ScalingStacks

6.3. Positive and finite variants

6.3.1. Constructions

We define now positive and finite variants of the categories.

We define ๐”–^n+โฃ+\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n}^{++} to be the submonoid of ๐”–^n\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n} of elements ฯƒ\sigma such that ฯƒโก(r)โ‰ฅr\sigma(r)\geq r for all rโˆˆ๐™r\in{\mathbf{Z}}.

Let ?โˆˆ{+,++}?\in\{+,++\}. We define ๐’ฎn?{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{?} to be the ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-filtered subcategory of ๐’ฎn{\mathcal{S}}_{n} with same objects as ๐’ฎn{\mathcal{S}}_{n} and with maps those ฯƒโˆˆHom๐’ฎnโก(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) such that ฯƒโก(r)>0\sigma(r)>0 if ?=+?=+ (resp. ฯƒโก(r)โ‰ฅr\sigma(r)\geq r if ?=++?=++) for all rโˆˆI~โˆฉ๐™>0r\in\tilde{I}\cap{\mathbf{Z}}_{>0}. We define โ„‹n?{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{?} as the ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed subcategory of โ„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n} with same objects as โ„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n} and non-zero maps those of ๐’ฎn?{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{?}. Note that there is a canonical isomorphism of ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed categories grโก๐’ฎn?โ†’โˆผโ„‹n?{\operatorname{gr}\nolimits}{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{?}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{?}.

Note that the usual symmetric group ๐”–n{\mathfrak{S}}_{n} identifies with the subgroup of ๐”–^n\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{n} of elements ฯƒ\sigma such that ฯƒโก({1,โ€ฆ,n})={1,โ€ฆ,n}\sigma(\{1,\ldots,n\})=\{1,\ldots,n\}. The subalgebra of H^n\hat{H}_{n} generated by T1,โ€ฆ,Tnโˆ’1T_{1},\ldots,T_{n-1} is isomorphic to HnH_{n}.

We denote by ๐’ฎnf{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{f} the ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-filtered subcategory of ๐’ฎn{\mathcal{S}}_{n} with same objects as ๐’ฎn{\mathcal{S}}_{n} and with maps those ฯƒโˆˆHom๐’ฎnโก(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) such that ฯƒโก(r)โˆˆ{1,โ€ฆ,n}\sigma(r)\in\{1,\ldots,n\} for all rโˆˆI~โˆฉ{1,โ€ฆ,n}r\in\tilde{I}\cap\{1,\ldots,n\}. We denote by โ„‹nf{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f} the corresponding ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed subcategory of โ„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n}. There is a canonical isomorphism of ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed categories grโก๐’ฎnfโ†’โˆผโ„‹nf{\operatorname{gr}\nolimits}{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{f}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}.

We have also subcategories ๐’ฎnf++=๐’ฎnfโˆฉ๐’ฎn+โฃ+{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{f++}={\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{f}\cap{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{++} of ๐’ฎn{\mathcal{S}}_{n} and โ„‹nf++=โ„‹nfโˆฉโ„‹n+โฃ+{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f++}={\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}\cap{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{++} of โ„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n}.

0P83

Lemma 6.3.1. โ„‹nf{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}, โ„‹n+{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{+}, โ„‹n+โฃ+{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{++} and โ„‹nf++{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f++} are differential ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed subcategories of โ„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n}.

0P84

Proof. Let ฯƒโˆˆHomโ„‹nfโก(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}}(I,J). There is ฯ„โˆˆHomโ„‹nfโก(J,I)\tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}}(J,I) with โ„“โก(ฯ„)=0\ell(\tau)=0. We have dโก(ฯ„โˆ˜ฯƒ)=ฯ„โˆ˜dโก(ฯƒ)d(\tau\circ\sigma)=\tau\circ d(\sigma). The isomorphism H^nโ†’โˆผEnd๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹n]โก(๐™/n)\hat{H}_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}]}({\mathbf{Z}}/n) given by Proposition 6.2.11 restricts to an isomorphism of differential graded algebras Hnโ†’โˆผEnd๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹nf]โก(๐™/n)H_{n}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}]}({\mathbf{Z}}/n). It follows that dโก(ฯ„โˆ˜ฯƒ)โˆˆ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹nf]d(\tau\circ\sigma)\in{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}], hence dโก(ฯƒ)โˆˆ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹nf]d(\sigma)\in{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}]. So, ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹nf]{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f}] is a differential subcategory of ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹n]{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}].

One shows similarly that ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹n+]{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{+}] is a differential subcategory of ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹n]{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}].

Let ฯƒโˆˆHomโ„‹n+โฃ+โก(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{++}}(I,J). Let (i1,i2)โˆˆDโก(ฯƒ)(i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma) and let ฯƒโ€ฒ=ฯƒi1,i2\sigma^{\prime}=\sigma^{i_{1},i_{2}}. Given iโˆˆI~i\in\tilde{I}, we have ฯƒโ€ฒโ€‹(i)=ฯƒโ€‹(i)\sigma^{\prime}(i)=\sigma(i) if iโˆ‰(i1+nโ€‹๐™)โˆช(i2+nโ€‹๐™)i\not\in(i_{1}+n{\mathbf{Z}})\cup(i_{2}+n{\mathbf{Z}}), while

ฯƒโ€ฒโ€‹(i1)=ฯƒโก(i2)โ‰ฅi2>i1โ€‹ย andย โ€‹ฯƒโ€ฒโ€‹(i2)=ฯƒโก(i1)>ฯƒโก(i2)โ‰ฅi2.\sigma^{\prime}(i_{1})=\sigma(i_{2})\geq i_{2}>i_{1}\text{ and }\sigma^{\prime}(i_{2})=\sigma(i_{1})>\sigma(i_{2})\geq i_{2}.

It follows that ฯƒโ€ฒโˆˆHomโ„‹n+โฃ+โก(I,J)\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{++}}(I,J), hence dโก(ฯƒ)โˆˆ๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹n+โฃ+]d(\sigma)\in{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{++}]. โˆŽ

We extend all previous constructions to the case n=0n=0 by setting ๐”–^0=๐”–^0+โฃ+=๐”–0=1\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{0}=\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{0}^{++}={\mathfrak{S}}_{0}=1, H0=H^0=๐…2H_{0}=\hat{H}_{0}={\mathbf{F}}_{2}, ๐’ฎ0=๐’ฎ0+โฃ+=๐’ฎ0f{\mathcal{S}}_{0}={\mathcal{S}}_{0}^{++}={\mathcal{S}}_{0}^{f} is the category with one object โˆ…\emptyset and one map and โ„‹0=โ„‹0f=โ„‹0+โฃ+{\mathcal{H}}_{0}={\mathcal{H}}_{0}^{f}={\mathcal{H}}_{0}^{++} is its associated pointed category.

Let Rnf=โจaโˆˆ๐™/n,aโ‰ โˆ’1๐™โ€‹ฮฑaR^{f}_{n}=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n,\ a\neq-1}{\mathbf{Z}}\alpha_{a}.

Let ฮ“nf={(r,(l,ฮฑ))|ฮฑโˆˆRnf}\Gamma^{f}_{n}=\{(r,(l,\alpha))\ |\ \alpha\in R^{f}_{n}\}, a subgroup of ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}. Given DD as above, we denote by ฮ“Df\Gamma_{D}^{f} the image of ฮ“nf\Gamma^{f}_{n} in ฮ“D\Gamma_{D}.

Given ฯƒ\sigma a map in ๐’ฎnf{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{f}, we have degโก(ฯƒ)โˆˆฮ“nf\deg(\sigma)\in\Gamma^{f}_{n}. This shows that the ฮ“n\Gamma_{n}-gradings on โ„‹nf{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f} and โ„‹nf++{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f++} come from ฮ“nf\Gamma_{n}^{f}-gradings.

6.3.2. Lipshitz-Ozsvรกth-Thurstonโ€™s strands algebras

Fix nโ‰ฅ1n\geq 1. The differential algebra

๐’œโก(n)=Endaddโก(๐…2โ€‹[โ„‹nf++])โก(โจIโŠ‚๐™/nI){\mathcal{A}}(n)=\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f++}])}(\bigoplus_{I\subset{\mathbf{Z}}/n}I)

is the opposite of the strands algebra ๐’œLโ€‹Oโ€‹Tโ€‹(n){\mathcal{A}}_{LOT}(n) with nn places of [LiOzTh1, Definition 3.2].

There is a grading on ๐’œLโ€‹Oโ€‹Tโ€‹(n){\mathcal{A}}_{LOT}(n) by a group Gโ€ฒโ€‹(n)G^{\prime}(n) [LiOzTh1, ยง3.3.1]. This gives rise to a grading by Gโ€ฒโ€‹(n)oppG^{\prime}(n)^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}} on ๐’œโก(n){\mathcal{A}}(n).

The group Gโ€ฒโ€‹(n)oppG^{\prime}(n)^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} identifies with the index 22 subgroup kerโกฯตโˆฉฮ“[1,n]+f\ker\epsilon\cap\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}^{f} of ฮ“[1,n]+f\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}^{f} via (r,ฮฑ)โ†ฆ(โˆ’r,โˆ’ฮฑ)(r,\alpha)\mapsto(-r,-\alpha) (cf Remark 6.2.6 and the identification of ฮ“[1,n]+\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} with the set 12โ€‹๐™ร—Rn\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times R_{n} before Lemma 6.2.7). Via this isomorphism, the Gโ€ฒโ€‹(n)oppG^{\prime}(n)^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}-grading on ๐’œโก(n){\mathcal{A}}(n) comes from our ฮ“[1,n]+f\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}^{f}-grading on โ„‹nf++{\mathcal{H}}_{n}^{f++}.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2