ScalingStacks

0PDU

Lemma 8.3.2. The morphism σ\sigma is invertible. Given α∈Rξ2−∙​(T,U)\alpha\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U) and β∈Rξ1−∙​(U,S)\beta\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U,S), we have

σ(α⊗β)=δα|U⋅β≠0(id⊠(αχ⁡(β)​(ξ1−​(−1))⋅βξ1−​(−1)))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠(α|U∖{χ(β)(ξ1−(−1))}⋅β|S)).\sigma(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\delta_{\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta\neq 0}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha_{\chi(\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes(\alpha_{|U\setminus\{\chi(\beta)(\xi_{1}^{-}(-1))\}}\cdot\beta_{|S})\bigr).

Given α′∈Rξ1−∙​(T,U′)\alpha^{\prime}\in R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}^{\bullet}(T,U^{\prime}) and β′∈Rξ2−∙​(U′,S)\beta^{\prime}\in R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}^{\bullet}(U^{\prime},S), we have

σ−1(α′⊗β′)=δα′|U′⋅β′≠0(id⊠(αχ⁡(β′)​(ξ2−​(−1))′⋅βξ2−​(−1)′))⊗(αξ1−​(−1)′⊠(α|U′∖χ(β′)(ξ2−(−1))′∘β|S′)).\sigma^{-1}(\alpha^{\prime}\otimes\beta^{\prime})=\delta_{\alpha^{\prime}_{|U^{\prime}}\cdot\beta^{\prime}\neq 0}\bigl(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes(\alpha^{\prime}_{\chi(\beta^{\prime})(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\cdot\beta^{\prime}_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\bigr)\otimes\bigl(\alpha^{\prime}_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes(\alpha^{\prime}_{|U^{\prime}\setminus\chi(\beta^{\prime})(\xi_{2}^{-}(-1))}\circ\beta^{\prime}_{|S})\bigr).
0PDV

Proof. We have

σ=(Rξ1−∘mult)∘(Rξ1−⊗Rξ2−⊗εLξ1+,Rξ1−)∘(Rξ1−⊗λ⊗Rξ1−)∘(ηLξ1+,Rξ1−⊗id).\sigma=(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\circ\textrm{mult})\circ(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\otimes R_{\xi_{2}^{-}}\otimes\varepsilon_{L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}})\circ(R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}\otimes\lambda\otimes R_{\xi_{1}^{-}})\circ(\eta_{L_{\xi_{1}^{+}},R_{\xi_{1}^{-}}}\otimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits).

We have α=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⋅(α|U⊠id)\alpha=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\cdot(\alpha_{|U}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits), hence α⊗β=(id⊠αξ2−​(−1))⊗(α|U⋅β)\alpha\otimes\beta=(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{|U}\cdot\beta). As a consequence, it is enough to prove the first statement of the lemma assuming that α|U=idU\alpha_{|U}=\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{U}. In that case, the composition above is given by

α⊗β\displaystyle\alpha\otimes\beta ↦∑x∈ξ~1−1​(T)(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([x→1]))⊗α⊗β\displaystyle\mapsto\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(T)}(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x]))\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1]))\otimes\alpha\otimes\beta
↦∑x∈ξ~1−1​(T)(idT∖{ξ~1​(x)}⊠ξ~1([−1→x]))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠id)⊗(id⊠ξ~1([x→1]))⊗β\displaystyle\mapsto\sum_{x\in\tilde{\xi}_{1}^{-1}(T)}(\operatorname{id}\nolimits_{T\setminus\{\tilde{\xi}_{1}(x)\}}\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([-1\to x]))\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\tilde{\xi}_{1}([x\to 1]))\otimes\beta
↦(id⊠βξ1−​(−1))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠id)⊗β|S\displaystyle\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\operatorname{id}\nolimits)\otimes\beta_{|S}
↦(id⊠βξ1−​(−1))⊗(αξ2−​(−1)⊠β|S).\displaystyle\mapsto(\operatorname{id}\nolimits\boxtimes\beta_{\xi_{1}^{-}(-1)})\otimes(\alpha_{\xi_{2}^{-}(-1)}\boxtimes\beta_{|S}).

It is immediate to check that the formula for σ−1\sigma^{-1} does produce an inverse. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2