ScalingStacks

0P72

Remark 5.3.7. Consider three 22-representations (Ei,τi)1≤i≤3(E_{i},\tau_{i})_{1\leq i\leq 3} on a differential algebra BB together with closed morphisms σi​j:Ei​Ej→∼Ej​Ei\sigma_{ij}:E_{i}E_{j}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}E_{j}E_{i} for i≠ji\neq j satisfying (4.3.5). Assume E1E_{1} and E2E_{2} are right finite. We will construct a triple tensor product 22-representation.

Define

λi​j:Ei∨​Ej→Ei∨​Ej​ηiEi∨​Ej​Ei​Ei∨→Ei∨​σj​i​Ei∨Ei∨​Ei​Ej​Ei∨→εi​Ej​Ei∨Ej​Ei∨\lambda_{ij}:E_{i}^{\vee}E_{j}\xrightarrow{E_{i}^{\vee}E_{j}\eta_{i}}E_{i}^{\vee}E_{j}E_{i}E_{i}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{E_{i}^{\vee}\sigma_{ji}E_{i}^{\vee}}E_{i}^{\vee}E_{i}E_{j}E_{i}^{\vee}\xrightarrow{\varepsilon_{i}E_{j}E_{i}^{\vee}}E_{j}E_{i}^{\vee}

and denote by σi​j∨:Ei∨​Ej∨→Ej∨​Ei∨\sigma_{ij}^{\vee}:E_{i}^{\vee}E_{j}^{\vee}\to E_{j}^{\vee}E_{i}^{\vee} the map adjoint to σi​j\sigma_{ij}.

Let A′=TB​(E1∨​E2⊕E2∨​E3⊕E1∨​E3)A^{\prime}=T_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\oplus E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}). There is a derivation ∂\partial of A′A^{\prime} whose restriction to B⊕E1∨​E2⊕E2∨​E3B\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}\oplus E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3} is 00 and whose restriction to E1∨​E3E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3} is

∂:E1∨​E3→E1∨​η2​E3(E1∨​E2)​(E2∨​E3).\partial:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\eta_{2}E_{3}}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2})(E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}).

Define A′′A^{\prime\prime} to be the differential algebra with underlying algebra A′A^{\prime} and with differential ∂+dA′\partial+d_{A^{\prime}}.

Let EE be the set of quadruples (i,j,k,l)(i,j,k,l) with i,j,k,l∈{1,2,3}i,j,k,l\in\{1,2,3\}, j−l≥i−k>0j-l\geq i-k>0 and (i,j,k,l)≠(2,3,1,2)(i,j,k,l)\neq(2,3,1,2). Given such a quadruple, we define

fi​j​k​l:El∨​Ek∨​Ei​Ej→σl​k∨​Ei​EjEk∨​El∨​Ei​Ej→Ek​λl​i​Ej(Ek∨​Ei)​(El∨​Ej)f_{ijkl}:E_{l}^{\vee}E_{k}^{\vee}E_{i}E_{j}\xrightarrow{\sigma_{lk}^{\vee}E_{i}E_{j}}E_{k}^{\vee}E_{l}^{\vee}E_{i}E_{j}\xrightarrow{E_{k}\lambda_{li}E_{j}}(E_{k}^{\vee}E_{i})(E_{l}^{\vee}E_{j})
gi​j​k​l:El∨​Ek∨​Ei​Ej→El∨​Ek∨​σi​jEl∨​Ek∨​Ej​Ei→El​λk​j​Ei(El∨​Ej)​(Ek∨​Ei)g_{ijkl}:E_{l}^{\vee}E_{k}^{\vee}E_{i}E_{j}\xrightarrow{E_{l}^{\vee}E_{k}^{\vee}\sigma_{ij}}E_{l}^{\vee}E_{k}^{\vee}E_{j}E_{i}\xrightarrow{E_{l}\lambda_{kj}E_{i}}(E_{l}^{\vee}E_{j})(E_{k}^{\vee}E_{i})
h3221:E1∨​E2∨​E3​E2→E1∨​λ23​E2E1∨​E3​E2∨​E2→E1∨​E3​ε2E1∨​E3h_{3221}:E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{2}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}\lambda_{23}E_{2}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{2}^{\vee}E_{2}\xrightarrow{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}\varepsilon_{2}}E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}

where we put σr​r=τr\sigma_{rr}=\tau_{r} and σr​r∨=τr\sigma_{rr}^{\vee}=\tau_{r}. We define I′′I^{\prime\prime} to be the two-sided ideal generated by the images of fi​j​k​l+gi​j​k​l+δj​k​h3221f_{ijkl}+g_{ijkl}+\delta_{jk}h_{3221} for (i,j,k,l)∈E(i,j,k,l)\in E. We put A=A′′/I′′A=A^{\prime\prime}/I^{\prime\prime}.

As in §5.3.2, we have an isomorphism of differential categories Δ123​(B​−diff)→∼A​−diff\Delta_{123}(B\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}A\operatorname{\!-diff}\nolimits (cf §4.3.5).

We obtain a bimodule 22-representation on AA as in §4.3.5. We define the differential (B,A)(B,A)-bimodule

E=    E3⊗BA⊕E2⊗BA⊕E1⊗BA   π31        π32        π21         E={\lx@xy@svg{\hbox{\raise 2.5pt\hbox{\kern 71.13152pt\hbox{{\hbox{\kern-64.13002pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-2.66666pt\hbox{$\textstyle{E_{3}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}$}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-8.99098pt\raise 37.54272pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.00694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\pi_{31}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 71.13152pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern-42.33748pt\raise 19.54272pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.00694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\ \pi_{32}}$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 5.69052pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}{}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces{\hbox{\kern 25.32281pt\raise 19.54272pt\hbox{{}\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 3.0pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise-1.00694pt\hbox{$\scriptstyle{\pi_{21}\ \ }$}}}\kern 3.0pt}}}}}}\ignorespaces{}{}{}{{}}{\hbox{\kern 68.28625pt\raise 8.53578pt\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{\lx@xy@tip{1}\lx@xy@tip{-1}}}}}}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{}{{}{}{}\lx@xy@spline@}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces\hbox{\hbox{\kern 0.0pt\raise 0.0pt\hbox{{}{}{}{{}{}{}}{}}}}\ignorespaces{}\ignorespaces}}}}}

where

πi​j:Ei⊗BA→ηj​idEj​Ej∨​Ei⊗BA→Ej​multEj⊗BA.\pi_{ij}:E_{i}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{\eta_{j}\operatorname{id}\nolimits}E_{j}E_{j}^{\vee}E_{i}\otimes_{B}A\xrightarrow{E_{j}\mathrm{mult}}E_{j}\otimes_{B}A.

We extend the left action of BB to an action of AA by letting the action maps

Ei∨​Ej⊗BE→EE_{i}^{\vee}E_{j}\otimes_{B}E\to E

for i<ji<j be given by

E1∨​E32⊗BA⊕E1∨​E3​E2⊗BA⊕E1∨​E3​E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3⊗BA⊕E2⊗BA⊕E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{3}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3​ mult∘λ13​E3∘E1∨​τ3\scriptstyle{E_{3}\text{ mult}\circ\lambda_{13}E_{3}\circ E_{1}^{\vee}\tau_{3}}E1​mult∘ρ1​E3∘E1∨​σ31\scriptstyle{E_{1}\mathrm{mult}\circ\rho_{1}E_{3}\circ E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma_{31}}E3​ε1∘λ13​E1\scriptstyle{E_{3}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{13}E_{1}\ \ }
E2∨​E32⊗BA⊕E2∨​E3​E2⊗BA⊕E2∨​E3​E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}^{\vee}E_{3}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3⊗BA⊕E2⊗BA⊕E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{3}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3​ mult∘λ23​E3∘E2∨​τ3\scriptstyle{E_{3}\text{ mult}\circ\lambda_{23}E_{3}\circ E_{2}^{\vee}\tau_{3}}E2​mult∘ρ2​E3∘E2∨​σ32\scriptstyle{\!\!E_{2}\mathrm{mult}\circ\rho_{2}E_{3}\circ E_{2}^{\vee}\sigma_{32}}E3​ε2∘λ23​E2\scriptstyle{E_{3}\varepsilon_{2}\circ\lambda_{23}E_{2}\!}E1​mult∘λ21​E3∘E2∨​σ31\scriptstyle{E_{1}\mathrm{mult}\circ\lambda_{21}E_{3}\circ E_{2}^{\vee}\sigma_{31}}
E1∨​E2​E3⊗BA⊕E1∨​E22⊗BA⊕E1∨​E2​E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{3}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}^{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3⊗BA⊕E2⊗BA⊕E1⊗BA\textstyle{E_{3}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{2}\otimes_{B}A\oplus E_{1}\otimes_{B}A}E3​mult∘λ13​E2∘E1∨​σ23\scriptstyle{E_{3}\mathrm{mult}\circ\lambda_{13}E_{2}\circ E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma_{23}}E2​ mult∘λ12​E2∘E1∨​τ2\scriptstyle{E_{2}\text{ mult}\circ\lambda_{12}E_{2}\circ E_{1}^{\vee}\tau_{2}\!\!}E2​ε1∘λ12​E1\scriptstyle{E_{2}\varepsilon_{1}\circ\lambda_{12}E_{1}\!}E1​mult∘ρ1​E2∘E1∨​σ21\scriptstyle{E_{1}\mathrm{mult}\circ\rho_{1}E_{2}\circ E_{1}^{\vee}\sigma_{21}}

Finally, we define the endomorphism τ\tau of E2E^{2} as in (4.3.6).

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2