prime\prime}, define fr′,r′′=∑S′′,ζfS′′,ζf_{r^{\prime},r^{\prime\prime}}=\sum_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}f_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}, where

  • •

    S′′S^{\prime\prime} is a subset of SS with |S′′|=n|S^{\prime\prime}|=n and r⁡(S′′)=r′′r(S^{\prime\prime})=r^{\prime\prime}

  • •

    ζ\zeta is a positive admissible homotopy class of paths in ZZ with ζ⁡(0)∈S′′\zeta(0)\in S^{\prime\prime} and ζ⁡(1)∈S∖S′′\zeta(1)\in S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}

such that supp⁡(ζ)∩S′′={s′′}\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta)\cap S^{\prime\prime}=\{s^{\prime\prime}\} and r⁡((S′′∖{ζ⁡(0)})⊔{ζ⁡(1)})=r′r((S^{\prime\prime}\setminus\{\zeta(0)\})\sqcup\{\zeta(1)\})=r^{\prime}.

Let V=Vn​(S)=⨁rVrV=V_{n}(S)=\bigoplus_{r}V_{r} and let dV=∑rdVr+∑r′,r′′fr′,r′′d_{V}=\sum_{r}d_{V_{r}}+\sum_{r^{\prime},r^{\prime\prime}}f_{r^{\prime},r^{\prime\prime}}. We will show below (Proposition 8.1.10) that dV2=0d_{V}^{2}=0, i.e. VV is the object of 𝒮M​(Z)​−diff{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits corresponding to the twisted object [⨁Vr,(fr′,r′′)][\bigoplus V_{r},(f_{r^{\prime},r^{\prime\prime}})].

0PCE

Proposition 8.1.10. Given S⊂MS\subset M and n≥0n\geq 0, then dVn​(S)2=0d_{V_{n}(S)}^{2}=0 and the map of Lemma 8.1.2 defines an isomorphism of functors 𝒮M​(Z)→k​−diff{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)\to k\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits

Vn​(S)→∼L⁡(−,S,en).V_{n}(S)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}L(-,S,e^{n}).
0PCF

Proof. By Remark 8.1.1, we can assume ξ\xi is outgoing for ZZ. We will show that

(8.1.2) the isomorphism of Lemma 8.1.2 is compatible with the differentials.

The proposition will follow immediately from (8.1.2).

Let S′′S^{\prime\prime} be a subset of SS with nn elements, and let TT be a finite subset of MM. Let a:Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′′,{ξ⁡(1),…​ξ​(n)})∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S∖S′′,T)→L∙​(T,S,en)a:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots\xi(n)\})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime},T)\to L^{\bullet}(T,S,e^{n}) be the map of Lemma 8.1.2. Let α∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S′′,{ξ⁡(1),…​ξ​(n)})\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S^{\prime\prime},\{\xi(1),\ldots\xi(n)\}) and β∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S∖S′′,T)\beta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime},T). Let θ=α⊠β=a⁡(α∧β)\theta=\alpha\boxtimes\beta=a(\alpha\wedge\beta). The statement (8.1.2) will follow from the following property:

(8.1.3) a⁡(d⁡(α⊗β))=d⁡(θ).a(d(\alpha\otimes\beta))=d(\theta).

We have

a⁡(d⁡(α⊗β))=d⁡(α)⊠β+α⊠d⁡(β)+∑ζa⁡((id⊗β)⋅gS′′,ζ​(α))a(d(\alpha\otimes\beta))=d(\alpha)\boxtimes\beta+\alpha\boxtimes d(\beta)+\sum_{\zeta}a((\operatorname{id}\nolimits\otimes\beta)\cdot g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha))

where ζ\zeta runs over positive admissible homotopy classes of paths starting in S′′S^{\prime\prime} and ending in S∖S′′S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}.

We have

D⁡(θ)/inv=(D⁡(α)/inv)⊔(D⁡(β)/inv)⊔∐(s1,s2)∈S′′×(S∖S′′)I⁡(αs1,βs2)∩D⁡(θ).D(\theta)/\mathrm{inv}=\bigl(D(\alpha)/\mathrm{inv}\bigr)\sqcup\bigl(D(\beta)/\mathrm{inv}\bigr)\sqcup\coprod_{(s_{1},s_{2})\in S^{\prime\prime}\times(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime})}I(\alpha_{s_{1}},\beta_{s_{2}})\cap D(\theta).

Fix (s1,s2)∈S′′×(S∖S′′)(s_{1},s_{2})\in S^{\prime\prime}\times(S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}). Let S′=(S′′∖{s1})⊔{s2}S^{\prime}=(S^{\prime\prime}\setminus\{s_{1}\})\sqcup\{s_{2}\}. Let ζ\zeta be a smooth path s1→s2s_{1}\to s_{2}. Let u′=idS∖(S′⊔{s1})⊠ζu^{\prime}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S\setminus(S^{\prime}\sqcup\{s_{1}\})}\boxtimes\zeta. Write gS′′,ζ​(α)=v∧ug_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)=v\wedge u with u:S∖S′→S∖S′′u:S\setminus S^{\prime}\to S\setminus S^{\prime\prime} and v:S′→{ξ⁡(1),…,ξ⁡(n)}v:S^{\prime}\to\{\xi(1),\ldots,\xi(n)\}. We take u=0u=0 and v=0v=0 if gS′′,ζ​(α)=0g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)=0. If gS′′,ζ​(α)≠0g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)\neq 0, then u=u′u=u^{\prime}.

Assume (β⋅u)≠0(\beta\cdot u)\neq 0. Then αs1∘ζ−1\alpha_{s_{1}}\circ\zeta^{-1} and βs2∘ζ\beta_{s_{2}}\circ\zeta are smooth, and ζ\zeta and ζ¯\bar{\zeta} have opposite orientations, since ζ¯\bar{\zeta} is negative (it starts in ξ⁡(𝐙≥1)\xi({\mathbf{Z}}_{\geq 1}) and ends in MM). It follows that ζ∈L⁡(θ)\zeta\in L(\theta).

Assume ζ∈L⁡(θ)\zeta\in L(\theta). Since ζ¯\bar{\zeta} is negative, it follows that ζ\zeta is positive, then (θζ)s=θs(\theta^{\zeta})_{s}=\theta_{s} for s∉{s1,s2}s{\not\in}\{s_{1},s_{2}\}, while (θζ)s1=βs2∘ζ(\theta^{\zeta})_{s_{1}}=\beta_{s_{2}}\circ\zeta and (θζ)s2=αs1∘ζ−1(\theta^{\zeta})_{s_{2}}=\alpha_{s_{1}}\circ\zeta^{-1}. We deduce that (β⋅u)⊠v=θζ(\beta\cdot u)\boxtimes v=\theta^{\zeta} if β⋅u≠0\beta\cdot u\neq 0. So, the assertion (8.1.3) is a consequence of the following:

(8.1.4) given ​ζ∈L⁡(θ)​ positive, we have ​β⋅u≠0​ if and only if ​ζ∈D⁡(θ).\text{given }\zeta\in L(\theta)\text{ positive, we have }\beta\cdot u\neq 0\text{ if and only if }\zeta\in D(\theta).

We will prove that statement by reduction to the non-singular case. Let f:Z^→Zf:\hat{Z}\to Z be a non-singular cover. The morphism ξ:𝐑>0→Z\xi:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to Z lifts uniquely to a morphism of curves ξ^:𝐑>0→Z^\hat{\xi}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to\hat{Z}. Let M^=f−1​(M)\hat{M}=f^{-1}(M) and let α^:S^′′→{ξ^​(1),…​ξ^​(n)}\hat{\alpha}:\hat{S}^{\prime\prime}\to\{\hat{\xi}(1),\ldots\hat{\xi}(n)\} and ζ^\hat{\zeta} be the unique lifts of α\alpha and ζ\zeta to Z^\hat{Z}. There exist subsets S^,T^\hat{S},\hat{T} of M^\hat{M} and a lift β^:S^∖S^′′→T^\hat{\beta}:\hat{S}\setminus\hat{S}^{\prime\prime}\to\hat{T} of β\beta such that ζ^∈L⁡(θ^)\hat{\zeta}\in L(\hat{\theta}), where θ^=α^⊠β^\hat{\theta}=\hat{\alpha}\boxtimes\hat{\beta} (Lemma 7.4.28). We have ζ∈D⁡(θ)\zeta\in D(\theta) if and only if ζ^∈D⁡(θ^)\hat{\zeta}\in D(\hat{\theta}) (Lemma 7.4.28).

Write gS^′′,ζ^​(α^)=v^∧u^g_{\hat{S}^{\prime\prime},\hat{\zeta}}(\hat{\alpha})=\hat{v}\wedge\hat{u} as above. We have f⁡(u^)=uf(\hat{u})=u and f⁡(v^)=vf(\hat{v})=v. We have gS′′,ζ​(α)≠0g_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}(\alpha)\neq 0 if and only if gS^′′,ζ^​(α^)≠0g_{\hat{S}^{\prime\prime},\hat{\zeta}}(\hat{\alpha})\neq 0. Finally, β⋅u≠0\beta\cdot u\neq 0 if and only if β^⋅u^≠0\hat{\beta}\cdot\hat{u}\neq 0. This completes the reduction of (8.1.4) to the case of Z^\hat{Z}.

So, we now prove (8.1.4) assuming ZZ is smooth. Note that Z⁡(ξ)Z(\xi) is isomorphic (as a 11-dimensional space) to an interval of 𝐑{\mathbf{R}}. We consider ζ:s1→s2\zeta:s_{1}\to s_{2} in L⁡(θ)L(\theta) positive with s1∈S′′s_{1}\in S^{\prime\prime} and s2∈S∖S′′s_{2}\in S\setminus S^{\prime\prime}.

Remark 7.4.11 shows that β⋅u′≠0\beta\cdot u^{\prime}\neq 0 if and only if i⁡(βs,βs2∘ζ)=i⁡(βs,βs2)+i⁡(ids,ζ)i(\beta_{s},\beta_{s_{2}}\circ\zeta)=i(\beta_{s},\beta_{s_{2}})+i(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{s},\zeta) for all s∈S∖(S′⊔{s1})s\in S\setminus(S^{\prime}\sqcup\{s_{1}\}). That equality is always satisfied unless there are ζ′′:s1→s\zeta^{\prime\prime}:s_{1}\to s and ζ′:s→s2\zeta^{\prime}:s\to s_{2} positive. In that case, ζ¯′′\bar{\zeta}^{\prime\prime} is negative and the equality is satisfied if and only if ζ¯′\bar{\zeta}^{\prime} is positive.

We have u≠0u\neq 0 if and only if given ζ′′:s1→s\zeta^{\prime\prime}:s_{1}\to s and ζ′:s→s2\zeta^{\prime}:s\to s_{2} positive with s∈S′∖{s2}s\in S^{\prime}\setminus\{s_{2}\}, then ζ¯′′=αs2∘ζ′′∘αs1−1\bar{\zeta}^{\prime\prime}=\alpha_{s_{2}}\circ\zeta^{\prime\prime}\circ\alpha_{s_{1}}^{-1} is positive.

We deduce that ζ∈D⁡(θ)\zeta\in D(\theta) if and only if β⋅u≠0\beta\cdot u\neq 0. The proposition follows. ∎

0PCG

Example 8.1.11. The picture below gives two examples of description of the map gS′′,ζg_{S^{\prime\prime},\zeta}.

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2