ScalingStacks

Consider the adjunction isomorphism

ϕ:HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)→∼HomB⁡(E1∨​E2​L,L)\phi:\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L)\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L)

Let π∈Z​HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)\pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L) and let ς=ϕ⁡(π)∈Z​HomB⁡(E1∨​E2​L,L)\varsigma=\phi(\pi)\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{1}^{\vee}E_{2}L,L). The commutativity of the diagram (5.3.2) is equivalent to the commutativity of the diagram

(5.3.3) E22​L\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​π\scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi}τ2\scriptstyle{\tau_{2}}E2​E1​L\textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}E1​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1​π\scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi}E12​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}τ1\scriptstyle{\tau_{1}}E22​L\textstyle{E_{2}^{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E2​π\scriptstyle{E_{2}\pi}E2​E1​L\textstyle{E_{2}E_{1}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}σ\scriptstyle{\sigma}E1​E2​L\textstyle{E_{1}E_{2}L\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}E1​π\scriptstyle{E_{1}\pi}E12​L\textstyle{E_{1}^{2}L}

This gives us an identification (isomorphism of categories) between differential AA-modules and pairs [L,π][L,\pi] where LL is a differential BB-module, π∈Z​HomB⁡(E2​L,E1​L)\pi\in Z\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{B}(E_{2}L,E_{1}L) and the diagram (5.3.3) commutes. We have obtained the following lemma.

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2