ScalingStacks

0P8P

Lemma 7.1.16. Let EE be a finite subset of XX and γ\gamma a path in XX. Let BB be the set of connected components II of [0,1]∖γ−1​(E)[0,1]\setminus\gamma^{-1}(E) such that γ|I¯\gamma_{|\bar{I}} is not nullhomotopic. Then BB is finite and there are paths γ′\gamma^{\prime} and γ′′\gamma^{\prime\prime} homotopic to γ\gamma such that

  • •

    γ\gamma and γ′\gamma^{\prime} coincide on ⋃I∈BI¯\bigcup_{I\in B}\bar{I} and γ′​([0,1]∖⋃I∈BI¯)⊂E\gamma^{\prime}([0,1]\setminus\bigcup_{I\in B}\bar{I})\subset E

  • •

    γ′′−1(E)\gamma^{\prime\prime-1}(E) is finite.

0P8Q

Proof. Let 𝒰{\mathcal{U}} be an open covering of XX by connected and simply connected subsets, each of which contain at most one element of EE. By Lebesgue’s number Lemma, there are only finitely many I∈π0​([0,1]∖γ−1​(E))I\in\pi_{0}([0,1]\setminus\gamma^{-1}(E)) such that I¯\bar{I} is not contained in an element of γ−1​(𝒰)\gamma^{-1}({\mathcal{U}}). So, BB is finite.

We can write γ\gamma as a finite composition of its restrictions to I¯\bar{I} for I∈BI\in B interlaced with finitely many paths that satisfy the assumptions of Lemma 7.1.15. Thanks to that lemma, we obtain a path γ′\gamma^{\prime} satisfying the requirements of the lemma. By shrinking the intervals on which γ′\gamma^{\prime} is constant to points, we obtain a path γ′′\gamma^{\prime\prime} as desired. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2