ScalingStacks

0P79

Lemma 6.1.3. The maps (fm′​m)(f_{m^{\prime}m}) define a twisted object V=[⨁Vm,(fm′​m)]V=[\bigoplus V_{m},(f_{m^{\prime}m})]. There is an isomorphism of differential (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules

V→∼L+​(r,n),(h⊗h′)​bE↦h​fr​(ιn​(h′))​TwE​ for ​h∈Hr​ and ​h′∈Hn.V\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}L^{+}(r,n),\ (h\otimes h^{\prime})b_{E}\mapsto hf_{r}(\iota_{n}(h^{\prime}))T_{w_{E}}\text{ for }h\in H_{r}\text{ and }h^{\prime}\in H_{n}.
0P7A

Proof. The length property of the bijection β\beta above shows that the map of the lemma is an isomorphism of (Hr⊗Hn)(H_{r}\otimes H_{n})-modules. Since

d⁡(TwE)=∑i∈E,j∈{1,…,r+n}∖E,j<iTwE​si,j,d(T_{w_{E}})=\sum_{i\in E,\ j\in\{1,\ldots,r+n\}\setminus E,\ j<i}T_{w_{E}s_{i,j}},

it follows that the map of the lemma intertwines dVd_{V} and the differential of L+​(r,n)L^{+}(r,n). The lemma follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2