ScalingStacks

0P9F

Proof. Let (Z~,∼)(\tilde{Z},\sim) and (Z~′,∼′)(\tilde{Z}^{\prime},\sim^{\prime}) be two non-singular curves with finite relations and let q:Z~→Z=Z~/∼q:\tilde{Z}\to Z=\tilde{Z}/\!\!\sim and q′:Z~′→Z′=Z~′/∼′q^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}^{\prime}\to Z^{\prime}=\tilde{Z}^{\prime}/\!\!\sim^{\prime} be the quotient maps.

A morphism of curves f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f(z1)∼′f(z2)f(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f(z_{2}) induces a morphism of curves Z→Z′Z\to Z^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor induces indeed a functor as claimed. Consider f′:Z~→Z~′f^{\prime}:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} such that z1∼z2z_{1}\sim z_{2} implies f′(z1)∼′f′(z2)f^{\prime}(z_{1})\sim^{\prime}f^{\prime}(z_{2}). If q′∘f=q′∘f′q^{\prime}\circ f=q^{\prime}\circ f^{\prime}, then ff and f′f^{\prime} coincide outside a finite set of points, hence f=f′f=f^{\prime}. So, the quotient functor is faithful.

Consider now a morphism of curves g:Z→Z′g:Z\to Z^{\prime}. Let E′E^{\prime} be the finite subset of Z~′\tilde{Z}^{\prime} of points that are not alone in their equivalence class and E=q−1​(g−1​(q′​(E′)))E=q^{-1}(g^{-1}(q^{\prime}(E^{\prime}))). Consider the composition of continuous maps

f:Z~−E→𝑞Z−q⁡(E)→𝑔Z′−q′​(E′)→(q′|Z~′−E′)−1Z~′−E′.f:\tilde{Z}-E\xrightarrow{q}Z-q(E)\xrightarrow{g}Z^{\prime}-q^{\prime}(E^{\prime})\xrightarrow{(q^{\prime}_{|\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}})^{-1}}\tilde{Z}^{\prime}-E^{\prime}.

Given z∈Ez\in E, the ι\iota-equivariance of C⁡(g):CZ​(q⁡(z))→CZ′​(g⁡(q⁡(z)))C(g):C_{Z}(q(z))\to C_{Z^{\prime}}(g(q(z))) ensures that ff extends to a continuous map at zz. So, ff extends (uniquely) to a continuous map Z~→Z~′\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime}, and that map is a morphism of 11-dimensional spaces.

We have Z~u⊂Z~−E\tilde{Z}_{u}\subset\tilde{Z}-E and f⁡(Z~u)⊂Z~u′f(\tilde{Z}_{u})\subset\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{u}. Since g|g−1(Z~′o)−Eg_{|g^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o})-E} is orientation-preserving, it follows that f|f−1(Z~′o−E′)f_{|f^{-1}(\tilde{Z}^{\prime}_{o}-E^{\prime})} is orientation-preserving. So, f:Z~→Z~′f:\tilde{Z}\to\tilde{Z}^{\prime} is a morphism of curves and it is compatible with the relations. This shows that the quotient functor is fully faithful.

Let now ZZ be a curve. Let z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc} and Uz⊂ZoU_{z}\subset Z_{o} be a small open neighbourhood of zz. Fix an isomorphism of curves fz:Uz→∼St⁡(nz),z↦0f_{z}:U_{z}\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\mathrm{St}(n_{z}),\ z\mapsto 0. The equivalence relation on π0​(Uz−{z})\pi_{0}(U_{z}-\{z\}) whose equivalence classes are the orbits of ι\iota defines via fzf_{z} the equivalence relation on {ei​π​r/2​nz}0≤r<2​nz\{e^{i\pi r/2n_{z}}\}_{0\leq r<2n_{z}} given by ζ∼ζ′\zeta\sim\zeta^{\prime} if and only if ζ′=ζ±1\zeta^{\prime}=\zeta^{\pm 1}.

The proof of Lemma 7.1.14 provides us a non-singular curve Z^\hat{Z} with a finite relation. Indeed, with the notations of the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we have U^z=∐0≤r<nz𝐑​ei​π​r/nz\hat{U}_{z}=\coprod_{0\leq r<n_{z}}{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}}. Note that Z^o\hat{Z}_{o} is the subspace of Z^\hat{Z} obtained by adding to Zo−Ze​x​cZ_{o}-Z_{exc} the point 00 of 𝐑​ei​π​r/nz{\mathbf{R}}e^{i\pi r/n_{z}} for each r∈{0,…,nz−1}r\in\{0,\ldots,n_{z}-1\} and each z∈Ze​x​cz\in Z_{exc}.

This gives Z^\hat{Z} a structure of non-singular curve. As in the proof of Lemma 7.1.14, we obtain a finite relation on Z^\hat{Z} and an isomorphism of curves Z→∼Z^/∼Z\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}\hat{Z}/\!\sim. This shows that the quotient functor is essentially surjective. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2