ScalingStacks

0P7W

Lemma 6.2.10. Consider σ′′∈Hom𝒮n⁡(I,J)\sigma^{\prime\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(I,J) and σ′∈Hom𝒮n⁡(J,K)\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{S}}_{n}}(J,K) and let σ=σ′​σ′′\sigma=\sigma^{\prime}\sigma^{\prime\prime}. Assume ℓ⁡(σ)=ℓ⁡(σ′)+ℓ⁡(σ′′)\ell(\sigma)=\ell(\sigma^{\prime})+\ell(\sigma^{\prime\prime}).

Let (i1,i2)∈D⁡(σ)∖(D⁡(σ)∩D⁡(σ′′))(i_{1},i_{2})\in D(\sigma)\setminus(D(\sigma)\cap D(\sigma^{\prime\prime})). Let α′′=σ′′​si1,i2\alpha^{\prime\prime}=\sigma^{\prime\prime}s_{i_{1},i_{2}} and α′′=(σ′)σ′′​(i1),σ′′​(i2)\alpha^{\prime\prime}=(\sigma^{\prime})^{\sigma^{\prime\prime}(i_{1}),\sigma^{\prime\prime}(i_{2})}. We have σ=α′​α′′\sigma=\alpha^{\prime}\alpha^{\prime\prime} and ℓ⁡(σ)=ℓ⁡(α′)+ℓ⁡(α′′)\ell(\sigma)=\ell(\alpha^{\prime})+\ell(\alpha^{\prime\prime}).

0P7X

Proof. Assume first I=J=KI=J=K. The lemma follows in that case from Lemmas 3.2.4 and 3.2.2.

Consider now the general case. There are increasing bijections τ:J→I\tau:J\to I and τ′:K→J\tau^{\prime}:K\to J. We have D⁡(σ)=τ−1​(D⁡(τ′​σ​τ))D(\sigma)=\tau^{-1}(D(\tau^{\prime}\sigma\tau)) and D⁡(σ′′)=τ−1​(D⁡(σ′′​τ))D(\sigma^{\prime\prime})=\tau^{-1}(D(\sigma^{\prime\prime}\tau)) (proof of Lemma 5.4.7). The lemma follows now from the previous case applied to the decomposition τ′​σ​τ=(τ′​σ′)​(σ′′​τ)\tau^{\prime}\sigma\tau=(\tau^{\prime}\sigma^{\prime})(\sigma^{\prime\prime}\tau). ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2