ScalingStacks

0P88

Lemma 7.1.4. The following conditions are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    there is a finite subset E1E_{1} of XX such that f⁡(X−E1)f(X-E_{1}) is open in X′X^{\prime} and f|X−E1:X−E1→f(X−E1)f_{|X-E_{1}}:X-E_{1}\to f(X-E_{1}) is a homeomorphism

  2. (2)

    XfX_{f} is finite

  3. (3)

    there is a finite subset E2E_{2} of XX such that f|X−E2:X−E2→f(X−E2)f_{|X-E_{2}}:X-E_{2}\to f(X-E_{2}) is a homeomorphism

  4. (4)

    given x∈Xx\in X, there is a finite subset ExE_{x} of X−{x}X-\{x\} such that f|X−Exf_{|X-E_{x}} is injective

  5. (5)

    there is a finite subset E3E_{3} of XX such that f|X−E3f_{|X-E_{3}} is injective.

0P89

Proof. The implication (1)⇒(2)(1)\Rightarrow(2) follows from the fact that Xf⊂f−1​(f⁡(E1))X_{f}\subset f^{-1}(f(E_{1})). For the implication (2)⇒(3)(2)\Rightarrow(3), take E2=XfE_{2}=X_{f}. For (3)⇒(4)(3)\Rightarrow(4), take Ex=(X−{x})∩(f−1​(f⁡(x))∪E2)E_{x}=(X-\{x\})\cap(f^{-1}(f(x))\cup E_{2}). The implication (4)⇒(5)(4)\Rightarrow(5) is immediate.

Let us show that (5)⇒(1)(5)\Rightarrow(1). Note first that an injective continuous map 𝐑→𝐑{\mathbf{R}}\to{\mathbf{R}} is open and a homeomorphism onto its image. It follows that the implication holds when XX and X′X^{\prime} are homeomorphic to 𝐑{\mathbf{R}} and E3=∅E_{3}=\emptyset.

Consider now the general case. There is a finite subset E1E_{1} of XX containing E3E_{3} such that X−E1X-E_{1} and X′−f⁡(E1)X^{\prime}-f(E_{1}) are homeomorphic to a finite disjoint union of copies of 𝐑{\mathbf{R}}. By the discussion above, the restriction of ff to a connected component of X−E1X-E_{1} is open and a homeomorphism onto its image, so the same holds for f|X−E1f_{|X-E_{1}}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2