ScalingStacks

0P8E

Proof. Let EE be a finite subset of XX such that f−1​(f​(E))=Ef^{-1}(f(E))=E, f⁡(X−E)f(X-E) is open in X′X^{\prime} and f|X−E:X−E→f(X−E)f_{|X-E}:X-E\to f(X-E) is a homeomorphism. Let UU be a small open neighbourhood of x′x^{\prime} such that U−{x′}⊂X′−f⁡(E)U-\{x^{\prime}\}\subset X^{\prime}-f(E). Note that f⁡(X)∩(U−{x′})f(X)\cap(U-\{x^{\prime}\}) is open in X′X^{\prime} and f|f−1(U−{x′}):f−1(U−{x′})→f(X)∩(U−{x′})f_{|f^{-1}(U-\{x^{\prime}\})}:f^{-1}(U-\{x^{\prime}\})\to f(X)\cap(U-\{x^{\prime}\}) is a homeomorphism.

Let LL be a connected component of U−{x′}U-\{x^{\prime}\}. Note that f​(f−1​(L))f(f^{-1}(L)) is an open 11-dimensional subspace of LL and LL is homeomorphic to 𝐑{\mathbf{R}}. By shrinking UU, we can assume that f−1​(L)=∅f^{-1}(L)=\emptyset or f​(f−1​(L))=Lf(f^{-1}(L))=L. So, we can assume that given LL a connected component of U−{x′}U-\{x^{\prime}\} with f−1​(L)≠∅f^{-1}(L)\neq\emptyset, the map f|f−1(L):f−1(L)→Lf_{|f^{-1}(L)}:f^{-1}(L)\to L is a homeomorphism.

Since UU is small, there is a homeomorphism a:St⁡(nx′)→∼U, 0↦x′a:\operatorname{St}\nolimits(n_{x^{\prime}})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}U,\ 0\mapsto x^{\prime}. Let {x1,…,xr}=f−1​(x′)\{x_{1},\ldots,x_{r}\}=f^{-1}(x^{\prime}) and define

Il={e2​i​π​d/nx′|0≤d<nx′,xl∈f−1​(a⁡(𝐑>0​e2​i​π​d/nx′))¯}I_{l}=\{e^{2i\pi d/n_{x^{\prime}}}|0\leq d<n_{x^{\prime}},\ x_{l}\in\overline{f^{-1}(a({\mathbf{R}}_{>0}e^{2i\pi d/n_{x^{\prime}}}))}\}

for l∈{1,…,r}l\in\{1,\ldots,r\}. Define

I0={e2​i​π​d/nx′|0≤d<nx′,f−1(a(𝐑>0e2​i​π​d/nx′))≠∅,f−1(x′)∩f−1​(a⁡(𝐑>0​e2​i​π​d/nx′))¯=∅}.I_{0}=\{e^{2i\pi d/n_{x^{\prime}}}|0\leq d<n_{x^{\prime}},\ f^{-1}(a({\mathbf{R}}_{>0}e^{2i\pi d/n_{x^{\prime}}}))\neq\emptyset,\ f^{-1}(x^{\prime})\cap\overline{f^{-1}(a({\mathbf{R}}_{>0}e^{2i\pi d/n_{x^{\prime}}}))}=\emptyset\}.

Note that aa restricts to a homeomorphism St⁡(⋃0≤l≤rIr)→∼f⁡(f−1​(U))\operatorname{St}\nolimits(\bigcup_{0\leq l\leq r}I_{r})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}f(f^{-1}(U)).

The composition a∘ga\circ g takes values in f​(f−1​(U))f(f^{-1}(U)). Its restriction to St∘⁡(I0)\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0}) defines a homeomorphism St∘⁡(I0)→∼a⁡(St∘⁡(I0))\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})). Since f|f−1(a(St∘(I0))):f−1(a(St∘(I0)))→a(St∘(I0))f_{|f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})))}:f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})))\to a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})) is a homeomorphism, we have a homeomorphism b0=(f|f−1(a(St∘(I0))))−1∘(a∘g)|St∘(I0):St∘(I0)→∼f−1(a(St∘(I0)))b_{0}=(f_{|f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})))})^{-1}\circ(a\circ g)_{|\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})}:\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{0}))).

Consider now l∈{1,…,r}l\in\{1,\ldots,r\}. We construct as above a homeomorphism bl′:St∘⁡(Il)→∼f−1​(a⁡(St∘⁡(Il)))b^{\prime}_{l}:\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{l})\mathrel{\mathop{\kern 0.0pt\to}\limits^{\sim}}f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{l}))) such that (a∘g)|St∘(Il)=f∘bl′(a\circ g)_{|\operatorname{St}\nolimits^{\circ}(I_{l})}=f\circ b^{\prime}_{l}. The homeomorphism bl′b^{\prime}_{l} extends uniquely to a homeomorphism bl:St⁡(Il)→f−1​(a⁡(St⁡(Il)))b_{l}:\operatorname{St}\nolimits(I_{l})\to f^{-1}(a(\operatorname{St}\nolimits(I_{l}))). We define b=b0⊔b1⊔⋯⊔brb=b_{0}\sqcup b_{1}\sqcup\cdots\sqcup b_{r}. We have f|f−1(U)=a∘g∘b−1f_{|f^{-1}(U)}=a\circ g\circ b^{-1}. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2