ScalingStacks

2.2.2. Categories

Let π’ž{\mathcal{C}} and π’žβ€²{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime} be differential categories. A (π’ž,π’žβ€²)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime})-bimodule is a differential functor π’žβŠ—π’žβ€²oppβ†’kβ€‹βˆ’diff{\mathcal{C}}\otimes{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}\to k\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits. There is a 22-category Bimod\mathrm{Bimod} of differential categories and bimodules. Its objects are differential categories and ℋ​o​mBimod​(π’ž,π’žβ€²){{\mathcal{H}}om}_{\mathrm{Bimod}}({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}) is the differential category of (π’žβ€²,π’ž)({\mathcal{C}}^{\prime},{\mathcal{C}})-bimodules. Composition is given by tensor product: given π’žβ€²β€²{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime\prime} a differential category, MM a (π’ž,π’žβ€²)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime})-bimodule and NN a (π’žβ€²,π’žβ€²β€²)({\mathcal{C}}^{\prime},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime\prime})-bimodule, we put

(MβŠ—π’žβ€²N)​(c,cβ€²β€²)=M⁑(c,βˆ’)βŠ—π’žβ€²N⁑(βˆ’,cβ€²β€²).\bigl(M\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}N\bigr)(c,c^{\prime\prime})=M(c,-)\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}N(-,c^{\prime\prime}).

There is an equivalence of 22-categories Bimodβ†’βˆΌBimodrev\mathrm{Bimod}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{Bimod}^{\mathrm{rev}} sending a differential category π’ž{\mathcal{C}} to π’žopp{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits} and a (π’ž,π’žβ€²)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime})-bimodule to the same functor, viewed as a (π’žβ€²opp,π’žopp)({\mathcal{C}}^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})-bimodule.

The bimodule Hom:π’žβŠ—π’žoppβ†’kβ€‹βˆ’diff,(c1,c2)↦Homπ’žβ‘(c2,c1)\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits:{\mathcal{C}}\otimes{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}\to k\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits,\ (c_{1},c_{2})\mapsto\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\mathcal{C}}(c_{2},c_{1}) is an identity for the tensor product. The canonical isomorphism of (π’ž,π’ž)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}})-bimodules HomβŠ—π’žHomβ†’βˆΌHom\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits is given by

Homπ’ž(βˆ’,c1)βŠ—π’žHomπ’ž(c2,βˆ’)β†’Hom(c2,c1),((f:dβ†’c1)βŠ—(g:c2β†’d)↦f∘g.\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\mathcal{C}}(-,c_{1})\otimes_{\mathcal{C}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{\mathcal{C}}(c_{2},-)\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(c_{2},c_{1}),\ ((f:d\to c_{1})\otimes(g:c_{2}\to d)\mapsto f\circ g.

Let MM be a (π’žβ€²,π’ž)({\mathcal{C}}^{\prime},{\mathcal{C}})-bimodule. We define the (π’ž,π’žβ€²)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime})-bimodule M∨M^{\vee} by

Mβˆ¨β€‹(c,cβ€²)=Homπ’žoppβ€‹βˆ’diff⁑(M⁑(cβ€²,βˆ’),Homπ’žβ‘(βˆ’,c)).M^{\vee}(c,c^{\prime})=\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{C}}^{{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}}\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits}(M(c^{\prime},-),\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{C}}}(-,c)).

There is a morphism of (π’ž,π’ž)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}})-bimodules Ξ΅M:Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²Mβ†’Hom\varepsilon_{M}:M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}M\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits given by

Ξ΅M​(c1,c2):Mβˆ¨β€‹(c1,βˆ’)βŠ—π’žβ€²M⁑(βˆ’,c2)\displaystyle\varepsilon_{M}(c_{1},c_{2}):M^{\vee}(c_{1},-)\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}M(-,c_{2}) β†’Hom⁑(c2,c1)\displaystyle\to\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(c_{2},c_{1})
(M⁑(cβ€²,βˆ’)→𝑓Hom⁑(βˆ’,c1))βŠ—m\displaystyle(M(c^{\prime},-)\xrightarrow{f}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(-,c_{1}))\otimes m ↦f⁑(c2)​(m)​ for ​m∈M⁑(cβ€²,c2).\displaystyle\mapsto f(c_{2})(m)\text{ for }m\in M(c^{\prime},c_{2}).

Given Lβˆˆπ’žβ€‹βˆ’diffL\in{\mathcal{C}}\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits and Lβ€²βˆˆπ’žβ€²β€‹βˆ’diffL^{\prime}\in{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits, we have a morphism functorial in LL and Lβ€²L^{\prime}

Hom(Lβ€²,MβŠ—π’žL)β†’Mβˆ¨βŠ—βˆ’Hom(Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²Lβ€²,Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²MβŠ—π’žL)β†’Hom⁑(Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²Lβ€²,Ξ΅M)Hom(Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²Lβ€²,L).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(L^{\prime},M\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}}L)\xrightarrow{M^{\vee}\otimes-}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}L^{\prime},M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}M\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}}L)\xrightarrow{\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}L^{\prime},\varepsilon_{M})}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits(M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}L^{\prime},L).

We say that MM is right finite if the morphism above is an isomorphism for all LL and Lβ€²L^{\prime}. When this holds, the functor Mβˆ¨βŠ—π’žβ€²βˆ’M^{\vee}\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}^{\prime}}- is left adjoint to MβŠ—π’žβˆ’M\otimes_{{\mathcal{C}}}- and M∨M^{\vee} is left dual to MM . We also write ∨N=M{{}^{\vee}N}=M where N=M∨N=M^{\vee}. We say that MM is left finite if it is a right finite (π’žβ€²opp,π’žopp)({\mathcal{C}}^{\prime{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits}},{\mathcal{C}}^{\operatorname{opp}\nolimits})-bimodule.

Let MM be a (π’ž,π’ž)({\mathcal{C}},{\mathcal{C}})-bimodule. We define the differential category Tπ’žβ€‹(M)T_{{\mathcal{C}}}(M). Its objects are those of π’ž{\mathcal{C}} and

HomTπ’žβ€‹(M)⁑(c1,c2)=⨁iβ‰₯0Mi​(c1,c2).\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{T_{{\mathcal{C}}}(M)}(c_{1},c_{2})=\bigoplus_{i\geq 0}M^{i}(c_{1},c_{2}).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2