ScalingStacks

0PD0

Proof. The equivalence between (1) and (2) follows from Lemma 7.4.20.

Assume (2). We deduce that [iβˆ’nβˆ’1β†’iβˆ’n]∈L(Ξ±)[i-n-1\to i-n]\in L(\alpha), hence [iβˆ’nβˆ’1β†’iβˆ’n]∈D(Ξ±)[i-n-1\to i-n]\in D(\alpha). So (3) holds.

Assume (3). Writing Ξ±=Ξ±β‹…1\alpha=\alpha\cdot 1, we deduce from Lemma 7.4.35 that (4) holds.

The implication (4)β‡’\Rightarrow(5) is immediate.

Asssume (5). We have Ξ±|{iβˆ’nβˆ’1,iβˆ’n}β‹…([iβˆ’nβˆ’1β†’iβˆ’n]⊠[iβˆ’nβ†’iβˆ’nβˆ’1])=0\alpha_{|\{i-n-1,i-n\}}\cdot([i-n-1\to i-n]\boxtimes[i-n\to i-n-1])=0 by Remark 7.4.11. Lemma 7.4.9 shows that i(Ξ±|{iβˆ’nβˆ’1,iβˆ’n})β‰ 0i(\alpha_{|\{i-n-1,i-n\}})\neq 0, hence (2) holds.

Assume now L(Ξ±|(βˆ’n,βˆ’1))β‰ βˆ…L(\alpha_{|(-n,-1)})\neq\emptyset. It follows from Lemma 7.4.20 that there is i∈(1,nβˆ’1)i\in(1,n-1) with α⁑(iβˆ’nβˆ’1)>α⁑(iβˆ’n)\alpha(i-n-1)>\alpha(i-n), hence α∈Gn​Ti\alpha\in G_{n}T_{i}. This shows the last statement of the lemma. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2