ScalingStacks

0PBY

Proof. Lemma 7.4.28 shows that d⁡(f#​(θ′))=f#​(d⁡(θ′))d(f^{\#}(\theta^{\prime}))=f^{\#}(d(\theta^{\prime})) for any θ′\theta^{\prime} and that d⁡(f⁡(θ))=f⁡(d⁡(θ))d(f(\theta))=f(d(\theta)) if |f−1​f​(θ)|=1|f^{-1}f(\theta)|=1.

Assume Z=S1Z=S^{1} (unoriented) and consider a finite subset MM of ZZ as in §7.4.3. We use the notations of that section. It follows from Lemma 7.4.19 that the isomorphism FF of Proposition 7.4.18 induces an isomorphism of 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-linear categories F:𝐅2​[ℋn]→∼𝒮M​(Z)F:{\mathbf{F}}_{2}[{\mathcal{H}}_{n}]\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}{\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z). It follows now from Lemma 7.4.20 that this isomorphism commutes with dd. In particular, dd is a differential on 𝒮M​(Z){\mathcal{S}}_{M}(Z). Since this holds for any finite subset MM of ZZ, we deduce that dd is a differential on 𝒮⁡(Z){\mathcal{S}}(Z).

Consider now a non-singular connected ZZ and an injective morphism of curves f:Z↪S1f:Z\hookrightarrow S^{1}. Since ff induces a faithful 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-linear functor 𝒮⁡(Z)→𝒮⁡(S1){\mathcal{S}}(Z)\to{\mathcal{S}}(S^{1}) commuting with dd, we deduce that dd is a differential on 𝒮⁡(Z){\mathcal{S}}(Z).

The decomposition (7.4.3) is compatible with dd, hence dd is a differential on 𝒮⁡(Z){\mathcal{S}}(Z) for any non-singular ZZ.

Consider now a general ZZ and q:Z^→Zq:\hat{Z}\to Z its non-singular cover. Since the additive 𝐅2{\mathbf{F}}_{2}-linear functor q#q^{\#} commutes with dd, it follows that dd is a differential on 𝒮⁡(Z){\mathcal{S}}(Z).

The last statement of the theorem follows from Lemma 7.3.17. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2