ScalingStacks

0P7D

Proof. We have a​c​Ti​b=a​Ti+1​c​bacT_{i}b=aT_{i+1}cb for i∈{1,…,s−2}i\in\{1,\ldots,s-2\}. This shows the first statement of the lemma.

We have now a morphism of differential graded algebras and of (Hs,Hs)(H_{s},H_{s})-bimodules f′:THs​(Ms)→H^s+f^{\prime}:T_{H_{s}}(M_{s})\to\hat{H}_{s}^{+} induced by the morphism Ms→H^s+M_{s}\to\hat{H}_{s}^{+}. We have

f′​((1⊗1)⊗(1⊗Ts−1))=c2​Ts−1=T1​c2=f′​((T1⊗1)⊗(1⊗1)),f^{\prime}((1\otimes 1)\otimes(1\otimes T_{s-1}))=c^{2}T_{s-1}=T_{1}c^{2}=f^{\prime}((T_{1}\otimes 1)\otimes(1\otimes 1)),

hence f′​(κ)=0f^{\prime}(\kappa)=0. So, ff induces a morphism of algebras f:THs​(Ms)/(κ)→H^s+f:T_{H_{s}}(M_{s})/(\kappa)\to\hat{H}_{s}^{+}.

On the other hand, H^s+\hat{H}_{s}^{+} is the free algebra generated by HsH_{s} and cc with the relations c​Ti=Ti+1​ccT_{i}=T_{i+1}c for i∈{1,…,s−2}i\in\{1,\ldots,s-2\} and c2​Ts−1=T1​c2c^{2}T_{s-1}=T_{1}c^{2} (Proposition 3.2.9). Since Ti+1⊗1=1⊗TiT_{i+1}\otimes 1=1\otimes T_{i} in MsM_{s} for i∈{1,…,s−2}i\in\{1,\ldots,s-2\} and (1⊗1)⊗(1⊗Ts−1)=(T1⊗1)⊗(1⊗1)(1\otimes 1)\otimes(1\otimes T_{s-1})=(T_{1}\otimes 1)\otimes(1\otimes 1) in Ms⊗MsM_{s}\otimes M_{s}, we deduce that there is a morphism of algebras g:H^s+→THs​(Ms)/(κ),Ti↦Ti,c↦1⊗1g:\hat{H}_{s}^{+}\to T_{H_{s}}(M_{s})/(\kappa),\ T_{i}\mapsto T_{i},\ c\mapsto 1\otimes 1. The morphisms ff and gg are inverse and we are done. ∎

Original mathematics by the credited authors. Source collection and HTML conversion remain in progress.

Andrew Manion, Raphael Rouquier

Original source: arXiv:2009.09627v2