ScalingStacks

0P7I

Lemma 6.2.3. Let σ∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) where I={i1+n​𝐙,i2+n​𝐙}I=\{i_{1}+n{\mathbf{Z}},i_{2}+n{\mathbf{Z}}\} and J={j1+n​𝐙,j2+n​𝐙}J=\{j_{1}+n{\mathbf{Z}},j_{2}+n{\mathbf{Z}}\} with 1≤i1≠i2≤n1\leq i_{1}\neq i_{2}\leq n, 1≤j1≠j2≤n1\leq j_{1}\neq j_{2}\leq n and σ⁡(ir)=jr(modn)\sigma(i_{r})=j_{r}\pmod{n} for r∈{1,2}r\in\{1,2\}. Fix β:{i1,i2,j1,j2}→𝐑\beta:\{i_{1},i_{2},j_{1},j_{2}\}\to{\mathbf{R}} increasing with |β⁡(u)−β⁡(v)|<1|\beta(u)-\beta(v)|<1 for all u,vu,v.

Consider γr:[0,1]→𝐑\gamma_{r}:[0,1]\to{\mathbf{R}} continuous with γr​(0)=β⁡(ir)\gamma_{r}(0)=\beta(i_{r}) and γr​(1)=β⁡(jr)+σ⁡(ir)−jrn\gamma_{r}(1)=\beta(j_{r})+\frac{\sigma(i_{r})-j_{r}}{n} for r∈{1,2}r\in\{1,2\}. We have

ℓ⁡(σ)≤|{t∈[0,1]|e2​i​π​γ1​(t)=e2​i​π​γ2​(t)}|\ell(\sigma)\leq|\{t\in[0,1]\ |\ e^{2i\pi\gamma_{1}(t)}=e^{2i\pi\gamma_{2}(t)}\}|

with equality if, for all r∈{1,2}r\in\{1,2\}, the map γr\gamma_{r} is affine.

0P7J

Proof. Without loss of generality, we can assume i1<i2i_{1}<i_{2}. The lemma follows by applying the intermediate value theorem to γ2​(t)−γ1​(t)\gamma_{2}(t)-\gamma_{1}(t) and using Lemma 6.2.2, considering four cases according to the signs of j2−j1j_{2}-j_{1} and σ⁡(i2)−σ⁡(i1)\sigma(i_{2})-\sigma(i_{1}). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2