ScalingStacks

7.3.4. Functoriality

Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves.

0PA0

Lemma 7.3.13. Let ζ\zeta be a homotopy class of paths in ZZ. The class f⁡(ζ)f(\zeta) is smooth if and only if ζ\zeta is smooth. If ζ\zeta is admissible, then f⁡(ζ)f(\zeta) is admissible.

0PA1

Proof. Given γ\gamma an oriented path in ZZ, the path f⁡(γ)f(\gamma) is oriented. It is smooth if and only f⁡(γ)f(\gamma) is smooth. This shows that if ζ\zeta is a smooth (resp. admissible) homotopy class of paths in ZZ, then f⁡(ζ)f(\zeta) is smooth (resp. admissible).

Consider now ζ\zeta a homotopy class of paths in ZZ such that f⁡(ζ)f(\zeta) is smooth. Given γ\gamma a minimal path in ζ\zeta, then f⁡(γ)f(\gamma) is minimal (Lemma 7.1.20). Since f⁡(ζ)f(\zeta) is smooth, it follows that f⁡(γ)f(\gamma) is smooth (Properties 7.3.5(4)), hence γ\gamma is smooth and finally ζ\zeta is smooth. ∎

It follows from the previous lemma that the morphism ff induces a functor f:𝒮∙​(Z,1)→𝒮∙​(Z′,1)f:{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime},1). We have constructed a functor 𝒮∙​(−,1){\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(-,1) from the category of curves to the category of pointed categories.

Let us state a version of Lemma 7.1.20 for morphisms of curves.

0PA2

Lemma 7.3.14. Let γ,γ′\gamma,\gamma^{\prime} be two admissible paths in ZZ. If [f⁡(γ)]=[f⁡(γ′)]≠id[f(\gamma)]=[f(\gamma^{\prime})]\neq\operatorname{id}\nolimits, then [γ]=[γ′][\gamma]=[\gamma^{\prime}]. The functor f:𝒮∙​(Z,1)→𝒮∙​(Z′,1)f:{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z^{\prime},1) is faithful.

Note that ff induces an injective morphism of groups f:L⁡(Z)→L⁡(Z′)f:L(Z)\to L(Z^{\prime}) and a map f:π0​(Z)→π0​(Z′)f:\pi_{0}(Z)\to\pi_{0}(Z^{\prime}).

The next lemma is an immediate consequence of Lemma 7.1.24.

0PA3

Lemma 7.3.15. Given α,β∈R⁡(Z)\alpha,\beta\in R(Z), we have ⟨f⁡(α),f⁡(β)⟩=f⁡(⟨α,β⟩)\langle f(\alpha),f(\beta)\rangle=f(\langle\alpha,\beta\rangle).

It follows from Lemmas 7.3.15 and 7.1.25 that we have a morphism of groups f:Γ⁡(Z)→Γ⁡(Z′),(r,(m,α))↦(f⁡(r),(f⁡(m),f⁡(α)))f:\Gamma(Z)\to\Gamma(Z^{\prime}),\ (r,(m,\alpha))\mapsto\bigl(f(r),(f(m),f(\alpha))\bigr) which restricts to an injective morphism of groups Γ′​(Z)→Γ′​(Z′)\Gamma^{\prime}(Z)\to\Gamma^{\prime}(Z^{\prime}).

Let DD be a subset of T⁡(Z)T(Z) such that given z∈pt⁡(D)z\in\operatorname{pt}\nolimits(D), the composition D∩pt−1⁡(z)→C⁡(z)→C⁡(z)/ιD\cap\operatorname{pt}\nolimits^{-1}(z)\to C(z)\to C(z)/\iota is bijective. The morphism f:Γ⁡(Z)→Γ⁡(Z′)f:\Gamma(Z)\to\Gamma(Z^{\prime}) induces a morphism f:Γ⁡(Z,D)→Γ⁡(Z′,f⁡(D))f:\Gamma(Z,D)\to\Gamma(Z^{\prime},f(D)). Let g,h∈Γ⁡(Z,D)g,h\in\Gamma(Z,D). If g<hg<h, then f⁡(g)<f⁡(h)f(g)<f(h). If f:π0​(Z)→π0​(Z′)f:\pi_{0}(Z)\to\pi_{0}(Z^{\prime}) is injective and f⁡(g)<f⁡(h)f(g)<f(h), then g<hg<h.

Finally, the morphism f:Γ⁡(Z,D)→Γ⁡(Z′,f⁡(D))f:\Gamma(Z,D)\to\Gamma(Z^{\prime},f(D)) induces a morphism f:Γ¯​(Z,D)→Γ¯​(Z′,f⁡(D))f:\bar{\Gamma}(Z,D)\to\bar{\Gamma}(Z^{\prime},f(D)). Given g,h∈Γ¯​(Z,D)g,h\in\bar{\Gamma}(Z,D), we have g<hg<h if and only if f⁡(g)<f⁡(h)f(g)<f(h).

Let Z1,…,ZrZ_{1},\ldots,Z_{r} be the connected components of ZZ. There are isomorphisms of groups R(Z1)×⋯×R(Zr)→∼R(Z)R(Z_{1})\times\cdots\times R(Z_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R(Z) and L(Z1)×⋯×L(Zr)→∼L(Z)L(Z_{1})\times\cdots\times L(Z_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}L(Z) given by the inclusions Zi↪ZZ_{i}\hookrightarrow Z. They induce an isomorphism of groups

(7.3.3) Γ(Z1)×⋯×Γ(Zr)→∼Γ(Z).\Gamma(Z_{1})\times\cdots\times\Gamma(Z_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\Gamma(Z).

The inclusions Zi↪ZZ_{i}\hookrightarrow Z induce pointed functors 𝒮∙​(Zi,1)→𝒮∙​(Z,1){\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{i},1)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1) and give rise to an isomorphism of pointed categories

(7.3.4) 𝒮∙​(Z1,1)∨⋯∨𝒮∙​(Zr,1)→∼𝒮∙​(Z,1).{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{1},1)\vee\cdots\vee{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{r},1)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z,1).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2