ScalingStacks

8.2.1. Construction

Consider two injective morphisms of curves ฮพ1+:๐‘>0โ†’Z\xi_{1}^{+}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to Z and ฮพ2โˆ’:๐‘<0โ†’Z\xi_{2}^{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z where ๐‘<0{\mathbf{R}}_{<0} and ๐‘>0{\mathbf{R}}_{>0} are unoriented. We assume that ฮพ1+\xi_{1}^{+} is outgoing for ZZ, that ฮพ2โˆ’\xi_{2}^{-} is incoming for ZZ and that ฮพ1+โ€‹(๐‘>0)โˆฉฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(๐‘<0)=โˆ…\xi_{1}^{+}({\mathbf{R}}_{>0})\cap\xi_{2}^{-}({\mathbf{R}}_{<0})=\emptyset. We write rr instead of ฮพ1+โ€‹(r)\xi_{1}^{+}(r) and โˆ’r-r instead of ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’r)\xi_{2}^{-}(-r), for rโˆˆ๐™>0r\in{\mathbf{Z}}_{>0}.

Let MM be a subset of Zโˆ–(ฮพ1+โ€‹(๐‘โ‰ฅ1)โŠ”ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(๐‘โ‰คโˆ’1))Z\setminus(\xi_{1}^{+}({\mathbf{R}}_{\geq 1})\sqcup\xi_{2}^{-}({\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1})).

Fix an oriented diffeomorphism ๐‘>0โ†’โˆผ๐‘<โˆ’1{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{<-1} and let i+:๐‘>0โ†’๐‘i_{+}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to{\mathbf{R}} be its composition with the inclusion map. Similarly, fix an oriented diffeomorphism ๐‘<0โ†’โˆผ๐‘>1{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathbf{R}}_{>1} and let iโˆ’:๐‘<0โ†’๐‘i_{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to{\mathbf{R}} be its composition with the inclusion map.

Consider m,nโ‰ฅ0m,n\geq 0. Let Em,nE_{m,n} be the (๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z),๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodule given by

Em,nโ€‹(T,S)=Hom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,m)).E_{m,n}(T,S)=\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,m)).

Note that E0,1=Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™E_{0,1}=R^{\bullet}_{\xi_{2}^{-}} and E1,0=Lฮพ1+โˆ™E_{1,0}=L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}}, but Em,nE_{m,n} is not isomorphic to (Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™)nโ€‹(Lฮพ1+โˆ™)m(R^{\bullet}_{\xi_{2}^{-}})^{n}(L^{\bullet}_{\xi_{1}^{+}})^{m} in general.

There is an action of Hmโˆ™โˆงHnโˆ™H_{m}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n}^{\bullet} on Em,nE_{m,n} given by

(TaโˆงTb)โ‹…ฯƒ=(idTโŠ ([iโ†ฆa(i)]1โ‰คiโ‰คm)โ‹…ฯƒโ‹…(idSโŠ (โˆ’iโ†ฆbโˆ’1(n+1โˆ’i)โˆ’nโˆ’1)1โ‰คiโ‰คn)(T_{a}\wedge T_{b})\cdot\sigma=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T}\boxtimes([i\mapsto a(i)]_{1\leq i\leq m})\cdot\sigma\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{S}\boxtimes(-i\mapsto b^{-1}(n+1-i)-n-1)_{1\leq i\leq n})

for ฯƒโˆˆHom๐’ฎโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โก(SโŠ”(โˆ’n,โˆ’1),TโŠ”(1,m))\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,m)), aโˆˆ๐”–ma\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{m} and bโˆˆ๐”–nb\in{\mathfrak{S}}_{n}.

There is a map โˆ—:Em,nโ€‹Emโ€ฒ,nโ€ฒโ†’Em+mโ€ฒ,n+nโ€ฒ\ast:E_{m,n}E_{m^{\prime},n^{\prime}}\to E_{m+m^{\prime},n+n^{\prime}} given by

ฮฑโˆงฮฒโ†ฆฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ=(ฮฑโŠ ([iโ†’i+m])1โ‰คiโ‰คmโ€ฒ)โ‹…(ฮฒโŠ ([โˆ’nโ€ฒโˆ’iโ†’โˆ’i])1โ‰คiโ‰คn).\alpha\wedge\beta\mapsto\alpha\ast\beta=(\alpha\boxtimes([i\to i+m])_{1\leq i\leq m^{\prime}})\cdot(\beta\boxtimes([-n^{\prime}-i\to-i])_{1\leq i\leq n}).

This map is compatible with the action of (Hmโˆ™โˆงHnโˆ™)โˆง(Hmโ€ฒโˆ™โˆงHnโ€ฒโˆ™)(H_{m}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n}^{\bullet})\wedge(H_{m^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\wedge H_{n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}) via the canonical embeddings Hmโˆ™โ€‹Hmโ€ฒโˆ™โ†’Hm+mโ€ฒโˆ™H_{m}^{\bullet}H_{m^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\to H_{m+m^{\prime}}^{\bullet} and Hnโˆ™โ€‹Hnโ€ฒโˆ™โ†’Hn+nโ€ฒโˆ™H_{n}^{\bullet}H_{n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\to H_{n+n^{\prime}}^{\bullet}. We have (ฮฑโˆ—ฮฒ)โˆ—ฮณ=ฮฑโˆ—(ฮฒโˆ—ฮณ)(\alpha\ast\beta)\ast\gamma=\alpha\ast(\beta\ast\gamma).

So, we have defined a bimodule lax bi-22-representation on ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z){\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z).

Let Zฮพ=ZโŠ”๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0๐‘Z_{\xi}=Z\sqcup_{{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}}{\mathbf{R}}, where the gluing is done along the maps ฮพ1+โŠ”ฮพ2โˆ’:๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0โ†’Z\xi_{1}^{+}\sqcup\xi_{2}^{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z and i+โŠ”iโˆ’:๐‘>0โŠ”๐‘<0โ†’๐‘i_{+}\sqcup i_{-}:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to{\mathbf{R}}. Note that ZฮพZ_{\xi} is a 11-dimensional space and it comes with an injective open morphism of 11-dimensional spaces ฮพ:๐‘โ†’Zฮพ\xi:{\mathbf{R}}\to Z_{\xi}. We endow ๐‘{\mathbf{R}} with a curve structure by setting ๐‘u=๐‘โ‰คโˆ’1โŠ”๐‘โ‰ฅ1{\mathbf{R}}_{u}={\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1}\sqcup{\mathbf{R}}_{\geq 1} and by endowing (โˆ’1,1)(-1,1) with its usual orientation. We extend the curve structure on ZZ by endowing ฮพโก(๐‘)\xi({\mathbf{R}}) with the curve structure of ๐‘{\mathbf{R}}. Note that (Zฮพ)u=Zuยฏ(Z_{\xi})_{u}=\overline{Z_{u}}.

Given ฮต,ฮตโ€ฒโˆˆ{+,โˆ’}\varepsilon,\varepsilon^{\prime}\in\{+,-\} and aโˆˆ๐‘ฮตa\in{\mathbf{R}}_{\varepsilon}, bโˆˆ๐‘ฮตโ€ฒb\in{\mathbf{R}}_{\varepsilon^{\prime}}, we put [aโ†’b]=ฮพ([iฮต(a),iฮตโ€ฒ(b)])[a\to b]=\xi([i_{\varepsilon}(a),i_{\varepsilon^{\prime}}(b)]).

We consider the differential pointed category T๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)T_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}) with objects those of ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z){\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and with

Hom๐’ฎ~Mโˆ™โ€‹(Z)(S,T)=โ‹iโ‰ฅ0Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™(T,โˆ’i)โˆงLฮพ1+โˆ™(โˆ’i,โˆ’iโˆ’1)โˆงโ‹ฏโˆงRฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™(โˆ’2,โˆ’1)โˆงLฮพ1+โˆ™(โˆ’1,S).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\tilde{{\mathcal{S}}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(S,T)=\bigvee_{i\geq 0}R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,-_{i})\wedge L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-_{i},-_{i-1})\wedge\cdots\wedge R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(-_{2},-_{1})\wedge L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet}(-_{1},S).

We define a differential pointed functor ฮž~:T๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ€‹(Rฮพ2โˆ’โˆ™โ€‹Lฮพ1+โˆ™)โ†’๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\tilde{\Xi}:T_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}L_{\xi_{1}^{+}}^{\bullet})\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi}). It is the identity on objects and defined on maps by

ฮฒiโˆงฮฑiโˆงโ‹ฏโˆงฮฒ1โˆงฮฑ1โ†ฆ(ฮฒiโ‹…(idโŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1])โ‹…ฮฑi)โ‹…โ‹ฏโ‹…(ฮฒ1โ‹…(idโŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1])โ‹…ฮฑ1):\beta_{i}\wedge\alpha_{i}\wedge\cdots\wedge\beta_{1}\wedge\alpha_{1}\mapsto(\beta_{i}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[1\to-1])\cdot\alpha_{i})\cdot\cdots\cdot(\beta_{1}\cdot(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes[1\to-1])\cdot\alpha_{1}):
Sโ†’ฮฑ1U1โŠ”{ฮพ1+โ€‹(1)}โ†’idU1โŠ [1โ†’โˆ’1]U1โŠ”{ฮพ2โˆ’โ€‹(โˆ’1)}โ†’ฮฒ1V1โ†’ฮฑ2โ‹ฏโ†’T.S\xrightarrow{\alpha_{1}}U_{1}\sqcup\{\xi_{1}^{+}(1)\}\xrightarrow{\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U_{1}}\boxtimes[1\to-1]}U_{1}\sqcup\{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)\}\xrightarrow{\beta_{1}}V_{1}\xrightarrow{\alpha_{2}}\cdots\to T.
0PCW

Theorem 8.2.1. The functor ฮž~\tilde{\Xi} factors through ฮ”Eโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and induces an isomorphism of differential pointed categories ฮž:ฮ”Eโ€‹๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Z)โ†’โˆผ๐’ฎMโˆ™โ€‹(Zฮพ)\Xi:\Delta_{E}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi}).

The sections ยง8.2.2-8.2.4 below are devoted to the proof of Theorem 8.2.1.

0PCX

Example 8.2.2. We give below an illustration of the gluing data.

[Uncaptioned image]
0PCY

Example 8.2.3. The pictures below give two examples of description of ฮž~\tilde{\Xi}. The first picture corresponds to the gluing of two intervals to form an interval. The second picture corresponds to the self-gluing of an interval to form a circle.

[Uncaptioned image]
[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2