ScalingStacks

0P89

Proof. The implication (1)⇒(2)(1)\Rightarrow(2) follows from the fact that Xf⊂f−1​(f⁡(E1))X_{f}\subset f^{-1}(f(E_{1})). For the implication (2)⇒(3)(2)\Rightarrow(3), take E2=XfE_{2}=X_{f}. For (3)⇒(4)(3)\Rightarrow(4), take Ex=(X−{x})∩(f−1​(f⁡(x))∪E2)E_{x}=(X-\{x\})\cap(f^{-1}(f(x))\cup E_{2}). The implication (4)⇒(5)(4)\Rightarrow(5) is immediate.

Let us show that (5)⇒(1)(5)\Rightarrow(1). Note first that an injective continuous map 𝐑→𝐑{\mathbf{R}}\to{\mathbf{R}} is open and a homeomorphism onto its image. It follows that the implication holds when XX and X′X^{\prime} are homeomorphic to 𝐑{\mathbf{R}} and E3=∅E_{3}=\emptyset.

Consider now the general case. There is a finite subset E1E_{1} of XX containing E3E_{3} such that X−E1X-E_{1} and X′−f⁡(E1)X^{\prime}-f(E_{1}) are homeomorphic to a finite disjoint union of copies of 𝐑{\mathbf{R}}. By the discussion above, the restriction of ff to a connected component of X−E1X-E_{1} is open and a homeomorphism onto its image, so the same holds for f|X−E1f_{|X-E_{1}}.

∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2