ScalingStacks

8.2.3. Gluing map

We define a morphism of (𝒮M∙​(Z),𝒮M∙​(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodules q:G→Id𝒮M∙​(Zξ)q:G\to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}:

Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡(S⊔(−n,−1),T⊔(1,n))→Hom𝒮∙​(Zξ)⁡(S,T).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(S\sqcup(-n,-1),T\sqcup(1,n))\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})}(S,T).

Let α∈An\alpha\in A_{n}. We put T1=α⁡(S)∩TT_{1}=\alpha(S)\cap T and I1=α⁡(S)∩(1,n)I_{1}=\alpha(S)\cap(1,n). We define inductively Tm⊂TT_{m}\subset T and Im⊂(1,n−m+1)I_{m}\subset(1,n-m+1) for 1<m≤n+11<m\leq n+1 by Tm=Tm−1⊔(α⁡(−n+Im−1−1)∩T)T_{m}=T_{m-1}\sqcup(\alpha(-n+I_{m-1}-1)\cap T) and Im=α⁡(−n+Im−1−1)∩(1,n)I_{m}=\alpha(-n+I_{m-1}-1)\cap(1,n).

Note that −n+Im−1−1⊂(−n,−m+1)-n+I_{m-1}-1\subset(-n,-m+1), hence Im⊂(1,n−m+1)I_{m}\subset(1,n-m+1) since α∈An\alpha\in A_{n}.

Note that Tn+1=TT_{n+1}=T and In+1=∅I_{n+1}=\emptyset.

Define

βm=idTm⊠(⊠r∈Im(α−n+r−1⋅[r→−n+r−1])):Tm⊔Im→Tm+1⊔Im+1\beta^{m}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T_{m}}\boxtimes\bigl(\bigboxtimes_{r\in I_{m}}(\alpha_{-n+r-1}\cdot[r\to-n+r-1])\bigr):T_{m}\sqcup I_{m}\to T_{m+1}\sqcup I_{m+1}

for 1≤m≤n1\leq m\leq n. We define q(α)=βn⋅βn−1⋯β1⋅α|Sq(\alpha)=\beta^{n}\cdot\beta^{n-1}\cdots\beta^{1}\cdot\alpha_{|S}

q⁡(α):S→α|ST1⊔I1→β1T2⊔I2→⋯→Tn⊔In→βnT.q(\alpha):S\xrightarrow{\alpha_{|S}}T_{1}\sqcup I_{1}\xrightarrow{\beta^{1}}T_{2}\sqcup I_{2}\to\cdots\to T_{n}\sqcup I_{n}\xrightarrow{\beta^{n}}T.

We put q⁡(α)=0q(\alpha)=0 if α∈Bn\alpha\in B_{n}.

Assume now q⁡(α)≠0q(\alpha)\neq 0, hence α∈An\alpha\in A_{n}. Let S′=S∩α−1​(T)S^{\prime}=S\cap\alpha^{-1}(T) and T′=T∩α⁡(S)T^{\prime}=T\cap\alpha(S). Let S′′=S−S′S^{\prime\prime}=S-S^{\prime} and T′′=T−T′T^{\prime\prime}=T-T^{\prime}.

Given s∈S′s\in S^{\prime}, we have q​(α)s=αsq(\alpha)_{s}=\alpha_{s}.

Note in particular that S′={s∈S|μ⁡(q​(α)s)=0}S^{\prime}=\{s\in S\ |\ \mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=0\}.

Let s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=q​(α)​(s)t=q(\alpha)(s) and i=α−1​(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t). Put ds=μ⁡(q​(α)s)−1≥0d_{s}=\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})-1\geq 0. We have

q(α)s=αi⋅[1→i]⋅κds⋅[α(s)→1]⋅αs.q(\alpha)_{s}=\alpha_{i}\cdot[1\to i]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}}\cdot[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}.

Given a decomposition q(α)s=ξ⋅[1→−1]⋅κds⋅ξ′q(\alpha)_{s}=\xi\cdot[1\to-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}}\cdot\xi^{\prime} with ξ′∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡({s},{1})\xi^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(\{s\},\{1\}) and ξ∈Hom𝒮∙​(Z)⁡({−1},{t})\xi\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}(Z)}(\{-1\},\{t\}), we have αi=ξ⋅[i→−1]\alpha_{i}=\xi\cdot[i\to-1] and αs=[1→α(s)]⋅ξ′\alpha_{s}=[1\to\alpha(s)]\cdot\xi^{\prime}.

The next lemma is immediate.

0PD6

Lemma 8.2.8. The map qq defines a morphism of (𝒮M∙​(Z),𝒮M∙​(Z))({\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z),{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z))-bimodules G→Id𝒮M∙​(Zξ)G\to\operatorname{Id}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{M}^{\bullet}(Z_{\xi})} and q⁡(α∗α′)=q⁡(α)⋅q⁡(α′)q(\alpha\ast\alpha^{\prime})=q(\alpha)\cdot q(\alpha^{\prime}).

Given h∈Hn∙h\in H^{\bullet}_{n} and α∈Gn\alpha\in G_{n}, we have q⁡(h​α)=q⁡(α​h)q(h\alpha)=q(\alpha h).

0PD7

Lemma 8.2.9. The restrictions of qq to EE and to FF are injective.

0PD8

Proof. Let α:S⊔(−n,−1)→T⊔(1,n)\alpha:S\sqcup(-n,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,n) be a non-zero element of FnF_{n}. Let s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}. Given 1≤m≤n1\leq m\leq n, we put im(s)=βm−1∘⋯∘β1∘α(s)i_{m}(s)=\beta^{m-1}\circ\cdots\circ\beta^{1}\circ\alpha(s). We put ds=min⁡{m|im+1​(s)∈Tm+1}d_{s}=\min\{m|i_{m+1}(s)\in T_{m+1}\}.

Let s,s′s,s^{\prime} be two distinct elements of SS and let θ=βn|βn−1∘⋯∘β1∘α({s,s′})⋯β1|α({s,s′})⋅α|{s,s′}\theta=\beta^{n}_{|\beta^{n-1}\circ\cdots\circ\beta^{1}\circ\alpha(\{s,s^{\prime}\})}\cdots\beta^{1}_{|\alpha(\{s,s^{\prime}\})}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}.

∙\bullet\ If s,s′∈S′s,s^{\prime}\in S^{\prime}, then θ=α|{s,s′}≠0\theta=\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}\neq 0.

∙\bullet\ Assume s∈S′s\in S^{\prime} and s′∈S′′s^{\prime}\in S^{\prime\prime}. We have θ=θ1⋅α|{s,s′}\theta=\theta^{1}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}} where

θ1=(idα⁡(s)⊠(α−n+ids′​(s′)−1⋅[1→−n+ids′(s′)−1]⋅κds′−1⋅[i1(s′)→1])).\theta^{1}=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{\alpha(s)}\boxtimes(\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1}\cdot[1\to-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s^{\prime}}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])).

We have

i(θ1∘α|{s,s′})=i(αs,αs′)+i(αs,α−n+ids′​(s′)−1)+ds′−1=i(α|{s,s′})+i(θ1).i(\theta^{1}\circ\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})=i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{s^{\prime}})+i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1})+d_{s^{\prime}}-1=i(\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})+i(\theta^{1}).

Ir follows that θ≠0\theta\neq 0.

∙\bullet\ Assume finally s,s′∈S′′s,s^{\prime}\in S^{\prime\prime} and ds′≥dsd_{s^{\prime}}\geq d_{s}. We have θ=θ1⋅θ2⋅θ3⋅α|{s,s′}\theta=\theta^{1}\cdot\theta^{2}\cdot\theta^{3}\cdot\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}} where

θ1=(α−n+ids′​(s′)−1⋅[1→−n+ids′(s′)−1]⋅κds′−ds⋅[ids+1(s′)→1])⊠idin​(s)\theta^{1}=(\alpha_{-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1}\cdot[1\to-n+i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s^{\prime}}-d_{s}}\cdot[i_{d_{s}+1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{i_{n}(s)}
θ2=[−n+ids(s′)+1→ids+1(s′)]⊠(αn−ids​(s)+1⋅[−n→n−ids(s)+1])\theta^{2}=[-n+i_{d_{s}}(s^{\prime})+1\to i_{d_{s}+1}(s^{\prime})]\boxtimes(\alpha_{n-i_{d_{s}}(s)+1}\cdot[-n\to n-i_{d_{s}}(s)+1])
θ3=(([1→−n+ids(s′)+1]⋅κds−1⋅[i1(s′)→1])⊠([1→−n]⋅κds−1⋅[i1(s)→1])).\theta^{3}=(([1\to-n+i_{d_{s}}(s^{\prime})+1]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s^{\prime})\to 1])\boxtimes([1\to-n]\cdot\kappa^{d_{s}-1}\cdot[i_{1}(s)\to 1])).

We have

i(θ1∘θ2∘θ3∘α|{s,s′})=i(αids​(s),αids′​(s′))+ds′−ds+i(αs,αs′)=i(θ1)+i(θ2)+i(θ3)+i(α|{s,s′}).i(\theta^{1}\circ\theta^{2}\circ\theta^{3}\circ\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}})=i(\alpha_{i_{d_{s}}(s)},\alpha_{i_{d_{s^{\prime}}}(s^{\prime})})+d_{s^{\prime}}-d_{s}+i(\alpha_{s},\alpha_{s^{\prime}})=i(\theta^{1})+i(\theta^{2})+i(\theta^{3})+i(\alpha_{|\{s,s^{\prime}\}}).

It follows that θ≠0\theta\neq 0.

It follows from Remark 7.4.11 that q⁡(α)≠0q(\alpha)\neq 0.

Define S′S^{\prime} and S′′S^{\prime\prime} as above. Let r=|S′′|r=|S^{\prime\prime}|. We have α⁡(S′′)=(n−r+1,n)\alpha(S^{\prime\prime})=(n-r+1,n) and α−1​(i)<α−1​(i′)\alpha^{-1}(i)<\alpha^{-1}(i^{\prime}) for i<i′i<i^{\prime} in (n−r+1,n)(n-r+1,n).

Given i<i′i<i^{\prime} in (−n,−1)(-n,-1) with α⁡(i),α⁡(i′)∈(1,n)\alpha(i),\alpha(i^{\prime})\in(1,n), we have α⁡(i)<α⁡(i′)\alpha(i)<\alpha(i^{\prime}).

Consider now α~:S⊔(−n,−1)→T⊔(1,n)\tilde{\alpha}:S\sqcup(-n,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,n) another non-zero element of FnF_{n} and assume q⁡(α)=q⁡(α~)≠0q(\alpha)=q(\tilde{\alpha})\neq 0. We have S∩α~−1​(T)=S′S\cap\tilde{\alpha}^{-1}(T)=S^{\prime} and T∩α~​(S)=T′T\cap\tilde{\alpha}(S)=T^{\prime}. The discussion above shows that α​(s)=α~​(s)\alpha(s)=\tilde{\alpha}(s) for s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}. Note also that αs=α~s\alpha_{s}=\tilde{\alpha}_{s} for s∈S′s\in S^{\prime}. As a consequence, α=α~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha} if μ⁡(q⁡(α))=0\mu(q(\alpha))=0.

Let s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=q​(α)​(s)t=q(\alpha)(s), t~=q​(α~)​(s)\tilde{t}=q(\tilde{\alpha})(s), i=α−1​(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t) and i~=α~−1​(t)\tilde{i}=\tilde{\alpha}^{-1}(t). Since q​(α)s=q​(α~)sq(\alpha)_{s}=q(\tilde{\alpha})_{s}, it follows that t~=t\tilde{t}=t, μ⁡(q​(α)s)=μ⁡(q​(α~)s)\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=\mu(q(\tilde{\alpha})_{s}), [α(s)→1]⋅αs=[α~(s)→1]⋅α~s[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}=[\tilde{\alpha}(s)\to 1]\cdot\tilde{\alpha}_{s}, and αi⋅[−1→i]=α~i~⋅[−1→i~]\alpha_{i}\cdot[-1\to i]=\tilde{\alpha}_{\tilde{i}}\cdot[-1\to\tilde{i}]. We deduce that α~s=αs\tilde{\alpha}_{s}=\alpha_{s} for s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}.

We proceed now by induction on μ⁡(q⁡(α))\mu(q(\alpha)) to show that q⁡(α)q(\alpha) determines α\alpha, for α∈F\alpha\in F.

Assume there is s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime} such that μ⁡(q​(α)s)=1\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})=1. Let j=α⁡(s)∈(1,n)j=\alpha(s)\in(1,n) and i=−n+j−1i=-n+j-1. We have t=α⁡(i)=q⁡(α)​(s)∈Tt=\alpha(i)=q(\alpha)(s)\in T. Define α′:S∖{s}⊔(−n+1,−1)→T∖{t}⊔(1,n−1)\alpha^{\prime}:S\setminus\{s\}\sqcup(-n+1,-1)\to T\setminus\{t\}\sqcup(1,n-1) an element of Fn−1F_{n-1} as follows. Given s′∈S∖{s}s^{\prime}\in S\setminus\{s\}, we put αs′′=αs′\alpha^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}}=\alpha_{s^{\prime}} if α⁡(s′)<j\alpha(s^{\prime})<j, αs′′=[α(s′)→α(s′)−1]⋅αs′\alpha^{\prime}_{s^{\prime}}=[\alpha(s^{\prime})\to\alpha(s^{\prime})-1]\cdot\alpha_{s^{\prime}} if α⁡(s′)>j\alpha(s^{\prime})>j. Given i′∈(−i+1,−1)i^{\prime}\in(-i+1,-1), we put αi′′=αi′\alpha^{\prime}_{i^{\prime}}=\alpha_{i^{\prime}}. Given i′∈(−n+1,−i)i^{\prime}\in(-n+1,-i), we put αi′′=αi′−1\alpha^{\prime}_{i^{\prime}}=\alpha_{i^{\prime}-1}. This defines an element of Fn−1F_{n-1}. Furthermore, q(α′)=q(α)|S∖{s}q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\alpha)_{|S\setminus\{s\}}.

We define similarly i~\tilde{i}, j~\tilde{j}, t~\tilde{t} and α~′\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} starting with α~\tilde{\alpha} and ss. We have j~=j\tilde{j}=j and t~=t\tilde{t}=t, hence also i~=i\tilde{i}=i. We have q⁡(α′)=q⁡(α~′)q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}), hence α′=α~′\alpha^{\prime}=\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} by induction. Since αs=α~s\alpha_{s}=\tilde{\alpha}_{s} and αi=α~i\alpha_{i}=\tilde{\alpha}_{i}, it follows that α=α~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha}.

Assume μ⁡(q​(α)s)≥2\mu(q(\alpha)_{s})\geq 2 for all s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}. We have α−1((1,n−r))={i1<⋯<in−r}⊂(−n,−1)\alpha^{-1}((1,n-r))=\{i_{1}<\cdots<i_{n-r}\}\subset(-n,-1). Note that α−id=[−id→d]\alpha_{-i_{d}}=[-i_{d}\to d] for 1≤d≤n−r1\leq d\leq n-r. Let φ:(−r,−1)→(−n,−1)∖α−1​((,,,))\varphi:(-r,-1)\to(-n,-1)\setminus\alpha^{-1}((1,n-r)) be the unique increasing bijection. We define α′:S⊔(−r,−1)→T⊔(1,r)\alpha^{\prime}:S\sqcup(-r,-1)\to T\sqcup(1,r) and an element of FrF_{r} as follows. We put αs′=αs\alpha^{\prime}_{s}=\alpha_{s} for s∈S′s\in S^{\prime}, αs′=[α(s)→α(s)−n+r]⋅αs\alpha^{\prime}_{s}=[\alpha(s)\to\alpha(s)-n+r]\cdot\alpha_{s} for s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime} and αi=αφ⁡(i)⋅[i→φ(i)]\alpha_{i}=\alpha_{\varphi(i)}\cdot[i\to\varphi(i)] for i∈(−r,−1)i\in(-r,-1).

Let s∈S′′s\in S^{\prime\prime}, t=q​(α)​(s)t=q(\alpha)(s) and i=α−1​(t)i=\alpha^{-1}(t). We have

q(α′)s=αi⋅[1→i]⋅[α(s)→1]⋅αs.q(\alpha^{\prime})_{s}=\alpha_{i}\cdot[1\to i]\cdot[\alpha(s)\to 1]\cdot\alpha_{s}.

Define α~′\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime} similarly, starting with α~\tilde{\alpha} instead of α\alpha. We have q⁡(α′)=q⁡(α~′)q(\alpha^{\prime})=q(\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}). By induction, we deduce that α′=α~′\alpha^{\prime}=\tilde{\alpha}^{\prime}, hence α=α~\alpha=\tilde{\alpha}.

This completes the proof that the restriction of qq to FF is injective.

We deduce that the restriction of qq to EE is injective using Remark 8.2.6 ∎

0PD9

Lemma 8.2.10. The restrictions of qq to E∩CE\cap C and to F∩CF\cap C are surjective.

0PDA

Proof. Let θ∈Hom𝒮M∙​(Zξ)⁡(I,J)\theta\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z_{\xi})}(I,J). Let n=μ⁡(θ)n=\mu(\theta). We show by induction on nn that there exists α∈Fn∩Cn\alpha\in F_{n}\cap C_{n} such that q⁡(α)=θq(\alpha)=\theta.

Assume n=1n=1. Let s∈Is\in I such that μ⁡(θs)=1\mu(\theta_{s})=1. There is a decomposition θs=θsr−⋅θsr\theta_{s}=\theta_{s}^{r-}\cdot\theta_{s}^{r} as in §7.4.6. We define α∈Hom𝒮M∙​(Z)⁡(I⊔{−1},J⊔{1})\alpha\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}^{\bullet}_{M}(Z)}(I\sqcup\{-1\},J\sqcup\{1\}) by αs′=θs′\alpha_{s^{\prime}}=\theta_{s^{\prime}} for s′≠ss^{\prime}\neq s, αs=[0→1]⋅θsr\alpha_{s}=[0\to 1]\cdot\theta_{s}^{r} and α−1=θsr−⋅[−1→0]\alpha_{-1}=\theta_{s}^{r-}\cdot[-1\to 0]. We have α∈A1=F1∩C1\alpha\in A_{1}=F_{1}\cap C_{1} and q⁡(α)=θq(\alpha)=\theta.

Assume now n>1n>1. Consider a decomposition θ=r′​(θ)⋅r⁡(θ)\theta=r^{\prime}(\theta)\cdot r(\theta) as in Lemma 7.4.27. There exists α∈A1\alpha\in A_{1} and β∈Fn−1∩Cn−1\beta\in F_{n-1}\cap C_{n-1} such that q⁡(α)=r⁡(θ)q(\alpha)=r(\theta) and q​(β)=r′​(θ)q(\beta)=r^{\prime}(\theta). Let γ=β∗α∈Cn\gamma=\beta\ast\alpha\in C_{n}. We have q⁡(γ)=θq(\gamma)=\theta.

Let s=γ−1​(n)=α−1​(1)s=\gamma^{-1}(n)=\alpha^{-1}(1). We have μ⁡(r​(θ)s)=1\mu(r(\theta)_{s})=1. Let i∈(1,n−1)i\in(1,n-1) and s′=γ−1​(i)s^{\prime}=\gamma^{-1}(i). If s′∈(−n,−1)s^{\prime}\in(-n,-1), then I(γ|{s′,s})=∅I(\gamma_{|\{s^{\prime},s\}})=\emptyset. Assume s′∉(−n,−1)s^{\prime}{\not\in}(-n,-1). We have θs′r=[i→0]⋅γs′\theta_{s^{\prime}}^{r}=[i\to 0]\cdot\gamma_{s^{\prime}}. Since supp⁡(θsr)⊂supp⁡(θs′r)\mathrm{supp}(\theta_{s}^{r})\subset\mathrm{supp}(\theta_{s^{\prime}}^{r}), it follows that I(γ|{s′,s})=∅I(\gamma_{|\{s^{\prime},s\}})=\emptyset. Since β∈Fn−1\beta\in F_{n-1}, we deduce that γ∈Fn\gamma\in F_{n}.

The case of E∩CE\cap C follows from that of F∩CF\cap C applied to ZoppZ^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}, cf Remark 8.2.6. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2