ScalingStacks

8.1.5. Right action

Consider now ξ′:𝐑<0→Z\xi^{\prime}:{\mathbf{R}}_{<0}\to Z an injective morphism of curves, where 𝐑<0{\mathbf{R}}_{<0} is unoriented. Identifying (𝐑<0)opp({\mathbf{R}}_{<0})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} with 𝐑>0{\mathbf{R}}_{>0} by x↦−xx\mapsto-x, we obtain a morphism of curves ξ:𝐑>0→Zopp\xi:{\mathbf{R}}_{>0}\to Z^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}. Let MM be a subset of Z∖ξ′​(𝐑≤−1)Z\setminus\xi^{\prime}({\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1}).

We say that ξ′\xi^{\prime} is initial for (Z,M)(Z,M) if ξ\xi is terminal for (Zopp,M)(Z^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits},M) and that ξ′\xi^{\prime} is incoming for ZZ if ξ′​(𝐑≤−1)\xi^{\prime}({\mathbf{R}}_{\leq-1}) is closed in ZZ.

Assume ξ′\xi^{\prime} is initial for (Z,M)(Z,M). As in the left action case, we define a differential functor

R∙=Rξ′∙:𝒞×𝒞opp×𝒰\displaystyle R^{\bullet}=R_{\xi^{\prime}}^{\bullet}:{\mathcal{C}}\times{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}\times{\mathcal{U}} →k​−diff\displaystyle\to k\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits
R∙​(S,T,en)\displaystyle R^{\bullet}(S,T,e^{n}) =Hom⁡(T⊔{ξ′​(−1),…,ξ′​(−n)},S)\displaystyle=\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(T\sqcup\{\xi^{\prime}(-1),\ldots,\xi^{\prime}(-n)\},S)
R∙​(β,α,σ)​(f)\displaystyle R^{\bullet}(\beta,\alpha,\sigma)(f) =β⋅f⋅(α⊠ξ′​(σrev​opp))∈R∙​(S′,T′,n)\displaystyle=\beta\cdot f\cdot(\alpha\boxtimes\xi^{\prime}(\sigma^{\mathrm{rev}{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}))\in R^{\bullet}(S^{\prime},T^{\prime},n)

for α∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(T′,T)\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(T^{\prime},T), β∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S,S′)\beta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S,S^{\prime}) and σ∈End𝒰∙⁡(en)\sigma\in\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{U}}^{\bullet}}(e^{n}), and f∈R∙​(S,T,n)f\in R^{\bullet}(S,T,n).

We put Rξ∙​(S,T)=Rξ∙​(S,T,e)R_{\xi}^{\bullet}(S,T)=R_{\xi}^{\bullet}(S,T,e) and Rξ=𝐅2​[Rξ∙]R_{\xi}={\mathbf{F}}_{2}[R_{\xi}^{\bullet}].

Recall that the isomorphism (7.4.4) of differential categories 𝒮M∙​(Z)→∼𝒮M∙​(Zopp)opp{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}. This isomorphism provides an isomorphism Rξ′∙​(S,T,en)→∼Lξ∙​(T,S,en)R^{\bullet}_{\xi^{\prime}}(S,T,e^{n})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}L^{\bullet}_{\xi}(T,S,e^{n}) functorial in SS, TT and ene^{n}.

In particular, R∙R^{\bullet} provides a “right” 22-representation on 𝒮M∙​(Z){\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z) and all results of §8.1.1–8.1.4 have counterparts for R∙R^{\bullet}.

Given S⊂MS\subset M and n≥0n\geq 0, there is an isomorphism of functors

⋁S′⊂S|S′|=nHom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡({ξ′​(−1),…,ξ′​(−n)},S′)∧Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(−,S∖S′)→∼R∙​(S,−,en).\bigvee_{\begin{subarray}{c}S^{\prime}\subset S\\ |S^{\prime}|=n\end{subarray}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(\{\xi^{\prime}(-1),\ldots,\xi^{\prime}(-n)\},S^{\prime})\wedge\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(-,S\setminus S^{\prime})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R^{\bullet}(S,-,e^{n}).

There is an isomorphism of functors, functorial in SS and TT

R∙​(T,−,en)∧R∙​(−,S,em)\displaystyle R^{\bullet}(T,-,e^{n})\wedge R^{\bullet}(-,S,e^{m}) →∼R∙​(T,S,en+m)\displaystyle\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R^{\bullet}(T,S,e^{n+m})
(α,β)\displaystyle(\alpha,\beta) ↦α⋅(β⊠ξ′([−m−r→−r]1≤r≤n)).\displaystyle\mapsto\alpha\cdot(\beta\boxtimes\xi^{\prime}([-m-r\to-r]_{1\leq r\leq n})).

Assume there is a decreasing sequence m0,m−1,…m_{0},m_{-1},\ldots of points of ξ′−1​(M)\xi^{\prime-1}(M) with limimi<t\lim_{i}m_{i}<t for all t∈ξ′−1​(M)t\in\xi^{\prime-1}(M).

We obtain as in (8.1.1) isomorphisms functorial in SS and TT

(8.1.5) colimr→∞⁡Hom𝒮M∙​(Z)​(T⊔ξ′​({m−r,…,m−r−n+1}),S)→∼R∙​(S,T,en).\operatorname{colim}\nolimits_{r\to\infty}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(T\sqcup\xi^{\prime}(\{m_{-r},\ldots,m_{-r-n+1}\}),S)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}R^{\bullet}(S,T,e^{n}).

Let us finally consider functoriality as in §8.1.3. Let f:Z→Z′f:Z\to Z^{\prime} be a morphism of curves and assume f∘ξ′f\circ\xi^{\prime} is initial for (Z′,f⁡(M))(Z^{\prime},f(M)).

The functor f:𝒮f,M∙​(Z)→𝒮f⁡(M)∙​(Z′)f:{\mathcal{S}}_{f,M}^{\bullet}(Z)\to{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}) induces a morphism of bimodule 22-representations Rf∘ξ′∙→Rξ′∙R_{f\circ\xi^{\prime}}^{\bullet}\to R_{\xi^{\prime}}^{\bullet}, when |f−1​(f​(z))|=1|f^{-1}(f(z))|=1 for all z∈Mz\in M.

If ff is strict, then the functor f#:add⁡(𝒮f⁡(M)​(Z′))→add⁡(𝒮M​(Z))f^{\#}:\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{f(M)}(Z^{\prime}))\to\operatorname{add}\nolimits({\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z)) induces a morphism of bimodule 22-representations Rξ′→Rf∘ξ′R_{\xi^{\prime}}\to R_{f\circ\xi^{\prime}}.

0PCH

Remark 8.1.12. As in Remark 8.1.4, we recover the construction of “top algebra module” of Douglas and Manolescu by taking the underlying lax 22-representation of Rξ′R_{\xi^{\prime}}.

0PCI

Example 8.1.13. As in Example 8.1.5, we use an alternative graphical description for Rξ′∙R_{\xi^{\prime}}^{\bullet}. This is illustrated in the example of Rξ′∙​(−,−,e2)R_{\xi^{\prime}}^{\bullet}(-,-,e^{2}) below.

[Uncaptioned image]

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2