ScalingStacks

0PAF

Lemma 7.3.23. Consider ζ\zeta, ζ1\zeta_{1} and ζ2\zeta_{2} three homotopy classes of admissible paths in ZZ. Assume ζ\zeta is not an identity, ζ2​(1)=ζ1​(0)\zeta_{2}(1)=\zeta_{1}(0), ζ​(0)≠ζ2​(0)\zeta(0)\neq\zeta_{2}(0) and ζ​(1)≠ζ1​(1)\zeta(1)\neq\zeta_{1}(1). We have

i⁡(ζ,ζ1∘ζ2)≤min⁡(mζ⁡(0+)+​(ζ2)+i⁡(ζ,ζ1),mζ⁡(1−)−​(ζ1)+i⁡(ζ,ζ2)).i(\zeta,\zeta_{1}\circ\zeta_{2})\leq\mathrm{min}(m_{\zeta(0+)}^{+}(\zeta_{2})+i(\zeta,\zeta_{1}),m_{\zeta(1-)}^{-}(\zeta_{1})+i(\zeta,\zeta_{2})).
0PAG

Proof. Let ζ′\zeta^{\prime} and ζ′′\zeta^{\prime\prime} be homotopy classes of admissible paths such that ζ=ζ′∘ζ′′\zeta=\zeta^{\prime}\circ\zeta^{\prime\prime}. We have

i⁡(ζ,ζ1∘ζ2)≤i⁡(ζ′,ζ1)+i⁡(ζ′′,ζ2).i(\zeta,\zeta_{1}\circ\zeta_{2})\leq i(\zeta^{\prime},\zeta_{1})+i(\zeta^{\prime\prime},\zeta_{2}).

Let γ\gamma be a minimal path in ζ\zeta and let t∈(0,1)t\in(0,1). We have mζ​(0)+(ζ2)=i(γ|[0,t],ζ2)m_{\zeta(0)^{+}}(\zeta_{2})=i(\gamma_{|[0,t]},\zeta_{2}) for tt small enough. Since i⁡([γ[t,1],ζ1)≤i⁡(ζ,ζ1)CLOSEi([\gamma_{[t,1]},\zeta_{1})\leq i(\zeta,\zeta_{1}), it follows that

i⁡(ζ,ζ1∘ζ2)≤i⁡(ζ,ζ1)+mζ​(0)+​(ζ2).i(\zeta,\zeta_{1}\circ\zeta_{2})\leq i(\zeta,\zeta_{1})+m_{\zeta(0)^{+}}(\zeta_{2}).

The second inequality follows from the first one by replacing ZZ by ZoppZ^{\mathrm{opp}}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2