ScalingStacks

0P7Y

Proposition 6.2.11. The maps dd equip the 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-linear Ξ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded category 𝐅2​[β„‹n]{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}] with a differential Ξ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded structure, hence equip β„‹n{\mathcal{H}}_{n} with a differential Ξ“n\Gamma_{n}-graded pointed structure.

Given IβŠ‚π™/nI\subset{\mathbf{Z}}/n, the morphism FIF_{I} induces an isomorphism of differential 𝐙{\mathbf{Z}}-graded pointed monoids

𝔖^|I|nilβ†’βˆΌEndβ„‹n⁑(I).\hat{{\mathfrak{S}}}_{|I|}^{\operatorname{nil}\nolimits}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\operatorname{End}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(I).
0P7Z

Proof. Note that Lemma 6.2.9 shows that dd is homogeneous of degree 11. The compatibility of dd with FIF_{I} follows from Lemma 3.2.4.

Consider now ΟƒβˆˆHomβ„‹n⁑(I,J)\sigma\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(I,J) non-zero. There exists Ο„βˆˆHomβ„‹n⁑(J,I)\tau\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(J,I) with ℓ⁑(Ο„)=0\ell(\tau)=0. We have d⁑(Ο„βˆ˜Οƒ)=Ο„βˆ˜d⁑(Οƒ)d(\tau\circ\sigma)=\tau\circ d(\sigma), hence d2​(Ο„βˆ˜Οƒ)=Ο„βˆ˜d2​(Οƒ)d^{2}(\tau\circ\sigma)=\tau\circ d^{2}(\sigma). The compatibility of FIF_{I} with dd shows that d2​(Ο„βˆ˜Οƒ)=0d^{2}(\tau\circ\sigma)=0. Since Ο„\tau is invertible, we deduce that d2​(Οƒ)=0d^{2}(\sigma)=0.

Consider finally Οƒβ€²βˆˆHomβ„‹n⁑(J,K)\sigma^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(J,K) and fix Ο„β€²βˆˆHomβ„‹n⁑(K,J)\tau^{\prime}\in\operatorname{Hom}\nolimits_{{\mathcal{H}}_{n}}(K,J) with ℓ⁑(Ο„β€²)=0\ell(\tau^{\prime})=0. We have d⁑(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²βˆ˜Οƒβˆ˜Ο„)=Ο„β€²βˆ˜d⁑(Οƒβ€²βˆ˜Οƒ)βˆ˜Ο„d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau)=\tau^{\prime}\circ d(\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma)\circ\tau and it follows from the compatibility of FJF_{J} with dd that

d⁑(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²βˆ˜Οƒβˆ˜Ο„)\displaystyle d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau) =FJ​(d⁑(FJβˆ’1​(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²βˆ˜Οƒβˆ˜Ο„)))=FJ​(d⁑(FJβˆ’1​(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²)∘FJβˆ’1​(Οƒβˆ˜Ο„)))\displaystyle=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ\sigma\circ\tau))\bigr)=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime})\circ F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau))\bigr)
=FJ​(d⁑(FJβˆ’1​(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²))∘FJβˆ’1​(Οƒβˆ˜Ο„))+FJ​(FJβˆ’1​(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²))∘d⁑(FJβˆ’1​(Οƒβˆ˜Ο„))\displaystyle=F_{J}\bigl(d(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}))\circ F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau)\bigr)+F_{J}\bigl(F_{J}^{-1}(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}))\circ d(F_{J}^{-1}(\sigma\circ\tau)\bigr)
=d⁑(Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²)βˆ˜Οƒβˆ˜Ο„+Ο„β€²βˆ˜Οƒβ€²βˆ˜d⁑(Οƒβˆ˜Ο„).\displaystyle=d(\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime})\circ\sigma\circ\tau+\tau^{\prime}\circ\sigma^{\prime}\circ d(\sigma\circ\tau).

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2