ScalingStacks

0P92

Proof. Let LL be a non-empty finite subset of II such that supp⁡(ζ)∩supp⁡(ζ′)\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta)\cap\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta^{\prime}) is finite for any two distinct elements ζ\zeta and ζ′\zeta^{\prime} in LL. Let r=∑ζ∈Laζ​⟦ζ⟧r=\sum_{\zeta\in L}a_{\zeta}\llbracket\zeta\rrbracket where aζ∈𝐙−{0}a_{\zeta}\in{\mathbf{Z}}-\{0\} for ζ∈L\zeta\in L. Let ζ0∈L\zeta_{0}\in L. There is x∈supp⁡(ζ0)∩Ux\in\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta_{0})\cap U with x∉{ζ0​(0),ζ0​(1)}x{\not\in}\{\zeta_{0}(0),\zeta_{0}(1)\} and x∉⋃ζ∈L−{ζ0}supp⁡(ζ)x{\not\in}\bigcup_{\zeta\in L-\{\zeta_{0}\}}\operatorname{supp}\nolimits(\zeta). Let c∈C⁡(x)c\in C(x) and ι⁡(c)\iota(c) be the other element of C⁡(x)C(x). We have mc​(ζ0)=−mι⁡(c)​(ζ0)=±1m_{c}(\zeta_{0})=-m_{\iota(c)}(\zeta_{0})=\pm 1, while mc​(ζ′)=mι⁡(c)​(ζ′)=0m_{c}(\zeta^{\prime})=m_{\iota(c)}(\zeta^{\prime})=0 for ζ′∈L−{ζ0}\zeta^{\prime}\in L-\{\zeta_{0}\}. It follows that mc​(r)=−mι⁡(c)​(r)=±aγm_{c}(r)=-m_{\iota(c)}(r)=\pm a_{\gamma}. Consequently, (lx∘(mc,mι⁡(c)))​(r)=±lx​(aγ,−aγ)≠0\bigl(l_{x}\circ(m_{c},m_{\iota(c)})\bigr)(r)=\pm l_{x}(a_{\gamma},-a_{\gamma})\neq 0. Since every non-zero element of R⁡(X)R(X) is of the form rr as above, the lemma follows. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2