ScalingStacks

6.2.4. Non-commutative degree

Let us consider the free abelian groups Rn=⨁a∈𝐙/n𝐙​αaR_{n}=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}{\mathbf{Z}}\alpha_{a} and Ln=⨁a∈𝐙/n𝐙​εaL_{n}=\bigoplus_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}{\mathbf{Z}}\varepsilon_{a}. We define a linear map ρ:Rn→Ln\rho:R_{n}\to L_{n} by ρ⁡(αa)=εa+1−εa\rho(\alpha_{a})=\varepsilon_{a+1}-\varepsilon_{a} and a representation of the group RnR_{n} on LnL_{n} given by

αa⋅εb=(δa,b+δa+1,b)​εb.\alpha_{a}\cdot\varepsilon_{b}=(\delta_{a,b}+\delta_{a+1,b})\varepsilon_{b}.

Note that δ=∑a∈𝐙/nαa∈ker⁡ρ\delta=\sum_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}\alpha_{a}\in\ker\rho and δ⋅εb=2​εb\delta\cdot\varepsilon_{b}=2\varepsilon_{b} for all bb.

We define a bilinear map

⟨−,−⟩:Rn×Rn→Ln,⟨α,α′⟩=α⋅ρ⁡(α′).\langle-,-\rangle:R_{n}\times R_{n}\to L_{n},\ \langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle=\alpha\cdot\rho(\alpha^{\prime}).

Let Γn′=Ln×Rn\Gamma_{n}^{\prime}=L_{n}\times R_{n}. We define a group structure on Γn′\Gamma_{n}^{\prime} by

(l,α)⋅(l′,α′)=(l+l′+⟨α,α′⟩,α+α′).(l,\alpha)\cdot(l^{\prime},\alpha^{\prime})=(l+l^{\prime}+\langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle,\alpha+\alpha^{\prime}).

Given I⊂𝐙/nI\subset{\mathbf{Z}}/n, we put εI=∑a∈Iεa∈Ln\varepsilon_{I}=\sum_{a\in I}\varepsilon_{a}\in L_{n}. Given i,j∈𝐙i,j\in{\mathbf{Z}}, we put

αi,j=∑i≤r<jαr+n​𝐙−∑j≤r<iαr+n​𝐙.\alpha_{i,j}=\sum_{i\leq r<j}\alpha_{r+n{\mathbf{Z}}}-\sum_{j\leq r<i}\alpha_{r+n{\mathbf{Z}}}.

Note that αi,i+1=αi+n​𝐙\alpha_{i,i+1}=\alpha_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}}, αi+n,j+n=αi,j\alpha_{i+n,j+n}=\alpha_{i,j} and αi,j+αj,k=αi,k\alpha_{i,j}+\alpha_{j,k}=\alpha_{i,k} for all i,j,k∈𝐙i,j,k\in{\mathbf{Z}}. Note also that δ=αi,i+n\delta=\alpha_{i,i+n} for all i∈𝐙i\in{\mathbf{Z}}. Note finally that ρ⁡(αi,j)=εj+n​𝐙−εi+n​𝐙\rho(\alpha_{i,j})=\varepsilon_{j+n{\mathbf{Z}}}-\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}}.

Consider σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J). We put

⟦σ⟧=∑i∈I~∩[1,n]αi,σ⁡(i)∈Rn.\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=\sum_{i\in\tilde{I}\cap[1,n]}\alpha_{i,\sigma(i)}\in R_{n}.

Note that ρ⁡(⟦σ⟧)=εJ−εI\rho(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\varepsilon_{J}-\varepsilon_{I} and ⟦σ′∘σ⟧=⟦σ′⟧+⟦σ⟧\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\rrbracket=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket+\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket for any σ′∈Hom𝒮n⁡(J,K)\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K).

We define

m⁡(σ)=⟦σ⟧⋅εI∈Ln​ and ​dm⁡(σ)=(−m⁡(σ),−⟦σ⟧)∈Γn′.m(\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket\cdot\varepsilon_{I}\in L_{n}\text{ and }\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma)=(-m(\sigma),-\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)\in\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}.
0P7K

Lemma 6.2.4. Let w∈W|I|w\in W_{|I|}, m∈𝐙m\in{\mathbf{Z}} and let σ=FI​(w​cm)\sigma=F_{I}(wc^{m}) be the element of End𝒮n⁡(I)\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I) corresponding to w​cmwc^{m}. We have ℓ⁡(σ)=ℓ⁡(w)\ell(\sigma)=\ell(w), ⟦σ⟧=m⋅δ\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=m\cdot\delta and m⁡(σ)=2​m​εIm(\sigma)=2m\varepsilon_{I}.

0P7L

Proof. The first statement follows from the fact that FIF_{I} preserves lengths (cf the discussion before Lemma 6.2.2).

Note that ⟦si,j⟧=0\llbracket s_{i,j}\rrbracket=0 for i,j∈I~i,j\in\tilde{I} with i−j∉n​𝐙i-j{\not\in}n{\mathbf{Z}}, while ⟦FI​(c)⟧=δ\llbracket F_{I}(c)\rrbracket=\delta. We deduce that ⟦σ⟧=m⋅δ\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=m\cdot\delta.

The last statement of the lemma is immediate. ∎

0P7M

Lemma 6.2.5. Consider σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) and σ′∈Hom𝒮n⁡(J,K)\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K). We have dm⁡(σ′∘σ)=dm⁡(σ′)⋅dm⁡(σ)\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma^{\prime})\cdot\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma).

0P7N

Proof. We have

m⁡(σ′∘σ)=⟦σ′⟧⋅εI+⟦σ⟧​εI=m⁡(σ′)+m⁡(σ)+⟦σ′⟧⋅(εI−εJ),m(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot\varepsilon_{I}+\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket\varepsilon_{I}=m(\sigma^{\prime})+m(\sigma)+\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot(\varepsilon_{I}-\varepsilon_{J}),

hence

m⁡(σ′)+m⁡(σ)−m⁡(σ′∘σ)=⟦σ′⟧⋅ρ⁡(⟦σ⟧).m(\sigma^{\prime})+m(\sigma)-m(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)=\llbracket\sigma^{\prime}\rrbracket\cdot\rho(\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket).

The lemma follows. ∎

We put Γn=12​𝐙×Γn′\Gamma_{n}=\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}. We endow Γn\Gamma_{n} with a structure of 𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}-monoid by using the canonical embedding 𝐙↪12​𝐙↪Γn{\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\Gamma_{n}.

Given σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J), we put deg⁡(σ)=(−ℓ⁡(σ),dm⁡(σ))∈Γn\deg(\sigma)=(-\ell(\sigma),\operatorname{dm}\nolimits(\sigma))\in\Gamma_{n}.

Let DD be a subset of {1,…,n}×{±1}\{1,\ldots,n\}\times\{\pm 1\} that embeds in its projection on {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}. We denote by ΓD\Gamma_{D} the quotient of Γn\Gamma_{n} by the subgroup generated by (0,εi+n​𝐙)+(12​νi,0)(0,\varepsilon_{i+n{\mathbf{Z}}})+(\frac{1}{2}\nu_{i},0), where (i,νi)∈D(i,\nu_{i})\in D. We identify 12​𝐙\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} with the image of 12​𝐙×0\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times 0 in ΓD\Gamma_{D}. We define a partial order on ΓD\Gamma_{D} by h≥gh\geq g if h​g−1hg^{-1} is in 12​𝐙≥0\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}_{\geq 0}. We denote by degD⁡(σ)\deg_{D}(\sigma) the image of deg⁡(σ)\deg(\sigma) in ΓD\Gamma_{D}.

Given EE a subset of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}, we put E+={(i,1)|i∈E}E^{+}=\{(i,1)\ |\ i\in E\}.

By Lemmas 6.2.1 and 6.2.5, we obtain a ΓD\Gamma_{D}-filtration on 𝒮n{\mathcal{S}}_{n} by defining

Hom𝒮n≥g⁡(I,J)={σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)|degD⁡(σ)≥g}.\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}^{\geq g}}(I,J)=\{\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J)\ |\ \deg_{D}(\sigma)\geq g\}.

It follows from Lemma 6.2.5 that the pointed category ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n} is isomorphic to the graded pointed category associated to the ΓD\Gamma_{D}-filtration of 𝒮n{\mathcal{S}}_{n} (after forgetting the ΓD\Gamma_{D}-grading to 𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}).

Note that if D=∅D=\emptyset, then ΓD=Γn\Gamma_{D}=\Gamma_{n}, degD=deg\deg_{D}=\deg and the 𝐙≤0{\mathbf{Z}}_{\leq 0} grading on ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n} given by the length can be recovered from the Γn\Gamma_{n}-grading by using the quotient map Γn→Γn/Γn′=12​𝐙\Gamma_{n}\to\Gamma_{n}/\Gamma^{\prime}_{n}=\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}.

This quotient map provides a 𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}-grading on the Γn\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed category associated to the Γn\Gamma_{n}-filtration of 𝒮n{\mathcal{S}}_{n}. This 𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}-graded pointed category is isomorphic to ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n}.

0P7P

Remark 6.2.6. The bilinear form ⟨⟨−,−⟩⟩:Rn×Rn→12​𝐙\langle\langle-,-\rangle\rangle:R_{n}\times R_{n}\to\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} obtained from ⟨−,−⟩\langle-,-\rangle by composing with the morphism Ln→12​𝐙,εi↦−12L_{n}\to\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}},\ \varepsilon_{i}\mapsto-\frac{1}{2} is given by ⟨⟨αa,αb⟩⟩=12​(δb,a+1−δb+1,a)\langle\langle\alpha_{a},\alpha_{b}\rangle\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\delta_{b,a+1}-\delta_{b+1,a}). It is antisymmetric.

Assume D=[1,n]+D=[1,n]^{+}. Composing with the quotient map Γn↠ΓD\Gamma_{n}\twoheadrightarrow\Gamma_{D}, the embedding 12​𝐙↪Γn,r↦(r,0)\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\hookrightarrow\Gamma_{n},\ r\mapsto(r,0) and the quotient map Γn↠Rn,(r,(l,α))↦α\Gamma_{n}\twoheadrightarrow R_{n},\ (r,(l,\alpha))\mapsto\alpha induce an embedding of 12​𝐙\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}} as a central subgroup of ΓD\Gamma_{D} with quotient map ΓD↠Rn\Gamma_{D}\twoheadrightarrow R_{n}. So, Γ[1,n]+\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} identifies with the set 12​𝐙×Rn\frac{1}{2}{\mathbf{Z}}\times R_{n}, with multiplication given by (r,α)⋅(r′,α′)=(r+r′+⟨⟨α,α′⟩⟩,α+α′)(r,\alpha)\cdot(r^{\prime},\alpha^{\prime})=(r+r^{\prime}+\langle\langle\alpha,\alpha^{\prime}\rangle\rangle,\alpha+\alpha^{\prime}). When n≥3n\geq 3, the group Γ[1,n]+\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}} has a presentation with generators z=(12,0)z=(\frac{1}{2},0), ga=(0,αa)g_{a}=(0,\alpha_{a}), a∈𝐙/na\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n and relations

z​ga=ga​z,ga​gb​ga−1​gb−1={z if ​b=a+1z−1 if ​b=a−11 otherwise.zg_{a}=g_{a}z,\ g_{a}g_{b}g_{a}^{-1}g_{b}^{-1}=\begin{cases}z&\text{ if }b=a+1\\ z^{-1}&\text{ if }b=a-1\\ 1&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

We define a morphism of groups

ϵ:Γ[1,n]+→𝐙/2,z↦1,ga↦1.\epsilon:\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}\to{\mathbf{Z}}/2,\ z\mapsto 1,\ g_{a}\mapsto 1.
0P7Q

Lemma 6.2.7. Given (r,∑ava​αa)∈Γ[1,n]+(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})\in\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}, we have ϵ⁡(r,∑ava​αa)=2​r+12​|{a∈𝐙/n|va+va+1​ odd}|\epsilon(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})=2r+\frac{1}{2}\bigl|\{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n\ |\ v_{a}+v_{a+1}\text{ odd}\}\bigr|.

Given σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J), we have ϵ⁡(deg[1,n]+⁡(σ))=0\epsilon(\deg_{[1,n]^{+}}(\sigma))=0.

0P7R

Proof. Denote by ϵ~\tilde{\epsilon} the map defined by the right hand side of the equality of the lemma.

Let NN (resp. N′N^{\prime}) be the cardinality of the set of a∈𝐙/na\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n such that va+va+1v_{a}+v_{a+1} (resp. va′+va+1′v^{\prime}_{a}+v^{\prime}_{a+1}) is odd, where va′=va+δa​bv^{\prime}_{a}=v_{a}+\delta_{ab}. The integers NN and N′N^{\prime} are even. We have

ϵ~​(r,∑ava​αa)+ϵ~​((r,∑ava​αa)​(s,αb))\displaystyle\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}((r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})(s,\alpha_{b})) =ϵ~​(r,∑ava​αa)+ϵ~​(r+s+12​(vb−1−vb+1),αb+∑ava​αa)\displaystyle=\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}(r+s+\frac{1}{2}(v_{b-1}-v_{b+1}),\alpha_{b}+\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})
=2​s+vb+1+vb−1+12​(N+N′).\displaystyle=2s+v_{b+1}+v_{b-1}+\frac{1}{2}(N+N^{\prime}).

We have

N′={N+2 if ​vb−1,vb​ and ​vb+1​ have the same parityN−2 if ​vb−1,vb+1​ and ​vb+1​ have the same parityNotherwise.N^{\prime}=\begin{cases}N+2&\text{ if }v_{b-1},\ v_{b}\text{ and }v_{b+1}\text{ have the same parity}\\ N-2&\text{ if }v_{b-1},\ v_{b}+1\text{ and }v_{b+1}\text{ have the same parity}\\ N&\text{otherwise}.\end{cases}

It follows that

ϵ~​(r,∑ava​αa)+ϵ~​((r,∑ava​αa)​(s,αb))=2​s+1.\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})+\tilde{\epsilon}((r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})(s,\alpha_{b}))=2s+1.

We deduce by induction on ∑a∈𝐙/n|va|\sum_{a\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n}|v_{a}| that ϵ~​(r,∑ava​αa)=ϵ⁡(r,∑ava​αa)\tilde{\epsilon}(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a})=\epsilon(r,\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a}).

Given a,b∈𝐙/na,b\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n and i∈Ii\in I, we have

αa,b⋅εi=δi∈{a,b}a≠b​εimod2​Ln.\alpha_{a,b}\cdot\varepsilon_{i}=\delta_{\begin{subarray}{c}i\in\{a,b\}\\ a\neq b\end{subarray}}\ \varepsilon_{i}\mod 2L_{n}.

It follows that m⁡(σ)≡∑i∈I∖(I∩J)εimod2​Lnm(\sigma)\equiv\sum_{i\in I\setminus(I\cap J)}\varepsilon_{i}\mod{2L_{n}}. Write ⟦σ⟧=∑ava​αa\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket=\sum_{a}v_{a}\alpha_{a}. Given a∈𝐙/na\in{\mathbf{Z}}/n, the integer va+va+1v_{a}+v_{a+1} is odd if and only if a∈I​Δ​Ja\in I\Delta J, hence ϵ⁡(0,⟦σ⟧)=12​|I​Δ​J|=|I∖(I∩J)|\epsilon(0,\llbracket\sigma\rrbracket)=\frac{1}{2}|I\Delta J|=|I\setminus(I\cap J)|. It follows that ϵ⁡(deg[1,n]+⁡(σ))=0\epsilon(\deg_{[1,n]^{+}}(\sigma))=0. ∎

It follows from Lemma 6.2.7 that the Γn\Gamma_{n}-grading on ℋn{\mathcal{H}}_{n} comes from a grading by the kernel of the composition Γn→canΓ[1,n]+→ϵ𝐙/2\Gamma_{n}\xrightarrow{{\mathrm{can}}}\Gamma_{[1,n]^{+}}\xrightarrow{\epsilon}{\mathbf{Z}}/2.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2