ScalingStacks

0P94

Lemma 7.1.25. Let HH be the subgroup of R⁡(X′)R(X^{\prime}) generated by classes [γ][\gamma] with supp⁡(γ)⊂X′−f⁡(X)¯\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\gamma)\subset\overline{X^{\prime}-f(X)}.

The composition R⁡(X)→𝑓R⁡(X′)→canR⁡(X′)/HR(X)\xrightarrow{f}R(X^{\prime})\xrightarrow{{\mathrm{can}}}R(X^{\prime})/H is injective.

0P95

Proof. Let U′=X′−(Xf′∪Xe​x​c′∪∂X′)U^{\prime}=X^{\prime}-(X^{\prime}_{f}\cup X^{\prime}_{exc}\cup\partial X^{\prime}), a dense subset of X′X^{\prime}. Note that U=f−1​(U′)U=f^{-1}(U^{\prime}) is a dense subset of X−(Xe​x​c∪∂X)X-(X_{exc}\cup\partial X). Given x′∈U′x^{\prime}\in U^{\prime}, fix a morphism lx′:𝐙C⁡(x′)→𝐙l_{x^{\prime}}:{\mathbf{Z}}^{C(x^{\prime})}\to{\mathbf{Z}} that does not factor through the sum map. Given x∈Ux\in U, let lx=lx′∘f:𝐙C⁡(x)→𝐙l_{x}=l_{x^{\prime}}\circ f:{\mathbf{Z}}^{C(x)}\to{\mathbf{Z}}. Lemma 7.1.23 shows that (lx∘(mc)c∈C⁡(x))x∈U:R⁡(X)→𝐙U(l_{x}\circ(m_{c})_{c\in C(x)})_{x\in U}:R(X)\to{\mathbf{Z}}^{U} is injective. This map is equal to the composition

R⁡(X)→𝑓R⁡(X′)→(lx′∘(mc′)c′∈C⁡(x′))x′∈U′𝐙U′→f∗𝐙UR(X)\xrightarrow{f}R(X^{\prime})\xrightarrow{(l_{x^{\prime}}\circ(m_{c^{\prime}})_{c^{\prime}\in C(x^{\prime})})_{x^{\prime}\in U^{\prime}}}{\mathbf{Z}}^{U^{\prime}}\xrightarrow{f^{*}}{\mathbf{Z}}^{U}

since mf⁡(c)±​(f⁡(ζ))=mc±​(ζ)m_{f(c)}^{\pm}(f(\zeta))=m_{c}^{\pm}(\zeta) and mf⁡(c)​(f⁡(ζ))=mc​(ζ)m_{f(c)}(f(\zeta))=m_{c}(\zeta) for all x∈Xx\in X, c∈C⁡(X)c\in C(X) and all homotopy classes of paths ζ\zeta in XX (Lemma 7.1.24). Since HH is contained in the kernel of the composition

R⁡(X′)→(lx′∘(mc′)c′∈C⁡(x′))x′∈U′𝐙U′→f∗𝐙U,R(X^{\prime})\xrightarrow{(l_{x^{\prime}}\circ(m_{c^{\prime}})_{c^{\prime}\in C(x^{\prime})})_{x^{\prime}\in U^{\prime}}}{\mathbf{Z}}^{U^{\prime}}\xrightarrow{f^{*}}{\mathbf{Z}}^{U},

it follows that the composite map of the lemma is injective. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2